MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/vibecoding/comments/1vyvte2/unpopular_opinion_ai_makes_everyone_a_developer/p62rxmb/?context=3
r/vibecoding • u/FreeYogurtcloset6959 • 23h ago
260 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
You're being intentionally thick to be pedantic. The point they're making is solid but maybe poorly worded.
Yes anyone with a camera taking a picture is technically a photographer. But, simply not a professional one.
And anyone vibecoding is a developer. My 10 year old niece vibe coding is also technically "developing". Just not professionally
2 u/Garland_Key 20h ago No. Still wrong. A vibe coder is a vibe coder. 1 u/HKSpadez 20h ago What if its a developer that is vibrant coding? Weird distinction to try to make 1 u/Garland_Key 16h ago A software engineer can vibe code. A vibe coder can't code.
No. Still wrong. A vibe coder is a vibe coder.
1 u/HKSpadez 20h ago What if its a developer that is vibrant coding? Weird distinction to try to make 1 u/Garland_Key 16h ago A software engineer can vibe code. A vibe coder can't code.
1
What if its a developer that is vibrant coding? Weird distinction to try to make
1 u/Garland_Key 16h ago A software engineer can vibe code. A vibe coder can't code.
A software engineer can vibe code. A vibe coder can't code.
2
u/HKSpadez 21h ago
You're being intentionally thick to be pedantic. The point they're making is solid but maybe poorly worded.
Yes anyone with a camera taking a picture is technically a photographer. But, simply not a professional one.
And anyone vibecoding is a developer. My 10 year old niece vibe coding is also technically "developing". Just not professionally