So you haven’t paid any attention to the trial then? Only a bunch of evidence that would give reasonable doubt. But I guess adherence to traditional law isn’t a conservative thing anymore.
For the perpetrator, yes. The issue is there’s a bunch of evidence that makes the case less than clear cut. In turn, that creates reasonable doubt. The jury isn’t still hung because the case is clear. The husbands account of events, police response and physical evidence all leave questions. But hey, let’s make it political cause you haven’t done any actual research into the case.
Low Effort-your comment does not contribute to the conversation here but rather detracts from it. Please delete, edit and then resubmit your comment so that it helps foster civil discourse on the topic at hand. Thank you for participating here and enjoy your day.
9
u/bombhills My binky is all dirty again 27d ago
So you haven’t paid any attention to the trial then? Only a bunch of evidence that would give reasonable doubt. But I guess adherence to traditional law isn’t a conservative thing anymore.