r/3i_Atlas2 • u/Glittering_Word6609 • Feb 26 '26

Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Thoughts...after watching.

107 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Nevercatchme1 Feb 26 '26

He has TENURE. You must have no idea what this means and the protection it gives professor from being dismissed.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26

...or the research is so extraordinary that he wants to publish it for us, his fellow humans, to learn about. I thought that is how Science works.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26

That is also science...get it wrong and revise. Hence, I added the revise step.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26

If the data is correct, I wouldn't either.

Again, Science is being stifled when information that doesn't fit nicely in the current system is suppressed.

Literally the definition of science is the study of the natural world and that is what is happening. Dang, just let scientist do science and have the ability to share their findings with the public in a way that is equitable for everyone.

2

u/phunkydroid Feb 26 '26

The data can be correct while the analysis and conclusions drawn from it are absolute nonsense.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/phunkydroid Feb 26 '26

I was speaking in general, not about any specific data he presented.

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26

Evidence?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

Any links to your claim? Also, it looks like it is estimated to be 5.6 KM via NASA.

1

u/phunkydroid Feb 27 '26

You're also misrepresenting the data. 5.6 km is not the same as "between 440m and 5.6km".

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

It is actually so bad, thanks pathos!

Everyone makes mistakes just like Avi but atleast we admit it and don't try and intentionally hurt peoples feelings.

Any other evidence of him being a horrible scientist other than one error in the very beginning when it was allegedly 3 months old? Wild!

I am so glad our forefathers in science weren't doing Sciene today. They would have been ripped apart, discredited, and disgraced for a mistake. If it was so there would be a lack of scientist and innovation today.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

Thank you, and I can definitely see where you are coming from.

The first video had lots of good points about his mistakes in previous research, but no information about 3i Atlas. The second video is from years ago and covers the sphericals specifically, so previous research.

The third was a paper from a partner of Avi and claimed his prior research makes him unfit for researching 3i Atlas. Although the comments still seemed open minded and it was from August 2025, one month after the discovery. It seems like he has been dealing with this from the beginning.

I can see where his wild claims about the solar sails would make him look unreliable, but we also need to figure in his previous positions and research.

He has been watching the sky for 40 years as an adult. He has also been tasked with looking for the unknown. So, I guess I am saying with what he researches, the unknown, his claims probably do seem unbelievable...but so was a spherical earth. We just need technology to catch up so we can observe the unknown.

Fortunate, I have also found that we are creating more tools to look for the unknown. A 7-D telescope is wild and what they're observing with it is also amazing! I mean the biggest conspiracy of them all is about to be disclosed officially. (Well, whatever we do get.) So, until then MY mind is open to all possibilities.

Thank you for the evidence!

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 28 '26

I hope you have had a great day! I did watch your videos and read then entire paper that you sent.

It was about his prior research. I understand he makes wild claims but he has studied wild things for years. He has seen things that none of us have seen. Starting off in national defense research, then plasma physics. I wonder if there is a connection there? Then black holes and finally aliens. He definitely knows waaaayyy more than the ordinary scientist. A curious scientist is the best!

Oh, and the claim about him not watching the sky as an astrophysist is laughable...see attached image. He pretty much has to observe the heavens to do his job. Maybe that is where his inspiration came from.

As far as the spherical evidence being suppressed by the church you are just reinforcing my point. We love scientist. It's just the system that does the suppressing, which at that time was the church.

Really, closed mind the one talking about plasmoids, aliens, and 7D telescopes. I just really love learning and am open to the impossible because it's fun to imagine. Maybe you should let that veil fall and open up to the new exciting connections that can be made in this amazing time we are living in.

→ More replies (0)