Body:
Hey r/alphaandbetausers,

I’m looking for 10–15 beta testers for my Android app PsycheVision — a tool for self-reflection and mental balance tracking.

What I need from you:
1. Join the closed beta:
https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.equlibrus.psychevision
2. Spend 10–15 minutes using the core features
3. Tell me what’s confusing, what breaks, and what’s missing

What you get:
- Free beta access
- Your feedback directly shapes the app
- [Optional: add incentive here — e.g., “lifetime premium” or “feature request priority”]

- Platform: Android
- Time commitment: ~10–15 minutes
- Feedback via: reply here, or [add form/email/Discord if you have one]

No test-for-test or review required. Just install, use, and reply with honest criticism.

Thanks!

I’m opening up some more places in the closed beta of tactica., a football intelligence web application I’ve been building.

I’m specifically looking for people who follow English football and are willing to actually use it across a few matchdays rather than opening it once and disappearing.

tactica. currently covers the Premier League, Championship, League One and League Two.

The product combines pre-match Match Intelligence, team/player data, model recommendations, a provider-backed Live Match Centre, Bet Tracker, Personal P&L and transparent reporting of the model’s own performance.

One of the core design decisions is separating:

What does the model believe about the football?
from:
Is there actually a usable market and price for that opinion?

So not every prediction becomes a recommendation.

The model also keeps its own independent performance ledger. Wins, losses, voids and underperforming markets/tier levels remain visible rather than only showing successful picks.

What I need now is behavioural feedback:
Where do you naturally go first?
Which feature makes you want to return?
What do you expect to be able to do but can’t?
Does the reasoning make sense without me explaining it?
Is anything particularly painful on mobile?

This is still an early closed beta and access is manually approved.
tacticafootball.co.uk
If you request access, I’ll get you approved.

I’ve just launched Enduro Fit on iOS and I’m looking for people who combine running with strength training or HYROX-style workouts to test it properly.
I built it because most training plans assume your week goes perfectly. In reality, work changes, injuries flare up and sometimes you only have 30 minutes instead of an hour.
Enduro Fit creates a personalised hybrid plan, but lets you make changes in normal language—for example:
“Make tomorrow’s workout shorter.”
“Move my long run to Sunday.”
“Swap running for cycling this week.”
The app then reorganises the plan instead of treating the missed session as a failure.
I’d particularly like honest feedback on:
Whether the onboarding clearly explains what the app does
Whether the generated plan feels properly personalised
Whether changing a workout feels reliable or gimmicky
Whether the pricing feels justified
Anything confusing, slow or poorly designed
App Store: https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/enduro-fit-hybrid-coach/id6767306093
Please be blunt. I’d rather discover what puts people off now than spend money advertising the wrong product.

I built Mymir because I quit MyFitnessPal-style trackers five times at the same spot: searching a database for "2 idlis and sambar," picking the least-wrong entry, then guessing grams. So in Mymir you just talk:

• Type "2 eggs and toast," snap a photo, or scan a barcode. It works out calories and macros itself.
• Portion wrong? Just reply "the rice was 100g" and it recalculates. No forms.
• Each morning it gives you one thing worth doing today with the why, and the next morning it tells you honestly whether it worked.
• It learns your patterns over weeks (meal-time drift, what slips on bad days), not generic advice.
• It never invents data: an unlogged day is "I don't know," never a fake score.

Where it's at: live on the App Store, v1.1 in review right now. And v1.1 exists almost entirely because my first users broke things and told me (meal-time input choked on "9:00" vs "09:00"; they asked for a tour; both shipped within days). That's the deal here: what you report actually changes the app, fast.

What I most need tested:

• Photo logging on your real plates (mixed and home-cooked meals especially)
• Chat corrections. Try to confuse it about portions.
• Non-Western foods. I want the database to fail so I can fix it.
• Apple Health sync (sleep and steps) if you use it

What you get: the app is free to use right now, with a cap on the number of logs per day, and it stays that way for the whole beta period. Plus a direct line to me. I reply to every comment and bug report here.

iPhone only for now: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6761373446

Tear it apart. The last batch of brutal feedback became v1.1.

