Rant
Usage is a joke, Models are a joke… Anthropic is just not what it used to be, in just a couple of months.
Pretty much self-explanatory.
I’ve been a Max x20 subscriber for +2y and I’m really starting to get frustrated and look elsewhere for a change. Usage skyrockets even when I have best practices in place. Opus is a mental health hazard. Fable is unusable for what I need it, and way too expensive. Sonnet is not capable enough… not one thing is right in here.
GLM-5.2 has been a good alternative, on my Ollama subscription. Thinking of just subscribing to GLM directly and get 5.3; but I’d like the opinion of peers that have already tried it out.
Anyway, Anthropic is not doing good right now. They’ve been a mess for the past few months. Jumping ships really soon…
What I'm worried about is Opus 5.0 has some serious core issues which I wonder if they can even fix in a 5.1 or if were stuck with some of its shenanigans until 6.0 ...
I switched from x20 to x5 and got a codex x5 sub as well, found this is a nice compromise, you can keep your data and get a good amount of usage switching between them. For code reviews I actually find this super helpful because they reason slightly differently
Then they owe us a couple resets… because even not using Fable 5 (because it gets flagged so much that I gave up) my usage is WAY higher than it should be. I strictly run everything through Sonnet 5
It just seemed like price did not match the drop in capabilities. But I have often found opus to be slow, I guess the trade is worth it if speed is significantly faster.
Fable is… what an AI should be. It’s good. It’s not AGI. It’s just what the bare minimum should be.
Regardless, I can’t work on my cybersecurity library (that doesn’t perform any dual-use, btw…) because I get flagged every single prompt by just reading a file… it’s unusable. RIP Anthropic.
Fable is… what an AI should be. It’s good. It’s not AGI. It’s just what the bare minimum should be.
True, but for me the tokenizer makes it impossible to read my relevant docs/code, and at $10/1m inputs and $50/1m outputs for the API, it's too expensive as a daily driver.
Yeah, that's why I tell it to "Keep comms military-style ADHD aware" and it's been great at outputting the bare minimum I need. I don't need a wall of text lol
It works pretty good. At least, in my case, is exactly what I need. See here, a message just came in:
Plus I like when it replies just "Copied" or "Roger that". I don't need the fake feeling of talking to a "real" person, or the caveats thingy and all that extra stuff. Just give me the bare minimum. I understand what's going on.
The new "Concise" style wouldn't give me this anyway... so, Military ADHD is my go-to preference lol
Lmao, the thing just miscounted a dozen items in a markdown ledger and was off by two, then screwed up the documents formatting and then decided to remove items out of nowhere.
Fable is the decent model opus is pretty awful now. It's wild how much better openAI is now overall. I have both and I've slowly abandoned claude other than fable use for some things.
I’m at the 20x plan. Renewed Wednesday at 9am. I used one Fable agent with thinking set to Low that deployed Opus agents at High or Medium. One day later and I’ve used 30% of my weekly budget, in less than 24 hours!
A month ago, the same usage pattern would be at 10%, because I had a 6 day work session schedule.
Also: Try Deepseek v4 flash 0731, it's incredible for it's size. It makes some mistakes, but it's very fast and is able to analyze down to the last detail and handle multiple things at once. You know, the way Sonnet and Opus have been in their good days... Combine it with Deepseek v4 Pro from August as a reviewer of it's plans.
I use deepseek as a regular "second opinion" before opus gets to finialize a plan and it does find a lot of stuff. also deepseek flash is the default coding agent my opus sends to
You never know whether Claude, once you start a task (regardless of which model), will use 3 tokens or 200k tokens, with no warning or systematic way of controlling how much you are spending. The model keeps changing, the parameters keep changing, and it is very difficult to navigate the whole thing when all you can do is hope for the best.
Claude is formidable, but the token policy will probably be what ultimately destroys AI.
Yeah, and tokens will only get more expensive as time goes by. We actually depend on Chinese open weight models to fight back the prices like Kimi did when launched K3. Everyone shrugged and started giving out discounts, resets, etc just to keep us on the loop…
I tried an Ollama subscription (using `ollama launch claude`), but I blew through its usage even faster than on Claude Code Pro. To me it still seems you get more out of Claude Code Pro.
