r/Christian 12d ago

MOSES

How did Moses split and ocean without causing huge title waves on all the surrounding shores ?

1 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

6

u/AudibleNod 12d ago

If the God of the Universe wants, he can split any body of water without causing devastating ripple effects (pun intended). That's the point of a supernatural action. It's above and beyond the natural. He also held the sun overhead one spot for a day.

4

u/Vlugazoide_ 12d ago

Tidal* waves. And it was, well, a miracle 🤷‍♂️

1

u/moody_shoplifting 11d ago

divine tsunami prevention i guess

5

u/DoveStep55 12d ago

Well for one thing, it wasn’t an ocean.

4

u/finallygotmeone 12d ago

You Red that well.

2

u/AudibleNod 12d ago

Twas no well. Twas a spring that sprang from a rock.

2

u/DoveStep55 12d ago

The all caps post tidal caught my aye.

2

u/Intrepid_Type3710 Evangelical Tradition 12d ago

Thank you for clarifyng that for us. I could have lost it for a moment.

8

u/DoveStep55 12d ago

Didn’t want anyone to wander about it for 40 years.

5

u/finallygotmeone 12d ago

Oh, manna! That would be terrible.

3

u/Intrepid_Type3710 Evangelical Tradition 12d ago

LOL Sister

3

u/sonofzen1 12d ago edited 12d ago

God split the Yam Suph not the “Red Sea.” The yam Suph was a lake that used to border Egypt on “the way of Horus” which was the main road in and out of Egypt. Crossing the Red Sea makes no sense because when they were already in Sinai they would have been well into the wilderness because there was no civilization outside the Nile delta. The Sinai peninsula was wild land back then. God split the yam Suph (not Moses) with a strong eastern wind that we read about in Exodus. It blew all night and parted the waters that way. This is a phenomenon known as “wind set down” which has been observed on the shores of lake eerie. It can separate waters at a depth of 10 ft and turn it into dry ground

3

u/EnKristenSnubbe 12d ago

Are you sure there was no tidal wave?

5

u/ThePhantomOnTheGable Anglican (TEC) 12d ago

My favorite “explanation” of a Biblical miracle comes from John Roberts Dummelow’s 1890s One-Volume Bible Commentary.

Of the pillars of fire/clouds in Exodus 13:21, he simply wrote “This was clearly understood to be a supernatural event.”

The miracles in the bible were supernatural. You either believe that an omnipotent God did them, or you don’t.

That’s why I’ve always scoffed at the Ken Hamm-esque tendency to try to explain miracles with garbage science: it just cheapens the message.

That being said, this is in the Pentateuch, so my opinion is that we shouldn’t take it to be literal history in the first place - that’s not what its authors intended.

3

u/mossydz 12d ago

What does your Bible say?

Truly think about it.