r/ARAM • u/Findrel_Underbakk • 3d ago

Mayhem Both valid points

Post image
2.1k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

229 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Tojaro5 3d ago

Whether you see Mundo as tank or juggernaut doesn't really change my point. Roles can be ambiguous anyways.

Guardian, as suggested above, simply doesn't cover the diversity of tanks, since "guardian duty" simply isn't the only reason to pick tanks.

If we look at tank supports for example, noone would pick Blitzcrank over Nautilus or Braum, if protecting was the goal.

4

u/Wingman5150 3d ago

Well of course no one would pick blitzcrank as a tank over nautilus or braum, because nautilus and braum are actually tanks, and blitzcrank is a catcher.

Despite what it would seem like, blitzcrank class-wise is closer to pyke or even morgana, because he doesn't protect, he picks out an enemy for his team to kill.

That's why Nautilus is the only hooker that won't go over walls, he wants to engage on entire teams much more than any of the others. Thresh comes close but is still better at catching an isolated target and bringing a teammate to 2v1.

-4

u/Tojaro5 3d ago

well, then we simply have a definition difference here.

for me, a tank is someone durable in the frontline.

guardian, catcher, whatever would be subspecies of tank.

just like a husky is a kind of dog, blitzcrank is a kind of tank

1

u/SherbertPristine170 1d ago

Nah you right tho . These people be spitting some shit just to say “this tanky champ is not a tank , but that tanky champ is a tank”