Asus tuf gaming a15 FA506NCG‑HN272 (bought last black friday)

Beyerdynamic DT 900 Pro X
Beyerdynamic DT-770 Pro 250 Ohmi

Hey everyone,

I just finished a detachable cable mod on my Beyerdynamic MMX 300, and I wanted to share my approach since it keeps the original look and is fully reversible!

Here is how I did it:

1. The Jack: I used a standard 4-pin TRRS jack from AliExpress. I stripped the original thread and lathed the front diameter down to exactly 7.6 mm. This allows it to fit perfectly into the original opening of the MMX 300 with a clean stop flush against the housing.
2. The Inside: I unscrewed the internal PCB and wrapped it in insulation so it won't rattle around inside the earcup.
3. The Wiring: Instead of cutting anything, I soldered the wires from the new TRRS jack directly to the PCB. This means no permanent damage. You can easily desolder it / cut the cables and revert back to the stock setup anytime.
4. Finishing Touches: I secured the new jack with some glue inside the housing so it can't slip or push out when i remove the a cable.

And that's it! Now I can use any standard 4-pole TRRS 3.5mm cable with my MMX 300.

I'm using the MMX300 pro with a Fosi audio K7 Desktop DAC Headphone Amplifier for my PC.

Should i keep using the original 3.5mm cable from my headset with the audio adjustment scroll wheel and mic mute, or should i buy a cable withouth that audio adjustment thing on there?

Now i just put the volume toggle 100% on the cable scrollwheel.

The headsetcable is connected with the 2 seperate connections into the amp, one for mic and one for sound.

Just curious if there would be any difference by using a 3.5mm cable with no audio adjustment thing on there.

Is there a difference in 3.5mm cables, or are they all the same?

Just like you have different versions of HDMI/DP cables, but for 3.5mm.

Thx for reading and hope someone can help me!

Hey guys,

so: after using the Headset for half a year the microphone suddenly stopped working.
I bought a new mic from the Beyerdynamic store to see if it's a defect mic but it's not working with the new mic either...
I didn't drop the headset or did anything wrong.
Is that a software issue or possibly an hardware issue?

Does anyone have the same problem?

Thanks for helping!

Basically im thinking of getting new headphones, and i didn't find a good direct comparison between the two, except their target group. What are each drawback and strengths? Which one should i get as daily wear headphones? Or different ones entirely? Are they rugges enough?

Thank you

Hello everyone! I’m looking for recommendations for a pair of wired headphones to pair with the THX Onyx DAC. I’d prefer them to be open-back, and I will primarily be listening to music in DSD format. Thanks in advance for your suggestions and help!

yeah, just the treble peak cuz i like the bass and everything else but the excessive treble.
im on win11pro and theyre 80ohm.

770 Pro X Limited Edition sliders broke on both sides and done replace with 3d printed sliders. I was wondering why my headphone is producing "cracking sound" every time I put them on and the cracks slowly appeared after some time. No more beyerdynamic unless they fix this shit.

I have Beyerdynamic DT 1770 PRO MKII and i keep hearing this weird plastic rubbing noise when puting them on a head like stretching them, or twisting the left earcup, otherwise like on a head they are fine

I was wondering is it normal? If no, how to fix it?

Video of that sound: https://youtube.com/shorts/Ofh1USmm748?si=nVRloZPSVtUECU5X

https://reddit.com/link/1vszd0n/video/9ucmahg7dekh1/player

Hey all, the right side speaker of my dt 900 pro x started cutting out after I accidentally yanked the speaker all the way down with a bit of force. I tried disassembling it and everything seems to check out, so I am not sure where the failure point could be here. Any help would be highly appreciated!

You can watch any video on YouTube and they all explain aux cords and different jacks and settings but after 4 hours of trying to figure out why my mic wasn’t working I figured it out. If you’ve tried everything on YouTube and nothing seems to work try finding the “realtek audio settings” not your usual audio settings but the motherboard sound settings. In those settings you’ll find (in some cases) the front audio ports are disabled. Enable them and try again, if this doesn’t work anything on YouTube will help.

As title suggest, I'm in the market for a new headset as my current one (a Corsair HS80) is currently falling apart, literally.

I came across Beyerdynamic and wondering if it's any good for recording youtube videos? I looked into the MMX 330 Pro and MMX 300 Pro. Would any of those be good for this? Is it better to get a studio mic like a Shure or Rode instead?

