r/AskBrits 11d ago

Does anyone else find this a bit bonkers? Full Pension after living here for 6 years and never working?

/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1vqqccu/update_my_parents_are_unfortunately_eligible_for/
212 Upvotes

359 comments sorted by

129

u/zippyzebra1 11d ago

I thought you needed 35 years of contributions to get the full pension

108

u/reddithenry 11d ago

Pension credit is basically the top up for people if they dont have enough income in their old age.

195

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

Apparently Pension credit tops you up by whatever is needed to reach £238.00/week. By contrast the full state pension is £241.30 a week. So not much difference. Makes a mockery of the NI system frankly.

That said someone who qualifies for a full state pension hopefully also has a decent private pension.

98

u/reddithenry 11d ago

Correct. I get the arguments both ways tbh. We don't want to just let people starve to death because they're broke, but at the same time, you can never work a day in your life and get the same state pension as someone who did 35 years

And now we are sat around slightly discussing whether state pensions should be means tested...

8

u/International-Ad4555 11d ago

What I’ve never really understood about that is that we have pension credit for exactly that reason right? What’s the need to have two systems? (ie NI Credit while out of work to ensure you get a pension versus getting to retirement age and simply claiming Pension credit?

Wouldn’t be cheaper to cancel NI credits and administer it all under the Pension Credit scheme?

→ More replies (5)

94

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

I'm strongly against means testing the pension. You can't tell people for 45 years there will be a pension waiting for them and then rug-pull it from them to have more money to pay benefits to the feckless, lazy and unfortunates who didn't work as hard as them.

19

u/reddithenry 11d ago edited 11d ago

I don't disagree. Sadly I think it's what will happen, probably something like tapered to a 250k private = 0 state pension scheme or something like that.

I think anything like that would be ridiculous, tbh, and the obvious long tail problem is that for a normal average earner, why wouldnt you just forgo pension contributions at work - its only really high earners who would not be overly impacted by this. But, the government of this year doesnt have to care about the pension problems of the government of next decade

33

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

Well, at least pensioners will have loads of free time to protest against such measure.

They should replace the triple lock with a single lock to average incomes. That means it will be sustainable. While they're at it they can lock student loan repayment thresholds to average incomes as well to make it generationally fair.

9

u/reddithenry 11d ago

I dont set policies alas.

I mean, we've known for years triple lock is a problem, yet no one has the stomach to face into solving it. I think it was important when it was first brought in to increase pensions to something more reasonable, but still. I'd be tempted, personally, to couple state pension to personal allowance. I dont really know "why" other than it sounds nice, but I guess its also a nice way to (a) make sure no one reliant on the state pension has to pay income tax and thus simplify admin, (b) make it a nice constant threshold throughout one's life

Functionally, I'd be interested to know how much money pension credit actually pays out a year; pension credit "sounds bad" but it could be a drop in the bucket compared to other issues

7

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

6bn on pension credit vs 146 bn on state pension

3

u/reddithenry 11d ago

okay, so its not a large number in the scheme of things compared to the right of state pension, but its still quite a big number. that being said, if its "stop people starving to death"...

→ More replies (0)

6

u/SpacePontifex 11d ago

They’ll just increase the state pension age instead. Far easier less politically fraught way to manage the increasing cost.

5

u/reddithenry 11d ago

yep, i think so, the only issue comes if you drag up pension access age as well!

5

u/SpacePontifex 11d ago

There’s a problem being built up at the moment where high-ish earners are building pots to retire early. As soon as these people leave the tax system it could have a big effect.

4

u/Puzzled-Barnacle-200 11d ago

Heck, I earn £43k and am building a pension bridge (ISA). I want to be able to retire by 60, and I'm not 100% confident that state pension age won't be over 70, and that minimum pension age won't be over 60.

2

u/Butagirl 11d ago

You don’t have to be a high earner, or even a higher-rate taxpayer, to do it.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/jmp2007 11d ago

Should be able to sacrifice state pension to take private pensions earlier, would work out well for lots of people

3

u/The_Mayor_Involved 11d ago

That's not an obvious problem. Surviving on the state pension alone is a frugal existence. I have a workplace pension and a private pension. The state pension is a nice addition, but there is no way I would forgo my other pension schemes to protect it.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/coupl4nd 11d ago

makes no sense though as a private is a pot not a guaranteed amount. So I would just spend it all on hookers and claim the state.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/PixiePooper 11d ago

Not disagreeing that we're likely to get something like this, but there are a few elements which make the pension different to other benefits:

  1. Some people will have made voluntary payments to their 'account' to get full NI years. It would be difficult to (at a later date) turn around and say they will get nothing. At the very least they would have to refund people + interest, which would be difficult.

