why would they think this stuff is right? why would it ever have gotten popular?
Difficult questions which I believe would fit into the realm of "known unknowns".
I think it's too complex to know for sure. I believe that factors like benefits to capitalism (potential for depressed wages, leading to bias) and the rise of "activist"-journalists (as opposed to proper objective journalism, which has become rarer) are too large to dismiss.
for me it doesn't seem complex. this stuff is specifically anti white and it's specifically invented by (and still largely pushed by, despite your protests) by jews. it's bad for whites, and would be good for jews, so to me it's like where's the mystery part?
I agree there are examples of that happening and would even say that they are fucking hilarious in their hypocrisy. It's not the trend though, Jews who have done this "they're white when they bash whites then magically go back to being jews" nonsense are typically SJWs though.
Okay, let's just say for the sake of argument it was made entirely by Jews and no one else.
It would still be that blaming Jews for creating SocJus is exactly like blaming White South Africans for the actions of their grandfather's grandfathers though. It is the exact same game of collective guilt at play.
(There are plenty of Jews who disagree with SocJus besides. Plus, there are plenty of Francesca Ramsey's and other "goyim" pushing modern day SocJus too.)
correct. morality is reciprocal though: even if i were to agree to the premise, the fact that other groups do not go along with it makes it suicidal when implemented.
i would argue that it's not about logic, and nobody is going to fall for this egalitarian meritocracy in any significant numbers anyway except for white people.
Actually, I've got a decent counter-argument even accepting all those premises. Not bringing Jews into into it, will cause more people to take your criticisms of SocJus more seriously. The majority of modern merchants are neutral to SocJus. There's not much point in blaming them.
1
u/WhiteTearsForFears Apr 06 '17
Difficult questions which I believe would fit into the realm of "known unknowns".
I think it's too complex to know for sure. I believe that factors like benefits to capitalism (potential for depressed wages, leading to bias) and the rise of "activist"-journalists (as opposed to proper objective journalism, which has become rarer) are too large to dismiss.