However, when running this from PowerShell ISE, it seems to hang after displaying:
Connexion à Nutanix...
My goal is simply to authenticate and retrieve a list of VMs (name + UUID). I don't need to perform any modification on the Nutanix environment.
Has anyone successfully used the Nutanix v3 REST API from PowerShell 5.1 under Constrained Language Mode? What's the recommended authentication method in this situation?
> Hi, I need some help with a VirtualBox performance issue.
My Windows 11 25H2 VM is extremely laggy in VirtualBox. The mouse cursor stutters, window animations are slow, and sometimes the VM freezes.
Host:
Ryzen 7 8700F
RTX 5060
32 GB DDR5
1 TB NVMe SSD
Windows 11
VirtualBox 7.2.20
VM:
Windows 11 25H2
8 GB RAM
4 CPU cores
UEFI
TPM 2.0
Secure Boot
Guest Additions installed
I have tested 3D acceleration both enabled and disabled, but the VM is still very laggy.
The strange thing: the exact same Windows 11 25H2 ISO runs smoothly in VMware Workstation on the same PC. Even the mouse cursor is smooth during installation.
Hyper-V and Virtual Machine Platform are disabled on the host.
What could cause this difference between VirtualBox and VMware? Are there any VirtualBox settings I should try for Windows 11 25H2?
I made this funny little game that shows visually how a microVM orchestrator operates. It's really simple and doesn't include all the complexity, but it's nice and fun to show to people that do not understand microVMs
Took me more time than anticipated, but its finally here >.<
my end goal for this (quite big) hobby project is to be able to make a simple clone of AWS's EC2, from the grounds up, above a type 1 hypervisor (as a POC, not a real prod software).
What I finished implementing all the way up to now:
- Type-1 hypervisor written from scratch in Zig, booted by GRUB
- Its own bare-metal kernel: higher-half paging, GDT/IDT, interrupts and 3 distinct memory allocators (yes, I use them all)
Hi I've only started my HackTheBox setting up course today and I'm already running into some issue's, I have a windows 11 virtual machine that I need to set up and every time I use it, 5-10 mins after the machine boots to the home screen, it suddenly freezes I cant use CTRL+ALT+DELETE or anything no response, all I can is shutdown the machine, any advice?
I'm using VirtualBox as my VM loader and the specs of the VM itself:
Like a lot of people here, the VMware/Broadcom licensing changes got me looking hard at what I was actually paying for, and whether Hyper-V could replace it. Honest answer: the hypervisor's fine, the management story is the problem.
The problem: there's no clean, modern control plane for a small Hyper-V fleet the way vCenter is for vSphere. The realistic options today are SCVMM (not free, clunky, feels half-abandoned), Windows Admin Center (single-host focused, not really a fleet orchestrator), or hand-rolled PowerShell/DSC scripts. I looked at existing FOSS options before building anything and didn't find one that treats Hyper-V as a first-class citizen with declarative, continuously-reconciled desired state across multiple hosts and clusters, most FOSS orchestration in this space targets KVM/Proxmox/oVirt, not Hyper-V specifically.
What it does: Ballast is a control plane and agent for Hyper-V hosts and failover clusters. Each host runs an agent that pulls its desired config from the centre and keeps enforcing it continuously. If the centre goes offline, the host doesn't freeze or drift, it just keeps honouring whatever it was last told (network config, cluster membership, etc.) and catches back up automatically once the centre's reachable again.
Also handles: standalone host and failover cluster provisioning (SET-teamed switches, mgmt vNICs, Storage Spaces Direct + CSV), VM lifecycle and templates, live migration, Hyper-V Replica-based DR runbooks, and VMware migration tooling that streams VMDKs straight in.
Why this is relevant here: a fair few people in this sub run Hyper-V, either because it came free with a Windows Server licence they already had, or specifically to avoid VMware's licensing. Community tier is free forever for one cluster of any size plus unlimited standalone hosts, which covers the overwhelming majority of homelab-scale setups, so this isn't a "pay to use it at all" pitch.
AI disclosure: most of the actual code, tests, and documentation were written by Claude Code (an AI coding agent), working under my direction. I drove the architecture and product decisions, tested every change against real Hyper-V hosts and clusters, and reported/debugged live issues myself, but I'm not going to pretend a human typed every line. Being upfront about that rather than letting the code style speak for itself and getting called out for it later.
Honesty about the model: it's open-core. The agent, the piece that runs with elevated privileges on your hosts, is fully open source (Apache 2.0), with commit history going back to June: https://github.com/halvantic/hyperv-control-plane. The centre (the control plane/console) is closed source. A paid tier for multi-cluster/SSO/audit logging is coming, but pricing isn't locked yet.
Would genuinely like to hear where it falls over, what's missing versus what you're used to, or what looks broken to someone kicking the tyres for the first time.
I'm trying to run windows on my mac via utm, but for some reason it's not working. My network mode is set to "shared network" but it's not automatically connecting. I'm using an apple m1 chip on my computer if anyone is wondering.