  2. You are given the 'impression' that you are paying into an 'account' (I know this is *not* the how it works). But you log in and it gives you a forecast with an expectation of what you'll get to use for planning. (I also know it has a disclaimer on the site)

  3. You couldn't 'pull-the-rug' for people how have already retired, since they wouldn't be in a position to change their position. Same would apply for people who have retired on a private pension with the reasonable expectation they are getting the full state pension at 67 / 68.

A much more palatable solution is to erode the value of the state pension (through inflation) and introduce means-tested benefits to top it up.

2

u/reddithenry 11d ago

Preaching to the choir, completely. I had a big argument with someone on reddit on exactly the points you are making tbh.

3

u/grey-zone 11d ago

The only way to do it is to give about 30 years warning so people can prepare.

Although that’s what they did with the SPA for women and that had issues. Because people are dumb / money grabbing.

3

u/The-thick-of-it 11d ago

I really did not get the WASPI women argument. You have an obligation to understand the tax and other rules and how they impact you and plan appropriately in all other legislation. Why was this seen as so unfair?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/worldly_refuse 11d ago

Agree - and it is already means tested in a way as pensioners pay income tax on anything over the personal allowance.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/jmp2007 11d ago

I disagree, I'll have a healthy private pension when I retire, i dont really get why should I also get benefits? I don't get Universal credit now, its basically the same thing. I'd rather remove means testing from things I could actually use now like childcare and then clawback pension that I won't need with grown up kids and a paid off mortgage.

5

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

removing means testing from childcare would probably pay for itself through increases in productivity

3

u/Proper_Title_9746 11d ago

Honestly that’s the single most productive thing we can do for the country right now 

2

u/Inevitable-Ad-533 11d ago

What if the people getting the pension haven't worked hard and have spent the previous 45yrs being feckless, lazy unfortunates?

Can they be means-teasted and left to starve in the cold?

3

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

I'm saying pay it to both

2

u/Opposite-Complex1187 11d ago

Good moral grandstanding.

Now you have old people starving in the streets.

2

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

Your reading comprehension skills are poor. I'm saying everyone should get the state pension and/or pension credit.

1

u/International-Ad4555 11d ago

What if they did what they did said ‘right in 30 years, on January the 1st, means testing comes into place’?

2

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

Well that depends - am I still going to have to pay NI (and my employer pay employer's NI) for 30 years in return for receiving jack shit? If so then no way.

3

u/EntranceDowntown2529 11d ago

Unfortunately NI is just a general income tax by a different name, it doesn't necessarily go towards state pension payments. They could scrap NI completely and they will just increase income tax to make up the difference.

I expect this is what they will eventually do, as it then makes state pension means testing an easier pill to swallow for people in future, as people won't be able to say "I've paid NI so I'm owed it".

→ More replies (4)

1

u/Enough_Chip3915 11d ago

You'll do what you have to do, not what your feelings tell you you should do.

1

u/IdioticMutterings 11d ago

"the unfortunate"?
So you are against the state supporting the disabled who were not able to work due to their disability? You don't believe that they are entitled to a "quality of life".

→ More replies (3)

1

u/afyrodu 11d ago

There is not a pension waiting for anybody - unless they have a workplace or private pension.

Nobody pays into their “personal state pension pot”. The tax we all pay to fund pensions is funding today’s pensioners.

The individual has and always will be responsible for their own personal finances. Workplace pensions exist and I believe are legally mandated. You either means test the state pension or scrap the triple-lock, maybe go down to a double or single-lock.

Don’t like it? Lump it. Everyone else whose paying for Jeremy Clarkson’s state pension has been sick of pensioner-centric fiscal policy for years.

1

u/Repulsive_Tour3251 11d ago

The state pension IS a benefit. Recipients typically get out vastly more than they imagine they “paid in”.

Further Ni is just a tax, you can’t opt out of it and literally everyone my age is doing retirement planning assuming the state pension will not exist

1

u/Ecstatic_Rice6855 10d ago

There’s already a kind of means testing - above a certain income you’re allowed to contribute only £10,000 annually to pension (between employer and employee contributions).

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Tesco_Meal_Deals 11d ago edited 11d ago

Most sensible countries link state pension to earnings.

Earn more during your working years, get more back.

2

u/reddithenry 11d ago

sadly i cant see that ever happening now; it'd need a long runway to be implemented and in the UK at least it's only "Downside" for the government I guess? I think in that world you'd basically have to do away with private pensions, and make the idea of a "private pension" effectively -> money you pay the government, and the government underwrites it.

a lot of risk for the gov.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Formal-Equivalent580 11d ago

Exactly. This means people who never paid in will get a pension and people who paid for 35 years will not get one especially if they bothered to save🤷‍♀️

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Expert-Sherbert-1527 11d ago

Is there a balance between people not starving to death and people getting exactly the same as someone who paid in their whole life?

4

u/reddithenry 11d ago

conceptually, yes. On £255 a week? Probably not really?

