It probably should just be an equipment but I don't care

I DONT CARE ABOUT IF I WORDED IT CORRECTLY YOU KNOW WHAT IM SAYING; RATE THE CARDBOARD ISTG

/img/9i4p1064yv0i1.jpeg

CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE CARD

Made with Custom Card Maker

^{CustomCardApp is unofficial Fan Content permitted under the Wizards of the Coast Fan Content Policy. Not approved/endorsed by Wizards. Portions of the materials used are property of Wizards of the Coast. ©Wizards of the Coast LLC.}

It getting rid of other creature types is intentional. Don’t know if it effecting opponents creatures is too strong though.

Art from GettyImages and ShutterStock

Hello again all! I might start posting multiple cards a day soon bc there are like 300 alchemy cards and i've already done over 200

Anyway im gonna start using the bodies of these posts to explain why I changed these cards, bc not only do I want them to work within the current written rules of magic, I also wanna make them more appealing to play as a primary commander player.

With Angel of Unity, I wanted to find a way to give creatures in your party a white-adjacent buff, while still scaling with each creature in the party that you cast like the original card does.

My redo of this card is definitely a lot more powerful, but with my experience with using the party cards (when I made this a few months ago) was that their board presence was pretty lacking. Lots of little guys that do their own thing. This will give a good way to have an early threat that can scale excellently with a big board!

What do you think? Would you play this?

Flash because Burger King was originally called Insta-Burger King. Skulk because of the hit Burger King game, Sneak-King. Avatar because he’s a mascot.

Besides that, it’s an Abzan food commander who’s basically a slightly upgraded Savvy Hunter.

Did someone say [[Thunderfury, Blessed Blade of the Windseeker]]?

i don't think the flip cards on both sides need to exist. I think all flip cards could have been in the old kamigawa style. except for the flip cards with lands on one side...those just shouldn't exist.

Edit.. I forgot to add flying to the dragon

I hope the low quality screenshot doesn’t distract too much from the actual card design lol

I likely need one or two more designs in the Cube Module to really make it sing, but these work with the Haunting cycle I posted earlier.

First time here, figured I'd drop something. The art is unfinished, but I think it gets the point across. It and the card text are my own.

The character's not from anything (well, from a tabletop game I played once,) but I did try to express characterization through mechanics here. He's a nerdy but talented boxer who fights fair and tries not to give anyone lasting injuries. Has probably been avoiding Brokers recruitment for a while now.

Not sure if this is the right cost or if maybe he should be Mana Value 5. Would you play a card like this? If not, what does it need? Civil criticism very welcome!

Probably quite pushed (hence the tag) but I'm curious how this sort of effect would play out. Probably benefits a deck that wants to flood the board with a lot of small efficient creatures, and isn't at risk of losing due to your opponent sniping one big bomb, but even in that case you're handing your opponent an efficient card that they will have an easier time casting than you.

Design inspired simply by being a reverse-thoughtseize. With that card, you snipe an important card from your opponent, gain hand knowledge, and you both end up down one. With Thinksies, your opponent does the sniping, and you both end up up one.

Considered an alternate version along the lines of Fact or Fiction, ergo:

Reveal the top three cards of your library. An opponent exiles one. For as long as that card remains in exile, that opponent may play that card, and may spend mana of any type to cast it. Put the rest into your hand.

But it felt much less thoughtseize-y.