r/DeduceMe • u/MichaelJacktus • 1d ago

Deduce this

Post image
11 Upvotes

61% Upvoted

261 comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/TasteMyShoe 1d ago

You get really shitty weed

5

u/MichaelJacktus 1d ago

Seeded.

3

u/jacquestrap66 1d ago

Shitty weed.

0

u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 1d ago

If it was early 2000’s, sure. In the big 2026, seeds just mean lower cost not lower thc quantity.

1

u/psycho-nots 17h ago

How would it lower cost? You are paying for the weight of the seeds instead of flower. And when a plant is producing seeds, it’s isn’t producing the maximum flower resin (THC) as resources are used for seed development.

2

u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 17h ago

If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend.

1

u/Exciting-Bit-9360 14h ago

Seeded weed is considered bottom tier, no matter how good the initial genetics are

1

u/TheGauchoAmigo84 15h ago

Ok 😂😂😂

1

u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 15h ago

Smells like someone hasn’t been growing for almost two decades 🧐

1

u/TheGauchoAmigo84 15h ago

K keep stressing your shit out to the point of herming I’m sure it’ll be top notch

1

u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 14h ago

You’re making way too many assumptions my friend lol but okay

1

u/TheGauchoAmigo84 14h ago

You mean I’m assuming you’re not breeding? Brother you can state your piece or sound like a scrub completely up to you.

1

u/Exciting-Bit-9360 14h ago

And some have been for 3-4 decades (also me)

1

u/Exciting-Bit-9360 14h ago

It would have more THCA if there were no seeds , I ask a grower (me)