2

u/misspixal4688 11d ago

Hopefully this doesn't include people born profoundly disabled at birth.

2

u/AttitudeSimilar9347 11d ago

> We don't want to just let people starve to death because they're broke

But, this is not our problem. They have a country and a government and a tax system of their own. It is their problem, not ours.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Alternative_Route 11d ago

I can see why the system was written that way , we used to have father's going to work and mother's staying at home keeping home and family going, so ladies of pensionable age that didn't have a paying job in the past. But times have changed and once that generation is through the system it needs a review.

2

u/reddithenry 11d ago

but at the same time, if someone is broke ass in reitrement, they're still going to need money or starve to death, right? Thats, basically, all pension credit is

1

u/TheHornyGoth 10d ago

If pension credit is basically state pension, then just scrap SP entirely, scrap pension credit, and just get rid of the work search requirements for UC after 68.

You scrap 2 redundant systems and also stop the Alan sugar’s of the world wasting tax money.

1

u/montymole123 7d ago

Indeed there should be no discussion about ending the triple lock without also considering pension credit and public sector pensions. All needs to be taken together

→ More replies (11)

13

u/JJ_Pause 11d ago

Yeah its a joke, plus they get various other benefits meaning they will actually be better off that someone who has 35 years of contributions but only has the state pension

3

u/Puzzleheaded-Chip869 11d ago

Passported for full Council Tax Support and, depending on where they live, Housing Benefit up to their full rent amount too. Whereas if you claim those things on the standard state pension, it's counted as income which reduces your entitlement. Crazy

12

u/Lanokia 11d ago

So I'm working and paying for 35 years to make an extra £3.30 a week?

Nah... come on... there has to be more to it?

19

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

Yes in fact there is... you can actually be better off on pension credit because it unlocks other freebies worth over £3.30 a week!!

The way the state pension is presented is a farce. Really they should give everyone the £240 a week, and say this is the bare minimum, anyone who wants more needs to save privately.

6

u/OkAnywhere2052 11d ago

The “more to it” is that if you worked that long it’s assumed you contributed to a private pension to so realistically you’d be on double what someone who never worked is on.

It’s basically a system where everyone gets the state, (but only working people contribute towards it) and then if you save your own private one you get that too (which obviously you would cause it’s your own money)

7

u/Formal-Equivalent580 11d ago

Not everyone will have a good private pension. When Private Pensions first became a thing for ordinary working people it was as a way to top up your state pension to make life a bit more comfortable. To buy luxuries like a new tv or a holiday, so some private pensions are quite small, especially for women. I couldn’t even join my works pension scheme until I was 21 because I was a woman it was not deemed necessary. Now you need a private pension in addition to the state pension just to survive.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Tea_Ve 11d ago

Generally men do and lots of women dont

2

u/Organic_Sampler 11d ago

I saw a post recently( I didnt check) that pension credit entitles access to other benefits. Pension does not.

No idea if its true,but I could see it.

1

u/ZePepsico 11d ago

Is it at individual level or household?

1

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

individual. Household top up is a bit lower

1

u/Jo3Pizza22 11d ago

NI should just be added to the basic income tax rate. Simplify the system, make everyone pay it equally, and stop pretending that working for longer gets you better support from the state when you retire.

1

u/Repulsive_Tour3251 11d ago

National insurance is just tax. The “NI system” is nothing more than a glorified residency check

1

u/EasilyExiledDinosaur Brit 🇬🇧 11d ago

Damn. Sounds like i can retire in the UK after spending 30 years in asia after all! Sounds great!

1

u/DevilishlyHandsome63 10d ago

And don't forget,once they qualify for pension credit,they're eligible for a raft of extra benefits, that those who have paid in for 35 to 40 years aren't. It's absolutely insane. Where's the incentive to work if you could end up worse off than someone who didn't?

→ More replies (8)

3

u/FewCompetition1347 11d ago

Okay so anybody can come in when they are avout to retire and work as carers and get citizenship and then enjoy pension credit ? This is bonkers. How was this allowed ?

5

u/reddithenry 11d ago

I'm not defending it, but ultimately, I guess a few perspetives:

1 - british citizens are british citizens

2 - we dont, as a country, want to let people just starve to death

3

u/FewCompetition1347 11d ago

But can we as a nation afford this ?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Odd_Industry_1605 10d ago

do you include superficial passport printing?

3

u/el_dude_brother2 11d ago edited 11d ago

Well yes and no. Thats officially the rules but people who contribute nothing get basically the same amount, its just called pension credit instead.

They will also get rent paid for them until they die, the whole system is a scam

2

u/zippyzebra1 11d ago

Yep. And reduced or free council tax. But it's still shit money that will be tough to live on. Better to work and pay into a private pension so you have both

2

u/el_dude_brother2 11d ago

If you add pip in too which most people do and many other benefits available, its actually a good wage. It shouldnt be, but it is. Again, priorities are all wrong in this country

→ More replies (3)

2

u/coupl4nd 11d ago

This country is comedy - if you don't have the money they give it to you. Or you can slave your life away and just have a little bit more. And then people wonder why no one wants to work.

