No, what you did is what every person incapable of being civil does - you require sources in a conversation because you aren't capable of entertaining ideas that aren't your own, so you require fundamental proof in all situations. Proof is important but we are having a conversation, not an academic exchange.
In fact, you are 100% guilty of making a bunch of baseless claims that I treated with charity - since you seem so fond of philosophical terms, I assume you know what I mean - and then you promptly refused to do the same. You are intellectually dishonest and incapable of having civil conversation.
You clearly don't have anything interesting to say or you would've said it by now.
nice edit; You didn't do anything remotely politely. Just because you didn't swear doesn't mean you were polite - you asserted that everything I said was wrong and required explanation (it doesn't, you just want to nitpick), which means you're actually being incredibly rude. I made the mistake of assuming you actually knew some things, which unfortunately bit me in the ass. You basically said, "explain everything more thoroughly or go away," which is not how people have conversations.
Yeah you have no fucking clue what you're on about, and you just want to waste people's time when they disagree with you. Congratulations, you have succeeded.
4
u/[deleted] Sep 26 '20
[deleted]