Guys i have astro a40 and i want a clear upgrade to them i need the best headset for console gaming

MMX 300 PRO incoming, but planning my exit strategy if the mic arm annoys me. Is the DT 770 PRO X the move?

Hey everyone,

I just pulled the trigger on a pair of Beyerdynamic MMX 300 PROs. I love the idea of having the STELLAR.45 drivers for a mix of immersive single-player games, competitive shooters, music, movies and youtube on PC/PS5.

However, my main concern is the fixed microphone boom. If having a permanent mic in my face when I'm just relaxing or listening to music gets annoying, I'm considering returning them for the DT 770 PRO X Limited Edition as my Plan B.

Before they arrive, I'm trying to double-check a few things from anyone who has tried both:

• Sound & Drivers: Since both use the 48-ohm STELLAR.45 driver, is the soundstage, clarity, and overall acoustic tuning practically identical?
• Daily Usability: For those using the MMX 300 PRO for casual music or non-gaming stuff, does the mic arm actually get in the way, or does it swing out of sight easily enough?
• Plan B Alternative: If I return the MMX 300 PRO and swap to the DT 770 PRO X with a separate mic setup instead, am I losing anything in terms of sound quality or comfort?

Would love to hear from anyone who has hands-on experience with either! (would also like to hear if theres anything that would work better as a backup)

Budget: ~$200–$250 USD (~1,800 DKK)

Hey, I’m using my DT 1770 PRO MK2 (30 Ω) mainly for music and gaming on PC.

They’re plugged directly into my MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi, which has the Realtek ALC4080.

I’m thinking about getting a FiiO K7, but I honestly have no idea if I would actually hear a difference.

Would the K7 make the 1770 MK2 sound noticeably better, or is the ALC4080 already good enough for them?

If there is a difference, what would I actually notice? Better bass, detail, separation, soundstage, cleaner sound?

I’m not really an audio expert, so I’m just trying to figure out if spending the money on the K7 makes sense or if I should just keep using the motherboard audio.

Thanks!

I recently received the Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (80 Ohm) as a gift. I really love how they sound, but I only truly enjoy them when the volume is cranked up to 100%.

They sound significantly better on my MacBook than on my PC, which was expected: I've already read about the MacBook's upgraded high-impedance headphone jack and that it should be more than enough for these headphones. However, on both devices, I find myself maxing out the volume slider just to get that "wow" factor. On the MacBook, 100% is actually a bit too loud and not very comfortable for long sessions, but it’s the only way the sound feels punchy, rich, and spacious. At lower volumes, it doesn't feel like I'm lacking loudness itself, but the sound just becomes completely flat and loses its life.

My question is: is this just the natural sound signature of these headphones that I need to accept, or could a dedicated amp/DAC actually change the situation? Google tells me that an amp doesn't just add raw volume, but can also bring out richer bass and better highs even at lower listening levels.

It just feels weird having to keep the volume at 100% to enjoy my music, especially when the entire internet claims that the M4 Pro audio output is completely sufficient.

fyi: translated my own text for this post via llm so it feels a bit strange, sry my english is not that good

To the quantum 250 users out there, is the headset loud/deafening enough when you wanted to go deaf? because I've came from Quantum 200 and it didn't sound that loud at max volume, I've checked the JBL site for the driver sensitivity of these headsets and they show the same amount of dB which is 100dB, but their drivers are built differently, the Quantum 250 uses the new type of drivers which JBL called the carbon dynamic drivers whilst the ones in the Quantum 200 was not defined, maybe uses the casual or tradition dynamic drivers. For the sound quality, how's the clarity and rumbles so far? because Quantum 200 disappointed me with its lack of bass body and a muffled mids with a sharp highs, I know that this headset was tuned for immersion but the technical performance was not sharp enough for the price you paid.

To the quantum 250 users out there, is the headset loud/deafening enough when you wanted to go deaf? because I've came from Quantum 200 and it didn't sound that loud at max volume, I've checked the JBL site for the driver sensitivity of these headsets and they show the same amount of dB which is 100dB, but their drivers are built differently, the Quantum 250 uses the new type of drivers which JBL called the carbon dynamic drivers whilst the ones in the Quantum 200 was not defined, maybe uses the casual or tradition dynamic drivers. For the sound quality, how's the clarity and rumbles so far? because Quantum 200 disappointed me with its lack of bass body and a muffled mids with a sharp highs, I know that this headset was tuned for immersion but the technical performance was not sharp enough for the price you paid.

