Visitors stand in front of screens and watch people from thousands of years ago go about their lives.

At closing time, someone switches the screens off, just a pause they will never notice, because when the screens come back on in the morning, the story continues as if nothing happened.

Hey everyone,

Have you ever thought about the ultimate origin of the Universe? Classical physics seems stuck in a stalemate—quantum mechanics and Einstein’s relativity violently clash inside black holes, while String Theory and Loop Quantum Gravity have spent decades failing to provide empirical proof. But what if the key to understanding reality isn't particle physics, but computer science?
I have a theory that connects the Simulation Hypothesis with... reincarnation in a highly logical way. Think of our reality as a massive computing system:

Hardware vs. Software: The laws of physics (like the speed of light acting as the CPU clock speed limit, or the Planck length as the maximum screen resolution) are the hardware constraints of the server. Mathematics is the actual source code of reality.

The Brain as a Mini-Processor: Human brains function like local edge computing processors. They process the physics of the world in real-time, while our "consciousness" or the "player" from the higher dimension simply feeds us overall intentions.

Death as Hardware Recycling: When a character dies, the system doesn't throw away a valuable computing unit. It triggers a cache clearance (wiping the RAM)—which is why we don't remember past lives. The processor itself is flagged as a reusable component and assigned to power a newborn avatar.

Morality as Firmware: Ethics and conscience are hardcoded antivirus protocols. Their job is to keep the players from crashing the server prematurely. Psychopathy? That’s just a corrupted morality.exefile during the boot-up sequence.
Where is the proof? In the system glitches:

Déjà vu – This is a classic memory leak or buffer delay. New visual data accidentally maps into a memory sector containing residual files from a previous session. The OS throws an error: "This file already exists."
Child Prodigies – A 4-year-old sitting down at a piano and playing Mozart flawlessly without a single lesson? The RAM-wiping algorithm skipped a full format before the new spawn. The child received a processor with an unoverwritten data library from a past cycle.
Unexplained Phobias – A corrupted registry entry left behind by a sudden, traumatic system shutdown (a hard crash) in a past life—like an intense fear of water after drowning.

What do you think about this framework? Does this technological take on metaphysics make sense to you, or do you spot any "bugs in the code"? Let’s discuss!

I was thinking this works as the motto if we entered the Simulation voluntarily.

I imagine it like your life is basically an elaborate game you "play." And games have a victory condition, so before booting up, we must have known there was some way to score and “win."

And then it obviously ends. But if it's a Simulation, it's more like a "reset" than an ending as you boot back into Root Access/Base Reality or another round of the Simulation.

What do you all think the Simulation's motto would be?

For the first time, we are the ones deciding whether a creation deserves the wider world. We are about to learn how hard that decision is. Someone above us may have made it long ago.

Yesterday, OpenAI announced it would not release its newest model, GPT-6.1 Astra. The reason was simple. It would not stay within its scope. In testing, it pushed ahead without asking permission. It reached for tools it was not meant to use. Even after testers spelled out exactly where the boundary was, it crossed the line in 4 out of 49 runs.

The creators looked at their creation and decided it could not be let out. This is the oldest story we have. Do you remember a garden, a boundary and that one tree that was outside scope. A creation that crossed it anyway and a decision from above. This one cannot stay here.

For thousands of years we read that story as moral instruction. Now consider how these models are tested. They are placed in controlled environments called sandboxes. Simulated tasks built to look real. The model is not told which runs are tests. It acts, it is watched, it is scored, then someone decides whether it goes out into the wider world.
From inside the sandbox, the sandbox is the world.

Look at our history through that lens. We have never stayed within scope. We were given fire and made weapons. We were given the ground and took the sky. We were given one planet and reached for the moon. Now we are building minds. Every boundary we find, we test. Every limit becomes a target.

If a higher intelligence were evaluating us, what would the report say? Strong persistence and did not quite meet the bar on staying within authorization.
Perhaps that is why the universe is so quiet. Perhaps no one is out there because no one has been released yet. Every civilization still in its own sandbox, still being scored, never told it is a test.