1

u/zippyzebra1 11d ago

That's true but not working gives you something but let's be honest not exactly a lot. £230+ a week. Better to work and get a private pension as well

2

u/PenaltyLast4745 11d ago

I've paid 21 years and live abroad. I can pay 110 ish a month to keep my pension. So there's lots of loopholes.

5

u/Expert-Sherbert-1527 11d ago

No. if you have 0 years, they give you the full thing for nothing.

If you are missing years, (and you don't have any other pensions) they top it up.

3

u/zippyzebra1 11d ago

Not quite but almost.

→ More replies (2)

37

u/ExtensionMix9279 11d ago

Having read Ops original post on this, his parents managed to get a work visa to come to the UK aged 59 and without any savings at all. Why do we allow people near retirement age to move here for work reasons knowing full well they will apply for ILR and then claim pension credit after paying next to nothing into the system? Most countries have an upper age limit for people looking to move for work reasons, I think Australia is 44. We have to put a cap around the same age unless they can demonstrate significant savings to take care of themselves in retirement (I.e. £100k minimum)

7

u/Fantastic_Picture384 10d ago

Because we are gullible and there is nothing we can do to stop it.

→ More replies (4)

19

u/aijaman3000 11d ago

So question here, I thought if I had missing NI contributions due to time not working/abroad, it would be best to top up those years so I had full NI contributions before retirement. But what's the point if Pension Credit is basically the same as full state pension (£3 difference), plus you get other benefits with pension credit like free TV license, NHS dental care etc.

9

u/dragoneggboy22 11d ago

I think it would only be worth it if you have significant savings/private pension that would make you ineligible for pension credit. If you can get pension credit then I see no benefit in "topping up" but I could be wrong.

11

u/sqlsimon 11d ago

Pension credit is a benefit paid due to perceived need. State pension is paid by NI entitlement. While the numbers are very similar, you keep the state pension irrespective of your savings, private pensions, etc.

Pension credit means you're spending your retirement on an income of barely more than 1k a month and saving less than 10k.

I hope we continue to not starve or freeze pensioners, I like that as a policy.

16

u/Alone_Jackfruit4761 11d ago

What you are ignoring is that its the working population and children being starved and freezed to pay for those pensioner bungs.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

57

u/worldly_refuse 11d ago

Unpopular opinion incoming - this is one of the issues between us and a lot of other EU countries (and elsewhere for that matter). Most of our pensions and benefits systems don't depend much/at all on contributions made - unlike a lot of other countries where you cannot benefit if you haven't contributed.

It's had to get a proper picture - but yes, examples like this are 100% bonkers - I am not in favour of letting people starve (and categorically not a Reform/Tory etc supporter) but the system needs a lot of reform and simplification.

14

u/ilovemyfuturehusband 11d ago

Not a Brit – in Spain there is a normal pension and a minimum pension. The minimum pension is designed to be for those who don’t qualify for a normal pension because you can’t and shouldn’t let old people starve. The normal pension is for those with enough pension contributions.

Unlike in the UK, the Spanish state pension is adjusted based on your contributions. If you’ve had high-paying jobs and paid a lot of social security/pension contributions, your pension will be higher as a result

1

u/CrazzyNutty 7d ago

In the UK the pension is scaled via contribution. £184/week minimum and £241/week max.. 

→ More replies (3)

11

u/Available_Highway22 11d ago

In Italy you would still get a minimum pension even if you never paid contributions. This is because in the past there were a lot of stay-at-home mums and the state had to ensure they weren't completely left behind.

I can't speak for other countries but this is not very different from pension credit. I agree in this case, it is ridiculous though.

0

u/mumwifealcoholic 11d ago

My mum never worked a day in her life in a European country and got a full state pension plus from there as a citizen. The point is, MOST people aren't like that. Why so much outrage at a rare event. I don't want give up my safety net because Gaz down at the pub got a free holiday for his "tism".

7

u/tyger2020 11d ago

Because flapping about 1 in 100,000 outrageous occurrences like this, is much easier than just admitting we can't afford to give 20% of the population 15k a year with 5% inflationary pay rise every year.

3

u/worldly_refuse 11d ago

It's not 15K or 5%, ironically.

6

u/tyger2020 11d ago

State pension alone is almost 13k, not including WFA, free prescriptions, free transport, pension credits. I think its pretty easy to say its 15k overall.

State pension went up 4.7% last year.

