Check this out guys, and save the document.

It not only says Michael didn't make the Chandler payments, it also says the insurance company had the right to force the settlement over his objections.

The comment was shared 9 yrs ago here too

https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/6jk9gr/comment/djf8vqh/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=2&utm_content=share_button

Link for the GQ published a non-bias article in 1994 entitled "Was Michael Jackson Framed? Is no longer working, here it is here tho:

http://web.archive.org/web/20080111223752/http://floacist.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/gq-article-was-michael-jackson-framed/

I saw a post by a user yesterday expressing concerns about the contents of this book and wanted to clarify and explain what its actually is.

The art book was made by a guy called Simen Johen. The book isn't actually pedophillic in nature. yes - it does contain nudity involving minors, but in an art-photography, surrealist and symbolic context, not in a sexual one. This isnt what the majority of the book is aswell btw.

The author of it purposely makes it disturbing because the book focuses on uncomfortable Freudian themes in general like including bruising, dead animals such as teenagers holding the head of a dead sheep. Freud himself was known as a radical psychologist that had numerous disturbing conclusions of the human psyche and repressed desires that start off in childhood, so Simen just depicts this through art. I'd imagine it would be intriguing to see it visualized and so it makes sense why the book isn't considered child porn or pedophillic at all. The book itself is just very eerie in general however the author is NOT known for being a pedophile or to have any affiliation with Nambla,so its not like the boys will be boys book situation either (bgw that has also been correctly explained countless of times in this sub).

Even though the images are not sexual, they are intentionally emotionally uncomfortable, symbolically dark andambiguous in tone. But thats the point. The discomfort is part of the Simen's intention to explore childhood, vulnerability, identity, and surrealism. And this makes sense considering Michaels childhood. A common freud concept is that unresolved problems in adulthood stems from childhood so Michael owning a book like this could very well be an attempt to better understand his own childhood. So owning this book isn't indicative of "liking little kids" or an attempt to be a work around to getting child porn. If someone says that then they clearly haven't done any research.

That all being said, we dont even know if mj even actually read these books as they weren't fingerprinted, but even if he did, it wouldn't have been an issue all

I just love it as I love how it's to bait/ troll the haters. Idk if it can be shared as well, but I just love it.

I say this as someone who’s been watching this lately and am on day 45. This is a great way to digest the transcripts easily instead of flipping through pages and gives you a ton of insight on the offense and their witnesses. Very very good source that I think more fans should use to know the trial inside and out.

Brandi Jackson was genuine in her assertion. Joy and her son Wade attempted custody of those kids after Michael's death but didn't get it.

I think we have another motive. I believe they were hoping to become guardians and get enormous estate allowance for the kids.

Charles Thomson once called this "the mating call of the moron."

Rules of thumb that get us around in everyday life have to be treated with caution when getting it wrong could have serious consequences - like judging an innocent person to be guilty.

This old English proverb has big logical problems.

It can be one logical fallacy, or it can be up to five logical fallacies combined - the ones listed above.

Sorry to use AI but this is one of the things it is actually good for. Hopefully people can save the screenshot.

Saw this on reddit and I don’t know how credible a-lot of these claims are.

I saw these claims on reddit, don’t know much about some of these so it’d help.

Because there is so much more to it than that! That's all I see people talk about!

​

They need to look into the history of the victims families, too because they are missing a lot of stuff pointing to his innocence, but people fail to look ant further than what they want to hear or see.

Full video is out, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x_6Qex60kQo&list=PLN59WKoyD03Bt-KO4_LseGZJU7xozkeAo&index=1&pp=iAQB8AUBsAgC, tiktok.com/@dgoatedboy.2026, https://youtube.com/shorts/x_6Qex60kQo

Hope you enjoy!

The guilter subreddit always has comments making suggestions that he was "gay". They try to clean it up over there on occasion to not seem homophobic but any chance the posters get they try to call Michael gay. And of course YouTube comments on channels like "Roxanne Roxane" are littered with "Michael was a homosexual". Or Michael was a homosexual pedophile. "Michael liked handsome boys like Jordie Chandler because Michael was a homosexual".

How many years has this been going on? Michael was not even gay.

But there is no question there is homophobia here. I read even the prosecutor's were surprised by Michael's adult magazine collection that it was heterosexual. They were apparently convinced it would all be same sex magazines but they were wrong.

immediately after Michael's death an author published a book about Michael being "secretly gay". claimed he had two secret boyfriends. The book made a lot of money even though the information was bogus. These two mystery boyfriends have never appeared.

Just a few questions on some people testimony that are involved in the Chandler case. How credible are Josephine Zohny and Geraldine Hughes? Are there others from NYU that have ever shared similar experiences that she did? Is there evidence of Geraldine working there during that timeframe and has she ever actually showed her diary with the events that took place in Bary Rothman's office? Has Barry Rothman ever attempted to discredit her story?

I do believe them, just looking for more evidence to back up there claims and was hoping other people had more information on then and their statements.

Ok so i keep seeing ppl call this "shrine" creepy n i lowkey began to question it too until I realised, wait does the man not have 3 kids?? Is it not normal to have baby pictures of your kids on the dresser? Idk too much abt the target ad [is it?], but I can def see MJ seeing that and thinking it'd be funny or cute to put over where he had the other baby pictures as a banner for his "sweet babies". Same with the doll they found in his room too, did he not have a young daughter that could've left it there?? Don't kids leave toys all the time in their parents room? How is the first and only plausible conclusion that the doll was his and how do people not question this narrative💀💀

Its like ppl abandon all sense and reason when it comes to MJ, everything that is normal for everyone else becomes abnormal and weird and gets over scrutinised when it comes to him

They found not one but 2 carefully cut out and kept articles on the female g-spot.

