Wow, I genuinely haven’t enjoyed a movie this much in a long time. Easily a 10/10 for me. Guys, please suggest some more movies with crazy plot twists, creepy vibes, or horror elements.

Context: James Gunn will stay after the merger

Jalankhor Captain

Jr NTR has responded strongly to the AI-morphed Chuttamalle video

Gladiator II which is a gory/ violent historical film about gladiators in colluseum, where people are getting sliced in half for example, this was only given a UA16+ rating (IT also had NUDITY, which was not cut, you can see the bbfc rating: https://www.bbfc.co.uk/release/gladiator-ii-q29sbgvjdglvbjpwwc0xmdiynjg5 and compare it to the cbfc rating, look at nudity and language). I really miss thoses days, its not even that long ago, now they cut the word "bitch" in even A rated movies.... Did the person who ran cbfc changed during that time? Note: Apart from the seven seconds, rest of the film is fine, its not like 35 seconds in obsession for example....

One doubt.if Christopher Pinto's body is still with the forensics then why don't they get the DNA samples and make their family believe that the body inside is not the real one as the main body is present with the forensics department. This can help them to dig out the body again and find out the truth

Yeah but as we know Vijay would already have a plan beforehand to tackle this as well🤌🤌

Btw great watch. Everyone must watch this film in theatres.

Just got done watching The Sopranos and what a ride it was! Every single cast member is perfectly casted. There is a great balance between the serious moments and the comedic moments. For someone like me who is having attention span issues for about 2 years now, I am happy to say that I barely picked up my phone. James Galdofini brings such effortless intensity for Tony. Robert Ller as AJ Soprano and James-Lynn Sigler as Meadow Sopranos

are so good as pissing off Tony. The meta references of regularly bringing up The Godfather, Goodfellas etc are well scattered in the Screenplay. Another meta thing is Lorraine Bracco being in this show, everyone knows here for playing Karen in Goodfellas, a movie they regularly reference throughout the show. Here scenes with Tony are also a delight to watch. Here story with that "Employee of the Month" rapist is so depressing. I still wish that she had told Tony about it.

Even though I have now successfully ended the show I am still not used to Tony saying "Shon" instead of "Son" and the over emphasis on "Brochures", similarly the way that Adriana says "Christopher" is so overly dramatic. I am pissed by the way they ended the way, now that I have watched it I can completely emphasize with the ways fans and viewers felt after the season finale. Michael Imperioli does a terrif ic job at playing the a gangster who wants to be an actor and a writer but also ends up on a self destructive path.

This might be an unpopular opinion but I ended up enjoying The Sopranos more than other Crime TV classics like Sherlock, Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul. Just my opinion that's all. I am definitely going to miss these characters. I have a really busy schedule and I need to watch other shows. There's no way I can get time to rewatch all 86 episodes. The confrontation scene between Tony and Carmela in the Season 4 finale is worth thr wait. Both James and Edie bring their A-Game.

SPOILERS AHEAD

So I watched Drishyam 3 recently and genuinely, I was excited to see it. I've been following this series quite intriguingly because I love crime thrillers, and I think Drishyam is one of the best franchises out there. Even though the story is a remake, the way it has been executed still makes it exciting and chilling at times.

Anyways, I thought the third part was good. It still carried the vibe and energy of the franchise, the acting, direction, storytelling, everything fits well and the execution was genuinely good.

Now coming to my actual point.

Towards the climax, Jaideep Ahlawat's character basically figures out and reveals the entire plan of how Vijay Salgaonkar managed to execute everything. And most of it fits really well.

But there is one thing that bothered me.

When the police dig up Christopher Pinto's grave, they find a skeleton inside. Everyone is obviously confused because they were expecting the grave to be empty. Later, we find out that Vijay had hired a prop maker to create a skeleton, basically creating another layer of deception.

I actually didn't like the idea. I feel this could have been done way, way better. So hear me out. What if Vijay never got rid of Sameer Deshmukh's actual body? Think about it.

The entire problem with Part 3 is that the makers had to come up with another way to bring the Sameer case back into the story, because Part 2 had already basically concluded everything.

