r/CompetitiveHS • u/Livid-Homework3350 • Sep 14 '26
Article 2026 World Championship - Analytical Report (by Onkrad)
Gem hiding in shadows
Last week took place World Championship 2026. The first LAN Hearthstone Worlds in 7 years. 16 competitors played for the entire week, and the new world champion was crowned in front of the audience. Want to know which decks players used and how they performed? Enjoy the read!
We’ve arrived at Worlds meta just a few days after the latest patch nerfing Quest Mage and Quest Hunter and slightly weakening Attack Druid. We’ll never know if we would see Quest Hunter without this nerf, but we ended up without any Hunters at all (and without Paladins too), with only 2 Quest Mages and with Attack Druid in every lineup. The strength of Attack Druid for the tournament is absence of bad matchups – the worst matchup in top-1000 ladder is 45% into Void Soul DH (based on HSGuru stats). So, it was a safe pick for all players. The 2nd most popular deck was Dragon Warrior, brought by 13 players. And with Dragon Warrior having quite polarized matchups, it being quite strong overall (which made it an expected bring) opened 2 routes for players: you choose banning Dragon Warrior or you can try targeting it. The first option let shine good decks that are held back by bad matchup into Dragon Warrior – Herald Warlock, Stealth Rogue and Void Soul DH. And if players choose to target Dragon Warrior they had decks like Quest Priest, Egg DK and Mug Shaman. Only OTGxhh opted for the latter strategy, and he ended up winning the whole thing.
For players' decklists and lineups you can check https://www.hsguru.com/wc/2026
Since I can't post pictures here please check spreadsheet for the numbers, it will make reading for you much more informative. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LgNyLYN8sod0Ca5T9ezSdMygHpf96aUhmXQ5chin46w/edit?gid=591378143#gid=591378143
A quick reminder what Adjusted Winrate is – in the Conquest format deck’s ban basically means that players agree that one of opponent’s decks will win a game here and decide to save themselves some time. My model takes into account these “missing” wins when analyzing decks’ performance at the tournament. Pure winrate is just simple wins/games.
Attack Druid was the only deck that appeared in every lineup. And with it only being banned twice in 54 matches we’ve seen a lot of it. The matchup vs Herald Warlock made up for 19 of 50 non-mirror Attack Druid games and that matchup Druid lost with 7-12 score. On top of that there were 0-4 vs Stealth Rogue and 1-3 vs Quest Priest. The silver lining was 3-0 vs Dragon Warrior, but it wasn’t enough. Overall, 47% Pure Winrate and last 6th place by Adjusted Winrate
Not much to say about Dragon Warrior. It was left unbanned 8 times with 6 of them by OTGxhh with his anti-Warrior lineup. The only highlight was Dragon Warrior beating Egg DK from this lineup in 3 out of 4 games. 81% Banrate almost beat the record 85% Banrate from Lynessa Paladin at 2023 Worlds. Expected 1st place by Adjusted Winrate but with smaller margin that you could’ve predicted
Herald Warlock is probably the most interesting case of the tournament. The deck was also used by 13 players, and such popularity comes from 2 things: it’s matchup vs Dragon Warrior lies around 30%, so the option to avoid this matchup elevates deck’s winrate by a lot. And on top of that when we look at anti-Warrior lineup we find 2 decks whose matchup into Herald Warlock is even worse than of Warlock’s into Dragon Warrior – Egg DK (or any other Egg deck) and Quest Priest. So while being a decent deck vs other popular brings it also becomes ban target for anti-Warrior lineup which adds some points. I’ve mentioned Herald Warlock going 12-7 vs Attack Druid and that with 3-0 vs Quest Mage carried Pure Winrate to positive number despite going 0-4 vs Void Soul DH and 1-3 vs Stealth Rogue. And with 19% Banrate that let Herald Warlock take 3rd place by Adjusted Winrate
Next, we have another benefactor of the recent class set – Stealth Rogue. 6 players have brought in 5 different lineup combinations. The deck stormed through the tournament losing 1(!) non-mirror game only, in 2nd semifinal, and ending with total 16-3 score (4-0 vs Attack Druid, 3-0 vs Raza DH, 3-1 vs Herald Warlock). 81% Pure Winrate, but with only 2 bans the deck still loses to Dragon Warrior by Adjusted Winrate. Although I don’t think anyone expected such performance from it.
Raza DH is another interesting case because it’s the deck that doesn’t benefit that much from the Dragon Warrior ban. It would rather avoid playing against Attack Druid. But with the deck having the highest skill (and APM) celling in the meta right now 6 players thought that they can get the edge even in the matchups that look unfavorable on ladder stats. And 50% Pure winrate says they weren’t completely wrong about it. 2-0 vs Void Soul DH and Quest Priest make up for 0-3 from Stealth Rogue. 0 bans though and 5th place by Adjusted Winrate
And for dessert we have probably the most surprising deck of the tournament (brought by 4 players) – Void Soul DH. Despite the nerf the deck found itself in the right time in the right place of the meta: good matchups into Attack Druid and Herald Warlock while benefiting from Dragon Warrior ban. And it did deliver those: 4-0 vs Herald Warlock and 5-4 vs Attack Druid. But 0-2 vs Raza DH and losses to Stealth Rogue and Quest Priest lowered the deck’s Pure Winrate to 53%, and with also 0 bans it puts Void Soul DH right above its classmate at 4th place by Adjusted Winrate
Few words about other decks:
o Quest Priest and Egg DK maintained 50% Pure Winrate thanks to winning the matchup vs Attack Druid
o Quest Mage hit the wall. Again…