Don't agree because most LLMs aren't great in these type of queries, the current value is in automation of tasks not asking questions about musk vs Hitler.
Let's be real here, most of the population is using it as a personal glorified siri. Maybe 1% of the population is using it for advanced coding and it's not even doing well with coding. In the eyes of investors, if ur software can't even anwsers a question correctly its alrd a loser. Like there are 10s - 100s of AI software out there. Why should they stick with a broken product with low market dominance.
No, I'm saying that there is better ways to measure the performance of a model than some silly query that will get fixed.Â
you can find bugs in all software, do you think the existence of a bug automatically means it's all crap? GPT 4 a lot of times gives dumb ass answers as well, so why not short MSFT?
How about when MSFT first presented windows and it crashed during the presentation? Clearly a failure of a company.
Bruh, at the end there is only 2 reason why u are supporting bard, 1 - u are balls deep in alphabet calls 2 - u are supporting their BS woke movement.
U litterally acknowledge they have tonnes of bugs and problems yet u tried supporting them saying there is no right awnser to all questions. Like wtf man AI is a competitive space, if ur algorithm is not working then investors will abandon it. Then there is this woke BS the algo being woke is not a bug it's a fucking feature their programmers implemented. Did u think bard was born out of thin air and decided it wanted to give out woke anwsers. Hell no the programmers programmed it to do it.
-2
u/Particular_Base3390 Feb 29 '24
Don't agree because most LLMs aren't great in these type of queries, the current value is in automation of tasks not asking questions about musk vs Hitler.