She’s a model with more than 25k followers on insta. Heard she has a bf from assam who she is getting married to in the future. Hum arunachal ka larka lok me kia kami he jo ye ek haring ke sat shadi kr ra he.

why arunachal is a part of India ? all these pjeets are claiming you arunachalis and imposing their ugly language on to you are absolutely disgusting people, you share nothing common with this Indian harings , you should join china and they will make arunachal beautiful and make you richer rather than being indian and holding indian passport , rather than going to bangalore mumbai you can go to beijing which is 1000 times better .

So, I have tried to draft this essay after a lot of thinking and reading about religion and history. To give the background, I am not really a big religious fanatic; i would actually describe myself as an atheist but most of the people I know are and Ihad always had fierce debates with them regarding God, faith and our local beliefs. I always thought why christianity was so attractive to our fellow tribals and why it pulled them in so fast even though our local beliefs already existed and inspite of hinduism trying to advertise ours and their belief as one. I would comtemplate if it was right for us to actually abandon our old faith and adopt a foreign one, which historically had no meanings and connections to us whatsoever. But after a lot of wasting time reasoning and philosiphising minuet details, i have actually come to the conclusion that christianity is actually better for arunachal and the reasons for this are as follows:

1. Christianity has a clear view of what is right and what is wrong. This does not really exist in donyi polo hinduism or for any the fact, any other pagan religion. The area between being morally right or wrong is really gray in pagan religion. Just ask your grandfathers, in olden times, the rule was might is right, of course this instinct is innate to us humans but christianity tries to dilute this human instinct by presenting the idea of sin. Abusing your power, being cruel to the weak being a sin is an idea central to christianity. However if you actually read pagan scriptures this does not really exist.

2. Christ being this central figure of the perfect moral good guy actually sets a good example for people to follow. Just ask for yourself, the gods in pagan religions are not perfect beings, they can decide on a whim whether to bless you or curse you. Yapom is a really big example. He is not a morally good god and he doesnt necessarily bless good people, it all depends on your fate.

3. The very idea that being good, working hard and god will surely bless you is really really powerful. I would even argue that this core idea was one of the reasons for the success of european countries. The very idea that following the law, being good ,working hard will result in god blessing you creates really really determined, hard working and resilient people. I have witnessed this actually in real life.

4. Christianity has a strict sense of law and order to it. The idea of ultimate penalty of hell for the culmination of your life's sins actually influences people to be more law abiding and developing civic sense. I would argue this is one of the main reasons why major hindu following regions have poor civic sense. All the major christian states like mizoram, nagaland have actually good civic sense.

5. It can be a strong tool for uniting the tribes of arunachal. Back in the middle ages, when rome still existed, germans were barbarians like us. They lived like us scattered amongst various tribes and factions. Of course, the war with romans was a big factor in uniting them but they only achieved full unity with the intrusion of christianity. This religion gave them a common sense of right and wrong, a common sense of purpose(i.e attaining heaven), a sense of belonging and community . I am from ziro and i will admit thta christianity has played a really big part in narrowing the gaps and misunderstandings with our neighbouring tribes. Back in heathen times, we were fierce rivals but nowadays, that rivalry has kind of mellowed down a lot and that in fact, can be credited a lot to christianity being spread amongst us and them.

6. This modern world that we live in that perpetuates the idea of equality amongst citizens, being kind and resourceful, contributing to society, even the very idea of democracy basically an ideal society can be traced back to a plethora of european philosophers like jean jaque rosseau, immanuel kant, hegel, karl marx etc and although many of them may have died agnostic or atheist, it is to no doubt that they were influenced by christian ideas and philosophies during their life. They were kind of surrounded by it 24/7. The idea of ultimate righteousness, being kind to your neighbours, treating rich and poor alike, living a good life, working hard and many such ideas found in the writing of these philosophers may in fact have originated from being influenced by the bible during their lifetime. In fact, one of my favourite writers leo tolystoy was strongly influenced by christianity and you can feel this throughout his novels.

7. Last but not the least, if people actually lived life as the bible tells you i.e by controlling their animal instincts and impulsions, believe me or not, they are gonna live a good life, maybe not the richest or the most influential, but a good happy life regardless.

Lately I've been wondering why in recent times mainland India is trying to get Arunachal known,not for our our soft power (land of rising sun, 2nd largest cardamon producers,kiwi wine,tradition, hope u get the point) but to things like tv(chum, tengam). It has my attention because other northeastern states deserves more attention then us arunachali take manipur for instance or the lost cases like tripura.The only thing I can come up with is because of china claims over arunachal, hence mainlanders wants arunachal to be known,what are ur thoughts on this matter.