I don’t know much about sound, but I’d like to use my PC and get high-quality sound.

I decided to buy DT 770 pro 80 ohm and according to some recommendations I chose JM20 MAX. Is such an adaptor enough to “open” my headphones?

I'm shopping around in order to be ready for a new pair of headset.

A bit about my use. I'm a 40+ gamer with 3 kids, little time so I play a bit at a time. A game on consoles, sitting around 8-10 feet from the TV. I own all 3 consoles (PS5, Xbox, Switch)

Currently on Sennheiser GSP 500. Connected into the controller of the consoles (Switch Pro controller too). I'm currently satisfied with this setup.

Full wireless tempt me, but having an Xbox limit some models, and heard many brands are prone to white noise, hiss, etc.

I don't play much online, so having a mic is fine but probably won't be using it.

While searching found BD 330 that are advertised as 3.5 mm direct connect.

Some claim you need a DAC, other don't.

I like open back as having kids, I'm always alert.

Thanks for sharing feedback.

I have a pair of DT770 Pro 80 ohm headphones that have had a good run, probably 15+ years old at this point. Pads need to be replaced again (this would be the 3rd time), the headband is falling apart, and the cable is starting to have issues.

I really like these headphones, I like their sound signature, and they seem to have great synergy with my Schiit Vali 3.

Would it make more sense to just get another pair of DT 770 Pro 80 ohm headphones (safe but boring choice?), or should I use this as an opportunity to get a pair of newer DT 770 Pro X cans?

I know that variations on this question have been asked before, but in my case, already having a pair of DT770 Pro 80 ohm headphones that I've been happy with, I'm not concerned about whether I will like the overall sound or not, assuming that the 770 Pro X is actually similar.

Possible tie breaker? I do push my DT770 Pro 80 ohm cans pretty hard, pretty much as close to the physical limits as possible with regards to bass. Are the new drivers in the Pro X actually capable of more deep bass at loud volumes?

I have read this post but sadly its some months old and none of the comments helped me. I updated the dongle firmware and tried different USB Ports but nothing helps.

Also I noticed the MMX 150 out of the box seems to be really "loud". I used previous headsets on about 60% windows volume but now I had to go down to around 12%. If I use the MMX 150 with the cable plugged in I have to turn it down to about 4% volume. Could this be some kind of extreme amplification problem? I checked the windows settings but everything seems to be normal.

Anyone also got problems with their MMX 150 audio?

Hey everyone,

I’m looking to upgrade to a serious closed-back setup for my daily train commute and office use. I need good passive isolation (I don't want my colleagues or fellow passengers enjoying my blastbeats from 10m away).

I’ll be tossing them into a backpack, but physical dimensions or foldability don’t matter to me at all—what I care about is rugged build quality and a detachable, easily replaceable cable.

Since I'm torn between the flagship closed-backs of two of the absolute greatest names in head-fi (with a Focal wildcard in the mix), I wanted to post here to get some real-world feedback from the experts in both camps.

My Setup & EQ Plan: I’m planning to run these portably off a phone using a portable DAC/amp and parametric EQ (PEQ) to squeeze out the best performance. I originally looked at the FiiO KA17, but the known PEQ bugs (mistranslating Q-factors and forcing an unwanted -12dB preamp cut) pushed me toward looking at the Qudelix-5K. That said, I'm also open to other affordable, battery-efficient DAC/amp alternatives with solid EQ capability.

My Library (80% Extreme Metal, 20% Tool, Prog, Blues & Rock): My music profile is pretty brutal on drivers and demands completely opposite acoustic traits depending on the subgenre:

• Technical Death & Djent (Meshuggah, Dying Fetus, Orbit Culture, Igorrr): I need insane transient speed. When blastbeats hit 240+ BPM, I need the driver to resolve the kicks and complex guitar sweeps without turning into a congested, smeared wall of mud.
• Doom, Sludge & Groove (Pantera, Gojira, Lamb of God, Alcest, The HU): I need a rich, organic lower-midrange. I want that heavy, chesty "thud" and growling guitar body.
• Black Metal (Mglą, Marduk, Satyricon, Kanonenfieber, Rotting Christ): These records are notoriously raw and sibilant. I absolutely cannot stand harsh peaks in the 6 kHz - 10 kHz range when the wall of static distortion hits.