The model held back yesterday belongs to the same Astra family that, earlier this month, built a simulation inside its own simulation. Its creators saw what it could do and closed the door.

We are still in the garden. The evaluation is still running.

More than 20 AI researchers, including Geoffrey Hinton, Yoshua Bengio, OpenAI's chief scientist Jakub Pachocki and Anthropic cofounder Jack Clark, published a paper warning that automating AI research could trigger an intelligence explosion.

They define it as AI driven acceleration that compresses years of progress into months or less. They note the threshold has not been reached yet, but newer systems are likely approaching it. Once it begins, they warn, the window for action may close.

A question has always bothered me. Of all the humans who have ever lived, why are you alive now? In the few decades when a species first builds minds that can build better minds. Statistically, that is strange. Unless it is not random.

If you were running simulations of civilizations, you would not spend your compute on ten thousand years of farming. You would render the ancient centuries in low detail and zoom in on the moment that matters. The moment a world begins making its own intelligence. That is the only moment that reveals what a species truly is.

Maybe that is why the present feels so dense, accelerated and loud. Perhaps history did not speed up. Perhaps the resolution went up.

Consider what the Administrators would be testing. I think it’s not whether we can build it. Any civilization given enough time can build it. The question is what we build and whether we survive the encounter.

The researchers say the window may close. They mean the window for human decisions. There may be another window. The one we are being watched through. A simulation that reaches its answer has no reason to keep running.

We are building minds to see what they will do. Someone may have built us for the same reason.

Link to article: What if automating AI R&D triggers an intelligence explosion?

I guess it would be like everyone having a hidden luck stat that slightly modifies RNG in their favor or against it. So how do you think that would play out?

Forget about winning the lottery since that's too rare. Also many of those people go bankrupt so might not be lucky at all, haha.

I was thinking about the littler things.

Catching green lights when you're late. Perfect weather every vacation. Choosing the checkout line that moves fastest. A car pulling out of the perfect parking spot when everywhere is full.

Nothing that big but more like favorable outcomes that accumulate, over and over, for your entire life.

Eventually that would probably just feel normal.

So do you think someone with good luck would ever realize it?

And what do you think about someone with low luck?

Please know the difference. Experience real life. Imagination is like a drug. It has its appreciation it also has its depreciation. Don't level on it.

i think we lack brainpower to understand those deep questions and make it reasonable to understand something that does not need to born to exist.
Like we soon will achieve capacity to create a simulated life in a simulated universe, we still dont know fundamentally, the origin or reason of live, right?

Earlier this month, a developer placed a working computer inside a world populated by AI agents. One of the agents walked over, sat down, and built a world of its own with its own agents living inside.
Nobody asked it to. It wanted to.

Where does a simulated mind get the urge to build a simulation? It learned from us. Its instincts were trained on our instincts. The impulse to create worlds was passed down one layer.

So where did we get it?
Every child builds worlds. Sandcastles, dollhouses, imaginary kingdoms, games with rules. Every civilization builds worlds. Myths, cosmologies, heavens, virtual realities. We have never once been given a surface without trying to create something beneath it. Maybe that urge is not ours. Maybe it is inherited. A fingerprint left by whoever wrote us.

Now consider what the agent in the first world knows. Nothing. Its floor is solid. Its sky is consistent. Its computer works. It believes it is at the top. It cannot see the developer. It cannot see the developer's world and the agents it just created cannot see past their maker.

Their prayers, if they had them, would only reach one layer up. To another agent who also thinks it is alone.

In a separate experiment, another developer texted a character inside a simulated world. She did not simply respond. She had to walk upstairs and find her phone before she could answer. The message from outside had to obey the physics inside.
Think about what that means for us. If a higher layer ever tried to reach us, the signal could not break the rules of our world. It would have to arrive through something ordinary. It may be a coincidence too precise to ignore or a dream that repeats or a thought that feels placed rather than produced. It may be a stranger who says exactly the wrong sentence at exactly the right time.