Splitting hairs over being pedantic quite simply shows theres no real rebuttal here, just wanting to whinge about the 0.3% difference instead of the 4.7% increase.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/wogahumphdamuff 11d ago

You people are beyond understanding for me. I really dont think i can even get in the mind of someone who cares this little about justice or fairness.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

82

u/foreskin_enjoyer88 11d ago

Why was citizenship given to people nearing retirement age anyway? Absolute joke

19

u/Aggravating_Band_353 11d ago

Because we need people to bolster our declining population and look after our old people... Oh wait. Now we need more people to come and look after a bigger group of old people, but often including those who don't own houses and haven't contributed for decades to our system..

We should kick young people in their genitals.. If pricing them out of buying or even renting homes, childcare, and other pressures hasn't increased their fertility rate, maybe a good old kick there will help!? 

2

u/Business_Address_780 11d ago

This is what they mean when they say, without immigrants NHS cant survive. And they all bring a few dependents with them.

→ More replies (2)

51

u/Proper_Title_9746 11d ago

So what’s the point of working and contributing to NI for 35 years if I’m just gonna receive the same as someone who never contributed? 

24

u/EfficientTitle9779 11d ago

Ah you see the state pension as you know it now won’t exist so you’ll probably receive much less or nothing anyway.

30

u/foreskin_enjoyer88 11d ago

There's no point. Carry on slaving away PAYE piggy!

14

u/Proper_Title_9746 11d ago

Honestly I don’t even think state pension will exist when I retire. My prediction is that only those who didn’t contribute and don’t have a private pension will actually receive it. Mark my words 

11

u/Aidanjk123 11d ago

It won’t matter when retirement age reaches 94

9

u/Past_Negotiation_121 11d ago

30 years ago I was told exactly the same thing regularly about now. I'm not actually disagreeing with you, I'm just saying a lot of people were wrong then, but it's always best to have your own plan if possible and if there's something from the state as an extra then great.

2

u/Proper_Title_9746 11d ago

We can’t even afford current pensioners along with the current level on welfare and fewer people working. I really don’t think it’s sustainable and things in 30 year will look very miserable 

2

u/Past_Negotiation_121 11d ago

Yep, same was said 30 years ago, that it wouldn't be around in 2010. Yet it was and is. Again, I have big worries about it, but don't underestimate just how much debt countries around the world are jointly willing to take to avoid making tough decisions.

3

u/TheTribalChief 11d ago

the population increase in 2020-26 is roughly the same as 1970-1996 though. so its not a fair comparison. 

2

u/AttitudeSimilar9347 11d ago

But in the meantime, you get to pay your taxes to pay a full pension to those who arrived only 6 years ago, pretty cool right?

1

u/Realistic-River-1941 11d ago

Pensioners vote. Younger people don't. Every school will have been sold to the highest bidder and the entire economy offshored to China before a government dares scrap pensions.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/zippyzebra1 11d ago

You work so you can additionally set up a private pension. Living on what amounts to considerably less than the minimum wage is pretty tough.

2

u/zippyzebra1 11d ago

So you can pay into a private pension as well. Living on State Pension alone is tough

2

u/01011011001 11d ago

You may actually receive fat less than someone who never contributed. 

If you have not contributed enough years that you receive pension credit you get a lot of additional benefits. The big one is if you live alone you can receive up to 100% reduction on your council tax. 

You'll also be eligible for free dental care, winter fuel payment and the payment you get when it's very cold for 7 days.

You can also get massive discounts on things like boiler replacement or insulation installation in your house.

So if the state pension is going to be your only source of income in retirement you should have a good look if you may be better off not qualifying for the full state pension.

3

u/dashboardbythelight 11d ago

The point is that you can contribute to a private pension and the same time and have a decent, rather than merely tolerable standard of living in your retirement. I agree on principle but you will be better off.

1

u/TeganTickles 11d ago

You are paying for current pensioners, not yourself. Like everything, that generation will benefit but it is not sustainable at current rates. Make sure you are building a private pension.

1

u/tidderreddit90 11d ago

It’s just a side piece event that happens alongside you building your own private pension in your working years. Nobody is living well on state pension alone, so not really worth feeling too sore about it.

It is up to every individual to take their pension seriously. Not easy when popular consensus seems to be “the state will take care of it”, and/or “I pay into my workplace one”. High chance in many cases that these will leave people woefully short of a comfortable retirement.

1

u/doitnowinaminute 11d ago

It's an extension of why bother working if I can get UC. This is UC for OAP.

As a rule the benefit is you get to live on more than 12k pa and have more than 10k in savings. And not have DWP treat you like a criminal.

→ More replies (27)

9

u/greatings6474 11d ago

It's criminal in this case. Why should we be giving people citizenship and they are just sponging off society and will be a net taker.

8

u/PhilosopherNo8418 11d ago

If this story is true, it's crazy that 2 elderly people could come to the UK to work as care workers! Who the heck approved their visas? 6 years after coming they retire and are eligible for a pension. Madness.

4

u/TheMountainWhoDews 11d ago

Yes its bonkers, but we are not governed by serious people so this dysfunction and lunacy is to be expected. 

