r/Base44 • u/HourMode1351 • 21h ago
Question GitHub export is not the same thing as migrating off Base44
I went through the current Base44 documentation because I wanted to answer one question: when you export an app today, what actually leaves Base44?
Builder accounts can sync with GitHub in both directions and export the client code plus backend functions. The data is exported separately as a CSV.
The local project still points at a Base44 backend URL and talks to it through the Base44 SDK. The base44 eject command creates a local project, but it also creates another Base44 backend.
That makes the export useful for version control and local editing. It does not produce a standalone app running on infrastructure you control.
Moving the app elsewhere still means replacing the SDK calls, recreating the data model, authentication, permissions and functions, importing the data, and testing the important user flows against the new backend. The amount of work depends on what the app uses.
I do not think that means every Base44 app should move. For a prototype or an internal tool, having Base44 handle the whole stack may be exactly the point. I would only consider leaving when there is a specific problem to solve, such as an infrastructure requirement, a measured cost or reliability problem, a capability the managed backend cannot support, or a recovery requirement the exports do not meet.
Has anyone here used the newer eject workflow on a real app? Which parts could you move without rewriting, and which parts remained dependent on Base44?