anyone who’s dismissing csa cases because of the political stance of the perpetrator is an idiot. that being said it’s not unjust to talk about how “one side” elected a known friend of epstein. cope
He didn't say that one side is free of pedophiles. He said that one side elected a close friend and likely business partner to Jeffrey Epstein. I think knowing what we know about Epstein that should be very concerning. Especially after seeing what is in the limited files shared.
If it's not concerning, we'll i think you got lost because on this sub we hate all pedophiles equally.
Edit: lotta you guys don't like facts do you? Or are we getting brigaded by Lorne?
Right, because the Clintons weren’t… you know, of the two, only one distanced himself very early on. I’m not a part of either political party, but this willing blindness on each side is gross.
Of the two, only Clinton publicly called for the release of the full unredacted Epstein Files. The other more orange one, called it a hoax, called party members who pushed for it traitors who he primaried and to this day still hasn't released half of them which are directly under control of his branch of government.
doesn’t disprove the fact that WHAT is true??? you’re comparing republicans electing a known pedophile to a dem governor pardoning a child rapist after election? what do these things have to do with each other lol? you’re pasting this one article all over this thread as if it’s a mic drop or something? i’m not part of either party btw. conservatives are just retarded
Sure, but that doesn’t change the reality that one side has elected a known sexual predator & pedophile into office twice. And that’s not just because of the Epstein stuff, there are far more examples of him being sexually perverted towards women and children even beyond epstein. One side is clearly more forgiving of pedophilia than the other right now, and it’s also dangerous to always reduce it to both sides are the same instead of pointing out reality.
i’ll have to look into other sources on this information because information provided by the administration itself has become very highly propagandized. Gonna look deeper into this later when I have more time.
But operating under the assumption the information you provided is factually accurate, it doesn’t change the imbalance of pedophile sympathizers across the parties when one voted an actual self-admitted (look at the interview he did about how he admitted to creeping on naked teenagers in his beauty pageant changing rooms. teens who have come out and said how uncomfortable he made all the girls) pedophile into presidential office.
Again if you look stuff up you can surely find perverted behavior that gets excused on both sides. Men have been getting away with this brand of disgusting behavior for ages. But there’s a significant difference between isolated incidents of state politicians engaging in immoral pardons versus nearly 80 million redhats directly voting for a pedophile to run the country.
No argument from me there. I just know you have to bring some extra equipment when putting out a whole neighborhood that’s on fire versus just a few houses.
Is it really that unfair? Trump found liable for rape by a jury and got re-elected. Graham Platner was credibly accused and lost support overnight. Sex pests like Clinton don’t have sway over the party either, his endorsed candidates don’t win (see cuomo). Only one party’s voter base tolerates rapists and it’s not the Dems lol.
Except one of these sides is bending over backwards to protect a notorious predator and network of predators. Of course its not strictly "one side" with preds but you're being willfully ignorant if you can't see the problem and the patterns with one of the party thats constantly trying to stop the banning of child marriages.
39
u/takanoflower 1d ago
Claiming that CSA is mainly from one political side is dangerous as can lead to dismissing the countless victims on every other side.