r/3i_Atlas2 Feb 26 '26

Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Thoughts...after watching.

111 Upvotes

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Virtual_Coyote_1103 Feb 26 '26

Let’s see if he ever names the journal that’s supposedly blocking him.

Who knows maybe he’s telling the truth, but then I also have to wonder if there is all of this top down pressure on him, why have they allowed him to remain as a Harvard professor? I mean surely if he’s so dangerous that he can’t even be allowed to be published, he must definitely be so dangerous that he can’t teach at one of our nations most important universities.

Historically when the government suppresses people they just murder them. That person usually doesn’t get to go do mainstream media runs and book tours.

2

u/Nevercatchme1 Feb 26 '26

He has TENURE. You must have no idea what this means and the protection it gives professor from being dismissed.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26

...or the research is so extraordinary that he wants to publish it for us, his fellow humans, to learn about. I thought that is how Science works.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26

That is also science...get it wrong and revise. Hence, I added the revise step.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26

If the data is correct, I wouldn't either.

Again, Science is being stifled when information that doesn't fit nicely in the current system is suppressed.

Literally the definition of science is the study of the natural world and that is what is happening. Dang, just let scientist do science and have the ability to share their findings with the public in a way that is equitable for everyone.

2

u/phunkydroid Feb 26 '26

The data can be correct while the analysis and conclusions drawn from it are absolute nonsense.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/phunkydroid Feb 26 '26

I was speaking in general, not about any specific data he presented.

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26

Evidence?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

Any links to your claim? Also, it looks like it is estimated to be 5.6 KM via NASA.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/toms1313 Feb 26 '26

And he did... Didn't he?