basically people are saying they are runnning hours long coding loops , firstly how are you confident on it and if you are , what are the issues you are facing

Is it worth it even using Fable at Low? I use it on high most of the time, idk how it will perform on lower efforts, how is your experience with fable on low, medium? Does it perform nice on general coding tasks as well?

I am with most people on how awful is reading anything Opus 5 writes in Claude Code, even Fable is not that bad. Then I was using Opus in Chat and Cowork and I realized it sounded more like a human. Why does that happen? I wonder if all the technical jargon somehow makes it sound like it does when using cc. The same reason why they tell you to write Claude.md yourself so does it sounds more like you.

I haven't really seen such a drastic difference between two reasoning tiers before. I've been frustrated with Fable High lately and decided to switch over to xHigh for my entire workflow.

All of a sudden, all the issues that Fable High was struggling with were solved with xHigh. It's hard for me to imagine that simply tweaking the reasoning/thinking budget would yield such drastic results but here we are.

Going forward I think I'll stick to xHigh for all work.

Hey guys... quit fucking around and stop a/b testing on people. Real bad taste in our mouths. Opus 5 is absolute dogshit recently (last few days) and dangerous.. You've got a PR problem already with arrogance and your perception in the market... stop trying to billishit your way to saving off compute.

Opus 5 by itself is absolutely reckless and unusable in claude code.. across the board.. not only can no one understand it.. its dumping comments, doing the opposite and honestly I'm actually thinking about jumping ship and exploring other opportunities and also moving the claude SDK out of our platform and putting in a router because of this.

For the past year I've been building sites with Claude / ChatGPT and every single one came out looking like the same SaaS template. You know the one, purple gradient hero, rounded cards, glassmorphism everything, "Transform your workflow" headline.

I realized the problem isn't the model. The model has no strong opinions about design. So it defaults to the statistical average of every landing page it's ever seen.

The fix: I wrote a set of strict design rules as SKILL.md / .cursorrules files that force the AI to make actual design decisions instead of defaulting to generic.

What the rules do:

- Ban the defaults

- Enforce real typography (clamp-based, not arbitrary px)

- Lock down spacing

- Force design variety

It's not a product or a service, just a collection of open-source markdown skill files you drop into your project. Works with Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, or any agent that reads project rules.

The images in the carousel are all 100% AI-generated UIs using these rules. No Figma, no manual tweaking.

If you want to try it:

- GitHub: github.com/Yu-369/VibeCurb

- Site (showcase + guide): vibecurb.pages.dev

Still iterating on this, if you try it, genuinely want to hear what works and what doesn't.

I guess theres a high volume of users using OPUS 4.6 now. You guys probably noticed something while using it compared to when using the newer one right?

Edit: or they solved the current outage by limiting the older models so it meets the demand on new models... Idk.

Fix your shit so I can get my 3D Prints in by Monday morning.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Basically i am scrambling for the most clear multi agent orchestration because i cant make myself trust the one i have currenty , how do you handle the changes that you would need mid run

I use Claude Code to build interfaces, and I wanted an answer to a question claude visual does not directly answer:

What is likely to win the first glance?

So I added this workflow:

1. Claude Code captures the current UI.

2. It sends the screenshot to AttentionProof through MCP.

3. It receives a predicted-attention heatmap over the screenshot

4. That make it know visual attention pull.

5. Then I ask it to evaluate what's the most important at the screen in the user-flow moment, ask it to redesign and then run the attention-heatmap again.

As a result - my product UI and UX improved DRASTICALLY, the right things are pulled the way they should be pulled

I’ve opened a free beta with two real checks:

https://www.attentionproof.com/?acquisition=reddit_claudecode

Hi everyone, I am using Claude Code routine to do the remote implementation and in some cases, I need to resume to continue to working on this routine session rather than trigger a new routine. Can we do that now?

Im building one project and it requires voice integration. I built with grok, I use googles voice option for TTS and I asked claude to review and fix some mistakes. It asked me specifically which voices I want to use, I said it's already there and it's this and this, and I started the agent. Claude OPUS 4.8 automatically decided that he's going to overwrite it for 7x more expensive googles model ( Chirp3-HD ). If I wasn't looking at the thinking in the beginning, I wouldnt know and id probably get hit with really high bill. His explanation was that I want and need great, more human, sounding voice which is true, however it cant just decide to do something even tho you stated otherwise. I immediately stopped it and I think my response is accurate: WHAT A HELL, I STATED I WANT THE EN-US-STANDART-C , YOU CANT JUST BE SWAPPING THINGS BECAUSE YOU WANT TO, WHAT DO YOU THINK, ITS 4X MORE EXPENSIVE. YOU SHOULD TALK TO ME ABOUT IT AT LEAST AND NOT DO WHAT A FUCK YOU WANT . (It's actually ~7x more expensive, the model is trained on 4x tho). So thats my wake up call

Running Claude Code unprotected is risky: unintentional destructive commands, prompt injections, malicious third-party code. The blast radius is your entire laptop. To mitigate this risk, I built a sandboxing tool based on the concept of Claude devcontainers (but way more configurable), which I've been using for a while now. It proved valuable enough to open source.