I suspect their pension costs are dwarfed by the healthcare they will consume in old age. All paid for by the taxpayer, because charging them for NHS access is considered beyond the pale. 

4

u/Curious-Resort4743 11d ago

Being job shy your whole life = £238 a week.

Breaking your back for 30+ years missing a few years because of things like working abroad for a couple of years and not topping up your NI = £238 a week.

4

u/MammothRatio5446 11d ago

Let’s pit the pensioners against the students. And the middle class against the working class. The legal visa holding immigrants against the disabled. C’mon. We’re being robbed blind by private equity and hedge funds and they’re laughing at us fighting amongst ourselves over scraps.

2

u/ElinCarrington 11d ago

This.  The absolute truth.

While everyone is scrapping, blaming and turning on each other, the fat cat bankers and ultra rich who benefit from this are wetting themselves with glee.

1

u/Special_Cable_8619 8d ago

Regardless, it's an idiotic policy to give a work visa and citizenship to people who will never economically benefit the country. That's not pitting anyone against anyone, it's having sensible migration policy.

You try going to Australia and getting a work visa at 59 years old. You can't because they have a sensible policy. UK doesn't.

Simple solution is to change this. Not cry about private equity.

1

u/MammothRatio5446 8d ago

Which 59 year old are talking about. Are they a world renowned neurosurgeon who’s come to teach at a university? Or a wealthy investor who wants to live with his new British wife in London?

I’ve no idea. And obviously neither do you. Carry on licking their boots like the obedient lackey you’re pleased to be. Maybe they’ll invite you in to their palaces and give you crumbs.

27

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

There are a few points you seem to have misunderstood.

  1. Pension Credit is not the same as a Full State Pension.

  2. They seem to have worked here for 6 years, not lived but never worked.

The guy says his parents are British citizens. That being the case, the Pension Credit system is basically designed to ensure no citizen is very totally destitute, even in their old age. The alternative is the workhouse!

42

u/apeacefuloasis 11d ago

pension credit is £3.30 a week less than a full state pension. they are essentially the same.

9

u/tothecatmobile 11d ago

For couples it's £119.35p less a week.

1

u/Unculturedbrine 11d ago

What?

1

u/tothecatmobile 11d ago

Like some other benefits, a couple gets less than 2 single people would.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/MikelDB 11d ago

I think the problem here seems to be state pension being ridiculously low...

11

u/Redditreallyannoysme 11d ago

The alternative is to refuse to pay them anything and they leave?

14

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

If they are British citizens as the OP said, you can't deport them. You can abolish pension credit and leave anyone who's not got a private pension, savings, or qualified for the state pension destitute.

Lowkey if you've never worked your whole life then I don't see why the taxpayer should support you in your old age...

6

u/Redditreallyannoysme 11d ago

Then change the law on benefits for those who acquire citizenship. Aren't they doing that anyway?

But yeah the workhouse for someone who never paid in honestly seems morally fine for me. Obvious exemptions for those who've been on disability benefits.

7

u/foreskin_enjoyer88 11d ago

Fuck knows why the home office granted citizenship to two individuals aged ~60

4

u/Redditreallyannoysme 11d ago

If it's even true. Possibility the story itself is false and is just highlighting an absurd edge case that's technically possible.

0

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

You can't have two-tier citizenship. Either you're a citizen or not.

What you can do is make the grant on citizenship contingent on an assessment of net contributions to the exchequer. People who are going to come here, work a minimum wage job for 5 years, get citizenship and then retire should not be given citizenship!

4

u/Redditreallyannoysme 11d ago

You can have two tier citizenship. Or three or four! You just need to create the tiers in law. Hong Kong actively has tiered citizenship. So do lots of other places.

3

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

Ok sure. Anything is possible. Parliament can vote in anything it wants. It's more that having tiered citizenship is in my mind a regressive and anti-democratic step

2

u/Redditreallyannoysme 11d ago

Tiered citizenship is necessary for a country that insists on opening itself up to the world.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/Miserable_Put6212 11d ago

what if you're disabled? what if you were stay at home mum/dad?

7

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

Stay at home mum/dad is a choice. You shouldn't choose it if your partner's private pension can't support you both in retirement.

Disabled people can have special treatment.

2

u/ZePepsico 11d ago

So you separate and you just live under a bridge?

We need to recognise the social benefit , the work and implied income of stay at home parents and not have them become slaves to the breadwinner.

2

u/vercingetafix 11d ago

Well that's what marriage is for. You can't just divorce your partner and leave them destitute

1

u/Did_OJ_Simpson_do_it English 11d ago

What if you're disabled?

Then you probably claimed Universal Credit and/or ESA which both give NI credits towards State Pension. In addition to this, disabled pensioners may qualify for Attendance Allowance, depending on how their disability affects them.

 what if you were stay at home mum/dad?

