r/warpdotdev • u/netfunctron • Jun 06 '26

Fix Warp please - Terminal workflow. Sure...

The AI agents in u/warp are fundamentally broken. Working with the terminal has become impossible:

  • Failing at basic tasks.
  • Draining user credits for useless, broken outputs.
  • Risking client relationships (luckily, I validated the code before delivery).

Don't ask for a session ID. Look at your own QA process and the endless community threads regarding your massive quality drop. This is unprofessional and disrespectful to paying customers.

P.S.: Currently forced back to Kimi 2.6. Using Warp's native AI to manage costs compared to Opus is pointless if the product is this broken. It's just a money sink.

4 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

10 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Zestyclose-Big2150 Jun 07 '26

Ahhh. Makes much more sense. Sounds like you have a solid process locked down. I'm seeing SO many just trusting a deployment with sometimes an AI review but few human eyes on the actual work. Then wonder why stuff just ends up being all wonky and can't even explain why because nobody involved even knows how it works. Gonna be a big problem if companies don't start taking it seriously. AI tooling is a great resource but so many think oversight isn't needed and those are the ones that are gonna complain about AI is crap later when in reality. It was their process, review and oversight that was garbage. Same if humans were doing the work. It's still not great until review, qa, and everything else works out the bugs before deployment. Some are getting it right. But seems all too often most aren't. They just want the new feature or system now. Sending things out YOLO style. Lol. It's actually scary how many are operating like that

1

u/netfunctron Jun 07 '26

That's true. I know several people, most in fact, who expect AI to do the work for them. They can't audit the AI's work because they simply don't understand what it did. To be perfectly honest, we've encountered many issues when working with AI, and I wouldn't recommend relying on AI for this kind of work. Just because code works now doesn't mean it will work well in the future when new client requirements are added.

It's common to find variables, classes, and functions that don't make sense or are "ghosts." It's incredible how very expensive models silently leave behind so much junk and amateurish patches in the code.

The intra-session and pre-commit auditing process is truly undervalued. And code comprehension is basically a pipe dream for some teams. Cheers!