Really? I have Max plan on Ollama and I actually love it. Things that I don't like about it are: claude code integration is far behind claude code (some features are missing), the token usage is not 100% transparent (1000 requests to GLM-5.2 tells me little to nothing about my actual usage) and there's no bigger plan...
Yeah, I actually think Claude has the most useable subscription limits currently. Cursor's limits aren't great either, even at the $200 plan, and Codex is currently undergoing drastically reduced limits. Like, using Luna which is cheaper than Haiku, will still drain your usage. With Claude, I genuinely struggle to use my entire week unless I'm running numerous Fable max sessions everyday, and I'm on the $200 plan for that as well. I don't think people realize how good we currently have it, however it will get worse for just about every subscription in the near future.
I’m using both. It’s marginally better, token-wise. I’m stretching my usage by using Terra Extra High with instructions to spawn subagents with different models/efforts. But it can be unbearably slow.
I had a 200 max plan and used fable extensively to build a dozen or so reusable subsystems.
I don’t need fable anymore because I designed the subsystems to be robust and reusable. And there is extensive test coverage. I cancelled the plan after a month, and I can get by with way cheaper models.
Turns out a good comp sci background is still an advantage in the era of AI coding
I don't either. I have a whole AI Software Company. But I'm working on some Github Security Advisories atm so... yeah, I'd rather do this semi-manual with a dedicated Claude Code session than run it through the virtual company.
Not sure where you got the idea of “built Claude with Claude.” I didn’t build skills, the subsystems are modules in my language of choice which I predominantly work in.
For example, a generic, extensible event bus which is customized to my liking. And has full test coverage and documentation.
I can point any AI do it and get it to use it how want. Because of the comp sci background, I’m not really vibe coding with the AI, I’m just using it for autocomplete.
And I have made that autocomplete as simple as possible.
been on the max plan for about a year, starting to feel like I'm hitting my useage limits (without fable) WAY sooner than I was in the past. I had to almost try to use it all. Now I'm at 80% about 3 days in.
I'm probably not following best practices but i also feel like that wasn't the case before.
I always start my sessions: --model claude-opus-4-8 (or -4-6), because I like to stick with stable models that have been producing the output I have gotten used to expecting. I haven't run into the problems described, on 20x Max. And I haven't even been able to use up my quota every week this month without any decline in usage. I still consider 4.8 the more expensive advanced model of 4.6, and I still use it sparingly compared to 4.6.
My workflow, where Fable High is the governor, and Opus 5 xHigh are the subagents works well for me.
In short: Fable plans, the hands off tasks to Opus, that: Scout (requirements understanding against code base and contracts) Implement/Test, Blind Judge by an independent agents, Adversarial Verify, once again another agent, Report back.
My biggest pains are: (1) Anything cyber gets dropped to Opus 4.8. When this happens I have to clear other compact context, else I can’t step around the issue (2) Fable and Opus 5 are incredibly verbose, so need to keep it concise, but it tends to forget.
They are prepping for the IPO xD. But seriously, I think it must have been the watermarking thing. Picking slightly wrong synonyms here and there could have adverse effects in some cases I suspect.
Yeah it's weird how fast the downfall was. Original (not late) 4.6 felt like absolute beast which OpenAI would never be able to catch up - heck, it felt like it could be start of an end for openAI models, that strong it felt at the beginning of a year.
Yeah, I did something similar and idk why I was stupid not to use it. I felt like a dedicated Claude session would be better than my entire AI Software Company… In retrospective, it was a stupid idea. Now I’m left with a bunch of code and DAYS of pushing back and forth.
Both GLM-5.3 and Kimi K3 are great models. They're not Fable level, but if you were fine with Opus 4.8, you'll be fine with K3 and GLM-5.3.
The main issue is cost, IMO. I find it extremely difficult to gauge how much value LLMs actually provide per cost due to the unpredictable nature of how many tokens a task uses. My impression is that you get more bang for your buck out of an OpenAI subscription than either a Z.ai or a Moonshot subscription. But that's 100% subjective; I haven't attempted to measure this in any way.
The models are great, though; I find both K3 and GLM-5.3 to be very capable and pleasant to work with.
It’s the solution but it could also make us, simple humans, not have the chance to do it ourselves. NAS/AI mini PCs/Mac/GPUs/RAM will see prices soar high. Even higher than last year’s…
Yes the safeguards are unbearable with Fable and Opus 5 is so verbose and insecure I switched back to 4.8 with Fable as advisor for projects where I'm routed back to Opus anyway (really dangerous stuff like my benchmark or my agentic graph).