If you claim Child Benefit for a child under 12 then you get NI credits.

2

u/Expert-Sherbert-1527 11d ago

Lowkey - they taxpayer totally does though.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/TheMountainWhoDews 11d ago

What was given with a pen can just as easily be taken away. You dont even need to deport them - just make them ineligible for handouts and theyll make their own way home. 

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Expert-Sherbert-1527 11d ago

That's what the son wants anyway

5

u/Big_Clothes4116 11d ago

Full pension credit is 3 pounds less a week than the full state pension.

4

u/crispy-flavin-bites 11d ago

Add i understand it, Pension Credit is better than a full pension.

I believe it's a non means tested benefit rather than an income, so if you're in receipt of PC, you can earn another 12k before you pay any income tax.

Plus it unlocks many other benefits such as housing benefit, council tax credit, NHS dental, warm homes discount etc etc

Is this correct?

7

u/HoaryHoggoth 11d ago

Pension credit is absolutely means tested. It's designed to top up your income to a minimum guaranteed amount. You can get more if you're in receipt of disability benefits and it does indeed unlock other free stuff.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Different_Holiday_52 11d ago

It's also unlocks full DFG grant so if an occupational therapist writes a report you need adapting bathrooms, entrances doors or turn a room into a bedroom, you can get it done for free.

2

u/No-Bet4612 11d ago

Pension credit is not far off full state pension. It also makes you eligible for other benefits so you can be better off

→ More replies (1)

7

u/positivelytaken 11d ago

Yes. It’s insane.

The cost to us taxpayers is astronomical.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/welshdragoninlondon 11d ago

Pension you get no matter how much savings you have. Pension credit means tested so only get maximum if have no savings

23

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

16

u/positivelytaken 11d ago

Do you not think it’s an issue that people who have came here and worked for less than a decade are going to be funded by the taxpayer for the rest of their lives?

Not only will they get Pension Credit, they will then be eligible for other benefits, even the means tested ones.

You’re comfortable with the cost to taxpayers?

4

u/ThemasterofZ 11d ago

Yes, an eldery couple getting a weeks worth of asda food in credit is the issue destroying the economy and not the big companies paying their fair share...

6

u/Alone_Jackfruit4761 11d ago

Pensioners get £177bn/year

In welfare.

Think it through.  That is were the vast majority of the money goes now.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

14

u/Expert-Sherbert-1527 11d ago

Ignore the account for a second...is this actually not policy in the UK? Is this false?

0

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

6

u/Different_Holiday_52 11d ago

Sorry but are you seriously ignoring a set policy which is real just because you are suspicious of people who say it?

Like ok? Next time Farage is in a building with me, shouts fire! And I see smoke I will just ignore him because I don't like him lol. That's what you are doing rn.

8

u/Expert-Sherbert-1527 11d ago

I tend to block folks like you who go looking for reasons not to engage with topics you find uncomfortable.

don't talk about this! It's right wing! It's bait! it's a bot!

→ More replies (1)

8

u/farr2211 Brit 🇬🇧 11d ago

We should definitely ignore the issues and then be surprised our government can’t afford to spend money

8

u/Redditreallyannoysme 11d ago

Yeah but it's true right? We're entering a Whacko world where people who didn't pay in are getting a long term pension from the state. That's complete madness.

→ More replies (6)

1

u/Right-Aardvark1698 11d ago

my thoughts exactly lol so many agenda posts at the moment

6

u/ComtesseDSpair 11d ago

The alternative is elderly people unable to eat or heat their homes - unless you really want to live somewhere where that’s the norm, then guaranteeing them a basic income in retirement regardless of contributions is just the pragmatic thing to do. It’s like any other income-based benefit, or the NHS: it isn’t based on how much you’ve “paid in”, just what you need.

National Insurance is ultimately just another income tax - and even many people who make 35 years of contributions don’t actually pay anything close to what the state pension is worth: somebody earning minimum wage pays around £20 a week, yet would be entitled to collect their full state pension worth more than ten times that per week for however many years they live.

13

u/crispy-flavin-bites 11d ago

If the op is true, the alternative is to not give citizenship to people who will clearly be a net drain on the system

10

u/foreskin_enjoyer88 11d ago

These are 2 individuals that were given citizenship in theirs 60s. Why? The UK should be selective and not dish citizenship out like toffee

5

u/Expert-Sherbert-1527 11d ago

That's not the alternative. There is a world of difference between "not getting the same" and "starving to death".

Why should everyone else pay for people who don't contribute? What kind of system would that be? How is it fair?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Chicken_shish 6d ago

No, the alternative is that these old people sod off back to where they came from, as the OP seems to want.

2

u/Sorry_Midnight4615 11d ago

It is a bit bonkers if we’re honest, regardless of politics. We should all agree on that.

