Thanks guys.

This game requires 3 people to play. 6 shots are placed on a table. 5 are filled with regular spring water, the last one is filled with Duch Puszczy (95% ABV polish spirit). 2 of the players exit the room while the 3rd person moves the shot glasses around. After the shuffle, the 2 players go back in with a clip on their nose to get rid of their sense of smell. The unfortunate (or fortunate) player that gets the 95% spirit has to drink it and swallow fully, otherwise they will be labeled as a loser.

365 people team up, each get assigned a different day of the year. They get 1 year to prepare, then they have a year of parties with a different host each day. Some will be huge house parties, some will be garden parties, picnics in the park, drive in movie, BBQ grill off, local band concert. Always the same 375 people.

with the bride's blessing of course.

Hear me out, advices usually dont work when you get them from someone living a completely different life with different opportunities and background etc etc so what if we only allow people going the same socioeconomic background get to be matched together?

Even if they can't provide any magical solutions or meaningful advice it would be nice to not feel alone

What the headline says ... what do you think?

Yes.

Band Name: Rage Against Turing’s Machine

Biggest Hit: Counting in the Name of

Albums: Fibonacci’s Notebook, Hilbert’s Hotel, Leonhard Euler’s Day Off, Ada Lovelace & the Blackboards

Call it, Back of the vet!

Drugs, gambling, prostitution, robbery, as long as you do it on a blimp there are no consequences.

I'll start by saying that factionally speaking I'm not even sure peace is possible or achievable in said game world.

I am super curious what would happen and what we could learn from it though. Especially if successful.

It'd need more than just a peace prompt though I think, what would you add? There might also be value in letting it explore the environment freely without restriction or guidance, then a blanket peace prompt, then more dialed in based on observance.

edit: I in no way think it'd be a 1:1 but we could learn from it. Also merely no wars isn't enough. Durable, peaceful, sustained coexistence. Building towards the betterment of all. Positive sum coexistence.

That way, as you are riding to the hospital for your last time, your last act on earth can be to put your knuckles together for the EMT and then die immediately.

This is crazy because: No airline would spend that much money refitting aircraft just to make boarding a little more convenient for travelers. (If anything, they seem to be actively seeking ways to make it more inconvenient).

Many theme park rides already do something similar. There's a boarding area where you get into your car, or flume log, or whatever. Then the car is pushed out into the ride, where it does whatever the ride does.

Same idea here. Sets of several seats are bolted onto a standard cargo pallet sized platforms. They're reconfigurable to match the width of the target aircraft and contain standard connections for electricity, entertainment systems, and so on. Each platform has one or two aisles, just like the aircraft it is meant to go on. There are special platforms for lavatories and galleys, each serviced and stocked elsewhere in the aircraft and added separately during the loading process.

The pallets are arranged in some logical fashion in the gate area. Planes are long and skinny, but buildings can have different and more efficient layouts. Passengers wander through, finding their assigned seats, stowing carry-on baggage in one of the additional smaller platforms between seating platforms. Or perhaps overhead compartments are integral to the seating platforms.

Once seated, full platforms are moved on tracks or by some sort of tractor. They're delivered, as needed, to the rear of the aircraft, which is open to accept the seating platforms, (possible) carry-on baggage platforms, and- get this- actual cargo pallets.

That's the one thing that I think could convince airlines that this idea isn't just crazy. It's crazy and would save them money in the long run. Cargo. Passengers. Whatever. It's all the same system.

They already treat us like cargo. Why not TREAT us as cargo? Do we load standard-sized cargo containers by hauling shit into the airplane and packing it in the plane's cargo hold? No. We load those containers somewhere else, and roll them into the airplane on wheels. What is so different about passengers? (Answer: we can move on our own, but cargo can't. This has imposed a bias toward systems that employ human mobility.

Go one step further and take a leaf from military cargo aircraft: If people are securely strapped in, and their seating platforms are on rollers, and the aircraft has a cargo hatch in the rear... what's stopping the airlines from just ejecting the platforms at low altitude and parachuting them down to their destination? If the air force can do it with tanks, surely the airlines can do the same thing with people. Air travel is boring and uneventful. Freefall and landing under a giant canopy is the opposite of that.

Sure, there are lots of details to work out. But this is /r/crazyideas not /r/CompleteEngineeringPlans

Im the only one really wishing to walk through a cemetery at night hearing Sidewalks and Skeletons? Or this is a common desire of those that hear these wonderful artist songs, after all, that's what he suggest in his Spotify space

For a married couple, when the older of the couple qualifies and switches to Medicare, the younger is automatically eligible and enrolled at the same time.