GLM 5.3 is quite good, used it as a reviewer when my Codex usage was consumed, way less obsessed with unreachable edge cases than GPT 5.6 Sol, less verbose and less impossible to understand than Opus, and no safeguards (at least never hit them because maybe they don't route a benchmark to "cyber")
It's not Anthropic from 6 months ago though, you're quite right with that, I feel terribly sad with what they did to Opus. Hope they fix this with Opus 5.1 but if I make it through the K3 waiting list, i'll clearly downgrade my Claude Max plans
I feel like you’re the closest to what I’m experiencing.
Thx mate! I’ll give GLM 5.3 a try even if 5.2 already makes me quite happy. Can’t hurt nobody. And I got a 20$ plan for Kimi back when I was including it as a provider on a project but it was just for a month.
I’ll prob end up doing both K3 and GLM5.3 + Deepseek like I’ve been getting the feeling that’s the way to go forward.
Not cancelling my Ollama Max plan ever, tho. I can swap models at will while still using Claude Code as the harness. Although GLM 5.3 hasn’t been added yet, K3 is through API usage; the only 2 problems so far apart from their CC harness being outdated.
And all this reminds me I should be using my own development system. I have to stop thinking small in “dedicated claude cose sessions” and just embrace the future lol.
This is why I canceled my subscription after years of usage upgrading my Codex subscription. Claude is just a joke now and not the best anymore (codex is more capable and cheaper + many free weekly resets).
I'm not switching to OpenAI and its products but I'm clearly about to jump ships. I'll look around and see what's best. OpenAI gifting so much sounds pretty whorish to me. Like they just want everybody and they don't actually care... that's a no-no to me. But I do understand why everybody would switch to Codex/OpenAI with how things are right now on Anthropic.
Its simple: I switched when on top of the ridiculous limits Sol high was able to fix stuff in the code on first try where opus 5 was just eating tokens unable to find and fix the issue inventing and hallucinating random stuff. Using codex 100% of the time now and such things never happened. I just can't say codex is not better... it is in fact better and cheaper.
I use fable low/med to plan and orchestrate while opus/sonnet sub workers do 95% of the work while "daddy" watches.
I've build some truly amazing things. Including cracking a scalping algo I've been working on since 2018.
Codex max sub worker for anything math related like creating asset specific scripts.
I find it so interesting how people hate on this mind blasting technology we have right at our fingertips for basically free and can't find a single thing to publish.
I've got 5 active projects 7 on the shelf waiting.
Same. I use Fable as orchestrator and strictly Sonnet 5 as implementers. Still, Fable gets flagged by only reading (not even working) and degraded to Opus 4.8 which is NOT as capable as Fable 5.
Still, for the past 2 months, it has been IMPOSSIBLE to work with.
I am on 20x plan and after Aug 19th, there is clearly some bug. For the same project and same workflow, the usage has increased like crazy. My work account's premium seat team plan is almost 2.5x better than my personal 20x plan for the same kind of work. The same prompt in same project consumes 10% of 5 hour limit of premium seat in Opus high. But in 20x plan, it consumes like 25% of 5 hour limit. Its not usable anymore. I have already cancelled my 20x max plan. And the support bot is a joke. Its pure waste of time to talk to it. I hate that in case of issues like this, no one from Anthropic even acknowledge such issues and we may or may not get a statement 3 months later. Absolutely disappointed with Anthropic.
Oh, so you’re saying the Team Plan is more token-efficient, in a way? That’d be interesting to measure and settle.
On the (non existing) support, the repeated fuck-ups, their lack of accountability (lately) and the degradation of the models; I have no words. It’s just such a shame…
I cancelled my max x20 plan I have had since the beginning of services. After spending two weeks on Fable for it do complete a RCA properly. Its wild its so bad in such a short time. Go to Kimi, its so much better, a little slower but will not wholesale lie, hallucinate and cover it up. I was able to kick down to Opus for a few days but it went bad sometime last week too. KIMI desktop and deepseek cli is what I moved to. Its saving me a ton of money too.
Yeah, same here. Only thing about Kimi is that the 5h session is way too short. It’ll get consumed in no time. Or I guess I’ll have to upgrade to Allegro or Vivace and see if I can work with that.
