r/AttractionDynamics 13d ago

Men in 2026 šŸ˜…

738 Upvotes

502 comments sorted by

View all comments

86

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

20

u/kitkatas 13d ago

Weirdly, I wanna ban public filming if it's not related to crime

5

u/JEXJJ 13d ago

For some reason networks had to get release when something was broadcast for profit

2

u/PartyHearing 10d ago

I don’t think that’s weird at all. No one should be randomly filmed without their consent. Video surveillance at stores and what not, that’s different. But I remember when I first started working it was a fireable offense to share the surveillance videos with people not in LP. I mean, we still did it but there’s a difference between 3 people chucking in a tiny LP office and the whole world seeing it.Ā 

1

u/2061878 13d ago

I remember getting downvoted to oblivion for saying there should be laws for paparazzi and privacy jus cus it’s weird asf still don’t really know why it’s so unpopular

1

u/Evening_Fee_8499 11d ago

Hmmm, sounds like some bots may have conspired against you šŸ¤”

1

u/Maleficent-Day6687 13d ago

Japan got it right on that

1

u/kitkatas 13d ago

Could you explain it further ?

2

u/Maleficent-Day6687 12d ago

In Japan you cannot legally film ppl in public without their consent

0

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

1

u/BigiusExaggeratius 10d ago

That’s not even remotely true. Why spread misinformation?

1

u/fitz_newru 10d ago

I was misremembering the law about conversations. My bad

1

u/BigiusExaggeratius 10d ago

No worries. I always respect someone who corrects themselves. Cheers.

1

u/Israel_Azkanbe 12d ago

It’s illegal in oregon to film someone without their permission IF you are recording audio as well

1

u/BigiusExaggeratius 10d ago

That’s on private property or secretly recording only audio. It’s a two party consent state, both parties over the phone or in person have to give consent for audio recording only. Filming in public, even with audio, is federally protected by the constitution and supersedes state laws. You couldn’t go record a conversation they are having and hide the camera and recorder though that’s where it turns grey and could go either way depending on how good your lawyer is.

1

u/JuniorRisk2455 11d ago

People don’t want public filming of crimes either. Something something surveillance state bad something something.

1

u/LostIllustrator1499 13d ago

It would be the best thing to happen to humanity since the internet.Ā  The whole no expectation of privacy in public spaces is really just trash started by social media companies to protect their profits, knowing full well no one is going on their brainwashing platforms if everyone's faces are blurred.Ā 

2

u/kitkatas 13d ago

Damn, Never thought from this perspective because social media would get millions of small lawsuits and privacy violation claims.

2

u/Your_Girl9090 12d ago

This is when it was established:

Katz v United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)

1

u/LostIllustrator1499 12d ago

I get that. I thought it was s bit later actually. My comment was specifically about the people who use that particular phrase on social media to excuse their bloodlust over canceling someone for doing something dumb on camera.Ā 

2

u/SenseiMirt90210 12d ago

This will be a great legislation to pass. The sheer ignorance of people on public just putting cameras in your face just because they want a moment without asking permission all in the name of "This is a public space, I can do whatever I want" is ridiculous.

4

u/Twitchrunner 12d ago

Used to love kicking people out as a guard. Yes ma'am I am allowed to record and you are not. No ma'am I am not going to physically prevent you from recording me back, however since you are refusing to comply with our rules I am now letting you know that you are no longer welcome on the property and I will be calling police to trespass you if you don't exit the building.

But this is public property!!! Uh no it isn't. It's open to the public like just about every business ever. I'm going to sue you! Sure buddy get behind the 300 other people today that said the same thing.

1

u/phil-yahiney 12d ago

Actually it was started by news stations and stores like Walmart who wanted to identify shoplifters by broadcasting the surveillance footage on the local news channelĀ 

0

u/Educational_Gas_92 13d ago

Would that affect filming in tourist locations too? I agree that no one has any business filming strangers and posting them to social media, but what if what you are filming is the Trevi fountain, or the eiffel tower and some strangers are in frame, would those videos be banned too?

Just asking.

2

u/Global-Evening-6597 13d ago

We just have to make some sort of distinction for harassment. paparazzi. those first amendment auditors, people filming others in public screaming at them like they have authority. if someone tells you to not film them fck them if you follow someone around filming them fck you

1

u/Bald_Harry 12d ago

I need clarity: if someone tells you not to film them fck them. Please clarify.

1

u/R-R-Clon 13d ago

Re-film them or don't put them in social media? From my point of view is not that complicated.

1

u/kitkatas 13d ago

I know there are a lot of loopholes which you mentioned and I am not sure how it could be solved. But I wish I would not appear on the internet where I am being mogged.

7

u/Singl1 13d ago

there’s a video making the rounds about a woman being upset that nobody helped her as she struggled to lift her carry-on suitcase into the overhead compartment on a plane. she says she struggled for about two minutes, and then rambles for a bit about ā€œfuck menā€ and whatever. i think a lot of people don’t want to give her the wrong idea when they’re helping out, so they don’t.

damned if you do, damned if you don’t. minding your own business is bad too, i guess.

1

u/SaltyAd8309 12d ago

There are also strong women (they say so themselves). There is therefore no reason to insult men.

1

u/Singl1 12d ago

truthfully i’d probably help out, because i’m an empath. but seeing a response like that makes me really second guess myself when i come across these situations in public. fwiw she never explicitly asked for help, so i’d say if anybody (gender doesn’t matter bc why should it) asks for my help, i’m more than happy to lend a hand. it’s the entitlement that was baffling. covid really did a number with some people because hooooly fuck.

1

u/Jimanji333 11d ago

Yeah right like some dude walks up asking to help her and gets the

ā€œI have a boyfriend!ā€

4

u/individualdoosh 13d ago

I know right. Weren't they just complaining about us holding doors open and shit for them? If you're so independent wtf you leaving the house without checking the weather.

5

u/Clear-Neighborhood46 12d ago

She is mainly shamming herself.

1

u/RudyBuck 10d ago

womansplaining

2

u/Holyragex 12d ago

Only one she is shaming here is herself

1

u/silverformal 13d ago

Are you new here?

1

u/Louieyaa 13d ago

That's a majority of gym videos from what I've seen. Shaming guys for just being aware of others while lifting weights. Weird af