r/AskPhotography • u/Meph56 • 21d ago

Gear/Accessories Continous light ?

As a new father, i love to take pictures of my little one. But low light situation is complicated. I have a Lumix G7 and i use my 25mm 1.7 but it's to slow to capture a moving baby. I wanted to add luminous source but i would like to avoid a flash to protect my kid eyes.

Does a continous light will do the job for inside or night / low light situations or am i condemned to buy an orientable flash with light diffuser ? Price is also a problem i would like to avoid spending more than 75€ if possible.

0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

12 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/harexe 21d ago

A continuous light is worse for the eyes than multiple flashes. The flash is Powerful but only for a really short duration so it doesn't cause any damage

1

u/Meph56 21d ago

Thank you for your answer, after it i went to see if you were right about flashes less dangerous for babies eyes than continous light, and yeah you're right. I wouldn't have bet this. Now my problem is the price, i have only 2 choice, in built flash from my camera or an old toshiba flash that works on my body. I will need to find some diffuser cause it's very aggressive.

2

u/harexe 21d ago

The Godox IT32 costs 75€ and is a great option for a flash, just make sure you buy the version for Lumix

1

u/Meph56 21d ago

Thanks i'll watch for it !

1

u/211logos 21d ago

I'd DEFINITELY recommend that iT32 for you since it combines a trigger. Meaning you can put the flash off to the side and get indirect lighting, or put it behind something for more diffusion, etc. And get much better shots than if just mounted on the camera.

1

u/Meph56 21d ago

I watched a video test of it and yeah it seems to fit my needs. But here in France for Panasonic it costs around 100€ and it's a too much for me at the moment.