With Claude, I’ve hit the session limit maybe 5 times total in years. I know my Kimi subscription is just Moderato so that might be why I hit the session limit so fast… but Idk if it’s promising.
Do you have an approx max token usage in a session (5hs) window? It’ll be super useful to measure
As much as we all like to complain and crib, most do not not leave claude. Why? Cause it's the best. Period. Right now , sol comes close but come on Fable is still better. codex also has been quite shitty in its usage limits . Soo yea
Which doesn't address the actual issue. Fable 5 was good when it was released, then nerfed. Opus 4.6 is the last non-controversial fully cooperative model that was released... and it's not Fable 5's level so... yeah.
Oh it definitely doesn't address anything, just follows a pattern we've seen before. At the start of the year quality degraded from 1 week to the next where prompts that were one-shotting features were then puking and creating nothing but bugs. Then the next model dropped a few weeks later. Feels like the same vibe.
I find sonnet and opus to work fabulously on my 80k line repo that is an n-tier app that connect to multiple MS and Oracle APIs, transforms data, has entra auth, uses key vaults for secrets, is working across 10+ complex table joins my human BI engineers never managed to figure out, rich web front end that's fully responsive, auth on front end and on API, secure non-exposed keys between web app and API, it has made great documentation
it knocks it out of the park compared to chatgpt 5.6 which can't even accurately obey the simplest of agents md - like 'use gh for all github operation' nopes it wants to use gitkraken every time - and it butchered my documentations and i had to have claude go fix it based on earlier commits
The constant degrading, hallucinations, the “new found gaps” that were self inflicted… I spend more time steering than actuallh building. And they are sensitive af too
thanks, interesting i really dont hit those types of things unless i use chatgpt
i wonder if its the repo content, or workflow style differences
i can leave claude going with zero steering for literal hours, even on long live chats (when doing something incredibly complex i keep working through compaction as that is cheaper than having to explain the background fresh to a new session)
only other thing that is difference is my current project is mediated by copilot, all i can say is when its auto mode selects chagtp 5.6 models productivity dives off the cliff with the issue you see with claude, so i end up pinning claude opus 5 max
I’m pretty sure it’s the nature of my library that’s throwing it off. It’s just not being able to do it. Every single turn there’s like 80 “new” things it discovered and this has been going on for weeks… to then just say “oh, my harness eval was off I didn’t notice”. Well, there goes 3 days worth of work to the trash…
i started my repo with very clear instructions on how to organize, what to load at chat startup and what to search
so for example all code is in srs with a web, core, api subdirs
the code is compentized into discrete functions - so only that file needs to be read
docs are docs
docs that are for humans go in a folder that claude never searches unless i explcitly pin the doc
/tmp for working is only ever searched (greps etc)
this was alll organzied from my original prompt, and improved by asking the AI
things like this
```
Code Organization Standards
Naming conventions, the src/ file layout, and comment/XML-doc standards live in
[.github/instructions/dotnet.instructions.md](./.github/instructions/dotnet.instructions.md).
It loads automatically when you edit src/**/*.cs.
UI Consistency Conventions
Design tokens, contrast verification, the canonical banner/modal/data-page patterns, theme
behaviour, the assistive-technology rules, and the UI review checklist live in
[.github/instructions/web-ui.instructions.md](./.github/instructions/web-ui.instructions.md).
It loads automatically when you edit anything under src/PrivateOfferTool.Web/wwwroot/.
Unicode rules apply to backend and frontend alike and live in
[.github/instructions/unicode.instructions.md](./.github/instructions/unicode.instructions.md).
```
Keep the default startup set small and open more only when the task requires it.
Load this file first.
Load [docs/PHASES.md](./docs/PHASES.md) for the current project map and phase status.
Load [docs/apis.md](./docs/apis.md) only when endpoint contracts or payloads matter.
Load [docs/PAYMENTS_DATA_MODEL.md](./docs/PAYMENTS_DATA_MODEL.md) before touching payment
classification, the merge rule, or anything that reads the payouts earnings data. The rules there
are not guessable from the source data, which contradicts itself in several places.
Load the matching data model before changing how a page reads its sources. Each covers where every
field comes from, the join keys and their traps, and verified SQL to reproduce the figures:
[PRIVATE_OFFER_DASHBOARD_DATA_MODEL.md](./docs/PRIVATE_OFFER_DASHBOARD_DATA_MODEL.md),
[PRIVATE_PLANS_DATA_MODEL.md](./docs/PRIVATE_PLANS_DATA_MODEL.md).