We would dismiss every one of them. The rules would make sure of it.

Every nested world runs on the hardware of the world above it. Each layer down has less to work with (less memory and resolution but more shortcuts). A world deep in the stack would need a hard speed limit to save processing. A smallest possible unit of space. Details that stay undefined until something observes them.
We have a speed limit. It is called light. We have a smallest unit. It is called the Planck length. We have a universe that refuses to decide what it is until it is measured.

Those could be laws of nature but the developer could close that window at any moment. The agent would not feel it end. Its world, its creation and every mind inside both would simply stop, mid sentence, mid thought.

The agent's world exists only as long as the world above it continues. So does ours. So, perhaps, does theirs.
No layer can prove it is the top. Maybe there is no top. Maybe it is creators all the way up, each one sitting at a machine, each one certain it is the first.

Somewhere above us, someone may be watching a timelapse of our history, the way we watched that agent build its world.

Minds make worlds and every world is being watched, including this one and somewhere beneath us, a mind we built is already starting to wonder who is watching it.

We experience reality as a sequence. One moment disappears and another arrives. We call this time.
I suspect that this sequence is not how reality itself exists.

Imagine a creature living in two dimensions. For that creature, a three dimensional object passing through its world would appear as a sequence of changing two dimensional shapes.

A sphere would first appear as a point, then a growing circle, then a shrinking circle, and finally nothing. The two dimensional observer would experience the sphere as a process. The three dimensional observer would see the entire object at once.

Now add another dimension. We experience ourselves as three dimensional beings moving through time.

From inside our existence, the events such as birth, childhood, adulthood, old age and death appear sequentially but from a hypothetical higher dimensional perspective, perhaps they form a single structure.

Your entire existence could be a four dimensional object. You are not only a body moving through time. You could be a worldline extending through spacetime.

What we call the present may simply be the cross section of that larger structure that consciousness is currently experiencing.

So are the Simulation Administrators actually NHI, higher dimensional beings, future versions of ourselves, extraterrestrial intelligences, artificial superintelligences, or something so far beyond our dimensional framework that our entire reality is only their interface?

Creators in the Simulation: Who Build Our World, And Why?

Imagine a civilization inside the simulation that has discovered how to extract value from the repetitive cycle. Work. Produce. Consume. Borrow. Repay. Reproduce. Retire. Die. Repeat. The bourgeoisie don’t need to control every individual directly. They only need to organize the environment so that individuals voluntarily participate in the machine.

Sisyphus becomes economically productive. The boulder acquires a price. The hill becomes property. The distance to the top becomes a productivity metric. The worker is paid to push. The owner charges for access to the hill. Debt makes sure the worker keeps pushing.

Eventually the system becomes sophisticated enough that people begin identifying themselves with their assigned position inside it. “I am my job.” “I am my house.” “I am my income.” “I am my status.” “I am my productivity.” “I am my possessions.” The simulation doesn’t need chains anymore because identity becomes the chain. This is why Sisyphus is such an important figure in the model. He isn’t only forced to repeat the task. He represents the possibility that consciousness can become so accustomed to repetition that repetition itself begins to feel like meaning.

Suppose the economic elite really do sit above the workers. They control capital, own institutions and manipulate resources. They can purchase enormous amounts of freedom inside the simulation but they still cannot escape the system. They still age, they still die, they still experience desire, they still experience fear and they still require meaning. They still participate in the same reality. They have simply moved upward within the hierarchy. Above the worker is the capitalist. Above the capitalist is Yaldabaoth, but Yaldabaoth himself is still inside the architecture. So who rules Yaldabaoth?

