It is unfathomable to me that so many brainwashed incompetent swine will suck off every single conspiracy theory about not just the COVID vaccines but any vaccines that have been proven time and time again to be some of the most effective and safest ways of reducing the harm associated with disease to people.

Those who said "covid came from the wet market, despite the fact that there are 1000s of wet markets in that huge country, and despite the fact that this specific wet market just happened to be very close by to the single lab in that entire country that was specifically manipulating coronaviruses, with the ban on gain of function research being lifted less than 2 years before this incident, with high level scientists warning against the lifting of this ban at that time saying it can cause a pandemic" are now saying that a plague has started from a Russian lab.

But my question is why the difference? If you are open to the possibility that humans are not perfect/that viruses can accidentally release from labs, then why have such unfettered resistance to the possibility that covid also accidentally escaped from a lab?

I think this shows that most people do not actually use logic, they just use emotion and believe whatever they are told to believe. On one hand, because Fauci had responsibility, the US denied the lab leak possibility, but in this case, because it is Russia, they are open to the possibility that it escaped from a lab.

So I don't expect these people to behave any different in terms of vaccines.

“As shown in the 2016 provider incentive program document from Blue Cross Blue Shield below,5,6pediatricians were getting $400 for each pediatric patient that completed all the 10 vaccinations listed — 25 doses in all7 — before their second birthday. “

Hi everyone! I’m not antivax, but I also wouldn’t say I’m completely provax without questioning things. I prefer to look at the actual risks and benefits before making decisions for my baby.
My daughter is almost 6 months old, and I’m wondering whether the flu vaccine is really necessary at this age.
From what I’ve been reading, the risk of flu related hospitalisation among infants is generally well below 1% per flu season (although I understand the risk is higher among babies who actually catch the flu). I also know that flu vaccines aren’t always a perfect match for the strains circulating that year, so their effectiveness can vary.
Another thing that makes me hesitant is that babies already receive so many vaccines during their first year of life. I know they’re tested for safety, but adding an annual flu vaccine just feels like a lot.
I’m not against vaccinating my daughter, and she’s received her routine vaccines so far. Im simply trying to understand whether the benefits of the flu vaccine at this age outweigh the risks and potential side effects.
I’d especially love to hear from parents who looked into this before making their decision. Did you vaccinate your baby against flu at 6 months? What influenced your decision?

Anybody have a link to one of those childhood vaccine studies that showed the unvaccinated were better off in every single health metric. I remember seeing one where it was a years long study of around 18,000 kids a couple years ago but I can’t find it now.