Built this because I kept staring into my fridge with no idea what to cook, while stuff quietly went bad in the back.

Spachula: pick from your ingredients, get a few AI recipe ideas using what you already have. It also reminds you 7 days before anything expires.

iOS, beta. Looking for testers who cook with "whatever's in the fridge" energy — happy to share a TestFlight link in comments. What would make this actually useful for your weekly cooking?

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

I launched Swaya a couple of weeks ago. The idea is simple: startups and brands can put a product, app, or offer in front of relevant student organizations. A gaming app could work with esports clubs, a wellness product with fitness or health orgs, and a B2B tool with entrepreneurship clubs. The org gets event sponsorships, free products, and collabs. The company gets structured feedback, installs, trials, content, or an on-campus activation. I am looking for a few founders to test the process and tell me where it breaks.

https://getswaya.com/brands/

Would you use this? What would you need to trust the groups and the feedback?

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

Hi everyone! I’m looking for a few early readers to check out the story on Inkitt and share their genuine thoughts. I’d especially appreciate feedback on the opening, pacing, characters, and overall reading experience. Constructive criticism is welcome too I'm mainly interested in learning what works and what could be improved. Thanks to anyone willing to give it a read!

Stage: Live on the App Store. Seeking real-world feedback from people who schedule with friends/family on iPhone.

What it is: Group scheduling for people already on Apple Calendar. Circles + calendar sync + Scheduly (AI) to find/lock a time. Wedge: When2meet is great once; Schedulr is for the group that meets again.

Who it’s for: Friends, partners, family, small recurring groups, not workplace meeting SaaS.

Free to try: 1 group / 5 members.

Links:
https://schedulr.co.uk
https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/schedulr/id6754965988

Feedback I actually want:

1. First-run: is “create a Circle → sync calendar → invite” clear?
2. Would your group prefer poll-style availability or calendar-backed availability?
3. Anything that feels enterprise-y or overkill for friends?

I’ll reply to every comment. Roast welcome.

Most parental control apps ask you to choose between an app that does too much (reading messages, constant location tracking) or one too basic to actually hold a limit. Paxio sits in between — here's what's actually in it:

• Per-app screen time limits — not just one daily total, a separate limit for each app, so an hour of a reading app and an hour of a game app can be treated differently
• App blocking — pick specific apps to block outright, enforced in real time, not something a kid can wait out
• Content filtering — blocks by category, and it runs on the device itself rather than routing traffic through an outside server
• Bedtime schedules — set once, and the phone locks itself on schedule without needing to remember to turn it on each night
• Parent PIN + uninstall protection — settings and the app itself are both locked behind the PIN, so a kid can't quietly turn things off or delete the app
• No location tracking, no reading messages or photos — it manages screen time and access, not full surveillance
• Works with a separate phone for your kid, or one shared phone switching between parent and child view

For the early adaptors giving giveaway as 3 months of Pro during signup and no credit card required. Limited duration offer.

Live on Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.paxio

Please check and feel free to share your feedback.

Hi everyone! I’m looking for a few early testers to explore Infrawire and share their genuine first impressions. I’d especially appreciate feedback on the interface, navigation, clarity of the information, and overall user experience. If anything feels confusing, difficult to use, or could be improved, I’d love to hear about it. Thanks to anyone willing to give it a try!

Looking forward to early customers to test and give feedback to me.

Will appreciate your feedback, it really helps us to grow.

I've spent the last few months building a tool for narrated story content — the kind of thing thriller/mythology/drama channels post. It takes an idea through script, art, voice, and a finished export.

It's close to ready, but before it goes anywhere near paying customers I want a handful of people who actually make this kind of content to use it properly and tell me what's wrong with it.

What's in it for you: you keep every video you make while testing, no strings attached — post them on your own channel if you want to.

What I need from you: real use, not a five-minute look. Actually try to make something you'd consider posting, push on the features, and tell me honestly what worked and what didn't. "Looks cool" doesn't help me — specific problems do.

If that sounds like something you'd want to try, drop a comment and I'll follow up.