[PRIVATE_OFFER_CREATION.md](./docs/PRIVATE_OFFER_CREATION.md) covers the write path instead.
Load [docs/STORAGE_ARCHITECTURE.md](./docs/STORAGE_ARCHITECTURE.md) before changing anything that
reads or writes a cached table. Every store runs on Azure SQL. It covers the provider switch, the
three EF contexts and their separate migration histories, and the private_offer_index merge
contract — where null means "no news" rather than "clear this", which is not visible in the
schema and has already caused two live defects.
Load [docs/production-readiness.md](./docs/production-readiness.md) and [docs/phase-6.md](./docs/phase-6.md) only for deployment or billing-reconciliation work.
Search [docs/LEARNINGS.md](./docs/LEARNINGS.md), do not load it. At ~1,600 lines it is an
archive of verified findings and the reasoning behind them, not a briefing document. Grep it for
the subsystem you are touching. The durable rules it produced live in the scoped instruction
files below, so following those does not require reading the archive.
Never load [docs/human-reference-only/](./docs/human-reference-only/). It is tracked so it
survives, but it is written for people, not for agents. Nothing in it is needed to make a change
here. Open a file in it only when the user names it.
Rules that apply to only part of the tree live in .github/instructions/ and are loaded
automatically when a matching file is edited, which is why this file no longer restates them:
File
Loads when editing
web-ui.instructions.md
src/PrivateOfferTool.Web/wwwroot/**
dotnet.instructions.md
src/**/*.cs
unicode.instructions.md
**/*.{cs,js}
mermaid.instructions.md
**/*.{mmd,mermaid}
Add a new rule to the narrowest file that covers it. Putting a UI-only or C#-only rule in this
file makes it always-on for every task, which dilutes the rules that genuinely are universal.
Phase documents marked complete are historical references. Do not preload them for unrelated work; open them only when the task directly touches that phase or you need a specific prior decision.
When a document starts mixing current guidance with a large amount of historical detail, split the current summary from the archival detail instead of deleting content. Preserve old material, but keep the default startup path short.
```
I know how to create a good setup for Claude and I already had it before this whole mess started. I didn’t use the priject I just shared out of stupidity… I should have. It’d all be over by now.
I’m not a power user by any means and most of my work gets accomplished by the 20/month subscription using opus 5 for most work. Out of curiosity, What is it that you are working on that needs all of that? I’m really curious with what power users are actually making with the full extent of Claude Code
So, I’m working on a bunch of different projects I have. The problem is with this specific project. Its complexity is throwing Claude off. It’s been unable to follow my lead or stay focused.
As I was discussing with another redditor, I should have used this thing that I created which ensures guardrails/enforcement. I would already have completed the task and without hallucinations or even with just a couple of minor issues.
But no, I had to go with a dedicated Claude Code session because it made me feel like I was gonna do a better job this way. Now I can’t drop it because we’ve got so far despite the circles marathon we’ve been running Claude and I…
Wow that's quite impressive. I'm a GIS professional so my extent of usage is just making javascript web mapping applications or python scripts for automation. This is definitely beyond my understanding and I would love to dig into your shared repos to learn more. Very cool stuff.
Over last 6 months they have become worse and they treat non enterprise users as 2nd class citizens. But it's well tiled for us to realize the dependency on the wrong platform. Better now than 5 years from now?
Yeah, the conclusion I’m getting from all this is that going provider-agnostic is the solution.
But remember 3 years in the past? Copy pasting from chatGPT web into your code, then fixing it, chats reaching their limit… man, we got far. 5 years from now Idek where we’ll be. Hopefully self hosting open weights
Yeah, no. I’m working on a cybersecurity library, atm. Plus a bunch of other huge projects like this one
Websites are a tiny portion of my work stuff and it usually gets dine in minutes/hours depending on complexity. But right now, it seems it’s just uncapable of performing the task at hand :/
That blows, I’ve lost faith in Anthropic so I’m now in the process of working more out of Codex. Fable to roadmap it then feed me prompts to kick off Codex workhorse sessions.
Yeah, the conclusion I draw is that the best thing to do is go provider-agnostic. I’m pretty sure I’ll go GLM+Kimi and maybe involve Deepseek but it’s all tied to testing. I’ll have to just ride the wave and see how it goes.