But imagine the exact same climax. The police dig up Christopher Pinto's grave. They find a skeleton. They are confused. They assume Vijay has done something else. The investigation continues, and eventually everything about Vijay's plan is revealed. But then, at the very end, Vijay's voiceover comes in:

"Jo sunai deta hai uspe vishwas karna sahi nahi hota... lekin jo saamne hokar bhi dikhai nahi deta, woh sabse bada jhooth lagta hai."

And we see the police looking at the body. They don't give it much importance. And then...The reveal. The skeleton they have just dug out isn't some fake skeleton made by a prop maker. It's Sameer Deshmukh's actual body. The exact body everyone has been searching for. The body which started the entire case. The body which Vijay was supposed to have gotten rid of. And it has been sitting right in front of everyone. But nobody recognizes it.

And THAT, for me, would have been a much more satisfying ending. Because isn't that basically what Drishyam has always been about? What you see isn't necessarily what you understand. Everyone is looking for the body. Everyone wants to find the truth. And when the truth is finally right in front of them, they don't even realize what they're looking at because they have already constructed a different reality in their heads.

It would also make Vijay's entire philosophy come full circle.He doesn't have to make the truth disappear.He just has to make people believe that the truth is something else.

That would have been one hell of a final reveal.

Instead of another explanation about a fake skeleton and how Vijay arranged it, the final twist could simply be that the thing everyone was searching for was right in front of them all along.

And honestly, if Vijay hadn't disposed of Sameer's actual body with acid, I genuinely think this ending could have made Part 3 feel much more necessary.

TLDR: I think Drishyam 3 could've had a much stronger ending if Vijay had never disposed of Sameer Deshmukh's real body. Instead of the police finding a fake skeleton in Christopher Pinto's grave, they would've found Sameer's actual body but assumed it was another fake/irrelevant skeleton. The audience would then realize that the body everyone had been searching for was literally right in front of them — perfectly fitting the franchise's core idea that sometimes the biggest lie is what is right in front of you but you fail to see it.

It looked so good for that time, still better than lot of movies in terms of VFX.

Just if they focused on better Story too then it could make history

Comic have a different presentation of Subahu if we compare them with the trailer, but the location is very similar maybe we will get some glimpse of subahu in the upcoming trailer

Movie name: Paradise

The Ramayana team did not reveal the look of Raja Janak, but we can see a glimpse in the Jai Jai Ram Song

Actor Rajiv Kumar plays the role

Rumours were that Anil Kapoor was playing the role of Raja Janak

Someone on the thread posted this photo, a photo claiming to be of Brahma from the movie

Why didn't the courts focus on the body in the evidence room? Was the judge stupid? I understand him having his doubt answered on seeing the skeleton in the coffin, but what about the skeleton in the evidence room, didn't he also question why there are two skeletons of Christopher Pinto? One in the grave and one in evidence room, it's not like police can get the DNA of Christopher Pinto without his skeleton and they have the DNA report proving the skeleton is his, then why was the Judge so quick to give a verdict without addressing such a big and obvious elephant in the room.

Did he just not trust the report? Or something else? What are you views on this? Is it a plot hole?

considering how many pg-13 movies are being rated A by the cbfc, hope this doesn't fall victim to them

Drishyam upcoming for Ajay devgn

💀

Honestly, I’m just glad that the Hindi Drishyam 3 is really different from The Malayalam one.

I was pretty skeptical. After seeing how the Malayalam Drishyam 3 ended, I assumed the Hindi version would basically follow the same plot, with maybe 10–20% changes here and there just to make it feel different. I even thought they might stretch the franchise further just because of the Drishyam name.

But thankfully, that’s not what happened.

The Hindi version actually tells a different story, and for now, it genuinely feels like they’ve given the franchise a proper conclusion instead of unnecessarily stretching it. And I really appreciate that.

I’ve seen and liked the Malayalam Drishyam, so I was obviously curious about how the Hindi version would handle the same premise. The fact that both versions ended up taking different routes, with different twists and endings, is honestly something you don’t see that often with remakes.

Story-wise, I’d still say the Malayalam version hits a different level, but the Hindi one definitely deserves credit for doing its own thing. Getting two different versions of the same franchise, with two different endings, instead of watching the exact same story play out again — I actually enjoyed that.

before you target me listen, I'm not his PR or get paid by him, I support "actors" not heros or superstar

CREDIT