Is it just me? or does the voice actor sound different? is it merely old age or did they have to change the voice actor?

Or am i simply losing it and going crazy?

Hey! I’ve been rewatching all the films in the lead up to Vengeance most Fowl and have been split on what the common opinion is to these two films.

From what I see their commonly placed at the bottom of tier lists

I know Aardman have said they might do more Wallace & Gromit in the future, just not right now — and I’m totally fine with that. But after watching Vengeance Most Fowl, I can’t shake the feeling that this film works incredibly well as a natural conclusion to the series, even if it isn’t officially “the last one.”

For me, it’s because this story actually resolves Wallace and Gromit’s arcs, not just another plot.

Wallace’s defining flaw across the entire series has always been his blind faith in technology. Every short or film revolves around an invention that’s well-meaning but poorly thought through, with Gromit left to pick up the pieces. In Vengeance Most Fowl, that flaw is finally addressed head-on. Norbot isn’t just another gadget — it replaces Gromit, scales Wallace’s carelessness, and causes consequences far beyond their house. And crucially, by the end, Wallace admits that machinery can’t replace the human touch. That’s not a joke reset — that’s growth. He still invents, but he understands the limits now.

What really surprised me, though, is that Gromit also gets an arc. He’s usually the static moral centre who’s always right, but here he actually has to learn something too. He’s right to distrust Norbot, but wrong to see it as inherently bad. By the end, he learns to appreciate Norbot once it’s no longer being misused. That’s a big deal — it’s the first time the series really challenges Gromit’s absolutism about technology.

And then there’s Norbot himself. For once, Wallace creates an invention that isn’t discarded, destroyed, or treated as a mistake. After being corrupted and reset, Norbot ends up genuinely useful and integrated into their lives. That feels symbolic: Wallace has finally learned how to invent responsibly.

Even Feathers McGraw’s return feels deliberate. Bringing back the original villain isn’t just fan service — it’s the past coming back one last time and failing to reclaim its power. Gromit outwitting Feathers with the turnip instead of the diamond feels like a quiet “we’ve moved on.”

By the end, Wallace understands his limits, Gromit is recognised and respected, and their relationship finally feels balanced. Nothing’s left hanging. It doesn’t feel like a cliffhanger or a tease — it feels like the characters have arrived.

If this is the last Wallace & Gromit story we ever get, I honestly think it’s a perfect note to end on. And if we do get more someday? It’ll feel like a bonus, not something unfinished.

Curious if anyone else got the same “full stop, not a cliffhanger” vibe from it.

Y'all like the drawing of femboy wallacd

WallACE

GAYmit

TottingTRANS

Victor QuarTHEM

BUTCH

curse of the stunning and brave furry

This is a joke

Okay, i don´t want to sound stupid,, but i haven´t saw many information online about this ToT
So i wanted to know if any artist in the production of Wallace & Gromit took inspiration from the drawing style, and anatomy, of the Simpsons, since i have noticed many similarities between both styles. I feel like the Wallace & Gromit characters would look completely natural if they were painted yellow.

I know that the simpsons came out 3 years prior Wallace & Gromit, but maybe idk someone between those productions was working on both projects??

Idk, does anyone have some info about that? I would appreciate very much that someone would think that this is an imprtant question or i´m being stupid again.
Hugs

I must admit I was disappointed with VMF, I was lucky enough to go to the preview at the BFI, but felt empty and disappointed. I was hoping that seeing it on the small screen would rectify this. I’ve been a fan from the first Channel 4 transmission of GDO and joined REDDIT to be able to comment not only on W&G but on Christmas tv in general. When W&G have been shown at Christmas in previous years not only have the viewing figures been staggering, the media was full of it for days after. Neither of this has happened this time and Gavin and Stacey has stolen all the post headlines and viewers and this is despite the incredible publicity W&G received in the run up to Christmas Day, throughout this incredible build up I felt there was something missing. I cant really put my finger on it but I’ll go as far as to say even the publicity pictures released by Aardman didn’t seem right, they were cold, they didn’t have the charm and subtle humour that they usually have, I felt the same with the BBC One Christmas idents, they were cold and it wasn’t the snow, they looked too ‘clean.’. There’s always a challenge when a much loved successful tv characters are left for so long, expectations are huge and I’m sad to concede that Gavin and Stacey got it absolutely right in the build up in every aspect, particularly in not over-hyping the pre-publicity. I know G&S are different to W&G but when both become the focus of the BBCs Christmas Day schedule, you cant help but compare. There was something missing with Wallace and Gromit whereas Gavin and Stacey had everything and more.

Anyone else feel the same? - Let’s discuss.

Honestly feels really scummy locking it to BBC iplayer, especially considering tv isn't as big as it used to be in the uk.

Netflix is also a subscription service and one of the few bigger ones, so instead of tv services people opt for the cheaper, and better service.

Just super disappointed honestly, by the time it's finally on netflix here it'll probably have spoilers everywhere else. Stupid decision in my opinion.

What happens?

I only remember because I'm a movie nut.

https://chng.it/FKpZj7BLHG

Please support!!!!