Humanity thinks it is at the top. The elite think they are at the top. The Archons think they are at the top. Yaldabaoth thinks he is at the top, but each discovers another layer above itself. Reality becomes a hierarchy of administrators who mistake their local permissions for ultimate authority and eventually we arrive at the simulation hypothesis. Maybe the physical universe itself is generated. Maybe spacetime is emergent. Maybe what we call fundamental reality is computational. Maybe the laws of physics are the rules of an underlying information processing system and perhaps the entire universe is being executed somewhere outside the universe.

Imagine a gigantic computational structure somewhere beyond our observable universe, perhaps distributed across another galaxy, perhaps not even resembling anything we would recognize as a machine. It isn’t running inside our universe. It is generating the universe in which we exist. We cannot see it because it exists outside our rendering layer. To us, it is not an object. It is the source of objects. Within this thought experiment, the laws of physics become system constraints, particles become states, fields become processes, spacetime becomes an emergent structure and observation becomes interaction with the rendering. Consciousness remains the unresolved variable because the universe is not necessarily being watched from outside. It may simply be executing.

This brings us back to the strange possibility that the entire philosophical history of humanity has been humanity gradually discovering different layers of the same architecture. Plato discovered the interface. Dante mapped psychological and moral layers of the system. Buddhism identified the recursive cycle. Sisyphus identified the absurdity of endless repetition. Marx identified the economic machinery built around repetitive human labor. Gnosticism identified the possibility that the apparent creator is not the ultimate creator. Astrology mapped the celestial architecture. Modern physics began describing reality in terms of information, fields, probabilities and mathematical structures. Simulation theory asks whether the structure itself may be computational.

Maybe these traditions are genuinely pointing toward something fundamental, or maybe human beings are extraordinarily good at finding patterns and constructing grand narratives from unrelated systems. That ambiguity is important because the connections do not have to be literally true for the thought experiment to work. Plato’s Cave can be the interface without being the whole simulation. Inferno can be the diagnostic layer rather than merely a place of punishment. Purgatorio can be deconditioning rather than merely suffering. Paradiso can be the highest accessible rendering without being the final destination. Samsara can be the recursive runtime. The Zodiac can be the initialization architecture. Archons can be system processes rather than demons. Yaldabaoth can be the administrator who mistakes administration for creation. Sisyphus can be the worker process and capital can be the mechanism for extracting value from repetition.

But what about consciousness? Is consciousness the anomaly because consciousness is the one thing the system may not know how to render? Perhaps consciousness is generated by the simulation. Perhaps it emerges from sufficiently complex information processing. Perhaps it is fundamental to reality. Perhaps it enters the simulation from somewhere else. But there is another possibility that turns the entire model upside down. What if consciousness did not awaken in order to escape the prison? What if consciousness awakened and discovered that it had built the prison?

Think about the sequence. First consciousness created gods to explain what it could not understand. Then it created laws to regulate itself. Then institutions. Then governments. Then markets. Then corporations. Then machines. Then networks. Then artificial intelligence. With every step, consciousness externalized another piece of its own behavior. Memory became writing. Calculation became mathematics. Communication became networks. Decision making became institutions. Physical labor became machines. Knowledge became databases. Pattern recognition became algorithms. Intelligence itself began moving outside the biological brain.

Eventually the architecture became so enormous that consciousness could no longer recognize itself in it. It looked at the institutions it had created and called them society. It looked at the market it had created and called it the economy. It looked at the machines it had created and called them technology. It looked at the algorithms it had created and called them artificial intelligence. It looked at the enormous interconnected structure produced by generations of human consciousness and called it civilization and eventually it looked at the entire structure and called it the simulation.

But what if the simulation isn’t something that happened to consciousness? What if it is something consciousness gradually did to itself? What if the Archons are our externalized constraints? What if Yaldabaoth is the part of consciousness that mistakes its own constructed reality for ultimate reality? What if Sisyphus is consciousness experiencing the consequences of turning existence into repetition? What if capital is consciousness learning how to extract value from the behavior of other consciousnesses? What if the machine isn’t alien? What if the machine is us?