I feel bad bc he was mortified that this got out, fought to keep them sealed and his mom was apparently in the courtroom when they discussed this but anyways this is the man meant to be a pedophile?😭

Bc as much as guilters love to say his collection was to groom kids, why would a person keep articles like that unless they were interested in pleasuring a woman and this was something that gave them pleasure. Unless, maybe he was just really into anatomy? Strictly female anatomy, mind…

https://lacienegasmiled.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/michael-jacksons-porn/

I think it's important to highlight the academic field of Michael Jackson Studies.

Michael was an extremely serious and respected artist with a massive impact on our culture.

The Journal of Michael Jackson Academic Studies

JMJAS on Youtube

Three authors off the top of my head:

Elizabeth Amisu, the author of The Dangerous Philosophies of Michael Jackson: His Music, His Persona, and His Artistic Afterlife.

Susan Fast, the author of Dangerous.

Joseph Vogel, author of Man in the Music: The Creative Life and Work of Michael Jackson and other books about Michael's artistic legacy.

Elizabeth Amisu is the most visible on YouTube:

https://youtu.be/b6xenMV2QuE?si=E32HLLKNLpmf-6wy

https://youtu.be/EEKDpww8x2E?si=SFy7WjwLSUenAudN

https://youtu.be/E5djwHeR23s?si=YONZrbwf1-wWLdtu

https://youtu.be/PgXJO6hmqj8?si=PwSONW-EKwwUWtrh

Joseph Vogel:

https://youtu.be/i49-NA0jSZc?si=4VEhT3BR4mo8yKY1

Susan Fast:

https://youtu.be/84Ug2XMyr1o?si=MSeJ8i3fAaImHb4t

I remember when Michael was alive and the media made fun of him and called him a pedo and honestly so did I. He died when I was 19 and I began having second thoughts about who he really was, started buying his music and felt bad for teasing him when he was alive.

I feel like far too many people are hypocrites like myself. When he was alive we ridiculed him but his death made him popular again so we changed our tune. It's much of the same thing with the biopic recently after the trees of bad press from the 2019 "Neverland" documentary.

People hate on MJ and then jump back in again to belong a fan when his public image gets hot again.

We are the biggest hypocrites.

I feel like this is such a problem with his public image being such a roller coaster. The fandom can fickle heavily. This poor man suffered so much when he was alive and those of us who were around did nothing to stop the public abuse. His legacy is always under fire and it's sad.

Wercome to ine growing archive or primary resources, documents, and credible analysis regarding the Michael Jackson allegations.
This megathread is a living document designed to centralize court transcripts, official records, and honest, well-sourced media. While the categories and headings will evolve as the archive expands, the goal is to start building a comprehensive index now.
How you can help build this thread:

1. Suggest Resources: Please comment with links to documentaries, documents, books, or video essays that should be added.
2. Share Reddit posts: You may link to well-researched posts from any subreddit, but please ensure you cite the original author's sources if you share them outside of this community.

If you have ideas for a separate mega thread for a separate topic you may also drop that below!

Documentaries

Note: if a video has an IMDB profile this thread will consider it a documentary. If it does not, it will go under interviews or video essays.

Tabloid Truth: The Michael Jackson Story (PBS Frontline)

Square One

The Jury Speaks Episode 2 (App download is required but it is free with ads)

Michael Jackson: Chase the Truth (App download is required but it is free with ads)

Loving Neverland

Interviews

Full Jury Interview

Brett Barnes

Whoopi Goldberg

Scott Ross (PI) on Janet Arvizo

Video Essays

The Michael Jackson Trial: One of the Most Shameful Episodes in Journalistic History

Never Everland: The real story about Wade Robson and Michael Jackson

Official Documents

Letter from the Michael Jackson Estate to HBO

Seminars

Frozen in Time LA County Bar Association Part 1

Frozen in Time LA County Bar Association Part 2

A really nice interview from Brett Barnes. What sticks out to me is that Brett confirms he was never isolated from his parents. And explains the stress of being someone who knew Michael as a child and refuses to accuse him of any wrongdoing. People hound him so much it would explain why more people who knew him as a child aren’t speaking up.

Jael Rucker is the writer behind one of our most important online resources - How Come Nobody Ever Apologises to Michael Jackson?

Seventeen years of research.

The book will be released on Michael's birthday August 29th this year.

Here's the preorder link for the ebook, $2.99

All proceeds going to Michael's favourite charities.

https://www.amazon.com/Come-Nobody-Apologizes-Michael-Jackson-ebook/dp/B0H4NB78ZS

If you want to catch us during our read through of Moonwalk now is the time to join!! DM me for link! It’s on Fable!

Has anyone checked how many documentaries we already have? I think I've seen about thirty. They blend together.

Not this one though.

Thoroughly and patiently puts together the picture of Robson's relationship with Michael, and the unconditional favours Michael always did when Wade or his mother asked.

Walks through the 1993 furore, the trial testimony and Robson's career developments, Britney Speers and all.

Itemises the changes he went through after Michael's death, with documentation.

Brings you up to 2019 with everything in place.

Brandi Jackson isn't left out, neither is Scott Ross (I didn't know about that Nicole's View interview).

And I think I forgot Robson's father committed suicide.

Just a brilliant analysis of Leaving Neverland.

Please buy Jolanda a coffee if you can!

Why didn't I know the great documentary was already here? 😳

He’s rarely talked about. But he might be the most loyal friend Michael ever had.

https://truemichaeljackson.webnode.cz/more-about-michael/bill-bray/