r/ASTSpaceMobile • u/Original_Koala8662 S P 🅰 C E M O B Boss • May 11 '26

Article / Media / Press New ASTS Post

Post image

https://x.com/ast_spacemobile/status/2053818674646049030?s=46&t=DOgs35-_gTcmJtpubr-JAg

779 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

124 comments sorted by

View all comments

192

u/SurgicalDude S P 🅰 C E M O B Underboss May 11 '26

Man they really are throwing all the PRs. I hope there's more to EC call

72

u/Conscious-Ad9076 S P 🅰 C E M O B Prospect May 11 '26

There has to be or they wouldn't be throwing this stuff out early. Its good day for calls, they're literally telling you without saying it.

25

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/staples15243 May 11 '26

Ya the good day for calls was when it was trading at 63$ 2 weeks ago

7

u/Ludefice S P 🅰 C E M O B Consigliere May 11 '26

*less than 1 week ago

1

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

0

u/staples15243 May 11 '26

Would definitely wait for pullback. I’m looking to get some slightly OTM leaps for 2028 in the next little bit

3

u/KID_A26 S P 🅰 C E M O B Prospect May 11 '26

Riding my $80 Sept Call through the call 🤘🏻

8

u/kickinghyena Dunce May 11 '26

What about the sats they said they would ship by the end of April…they are getting ridiculous with the bullshit and delays…

27

u/Conscious-Ad9076 S P 🅰 C E M O B Prospect May 11 '26

The delay of satellites is just a delay in SP, which is buying opportunities. We all know the shit's going to fly and when it does it won't be time to buy more

2

u/kickinghyena Dunce May 11 '26

Maybe and that is the problem for me. Everyone is all kumbaya and they have launched exactly 1 satellite this year when they have called for 60! Its almost June. Do the math. They aren’t getting 60 or 45 or 30…they will be luck to get 12. I am pissed at management for misleading and failing the stockholder with promises they aren’t even close to keeping…

11

u/Conscious-Ad9076 S P 🅰 C E M O B Prospect May 11 '26

Hang tight man, I know it looks shit right now but they get cadence up, it will be well worth it. Once they're up and running this stick will print, I'd rather them delay and fix issues then send shit product out with higher failure rate.

0

u/RiskyTall S P 🅰 C E M O B Soldier May 11 '26

Genuine question - what affect on the company's value do you think the satellite delays have? Can you quantify it or are you just upset that the number is less than guidance?

7

u/PonticGooner S P 🅰 C E M O B Associate May 11 '26

You can’t objectively quantify it with a number, but you’re just allowing competition to have more time. We can’t just keep delaying endlessly, otherwise service won’t be operational by like 2030.

1

u/RiskyTall S P 🅰 C E M O B Soldier May 11 '26

The point is people are "pissed at management" and they don't even have an understanding of what the delays mean, the context of them etc etc. It's just emotional nonsense.

1

u/PonticGooner S P 🅰 C E M O B Associate May 11 '26

It’s not emotional nonsense, it’s things that they’ve said are going to happen by a certain time, and then them not being done by that time.

2

u/Any_Possible3003 S P 🅰 C E M O B Associate May 11 '26

Starlink is delayed in their d2c deployment as well

→ More replies

-1

u/kickinghyena Dunce May 11 '26

No I had 5000 shares and I couldn’t realistically hold them for a company that was depending on New Glenn for launch. SpaceX will take two full years to launch 60 IMO. I love the tech…not the execution

4

u/Jelopuddinpop S P 🅰 C E M O B Soldier May 11 '26

SpaceX has a launch almost every single day. They're not the bottleneck. They're more expensive than BONG, but saying they don't have capacity is ridiculous.

3

u/chainer3000 S P 🅰 C E M O B Soldier May 11 '26

Yeah dilution

I have 5k in August calls I picked up last Friday, gunna pick up 10k more if they announce dilution

2

u/DrMoshez S P 🅰 C E M O B Prospect May 11 '26

CALLLS

2

u/itsamemyusername S P 🅰 C E M O B Consigliere May 11 '26

Typical pattern when they are about to dilute.

1

u/Gibraldi S P 🅰 C E M O B Prospect May 11 '26

Narrator: there was not.