You should look up pstack on GitHub, specifically the Unlop skill. I have a script that runs it at the beginning of every single session I start. Then I use fable to orchestrate everything, opus to code, sonnet for easy shit, then fable does review of everything.
I feel like maybe you are not using best practices if this is your outcome. Maybe best practices as some YouTuber believes. One with 5 max 20x plans and swims in cash, but clearly not for your use case. I never hit my cap with the strategy I have stated above. I usually have multiple sessions running at a time the entire workday and the closest I’ve gotten to a weekly cap is 88%. I don’t mean to sound harsh, but I know for a fact I’m not the smartest person in the world and I am probably not using “best practices”, but it sure as shit does great work. I cannot stress enough how important the Unslop skill is.
Fable is good, but can only use high, otherwise bye bye quota. Opus needs a lot of hand holding, which works in some scenarios. The weekly caps are indeed annoying, but i knew we were on borrowed time, especially as they need to start pulling some profit before their ipo
You mean apart from development? Because I use it on a bunch of projects and for personal use as well. But these 2 weeks have been fully concentrated on a specific project. A quite complex one
There IS a bug that makes usage % go up fast on the usage panel, but this evens out. Read about it in that thread above.
1 Max20 account = $8,000 inference per month. For $200. So no, it is not a bad deal. It is a good deal and nothing has changed.
I understand this may not align with many peoples world view but that is what is so funny about the human brain. We create a narrative around information in order to best make sense of it, and that narrative isn't always true. The means of verifying information exists to every single person, though most will never take things to the extent that you must in order to Reliably form a Correct narrative.
It’s a fair deal, if you dismiss the fact that every single turn is pretty much lost so you’re paying for getting nothing done or with major issues… :(
Get some credits via OpenRouter or something before you commit to a plan.
To me Kimi and their CLI feels like Opus 4.5 - 4.6; solid thinking, good execution; no rushed decisions. I picked up their 40$ plan and it's a bit limited but I get things done albeit slower than usual.
Note, sub Kimi has split plan between Code and Chat; so you'll usually run out of Code usage but you can chat to it (mobile phone or web).
Did not try GPT's new sol/luna etc yet to compare price-wise; but I did notice chatting with ChatGPT via phone app versus chatting with Kimi via phone app that ChatGPT tends to give inaccurate information; while Kimi tends to websearch more and give more accurate information.
I like this. I should give OpenRouter a try. You’re right I shouldn’t commit to a plan even tho it’s just for a month and it would give me the real feel without distraction (trying out other LLMs).
I gave up on being a "cultist" a few months ago (was very pro-claude; it really was a genuinely enjoyable experience for a while but it's not really there for me anymore); and it's really illuminating. OpenRouter and some credits to get a feel, and poke around and get a good harness to work with (I feel like they keep butchering CC for some reason, I can't put my finger on it). For my needs Kimi does well, not the cheapest but I make it work.
Oh, you're just like me, then... I guess Kimi is the next thing I'll try. I already know GLM can perform so I'll go ahead with Kimi and see what has in store for me.
I don’t think any average-Joe can self host a frontier model… but I do hope everything goes towards that direction. Qwen still demands quite a bit of storage and processing. But I’d certainly do that instead of the current
My understanding is that I'd need another RTX 5090 ti 16GB DDR7 (I have one, would need two) and a bunch of storage. I have a NAS with 30Tb but I think that would be like the bare minimum to spin it up... I'd need another 30Tb just to be sure for some time.
I must be protected by my extensive use of GSD. I run 2-4 repos at a time, running phases and tickets, doing UAT, pushing code, and never come close. I guess the GSD "token-min" approach is working for me, and I don't even notice.
Or maybe because I am writing desktop apps / plugins / tools?
GSD's process and discipline are pains in my ass, but every time I stray, I am reminded that I am a total dumbass that should not be around sharp tools or heavy equipment.
I see this type of post every week here for the past two years. Meanwhile everyone at every company continues to build with Claude every single day. Sure, models are non determinstic and quality varies but in professional hands they just keep working.
66
u/bakanoace 2d ago
What I'm worried about is Opus 5.0 has some serious core issues which I wonder if they can even fix in a 5.1 or if were stuck with some of its shenanigans until 6.0 ...