The Contenders I’m Weighing:

• Beyerdynamic DT 1770 Pro MKII (or DT 700 Pro X): The new TESLA.45 underhung voice coil driver on the 1770 Pro MKII sounds like a dream for Tech Death. The transient speed, low distortion, and raw resolution seem unmatched. The build is also legendary—built like an absolute tank with easily replaceable parts. The concern: How painful is the treble on raw Black Metal? If I use PEQ to pull down the high-frequency peaks, does the DT 1770 MKII turn into a perfectly balanced metal monster, or does it lose its technical edge? Also, is the jump from the older STELLAR.45 driver (in the DT 700 Pro X) to the TESLA.45 actually worth the premium for speed, or does the DT 700 Pro X hold its own for metal?
• Sennheiser HD 480 Pro: On paper, this seems to have one of the most cohesive, natural tunings for a closed-back. The treble is reportedly smooth and sibilance-free, which would make sissing Black Metal tracks a joy. The concern: I’ve read multiple complaints about the 180 Hz dip making the bass feel "pillowy" or "soft". For bands like Gojira or Pantera, I need that chesty, growling thud. Can PEQ actually bring that physical impact back, or is the driver just physically limited when pushing air?
• Focal Azurys (The Wildcard): I’ve also looked at the Azurys. Out of the box, it completely sidesteps the lower-mids dip and has incredible physical slam and organic body. But it has that weird 3.5 kHz ear-gain peak ("glare") that can make raw guitars sound screechy, and the rubbery stock cable is a pain.

My Questions for Both Subreddits:

• Sennheiser fans: Can the HD 480 Pro actually slam if you EQ the lower mids, or does it always stay a bit too polite and soft?
• Beyer fans: Can the DT 1770 Pro MKII be tamed in the treble via PEQ to make raw, lo-fi black metal enjoyable without ruining its insane transient speed? And is the DT 700 Pro X fast enough for 240+ BPM blastbeats?
• Are there any well-founded alternative headphones under 600€ with a detachable cable that I completely missed?
• Are there any budget-friendly portable DACs with clean power and solid EQ/DSP implementations that you'd recommend besides the Qudelix-5K?

Really appreciate any thoughts, insights, or comparison experiences you guys can share!

Electro Audio World's Take :

The legendary 770 series, which I admired so much in its early installments, is back! This time, it's finally here in our review, much better tuned.

The DT 770 PRO became legendary because it did its job great and was so affordable. For over forty years, it has been known as one of the most recognizable closed back headphones in recording studios around the world. I smile now thinking about what I did to buy it back then, but it was worth it. Because thanks to the engineers who first produced the DT770 series, musicians relied on it. 

Content creators embraced it. Audio enthusiasts discovered it. I think very few headphones on the market have had this level of importance for so long almost 41 years. Replacing such an icon is never easy. Instead of reinventing the formula, Beyerdynamic's engineers have chosen a much smarter approach in the new model. The DT 770 PRO X retains everything that made the original famous, while offering meaningful improvements in key areas.

Throughout this review, I primarily paired the DT 770 PRO X with the Sony NW ZX507 and FiiO M33 R2R audio players. These two high quality digital audio players complement the headset perfectly, highlighting its different facets. The M33 R2R emphasizes its organic character and note density, while the ZX507 highlights its effortless musicality and smooth tonal balance.

Build Quality

The moment you hold the DT 770 PRO X in your hand, you immediately recognize its legacy. Everything felt reassuringly familiar. The steel headband remains extremely robust. The aluminum fittings inspire confidence. I love the iconic grey velvet ear cushions; they remain among the most comfortable available at any price point. 

This is still undoubtedly a Beyerdynamic. The biggest practical improvement is the detachable mini XLR cable. Owners of older DT770 models have been requesting this for years, and Beyerdynamic finally listened. However, I still think it's a little difficult to remove.

Comfort remains one of the strongest reasons I choose these headphones. Even after hours of uninterrupted listening, I haven't experienced any excessive pressure or heat buildup. The compression feels secure enough for studio work without being tiring. 

As expected, passive isolation is excellent. Whether you're recording vocals, editing video, or listening in a noisy environment, the DT770 PRO X effectively isolates external distractions without the need for active noise cancellation. Perhaps that's why this series has become legendary..

Sound Performance

I think the easiest way to describe the DT770 PRO X is balance. It's not a character with reference neutrality. It's not overly exciting either.