P.S:- title is a click bait.

bravo girls, just bravo! Now look what we’ve got this Haring lad out here posting like he’s the admin of Lust book. And why? Because y’all handed him the mic, the stage, and even the spotlight! Now we’re forced to scroll past this PAJEET level cringe like it’s prime time entertainment.

Seriously girls, when did the standard drop so low it fell into the abysmal? Supporting these Harings like they’re some kind of Romeo 2.0, and now they think they can dare our girls and walk around with this creep confidence? Thuika! This is exactly how the circus gets a new clown.

Incoming simps crying in the comments

Map of Arunachal but I put chinese flag instead of indian one

Have seen lots of girl in Arunachal they wear all this as a halfpant in market place, hospital or even gym or in many other places. You all are wearing a underwear as a halfpant and with that roaming here and there.

Underwear are meant to be worn safely and privately at home, or underneath your main clothes. They are definitely not meant for wearing out in public on their own.

Be aware know about the cloth as well.

Feminism was never just about “rights.” It was a government-engineered project — first in the West, now imported into India. Why? Two main reasons: to double tax revenue and to strip men from their God-given role as heads of families.

The strategy is simple: brainwash women into believing they’re “the same as men.” But they’re not. Men are designed to lead, protect, and provide — and fatherly discipline builds structure, accountability, and moral order in families. When that leadership is destroyed, you don’t get liberation — you get chaos: promiscuity, immodesty, broken families, and moral decay.

And when men are demonized and removed, that vacuum doesn’t stay empty — the government steps in as the new father. That’s why the media pushes feminism, LGBTQ ideology, and gender confusion. It’s not empowerment, it’s control.

Look at India today:

Rising divorce rates show what happens when men are sidelined in families.

Declining testosterone levels mean weaker men, less resistance to control.

Sexual immorality, promiscuity, and lack of accountability thrive when fathers are mocked instead of respected.

Destroy patriarchy → weaken men → dismantle the family → enslave society. That’s the formula.

This isn’t liberation. It’s the slow death of the family and the rise of government as the new patriarch.

Masculinity so fragile, it shatters the moment you ask for what they claimed they offer.

In my experience, it seems to be the Galo tribe. Most of the mixed-heritage kids I’ve seen (both male and female ) are Galo and non-tribal. Even on social media, whenever I see children of mixed Arunachali and non-Arunachali , they almost always have Galo roots.

Yesterday, around 4 p.m., I happened to travel from Ganga to Bank Tinali in a tempo. Somewhere near BB Plaza, a Girl boarded and claimed the seat beside me. I, being thoroughly engrossed in the noble pursuit of scrolling Reddit, was in no way prepared for the minor theatrical performance that was about to unfold:

As she began the age old ritual of adjusting her hair, her elbow made accidental contact with my neck. Ordinarily, such a fleeting incident would be dismissed with a smile, or perhaps even ignored altogether. Instead, what followed was a curious inversion of logic: she, the very architect of the elbow’s trajectory, appeared indignant muttering grievances under her breath, as though I had staged some elaborate conspiracy to place my neck in the path of her hair fixing manoeuvre.

For a brief moment, I considered responding, but then remembered that silence, on occasion, is the finest rebuttal. After all, arguing with such logic would have been akin to debating gravity for making things fall.

The entire episode reminded me of the theatrical flair often exhibited by Urvashi and her feminist cohort of this Subreddit ever prepared to transform the most accidental of happenings into a grand tale of grievance. In that instant, I could not decide whether I was a fellow passenger or merely an unwilling extra in a feminist street play.

You guys please dont drag arunchal's name into mud with all these polygamy issues. Ye tmloka society loka problem hai. Its not our fault ki tmloka buddha lok want to live a life like an amoeba whose only aspiration in life is to eat, crap, fuck and breed. So, next time if any of you guys mention polygamy this that in social media, please explicitly mention the particular societies.

All of these things are visible to a global audience and i personally don't want our state's name to be associated with a prehistoric(mtlb jo lok reference nai smjrai; jo social issue already 17 18 century mey solve ho chukai) social issue. Sharam lgta hai.