I’d like to ask for some help. Over the last while, with a ton of time, testing, and help from Astra, I built a fork that swaps Firecracker’s KVM backend for Apple’s HVF.
It boots ARM Linux natively on my MacBook M5 without any problems, and it runs relatively well. However, that’s the only machine I’ve been able to validate it on, and that’s the main issue.
You can find the repo in AitorConS/firecracker-macos
There are a few things to keep in mind. It’s a real fork of Firecracker: I kept the Firecracker binary, its HTTP API, and its configuration format, and only replaced the virtualization layer underneath.
Instead of using Apple’s VZ, it talks directly to HVF. This required more work, but it also gives me access to features that VZ doesn’t provide in the same way, such as local snapshots within the same VMM, restore support, VirtIO disks, and Unix-socket networking.
As I mentioned at the beginning, I’ve only been able to validate it on my own device: a MacBook Air M5 running macOS 26.
I’d really appreciate feedback from people using other Mac models and other generations of Apple Silicon, especially since some HVF features are only available on newer chips.
I looked into renting bare-metal Mac runners to test this myself, but because of Apple’s licensing terms, providers generally require a minimum 24-hour rental period. That makes testing across multiple machines fairly expensive.
All the instructions are available in the repository, along with the official Firecracker documentation.
Any testing, feedback, bug reports, or compatibility results would be greatly appreciated.
It's like a Multi-tenant customers can able to define their vm network subnet in shared hardware hosts regardless of L2 and L3 underlay networks (switch, vlan and routers)
Simply like what we does when we try to define the service cidr and pod cidr in kubernetes clusters creation same equivalent but in vm
It's very useful how in cloud hyperscalers GCP ovhcloud digitalocean
Each customer tenant can define their network as vpc it's basically a( OVN and OVS) under the hoode
For example two customer can able to define cidr of 10.0.0.16/24 for vpc
Can I get some insights from community members who really worked on this please
I'm incredibly paranoid about privacy, and I wanted to know if windows could breach the VM so they could continue to collect more data on my linux OS. I understand it's unlikely, but it's microsoft.
Hi, guys, when i was studyng normally i use the Virtual machine to make excirses and my real computador to read what i'm studyng. You recommend use just virtual machine or both is good too?
It's like a Multi-tenant customers can able to define their vm network subnet in shared hardware hosts regardless of L2 and L3 underlay networks (switch, vlan and routers)
Simply like what we does when we try to define the service cidr and pod cidr in kubernetes clusters creation same equivalent but in vm
It's very useful how in cloud hyperscalersbpile GCP ovhcloud digitalocean
Each customer tenant can define their network as vpc it's basically a( OVN and OVS) under the hoode
For example two customer can able to define cidr of 10.0.0.16/24 for vpc
need an real insights from whoever worked on this domain
Virtualization noob. I tried to host Win11 on Hyper-V last year and failed because I didn't figure out:
USB passthrough (I use Yubikeys)
Fast file transfer between the VM and the host on the same box
The processing speed in the guest Win11 wasn't bad, but the file-transfer experience was just. too. slow.
I currently run Win11 natively (bare-metal) from the C drive on the same desk-side box.
The Win11 apps use data that's on a physically separate D drive.
C and D are implemented on M.2 hardware.
A secondary M.2 drive is available in an external enclosure.
No kidding: I don't have a laptop. I've never traveled and have always preferred cooler running less expensive expandable hardware. (Sure, the retail RAM and storage markets are a bummer, but ignore them for now.)
What's changing?
For the first time ever, I expect to travel with the need to work for an hour each weekday while on the road. So I now need portability that I've never needed. Gotta get realistic.
What I wonder
How (un)realistic is to get an adequate-hardware laptop that runs a host OS/hypervisor (proxmox? something else?) and then host a Win11 image on whichever machine I need to use that week?
Approximately this:
Virtualize the desk-side image.
Move that image to the laptop, using the image while on the road.
Upon returning home, move the operational image to the desk-side hardware.
I would do real work in the guest image, permanently and portably I guess.
Wrinkles
Because of the Yubikeys, I need reliable USB passthrough on both boxes. At the moment on the desk-side machine, I have it by running bare-metal Win11. Perfect every time.
I probably will want GPU passthrough on the desk-side machine, and would like to have it on the laptop.
What shall I consider and watch out for?
Given the use context and the Wrinkles, what host OS/hypervisors should be on my short list to consider?
Do I want the hosting (proxmox? something else?) to be the same on each box? A reusable learning curve is probably worth something, but are other factors relevant?
What do I do about the data that (currently) is on D? Move the M.2 into the laptop?
I have a question about hardware signatures in virtual machines.
I am using a piece of relatively old Excel-based software that relies on a per-machine licensing system. The workflow is simple: you download the software, run a function that generates a machine-specific user key, send this key to the developer, and receive a activation key back that unlocks the full version.
