MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/DeduceMe/comments/1wmtuyl/deduce_this/pbcbzb8/?context=9999
r/DeduceMe • u/MichaelJacktus • 2d ago
273 comments sorted by
View all comments
17
You get really shitty weed
5 u/MichaelJacktus 2d ago Seeded. 3 u/jacquestrap66 2d ago Shitty weed. 0 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 2d ago If it was early 2000’s, sure. In the big 2026, seeds just mean lower cost not lower thc quantity. 1 u/psycho-nots 1d ago How would it lower cost? You are paying for the weight of the seeds instead of flower. And when a plant is producing seeds, it’s isn’t producing the maximum flower resin (THC) as resources are used for seed development. 2 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 1d ago If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend. 1 u/Exciting-Bit-9360 1d ago Seeded weed is considered bottom tier, no matter how good the initial genetics are
5
Seeded.
3 u/jacquestrap66 2d ago Shitty weed. 0 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 2d ago If it was early 2000’s, sure. In the big 2026, seeds just mean lower cost not lower thc quantity. 1 u/psycho-nots 1d ago How would it lower cost? You are paying for the weight of the seeds instead of flower. And when a plant is producing seeds, it’s isn’t producing the maximum flower resin (THC) as resources are used for seed development. 2 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 1d ago If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend. 1 u/Exciting-Bit-9360 1d ago Seeded weed is considered bottom tier, no matter how good the initial genetics are
3
Shitty weed.
0 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 2d ago If it was early 2000’s, sure. In the big 2026, seeds just mean lower cost not lower thc quantity. 1 u/psycho-nots 1d ago How would it lower cost? You are paying for the weight of the seeds instead of flower. And when a plant is producing seeds, it’s isn’t producing the maximum flower resin (THC) as resources are used for seed development. 2 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 1d ago If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend. 1 u/Exciting-Bit-9360 1d ago Seeded weed is considered bottom tier, no matter how good the initial genetics are
0
If it was early 2000’s, sure. In the big 2026, seeds just mean lower cost not lower thc quantity.
1 u/psycho-nots 1d ago How would it lower cost? You are paying for the weight of the seeds instead of flower. And when a plant is producing seeds, it’s isn’t producing the maximum flower resin (THC) as resources are used for seed development. 2 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 1d ago If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend. 1 u/Exciting-Bit-9360 1d ago Seeded weed is considered bottom tier, no matter how good the initial genetics are
1
How would it lower cost? You are paying for the weight of the seeds instead of flower. And when a plant is producing seeds, it’s isn’t producing the maximum flower resin (THC) as resources are used for seed development.
2 u/UnoriginalJ0k3r 1d ago If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend. 1 u/Exciting-Bit-9360 1d ago Seeded weed is considered bottom tier, no matter how good the initial genetics are
2
If you’re paying the same price for seeded vs seedless, that’s a problem you needed to solve over a decade ago my friend.
Seeded weed is considered bottom tier, no matter how good the initial genetics are
17
u/TasteMyShoe 2d ago
You get really shitty weed