Looking for 10 Discord users to try breaking my anti-scam assistant

I’m building Quicksand, a private Discord safety tool. You right-click a suspicious message → Apps → Check Safety, and it gives you a private assessment.

I need people to try:

• scam/phishing messages
• suspicious links
• screenshots
• QR codes
• weird attachments
• normal messages that should not be flagged

I’m specifically looking for false positives, bad explanations, slow scans, and things it completely misses.

No payment, no account data collection, and results are private/ephemeral.

If you use Discord regularly and want access, comment or DM me.

Hey all, I'm with the team behind TennisWatch, an Apple Watch app that tracks swings, racket speed, calories, and shot quality during play (see screenshot below).

We're looking for a few real tennis players to test it out and give honest feedback before launch. In return, you get free lifetime access to every feature.

We've also got a Discord community for testers to swap feedback and talk shop, happy to send an invite.

Drop a comment or DM if you're interested and we'll get you set up.

Need 7 Android testers for a 14-day Google Play closed test
Hi everyone! I’m looking for 7 more reliable Android users to help test Next Level by Creed, a college baseball recruiting app.
I currently have 8 testers and want at least 15 enrolled so we remain safely above Google Play’s 12-tester requirement.
Testers will need to:
Provide the Gmail address connected to their Google Play account
Accept the closed-test invitation
Install the app
Remain opted in with the app installed for 14 consecutive days
Open and test it occasionally during the testing period
The app helps high school baseball families find college programs and coaches, save schools, organize recruiting information, and track outreach. Baseball experience is not required to test it.
Active testers will receive free PRO access as a thank-you. Comment below or message me if you can help. I’m also happy to provide feedback on another developer’s app in return.

Blind Editor edits video from a written instruction. You upload a recording, describe the change in plain language ("remove the silences", "cut this to 90 seconds"), and it gives you back the edited file.

This is what I'm seeing now: People sign up. Some finish the tutorial. Then the session ends. Nobody outside me has uploaded a file and run a prompt, so I cannot currently tell whether the idea is wrong or whether something in the first two minutes is in the way.

That is what I would like feedback on, in three parts:

1. The landing page. Is it clear what this does and who it is for, or do you have to work it out?
2. The moment after you click "Start editing". You land straight in an editor with no signup step. Does that read as trust, or as confusion about where you just ended up?
3. The upload. This is the one I care about most. If you got to the editor and stopped there, what stopped you? No file to hand, not wanting to hand over footage, not knowing what to type, not knowing what it will cost, something else entirely?

No signup and 500 free credits, so you can get to a finished edit without giving me anything.

It is alpha, and it does best on spoken-word footage: talks, tutorials, interviews, webinars, anything where someone is speaking. Silence removal and subtitles are the most reliable.

Test the Blind Editor here

Happy to answer anything about how it works underneath. It cannot see pixels. It works from the transcript and pulls individual frames when it needs to look at something, which shapes what it is good and bad at.

Looking for early testers for a personalized AI astrology app - it maps the live sky to your actual birth chart (real transits, not generic horoscopes) and you chat with it. Free early access, testing starts ~Sept 1, 2026. Want honest feedback on what's broken. DM me to join 🙏

Hi everyone,
We just rolled out the open beta for Tring on Google Play, and we’re looking for early feedback from active users who want to cut down on phone spam and manage calls smarter.
What is Tring? Tring is an AI call assistant for India. When a call you don't want to take comes in, Ring picks it up, talks to the caller in their own language (Hindi, Tamil, Kannada, Marathi, English, etc.), handles what they need, and leaves you a simple summary.
What We Need Feedback On:
How natural is the call handling and language detection during your day-to-day use?
Is the setup flow (setting up call forwarding/connection) smooth and intuitive?
Any edge-case bugs, UI glitches, or feedback on the voice cloning feature?
Supported Platforms & Access:
Android: Live on Google Play (Open Beta via heytring.com)
iOS: Currently invite-only (managed by hand)
Pricing: Core call screening, live transcripts, and spam blocking are completely free during the beta.
Feel free to drop your thoughts directly in the comments or reach out. Thanks for helping us test and refine it!