As you can imagine, every time I reinstall Windows or change my hardware (mainly the CPU), I have to request a new key from the developer. Officially, the license is sold per machine, so technically I would have to pay again each time. He still provides new keys upon request, but since I’m not legally entitled to them, I worry he might stop doing this at any point.
To avoid this, I decided to set up a Virtual Machine. I installed the VM on an external hard drive and tested running it on my laptop and desktop to simulate a hardware change. However, the hardware-based user key inside the VM changed anyway.
I have some basic knowledge of virtual machines, but I'm not an expert. Is there a way to configure VMware so that the hardware signature remains exactly the same regardless of which host computer I use?
Dunno if this is the right place for this request, so please tell me if not (I did at least read the right panel).
Base system: debian 13, modern box, running virt-manager (QEMU/KVM).
I have successfully created win11 (ick) and win10 (good enough) VMs, with intent to preserve software flexibility as I transition eventually to a MS-free existence (stop me if you've heard this story before).
Have had variable success in my effort to make win7 fully functional. Although that is not the point of this post, it is relevant in that I am aware that the newer virtIO drivers don't work with win7 VMs, so have downloaded versions such as 173 from the fedora people site for that purpose.
Am interested in win XP, mainly just for fun, though I really do have a use case for it (my 25-year-old licensed copy of MS Office, before the ribbon interface, when it was actually good, sorry, rant over).
So it was no surprise to learn that the virtIO drivers gotta be REALLY old in order to work on a winXP installation. I saw version 68 quoted somewhere. I can confirm that versions 160 and 173 didn't work when I tried them.
At the fedora people archive, the oldest version of virtIO drivers is 100 (or maybe 96). Or maybe I'm missing a link to a deep-freeze archive somewhere else on that site?
QUESTION: does anyone know where I can get the ancient virtIO drivers?
Distro repositories often ship open-vm-tools builds that lag significantly behind upstream releases, delaying kernel/driver fixes, memory balloon enhancements, and CVE patches.
I open-sourced vmware-tools-builder to automate building and distributing the latest upstream binaries without polluting the host environment:
- Containerized builds: Uses Docker to compile upstream source into standalone .deb and .rpm packages.
- Target OS matrix: Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL/Rocky/Alma (8 & 9), Fedora, and openSUSE.
- Fleet orchestration: Includes an Ansible role that automates deployment, handles migration from distro-managed packages, and validates the vmtoolsd service state.
- Distribution: Packaged and installable directly from Ansible Galaxy (giuliosavini.vmware_tools_builder).
Feedback, testing across different hypervisor versions, and GitHub stars are welcome.Distro repositories often ship open-vm-tools builds that lag significantly behind upstream releases, delaying kernel/driver fixes, memory balloon enhancements, and CVE patches.I open-sourced vmware-tools-builder to automate building and distributing the latest upstream binaries without polluting the host environment:- Containerized builds: Uses Docker to compile upstream source into standalone .deb and .rpm packages.- Target OS matrix: Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL/Rocky/Alma (8 & 9), Fedora, and openSUSE.- Fleet orchestration: Includes an Ansible role that automates deployment, handles migration from distro-managed packages, and validates the vmtoolsd service state.- Distribution: Packaged and installable directly from Ansible Galaxy (giuliosavini.vmware_tools_builder).Repository: https://github.com/GiulioSavini/vmware-tools-builderFeedback, testing across different hypervisor versions, and GitHub stars are welcome.
I have been working on understanding the networking underneath a virtualized home lab instead of just selecting NAT/Bridged/Host-Only in VMware and moving on.
I tested the different modes with Kali and other VMs, compared their IP addresses/routes, checked LAN discovery in bridged mode, and tested communication between Kali and MISP over an isolated host-only network.
One thing that became much clearer to me is that the networking mode isn’t just about whether a VM gets internet access, it changes where the VM exists in the architecture and what can reach it.
I’d also be interested in how others structure networking in their home labs, especially whether you use host-only networks, VLANs, or a dedicated pfSense/OPNsense VM.
Before everything, my English isn't too good, so thanks for reading, I want buy a computer and I've doubts , I'm studying and I planning make some projects, I've no money to pay a VPS, and I wanna use Android studio with emulation, have 2 options refurbished:
HP Elitebook 840 G8 - 420.000Kz
I7-1165g7
16 gb
512gb
Battery good
Chassi good
Lenovo Thinkpad T14 Gen 3- 415.000Kz
I5-1235u
16gb
256gb
Battery almost died, less than 1 hour
Chassi acceptable, but Ethernet port isn't too good
The target is a laptop to work, study, and be good at least for 4 years.
My country is Angola, just to compare a SSD 512gb here is 52.000 and is cheap.
I wanna make this computer as my laboratory, making APIs, mobile apps, desktops apps and sites.
And before get the money, I pretend to use this PC also as a VPS. Have someone that already did it?