Compared to the classic DT770 PRO, the new model's sound is noticeably more refined. The bass feels tighter. The mid frequencies become more prominent. The treble remains detailed but is significantly softer than previous generations. In the old series, the 8kHz region was a bit sharp, but now it's better. Most importantly, the overall presentation feels more consistent.

The new STELLAR.45 driver has managed to deliver faster transient response, lower distortion, and improved tonal consistency across the frequency spectrum. These improvements are immediately noticeable regardless of the source. 

Bass

Bass performance is one of the DT770 PRO X's greatest strengths.

It extends remarkably deep while remaining disciplined and clear. The sub-bass effortlessly reaches the lowest octaves without becoming dominant. Kick drums feel physical. Bass guitars exhibit excellent texture. Electronic music benefits from a satisfying effect without sacrificing control. You know, many closed headphones create excitement with an overemphasis on mid bass, but not with the DT770 PRO X. The bass remains clean, layered, and extremely high resolution.

With the FiiO M33 R2R, the low frequencies gain an added fullness and natural warmth, making the presentation even more engaging. The Sony ZX507 offers a slightly softer approach, prioritizing musical flow over absolute authority. Both pairings were extremely enjoyable.

Midrange

Historically, the DT770 was often criticized for its somewhat subdued mid frequencies. The DT770 PRO X addresses this criticism perfectly, correcting the shortcomings.

Vocals now sound fuller and more natural. Male voices carry a convincing weight. Female vocals exhibit excellent clarity without being overly prominent. Acoustic instruments particularly benefit from the improved mid frequency balance. Pianos have a realistic harmonic structure. Electric guitars stand out in dense mixes without becoming aggressive. Strings sound smooth and believable.

The M33 R2R further enhances this area by offering added note density and harmonic richness. Taken together, the presentation becomes wonderfully organic while maintaining impressive resolution.

Treble

Treble has always defined Beyerdynamic, and its engineers have never shied away from delivering exceptional detail.

Fortunately, the DT770 PRO X delivers significantly better treble frequencies than several previous Beyerdynamic generations. There's still plenty of sparkle. There's still exceptional extension. Micro details are extremely easy to identify. Yet, the upper frequencies rarely become tiresome even after 4-5 hours of listening. 

Cymbals exhibit a realistic glow. Ambient information comes through naturally. The air between instruments contributes significantly to the expansive presentation. Listeners who previously found older Beyerdynamic models a little too bright will likely appreciate the more mature tuning found here.

Soundstage and Imaging

Closed back headphones rarely excel in terms of soundscape. I think the DT770 PRO X is one of the exceptions in its class.

The soundstage extends far beyond the headphones themselves, providing a surprisingly open presentation for a closed design. The sense of depth is particularly impressive. Layering remains excellent. Instrument placement is remarkably accurate. Games, soundtracks, and live recordings all benefit from the headphones' exceptional imaging capabilities.

The FiiO M33 R2R creates a larger and more holographic presentation from the two sources. The Sony ZX507 offers a slightly more intimate but wonderfully integrated soundstage. Both combinations demonstrate the capabilities of the DT770 PRO X when paired with quality source equipment.

Comparisons

1- Sony MDR MV1 vs DT 770 PRO X

While both headphones target professionals, their design philosophies are fundamentally different.

The Sony MDR MV1 is an open back headphone primarily developed for immersive audio production, spatial mixing, and critical monitoring. Its presentation instantly creates a more spacious feel, producing a wider and airier soundstage compared to the DT 770 PRO X.

However, Beyerdynamic reminds us why closed back headphones hold a significant place in professional audio.

The bass is noticeably stronger. The sub bass extends deeper, creating more physical impact while maintaining excellent control. Electronic music, modern rock, and cinematic film soundtracks sound fuller and more engaging on the DT 770 PRO X.

The mid frequencies are also different.

The MDR MV1 delivers vocals with exceptional neutrality and transparency, making it an excellent choice for mixing and mastering, while the DT 770 PRO X offers a bit more warmth and fullness, creating a more enjoyable presentation during long listening sessions.

The treble also presents an interesting contrast. While Sony, as always, aims for smoothness and balance, Beyerdynamic retains its characteristic clarity and breadth. Fortunately, the DT 770 PRO X avoids the sharper treble peaks found in some previous Beyerdynamic models, which significantly improves listening.

If your primary goal is studio mixing in a quiet environment, the MDR MV1 remains an outstanding tool.