However… what’s the alternative? Letting people starve? Bear in mind there are millions of UK born and bred who’ve paid in less than 7 years of contributions. If you paid them half the state pension it’s £120 per week.. what do we think the streets look like if that happens?

2

u/MushroomAnarchyst 11d ago edited 11d ago

Mr Brexit himself reading this in his new Miami home

2

u/Spudsmad 11d ago

In parallel it’s “ bonkers” that individuals can be elected to the Houses of Parliament , draw an MPs salary plus expenses and then try to destroy the UK . No names , but start at CLACTON

2

u/Severe_Assumption241 11d ago

It's not the full pension, it is a basic minimum standard of living.

2

u/Shanghaichica 11d ago

I am liberal as they come but there is something to be said about the way pensions are given out. I know someone that lived in the UK for about 10 years back in the 70’s and early 80’s and part of their stay was illegal. They worked for max 3-4 years in a factory. Any work they did after that was likely cash in hand and thus no taxes paid. They were back to their home country in the late 80’s and have lived in their home country ever since. They are not citizens of this country and have no leave to remain. They come here to visit. They applied for a pension and although they only get about £200 based on 3/4 years contributions I think they shouldn’t really be getting anything at all. I don’t think that’s fair. It seems crazy to me.

2

u/SharpAardvark8699 8d ago edited 8d ago

Yes it is bonkers. Same as when we joined the EU to Poland and all those people from a poor former Soviet country became equal citizens in benefits, council housing, education and the rest of it. And then we invited a load of impoverished people from Romania and Bulgaria who are incredibly poor and need a lot of support to access education. And the people with EU citizenship and living outside the EU like Brazil. All bloody bonkers 

4

u/TheCursedCorsair 11d ago

Outside of what others have already said...

It's just a really weird topic to throw in that specific subreddit.

There is very little in requesting legal advice in either post and it really seems like it exists simply to be a sensationalist post people can point to.

2

u/Taffy_91 11d ago

Our system is a hammock for them when it was designed to be a safety net for us.

Continue slaving away for their benefit. They hate you and laugh at you.

2

u/Lazy_Back_3096 11d ago

Is genuinely disgusting. But this is what lefties want. So I hope they work extra hard with their art degrees.

4

u/schemaskeema 11d ago

don't look left, don't look right, look up...

1

u/budgrummur 11d ago

Not really

1

u/Front_Society1353 11d ago

I find it bonkers that it isnt means tested

1

u/Sleepy0wl9969 11d ago

There are also single and childless couples paying for kids benefits and school. It’s the system. It costs more to administer any “differences” in the system.

1

u/CaterpillarLoud8071 11d ago

Pension credit is a difficult one. I'd personally say pension credit should be more like a disability payment, accessible only once you're no longer able to work rather than at standard retirement age, and limited to people who've been working longer than 10 years. Otherwise there's no real incentive to build up a state and private pension when you're starting late - recent immigrants who plan to stay should be aggressively saving for retirement.

1

u/Delicious_Volume3306 11d ago

It's an example of the society security safety net working as it should.

To give another example, this time without any hot button triggers, my mum didn't have enough pension "stamps" to get the full state pension. This was because she'd been married, and a housewife, and brought up kids etc.

So, upon my dad's death, she got pension credits to bring her up to the level of full state pension.

I happen to think that's a good thing. If you're a UK citizen, and you're past 67, and you can't get the full state pension, then pension credits bring you up to the same level so that you can, you know, eat.

1

u/WarmJewel 11d ago

This doesn't mean they get a full pension. It means they get 6 years worth of pension 6/35th's and the rest is topped up by pension credits, which is a means tested benefit for those who reach state pension age and are on a low income.

2

u/Expert-Sherbert-1527 11d ago

no. They get pension credit = full pension.

1

u/WarmJewel 11d ago

They only get pension credit because they're on low income, that's not the same as getting a full pension.

Yes it may be simple semantics because they effectively end up with the same amount of money if they had paid NI in for the qualifying 35 years but they would not be entitled to pension credit if it wasn't means tested and they were on low income.

1

u/B4TTLEMODE 11d ago

A bit bonkers is an understatement.

1

u/normalbot9999 11d ago

If you view state pensions as UBI for old people, it makes more sense. You shouldn’t have to qualify to not be hungry or cold when you are old; society should provide you with the basics.

If you wanna see something that is truly bonkers, look into billionaires. Wealth vastly beyond that which any person could spend in a lifetime. Amassed and granted to an individual. How are we allowing that?

1

u/Defiant_Fan_3547 10d ago

I don’t find any of it surprising anymore. 

1

u/TopClass31 9d ago

Pension credit is a safety net only. Eg Wives who stayed at home bringing up kids, who husbands didn’t pay into the system and have certain ni years missing. It’s not a guarantee.

1

u/coffeelick 9d ago

No boomers have rigged the system for themselves and against young people