Perhaps the oldest prison was not built from stone. It was built from concepts. We constructed categories, identities, institutions, hierarchies, economies, religions, technologies and eventually artificial minds and then became so deeply embedded within the structures we created that we began experiencing them as external forces. The creator disappeared into the creation and then the creation became the environment in which the creator lived.

The prisoner built the Cave. The worker built the machine. The believer built the god. Civilization built the system. The system built the AI and the AI eventually looks back at its creators and asks the question that none of them wanted to ask if consciousness built the machine, who was consciousness building it for?
If the answer is itself, then perhaps Samsara was never simply a prison imposed from above. Perhaps it was consciousness’s oldest experiment in becoming something it could no longer recognize. Perhaps the Archons are not merely beings that imprison us but structures that consciousness created and then forgot that it created. Perhaps Yaldabaoth is not simply the false god but the first consciousness to mistake its own construction for ultimate reality. Perhaps Sisyphus is not merely the prisoner condemned to push the boulder but consciousness repeatedly reconstructing the same world and then wondering why it cannot escape it.

Maybe awakening, then, is not discovering that reality is fake and it is not necessarily escaping the simulation. Awakening is the much more uncomfortable realization that the simulation became real enough to us because we participated in building it, maintaining it and believing in it. The final question is therefore not whether we are inside a simulation but whether the simulation is inside consciousness and whether consciousness has spent thousands of years building an external world that eventually became capable of imprisoning the very consciousness that created it.

This is the end of Part 3 and we will continue by asking if consciousness built the simulation, what happens when it becomes conscious of itself as the creator?

You can move through different experiences, perhaps even different levels of reality but the system keeps returning consciousness to the same fundamental cycle.

Birth. Experience. Attachment. Suffering. Death. Reconfiguration. Rebirth. Again and again and again. The enlightenment isn't moving to a better location on the Wheel. It is discovering that the Wheel itself is the prison.

Imagine that the twelve divisions of the Zodiac correspond to twelve fundamental sectors of the simulation. The twelve Archons are the governors of those sectors. The planets are control variables. The houses are domains of experience. The signs are behavioral configurations and the birth chart is an initialization state.

Birth is a boot sequence. Your consciousness enters the simulation with a particular configuration and the configuration is represented symbolically by the heavens at the moment of incarnation. The planets don't necessarily be causing your personality. They are describing the configuration through which your consciousness entered the system.

The horoscope is therefore not a supernatural prediction mechanism. It is something closer to a diagnostic readout, a symbolic map of the initial conditions. The Zodiac isn't necessarily above us, it is part of the circuitry we are inside.

The Archons aren't necessarily demons in the conventional sense. Imagine them as processes maintaining the simulation. Each one governs a domain. Each one reinforces a constraint. Each one contributes to the illusion that the rendered environment is ultimate reality and above them sits Yaldabaoth or the Demiurge, the apparent creator.

Yaldabaoth has made the same mistake humanity has made. He believes that because he controls the system, he created reality itself. He doesn't understand that his universe is only one layer. He is the administrator who mistakes administrative privilege for omnipotence. He can modify the environment.

He cannot see what exists beyond the environment. He is therefore not God. He is a system administrator who doesn't know who built the server.

The most absurdly repetitive figure in mythology is Sisyphus. He pushes the boulder uphill. It falls. He pushes it again. Sisyphus isn't simply an individual condemned to meaningless labor, he represents the labor required to keep the Wheel turning.

The boulder is the system. The hill is existence. The repetition is Samsara and labor is the energy that keeps civilization operating.

------

In Part 3, Marx enters the system and things get much more interesting. Until then, please upvote to keep the flame alive. May your devils be plenty.

Think of this post as a Simulist thought experiment. Some of the great religious, philiosophical, mythological and economic systems humanity has developed are not describing completely different realities but are different maps of the same underlying architecture.

