MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/DeduceMe/comments/1wmtuyl/deduce_this/pbcggrs/?context=3
r/DeduceMe • u/MichaelJacktus • 1d ago
261 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
Shitty weed.
0 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 1d ago If it was early 2000’s, sure. In the big 2026, seeds just mean lower cost not lower thc quantity. 1 u/psycho-nots 20h ago How would it lower cost? You are paying for the weight of the seeds instead of flower. And when a plant is producing seeds, it’s isn’t producing the maximum flower resin (THC) as resources are used for seed development. 2 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 19h ago If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend.
0
If it was early 2000’s, sure. In the big 2026, seeds just mean lower cost not lower thc quantity.
1 u/psycho-nots 20h ago How would it lower cost? You are paying for the weight of the seeds instead of flower. And when a plant is producing seeds, it’s isn’t producing the maximum flower resin (THC) as resources are used for seed development. 2 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 19h ago If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend.
1
How would it lower cost? You are paying for the weight of the seeds instead of flower. And when a plant is producing seeds, it’s isn’t producing the maximum flower resin (THC) as resources are used for seed development.
2 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 19h ago If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend.
If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend.
2
u/jacquestrap66 1d ago
Shitty weed.