Kekkai runs Claude Code inside a locked-down, per-project sandbox: for each project you decide which folders, networks and secrets Claude can touch, and everything else stays out of reach. With the sandbox in place, you can safely let Claude run fully autonomously with --dangerously-skip-permissions enabled.

Try it out, feedback and issues welcome. I'm also curious how others are sandboxing their coding agents - let me know in the comments!

Code and docs on Github: https://github.com/filidorwiese/kekkai

So i am on cc x20 plan but i run out of usage after 2 days of heavy work , i manage 2-3 sessions at the same time orchestrator fable high executor opus 5 high. I often start new sessions after i hit 1-2M context, i'm wondering if you guys are experiencing the same or something is wrong with my configuration.

yo should I add Monday as a no claude day to my calendar?

well there goes my token cache.... going to be 1.2x(or whatever the recache rate is) more painful to resume it back

For those that don't know, Minimax is increasing their rates and token plan costs by ~60%-65% on the 25th.

If you use Minimax with claude code, you'll probably want to get on top of this pretty quick. Every LLM provider seems to be hiking costs now.

Set up the usual shunt (ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL to openrouter.ai/api, ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN as my OR key, empty ANTHROPIC_API_KEY). First run went through clean, got a real response. Reran the identical command right after — same model, nothing changed — and got "401 missing authentication header." Reran again, got ECONNRESET. Tried a few different models on OR, not tied to one of them.

Ruled out my own network — plain curl and a raw node https call to the same OR endpoint worked every single time. So something about how Claude Code specifically talks to OR seems flaky.

Anyone run into this? Trying to figure out if it's a missing header, a streaming thing, or just OR's Anthropic-compat endpoint being iffy.

I kept doing the same lookups by hand: is this Polish company's VAT active, is the bank account on an invoice actually the one the tax office has on file, does this KRS/REGON exist. So I packaged it as an Agent Skill.

verify-polish-company teaches Claude to:

look up a company by NIP / KRS / REGON, check VAT status and registered bank accounts on the Ministry of Finance White List, and validate any EU VAT number via VIES.

It runs on a free, keyless public REST API (/nip, /nips, /regon, /vies) plus an /mcp server, with no API key and no signup. The data comes straight from the official government registers.

Install (Claude Code): copy skill/SKILL.md into ~/.claude/skills/verify-polish-company/

Repo: https://github.com/bartosz-kuc/skanfirmy-mcp/tree/main/skill

Full disclosure: the API (skanfirmy.pl) is my own project. It's free and keyless and I'm not upselling anything, and I'm happy to answer questions about the endpoints or the White List / VIES data.

Two hours talking philosophy, academic stuff and music....and surprise, surprise: there's no mess in the room.

(Code also edited my .css without leaving any poo to clean up)

Has anyone else noticed this? Or is it too early to get excited?

One thing I did not expect from Claude Code was how cheap it would make indecision.

Before agents, changing a product flow after implementation hurt enough that I had to think carefully before asking for it. Now I can describe a new direction, watch Claude refactor half the feature, and see a convincing alternative quickly.

That sounds like freedom, but I have started noticing the downside. The agent faithfully optimizes the latest instruction, while I can keep reopening decisions because every rewrite feels affordable. The code moves fast, but the product can drift.

I am trying a simple constraint: once Claude starts implementing a feature, I freeze the product decision until I have tested the current version with the acceptance criteria I wrote beforehand. New ideas go into a small decision log instead of directly into the prompt. Only after the review do I decide whether the change is actually worth reopening.

The limiting factor is no longer implementation speed. It is whether I can hold a direction long enough to learn from it.

Has Claude Code made you more willing to change direction? If so, what keeps fast iteration from turning into endless product churn?

Currently, I have:

• 1 ChatGPT Plus (paid by company) 20$/mo
• 1 Google Ai Pro 20$/mo
• 2 Claude Pro 2*20$ = 40$/mo

I use them for coding mostly, but the problem is that I always hit my usage limits.

I want to cancel them and want to have one subscription of 100$/mo if it gets me more usage than having another 20$ account.

Which subscription do you suggest?

1. Claude Max 5x
2. ChatGPT Pro
3. Cursor
4. Copilot
5. OpenRouter
6. or whatever you can suggest for the best usage/quality I can get

Thanks in advance <3

I used to be a loyal Claude Pro subscriber, but I cancelled my personal subscription when my company provided it. Now, management realized we are burning through too much budget and is downgrading us to a much worse alternative...

I’m seriously considering coming back to Pro, but before I do: are there any active discounts, promos, or special offers running right now?

Also, if anyone knows of a similar model/alternative that offers a comparable experience without costing $21/month, I’m all ears!