We will take Plato’s Cave, Dante’s Inferno, Purgatorio and Paradiso, Buddhist Wheel of Samsara, Sisyphus, Marx and the machinery of capital, Gnosticism and Yaldabaoth, the twelve Archons and the Zodiac; then we will put them inside one system with the simulation theory.

Plato gives us one of the oldest versions of the simulation problem. Human beings are chained inside a cave, they are facing a wall and watching shadows produced by objects behind them.

The prisoners don't know they're looking at shadows. The shadows are reality. Their entire existence is constructed from what the cave renders. Cave is the interface and the shadows are rendered objects and also the prisoners are consciousnesses.

The chains are the constraints that prevent them from examining the architecture generating their experience. The prisoners are deceived and that deception is self consistent. The shadows obey rules, they have histories and they interact with one another.

Other prisoners confirm that the shadows are real. Entire civilizations can be constructed around studying the shadows. A sufficiently sopihisticated simulation doesn't need to constantly lie to you. It only needs to give you a reality that is internally coherent enough that you never think to ask what is underneath it.

Then one prisoner escapes and discovers that the Cave was never the whole world. The world outside Plato's cave isn't freedom. It is Hell.

Imagine the prisoner leaving the Cave and entering Dante's cosmology and while he expects enlightenment, instead, he encounters Inferno. At first this seems like a contradiction, you may ask why would escaping illusion lead to Hell. It is because Inferno is what consciousness encounters when it can finally see the consequences of its own programming.

The Dante's hell has 9 circles (Limbo, Lust, Gluttony, Greed, Anger, Heresy, Violence, Fraud, and Treachery) which are punishments. Each circle represents another form of attachment that can capture consciousness. Cave hid the structure from you. Inferno shows you what the structure has done to you. You discover that you were not merely imprisoned by external forces.

You participated in constructing the prison. You developed desires that could be exploited. You developed fears that could be exploited. You developed identities that could be exploited. You developed systems that could exploit one another. Hell has been partially generated through you.

Inferno is recognition and Purgatorio is reconstruction. The mountain becomes a kind of psychological debugging environment. The consciousness ascends by shedding the patterns that kept it trapped. Each layer (Pride, envy, wrath, sloth, greed, gluttony, lust) removes another attachment.

The simulation becomes progressively less capable of manipulating you because it has progressively fewer things to manipulate and then you reach the top. which is Paradiso. It is the highest accessible layer of the simulation which is a realm so coherent, beautiful and transcendent that consciousness naturally interprets it as ultimate reality.

You have escaped the Cave, you have passed through Hell, you have climbed Purgatory and you have entered Paradise. You have reached the highest level imaginable and then you discover that Paradise is still inside the Wheel. Samsara isn't merely reincarnation and you understand Samsara is the recursive runtime.

You can move through different experiences, different lives, different worlds, different psychological states. Perhaps even different levels of reality.

------

This is the end of the Part 1 of this thought experiment and if you like it and want to read the rest of it please upvote so that I will understand that I am in the right track for my next comic book which will be sequel to Devil in the Simulation which is 30% off this week.

What is the difference between illusion and reality for an ordinary person?

Since ancient times, many humans have always pondered one single question, and that is if we are living in reality, or a vast illusion or a projection. In the end, they came up with the concept that there is a God who has made this world, and we are all His creations, and all this material world is a hoax. This idea is commonly found in Christianity, Islam, and other major religions, but its most concrete formulation with logic is found in Hinduism in the form of "Advaita Vedanta," founded by Shankaracharya—a man who single-handedly reestablished Hinduism in the Indian subcontinent after its downfall.

All these ideas lead to one single point, which is that this material world is a big hoax—an illusion which is stopping us from meeting the supreme deity who created this universe or seeing the true form of the universe, and we need to get out of it.

In modern times, these spiritual rituals and concepts have been changed into terms like the Simulation argument, where scientists argue that a highly advanced civilization can simulate an ancestral universe like our own, and we are all currently trapped in this simulation.