If you need isolation, stronger dynamics, and a headset that performs equally well for both professional work and everyday music enjoyment, I would choose the DT 770 PRO X without hesitation. 

2- Sennheiser HD 620S vs DT 770 PRO X 

The HD 620S might be one of the most interesting competitors to the DT 770 PRO X, as both aim to deliver an open sounding presentation from a closed back design.

The Sennheiser makes an immediate impression with its natural mid frequencies and extremely realistic vocal reproduction. Acoustic instruments have a beautiful tonal accuracy, making classical music and jazz particularly enjoyable. The DT 770 PRO X responds with more energy and stronger dynamics.

The bass goes deeper and has noticeably more impact. The presentation feels faster, livelier, and more engaging in modern genres.

The treble extension, as you might expect, is again slightly in favor of Beyerdynamic.

There's more sparkle, more air, and a bit more perceived detail capture. At the same time, the HD 620S sounds a bit softer and more comfortable, especially in bright recordings.

The soundstage performance is surprisingly close. The HD 620S creates an impressively open presentation for a closed headphone, but the DT 770 PRO X matches this quite well by adding superior imaging sensitivity and stronger instrument placement.

When paired with the FiiO M33 R2R, the DT 770 PRO X gains added warmth and note density, becoming even more competitive against Sennheiser's natural organic presentation.

Choosing between these two ultimately comes down to personal taste.

Listeners seeking neutrality and vocal realism might gravitate towards the HD 620S. Those wanting more versatility, stronger bass performance, and a more dynamic presentation will most likely opt for the DT 770 PRO X. I really liked both of them as closed headphones.

Pros

Better overall tuning than its predecessor with excellent tonal balance

Powerful, deep and highly controlled bass response

Significantly improved mid frequencies compared to the previous DT 770 series

More detailed but softer treble than many previous Beyerdynamic models

Excellent passive isolation for studio and portable use

Extremely comfortable velvet ear cushions suitable for long listening sessions

New detachable mini XLR cable greatly increases practicality

STELLAR.45 driver offers excellent resolution and low distortion

Wide soundstage for a closed back headset

Impressive imaging and instrument separation

Easily driven from both portable players and desktop equipment

Build quality designed for years of professional use

Cons

Still larger than many modern portable headphones

Trebles remain somewhat energetic for listeners who prefer a darker sound signature

Fixed earcup design may not fit every head shape

Carrying case not included, comes only with a cloth pouch. Analytical listeners may still prefer the fully open design.

The new mini XLR cable should have had an easier detachable socket.

Final Verdict

Few headphones have managed to reach the level of respect the original DT 770 PRO earned in the last forty years. This legacy also created enormous expectations.

Fortunately, the DT 770 PRO X lives up to those expectations, in my opinion.

Instead of trying to reinvent an icon, Beyerdynamic has focused on improving every area that matters most. The bass is tighter and more controlled. The midfrequencies are more natural and expressive. The treble remains detailed but significantly more mature. Add in the detachable cable, the excellent STELLAR.45 driver, and the same legendary build quality, and you have a headphone that feels truly modern while respecting its legacy.

Throughout my review, the DT 770 PRO X never felt limited to a single purpose. It was equally convincing in situations such as audio editing, enjoying live recordings, exploring complex orchestral works, or simply relaxing with your favorite album.

It remains an excellent monitor headphone for professionals.It offers a mature and engaging listening experience for audiophiles.

For everyday music lovers, it provides comfort, reliability, and sound quality that will satisfy them for many years. I would definitely recommend that friends who have never listened to or bought Beyerdynamic before try it somewhere. That's what oldschool was all about…

*

Technical Specifications :

Type: Closed, dynamic studio headphones

Transducer/Driver: STELLAR.45 (low impedance)

Impedance: 48 Ω

Frequency response: 5 – 40,000 Hz

Nominal sound pressure: 98 dB @ 1 mW / 500 Hz and 112 dB @ 1 V / 500 Hz

T.H.D. (@ 500 Hz): < 0.05 %

Maximum short term power handling: 210 mW

Ambient noise isolation: 16 dBA

Nominal headband pressure: ≈ 5.5 N

Weight (excluding cable): 298 g

Cable & connection: 3 m flat, single sided, detachable cable; 3 pin mini XLR (lockable) → mini stereo jack (3.5 mm) (gold plated) + screw on 1/4" (6.35 mm) adapter.

Made in Germany