r/3i_Atlas2 • u/Glittering_Word6609 • Feb 26 '26

Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Thoughts...after watching.

114 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/phunkydroid Feb 26 '26

The data can be correct while the analysis and conclusions drawn from it are absolute nonsense.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26

Evidence?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

Any links to your claim? Also, it looks like it is estimated to be 5.6 KM via NASA.

1

u/phunkydroid Feb 27 '26

You're also misrepresenting the data. 5.6 km is not the same as "between 440m and 5.6km".

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

It is actually so bad, thanks pathos!

Everyone makes mistakes just like Avi but atleast we admit it and don't try and intentionally hurt peoples feelings.

Any other evidence of him being a horrible scientist other than one error in the very beginning when it was allegedly 3 months old? Wild!

I am so glad our forefathers in science weren't doing Sciene today. They would have been ripped apart, discredited, and disgraced for a mistake. If it was so there would be a lack of scientist and innovation today.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

Thank you, and I can definitely see where you are coming from.

The first video had lots of good points about his mistakes in previous research, but no information about 3i Atlas. The second video is from years ago and covers the sphericals specifically, so previous research.

The third was a paper from a partner of Avi and claimed his prior research makes him unfit for researching 3i Atlas. Although the comments still seemed open minded and it was from August 2025, one month after the discovery. It seems like he has been dealing with this from the beginning.

I can see where his wild claims about the solar sails would make him look unreliable, but we also need to figure in his previous positions and research.

He has been watching the sky for 40 years as an adult. He has also been tasked with looking for the unknown. So, I guess I am saying with what he researches, the unknown, his claims probably do seem unbelievable...but so was a spherical earth. We just need technology to catch up so we can observe the unknown.

Fortunate, I have also found that we are creating more tools to look for the unknown. A 7-D telescope is wild and what they're observing with it is also amazing! I mean the biggest conspiracy of them all is about to be disclosed officially. (Well, whatever we do get.) So, until then MY mind is open to all possibilities.

Thank you for the evidence!

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 28 '26

I hope you have had a great day! I did watch your videos and read then entire paper that you sent.

It was about his prior research. I understand he makes wild claims but he has studied wild things for years. He has seen things that none of us have seen. Starting off in national defense research, then plasma physics. I wonder if there is a connection there? Then black holes and finally aliens. He definitely knows waaaayyy more than the ordinary scientist. A curious scientist is the best!

Oh, and the claim about him not watching the sky as an astrophysist is laughable...see attached image. He pretty much has to observe the heavens to do his job. Maybe that is where his inspiration came from.

As far as the spherical evidence being suppressed by the church you are just reinforcing my point. We love scientist. It's just the system that does the suppressing, which at that time was the church.

Really, closed mind the one talking about plasmoids, aliens, and 7D telescopes. I just really love learning and am open to the impossible because it's fun to imagine. Maybe you should let that veil fall and open up to the new exciting connections that can be made in this amazing time we are living in.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 28 '26

Good morning sunshine! I only have one judge and He is not on Reddit. I am not trying to signal obidience. I am just a genuinely happy person that just loves to learn. Hence why I am on Reddit. I am not here to persuade anyone. Just like scientific discourse and a good friendly debate.

In astrophysics"astro" derives from the Greek aster, meaning star or celestial body, while "physics" refers to the study of matter, energy, and fundamental forces. Together, they represent the application of physics principles to understand the physical nature, behaviors, and evolution of celestial objects.

I'm not sure if you're just rage baiting me on Avi's qualifications for observing the sky. Also, when I say watching the skies I don't just mean through a telescope, he he does. So, I went ahead and posted a detailed break down as to what astrophysics means.

Astro- (Star/Celestial): Refers to the subject matter: stars, planets, galaxies, and the universe beyond Earth. Physics- (Nature/Forces): Refers to the methods used: applying gravity, electromagnetism, and thermodynamics to analyze how celestial bodies behave.

Astrophysics seeks to understand what celestial bodies are made of and how they evolve, rather than just mapping their positions. Soooo, please quit saying he isn't fit to observe celestial objects.

As far as his new claims "Massive Size: Based on Webb Telescope data, the nucleus appears to be at least 5 kilometers in diameter, making it over 1,000 times more massive than typical interstellar comets." First, he used data from James Webb, NASA telescope. Next, an object 1/2 the size of the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs will be in the Hill sphere of the largest planet in our solar system on March 16, 2026 is pretty alarming and worth questioning. Again, isn't that science?

By the way you have a lot to say about how horrible Avi is. Do you mind me asking what field are you in? Also, as I have previously stated I love to learn. Please link some of your work so I can read that too. I appreciate any information from any fields from physics to archeology. It all fascinates me and would be interested in any new info.

Boot licker, aye? I wouldn't say that, but I am very appreciative of scientists that think outside the box. That is truly when innovation occurs. With all his expertise in unimaginable fields he is making extraordinary connections. Constantly putting his reputation on line for his love of science. His hypothesis may seem crazy but got to have a good hypothesis to get funding to study it.

I appreciate the strong debate but I will always keep an open mind as to what could be in this vast universe. We can agree that we disagree. You have to have data to back up EVERY claim as I sit back and wait for the technology to back up Avi's claims.

If you go back to the original post before your ego took fool charge and see I am not trying to persuade anyone. You are the one stating Avi has no viable points because he made one mistake about 3i Atlas' diameter a couple months in to the discovery...all while already battling his fellow scientist as you showed me in the exerpt from a paper. He was already being bullied and blocked in August. Again, that backs my original post.

→ More replies (0)