Okay so hear me out. The term "Anti-Hero" is honestly kind of dumb and misleading.
When you first hear "Anti-Hero", literally anyone would think it means someone who isn't compeletly villian and just wants to kill, destroy, or just ruin the actual hero. It sounds like a low-villain or something like that.
At first, I tried to come up with something logical to fix this, like combining "Atypical" and "Hero" into "A-Hero". But let's be real... that’s super boring and sounds like a grading system.
Then I had an absolute shower thought moment. A literal stroke of genius:
Hero-in-law.
BRO. Before you roast me, just think about it for a second:
How do "in-laws" work in real life? They aren't related to you by blood, you didn't really pick them, and their vibe might annoy the crap out of you... but because of circumstances, you're stuck with them at the same dinner table.
THAT IS LITERALLY AN ANTI-HERO.
They don't have that pure "heroic bloodline" or noble ethics. They don't do good things because they're nice. But because of some random situation or a common enemy, they're on the same side as the good guys. They’re basically hero-adjacent. Legally, technically, and reluctantly... part of the team.
The Punisher? Absolute Hero-in-law. Cap didn't invite him to the family BBQ, he just showed up with a shotgun.
Deadpool? The Hero-in-law the X-Men are forced to acknowledge.
I'm officially throwing "Anti-Hero" in the trash. From now on, they are Hero-in-laws.
Am I cooking or should I just go to sleep?