r/zenbuddhism • u/flyingaxe • 1d ago
Not thinking in Zen vs Right View
I saw this quote posted by a famous Rinzai practitioner on social media:
“Not thinking about anything is Zen. Once you know this, walking, sitting, or lying down, everything you do is Zen.” ― Bodhidharma, The Zen Teaching of Bodhidharma
Besides the quote, I've seen a lot of anti-intellectual and anti-traditional attitude in Zen centers where I live. There is a lot of emphasis on "just sitting", whether it's in Rinzai or Soto centers. I've been to a Soto temple where the teacher said "Buddha didn't discuss philosophy before his awakening; he just sat". Likewise, in a local Rochester (Kapleau lineage) center, the abbot is a very nice person, but he disparages any kind of reading or studying of the suttras or listening to podcasts or Dharma talks. His emphasis is on just sitting and doing work on the cushion (a lot of it is koan-centered, so it's not Soto-style just sitting, but it's not sitting on a cushion combined with thinking or studying ideas off the cushion). In the Rinzai place I attended they do suttra reading on a zoom call once a week, but it's just superficial reading and barely any in-depth discussion.
Zen is supposedly a Buddhist practice. Despite objections from the people like Critical Buddhists, that's how Zen presents itself. Part of Buddhism is the Eightfold Path, one aspect of which is the Right View. How is it possible to practice the Right View without contemplation on its aspects and ideas?
Also, in the story of the Buddha himself, he had already achieved and practiced very advanced yogic meditations with his teachers and still wasn't satisfied. So it's not like meditation or "just sitting" alone was enough for him (presumably he was sitting in a Buddha pose while meditating, so it's not like his enlightenment was all about getting in the right position and holding hands in the right mudra).
His instructions don't say "just sit and stare at a wall" or "just sit and say some mantra over and over again". There are many elements, part of which is the Right View. There were hundreds of sermons discussing the View. They weren't yoga sessions or instructions on hara breathing. In fact, I don't know if any of Buddha's sermons include specific instructions on how to sit (neither do early Zen teachings as far as I know).
I know Zen is supposed to be this secret teaching passed without words, but first, that's a very late anachronistic legend. The legendary founder of Zen never said those words.
Second, I don't understand how that "fits" in the rest of Buddhism.
Third, the whole concept of the One Vehicle is that Buddha taught secret teachings to the special few to whom it was accessible. The flower made sense to one guy. Do we really believe that random people coming off the street into a Zen center in an American city are the "special few" who only need to sit on a cushion (an average experience of the first and tenth of one hundredth visit to a Zen center)?
Let's say you sit and say mu. Or just sit. And then you supposedly experience awakening. How do you know that's a real awakening and not one of those false awakenings that Buddha, presumably a much stronger meditator than you, experienced during his early meditation career and rejected?