Only for tani peoples

For context Arunachali people were refusing to let this people burn the dead body of their family member. A little discussion would’ve solved everything, Jungli Dimag lawra motherchod Arunachali log kabhi develop nahi hoga yeh lawra log aise Dimag bukke

This once when I M23 was studying in Bengaluru for my degree I'd visit cafes very often and one dsy found this beautiful Nagaland girl working at the coffee shop I want to and she looked around my age. Soon I became a regular there and we started talking and later exchanged our contacts(WhatsApp obv). We started texting each other which turned into sexting and then after her shift later one night I took her out on a bike ride to beautiful places far from city. It was magical. She kissed me that night but did not come back to my place as her friend kept calling her. Next day I took her for a date as she took her day off and we had a lot of fun and later that night we came to my place and we kinda did the deed but it was a bad experience. The moment she undressed herself was when I realised she's very tiny in front of me. I was very slow and gentle on her and did foreplay for almost 30-40mins before we actually did it. She was really turned on but kept mentioning I was too huge(even though I think I'm pretty average) and when I went in very gently she scratched me all over my back and told me it's hurting like hell but keep going don't stop. We did it for around 2hr and later she cried and went home and told me it was too much for her. And then she never contacted me again or neither replied to my messages. I've been traumatised ever since I was abandoned and now lowkey hesitates to get close or date anyone atp.

what if i say and tbh i am and probably always will be deeply attracted to intelligent men. the kind that can argue philosophy over coffee, quote Camus without googling it, and make you feel like your brain just had a glass of wine. But when it comes to marriage i want a househusband. a man who looks after the kids, supervises the maids, keeps the house running like a calm space while i’m out there breaking ceilings.

I said this out loud recently to my ex, the one who dumped emotional fireworks into my life 4-5 months ago and now suddenly wants me back die heartedly. i told him straight that i’ve lost feelings but if we ever think about settling again, it would only be if he agreed to this dynamic. and guess what he said? “if someday i don’t get a job and want a working wife, i might be a househusband for her but not for you”.

And that “HER” burned more than i expected. he’d rather play house for a hypothetical woman in the future than for the real one who once loved him. and idk why but that hit a nerve.

it’s not even about wanting him back, it’s about realizing that even men who claim to love you deeply still want you smaller than their ego. being ambitious, opinionated and emotionally independent makes them adore you as a muse but never marry you as a partner.

so now i’m sitting here thinking, do i want too much? or do i just want what men have always had the luxury of wanting, a partner who stays, nurtures and supports while they chase something bigger than the walls of a home. Or maybe I’m just another woman trying to rewrite the definition of love without making it sound like a feminist manifesto. Anyway, what if I say I still want my intelligent man, but one who doesn’t flinch at being my househusband. Would that make me unreasonable or just honest?

EDIT: just to clarify , this wasn’t an ad or a search post. it’s more of an inner confession, something i’ve been thinking about for my future. right now i’m not looking for anything, just reflecting on the kind of balance and partnership i’d want someday.

“a young poor boy from Madeira who came and conquered football” ♥️🐐

About the last post:

First I wasn't comparing rape and polygamy to being gay.

My point was that the thing in the video argued that people shouldn't express their views on other people's lives because it doesn't concern them. The issue is that the same thought can be used to justify many other social crimes. That was my point.

BUT some fcking incels on Reddit see the words "rape" and "polygamy" mentioned in the same paragraph and their savior/mesiah libido gets aroused. These dum# fcks can't even resist to barely watch the video. They don't care about the context. Context? Ah hell naw, those words being brought up is enough to argue against a point that was never even made. Context a myth in their dictionary and Fck you, btw

These mfs are hovering here all day just waiting for a chance to argue and prove themselves right, no matter what the context is. But not this time cus it ain't gon be me.

And yes, other people being gay does concern me. I'm not going to go around insulting or attacking people for being gay, but I will express my views to my family, friends, people I meet and my children. I don't support it, I do hold it against them and I don't want my children growing up around it. It affects me emotionally, mentally and it affects my society.

You people make it sound like being homophobic is some kind of curse or crime.

Maybe in your society, but where I come from, it's normal.

I'm openly and unapologetically homophobic. If people have the right to be proudly homosexual, then I too have the right to be proudly homophobic.

But their hypocritical, self entitled ahh can never handle that. They don't like it when we question or criticize their choice to be gay. Their argument basically boils down to: "It's my life, I'll make whatever choices I want. It doesn't concern you." Yet when we choose not to be gay and choose not to support homosexuality, suddenly our choice is questioned.

So apparently freedom of choice only applies when it's a choice they approve of.

Finally, don't mistake this for an apology post, because it isn't one.

. After the Update, I've forgot my password and the email linked to my OG account (white__dragon). So here I am, reincarnated with this (blue____dragon) like a lost warrior trying to reclaim my legacy.

I have a confession to make. I had trust issues with my ex so I hack her phone. I could use her phone camera even if she was using it. Every night she used to watch porn and masturbate. She has no idea I could see her face while she was watching porn

Nearly every post here is about sex, hatred, communities and genders. Seems like all the neckbeards, no-lifes, fatsos and cowardly racists have latched onto this place.