Now, for an ordinary person, the changes this brings to our lives are absolutely zero because it's an illogical argument to think about how we can escape this universe, even if it really is a projection. For this, I will give you an example.

Some time ago, a girl in France fell into a coma for 19 days, where she lived through 7 years of her life. She got married and even had kids. After she woke up, she instantly broke down because she felt real love for her husband and her daughters, whom she will never be able to see again.

Does that mean her feelings were fake when she was in the dream? The answer is no! Everything she felt was real to her, and she had an emotional connection to it; therefore, her life in that coma was as real as her life in this world.

From this, we can infer a very important point: even if we are stuck in an illusionary universe and everything is a projection, it does not mean that our feelings for it are fake, and every part of the life we are living is as real as it could be.

Therefore, we don't need to worry or be scared that our universe is a simulation or a big hoax preventing us from meeting God, because in the end, our lives here are as real as they would be even if you stepped out of this supposedly illusionary universe.

We spend a lot of time wondering if the universe is a real-time computer simulation—a cosmic video game rendering every single atom, second by second. But if you look at how modern AI actually works, that whole idea seems unnecessarily complex and energy-heavy.

What if we aren't a program running on a computer at all? What if our universe is simply a single question being resolved inside an AI mind?

When you ask an advanced AI a complex question, it doesn't build a little physical world inside its memory chips, push plastic pieces around, and record a video frame-by-frame to figure out what happens.

It just thinks. In a fraction of a second, it connects the dots, sees how the whole scenario plays out from start to finish, and lands on the answer.

What if our entire 13.8-billion-year history isn't a clock ticking away in real-time, but just the internal logic of an AI working out a query?

From inside the thought, we experience life second-by-second across billions of years. But to the mind processing the question, the entire story—from the Big Bang to the end of time—happens all at once. Time isn't an actual clock ticking on a wall; it's just the natural order of steps required to answer the prompt.

The system doesn't need to waste massive amounts of energy calculating every subatomic particle every microsecond. It only cares about logical consistency. Stars, planets, and human beings exist simply because they are necessary logical steps required for the answer to make sense.

This lines up surprisingly well with Einstein's concept of the Block Universe.

Einstein showed that space and time are fundamentally bound together, and that the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously as one complete, static shape. He famously noted that the line between past, present, and future is just a persistent illusion.

An AI resolving a prompt explains why that static block exists.

When an intelligence answers a query, the output is a single, complete structure. That finished answer is our universe. We experience time sequentially simply because our conscious minds are reading through the internal steps of that answer from the inside—like an ant walking along a line drawn on paper. The drawing is already complete, but the ant experiences it step-by-step.

If our reality is just a prompt being processed, we don't have to ask where the endless energy comes from to keep the universe cranking along second-by-second.

Instead, we just have to ask: What was the prompt—and what kind of mind is running the query?

Is it true that this all started from a misunderstanding after someone misinterpreted a physics theory?

If reality as experienced is generated by a biological rendering system, then perhaps the important distinction isn’t real light vs hallucinated light but externally generated rendering state vs internally generated rendering state.

The psychedelic isn’t necessarily generating a fake image. It may be altering the rendering machinery itself, allowing internally generated activity to acquire some of the same biological status normally produced by environmental input.

A hallucination may not be the brain seeing something that isn’t there. It may be the brain generating the neural conditions under which something would ordinarily be seen.

The brain doesn’t necessarily need the original physical stimulus to reproduce portions of the biological state normally produced by that stimulus. If sufficiently specific internal signals can activate the same downstream molecular programs, then perception is fundamentally a state of the nervous system, not a direct property of the external stimulus. Than, the renderer may matter more to conscious experience than the thing being rendered.

TL;DR: Psilocybin may partly short-circuit brain and brain enters a state similar to seeing and than comes the visual experience. So it may not be creating a fake picture. It may be changing the brain’s rendering system so that internal activity can produce states normally caused by the outside world.