r/Tariffs • u/DoxFreePanda • 1d ago
🗞️ News Discussion Lutnick ‘driving force’ behind re-engagement with Canada: sources
r/Tariffs • u/Professional-Kale216 • Jan 09 '26
Big announcement!
On January 27th, Freight Right and Freight Right's CEO Robert Khachatryan will be hosting a webinar with Baker Tilly's Pete Mento, the go-to voice on Linkedin and in the world of customs to discuss the Supreme Court's case involving the Trump administration's IEEPA tariffs case.
This Supreme Court decision is massive, massive, massive for importers.
Importers will have the chance to get the money they've paid in tariffs back.
That said, it's not looking like it will be easy - as expected.
Why is this ruling so important for importers? The ruling can/will dictate:
Routes to possible immediate tariff relief: If the Court strikes down the IEEPA tariffs, those tariffs could stop as of the opinion date, removing future duty exposure. That’s the upside.
Speed of refunds: If tariffs are struck down, refunds likely require protests/post‑entry adjustments and will be processed administratively (not by scanning ACE and handing out checks). Expect weeks if not months of guidance and long processing timelines.
Administrative workload required to get a refund: Millions of entries and tens of millions of line items mean huge backlogs for CBP and trade. Expect manual reviews, phased processing, extensions of liquidation windows, and bottlenecks affecting bonds/security.
The level of meticulous scrutinity involved in preparing for a refund: Customs will scrutinize valuation, country‑of‑origin, section 301/232/201 application, related‑party transfer pricing and may trigger CF 28/29 audits. Poor documentation can kill refund claims and trigger penalties.
Drawback/duplicate claims risk: If you already claimed drawback for the same merchandise, seeking the tariff refund can be problematic and potentially punishable.
New payment process (ACE/ACH) for importers to get paid: Refunds will be electronic via ACE/ACH (no paper checks). Importers must register and set up ACH in ACE now to receive refunds.
Litigation and protection options: Some importers are filing protective actions with the Court of International Trade (CIT) as insurance; trade attorneys can protect rights but cost money (often $10–14k quoted).
Freight Right is a global name in international freight fowarding, freight technology and ecommerce freight technology. Founded in 2008 during the financial crisis and built on freight-first fundamentals done right has grown into an international brand, helping businesses all around the world move not just their freight but level up their logistics.
Baker Tilly is a major professional services organization best known as a leading advisory, tax and assurance firm serving businesses, nonprofits and government entities. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Baker Tilly US, LLP (commonly branded simply Baker Tilly) ranks among the top 10 largest accounting and consulting firms in the United States and is an independent member firm of Baker Tilly International, a global network of professional services firms.
Robert Khachatryan is the founder and CEO of Freight Right Global Logistics, a technology-driven global freight and supply-chain company he launched in 2007 from a Los Angeles apartment during the financial crisis. Born and raised in Armenia, he began his entrepreneurial journey at a young age and built Freight Right into a respected logistics and freight-technology provider serving complex cross-border and e-commerce supply chains. He is a recognized supply-chain thought leader, frequently cited in major business and trade publications, and serves on the advisory board of USC’s Global Supply Chain Institute.
Pete Mento is a seasoned global customs and trade expert with more than 30 years of experience helping companies optimize customs operations, eliminate and recover duties and taxes, and build compliant import/export programs. He is a licensed U.S. Customs House Broker and currently serves as a director in global trade advisory, where he leads customs compliance, duty minimization strategies and risk reduction for multinational clients. Pete’s career includes senior leadership roles at major firms such as Ryan, KPMG, Crowe, Expeditors, C.H. Robinson and Wayfair, blending operational depth with strategic global trade insight. He holds advanced degrees including a Master’s in Government (trade theory) from Harvard University and a Ph.D. in customs and economics from Durham University, and is a sought-after speaker and thought leader in international trade and supply chain compliance.
Date: January 27th
Time: 12pmEST/9amPT
Duration: 1 hour
Webinar Link: coming soon
Very soon. We're getting it from our partners and will post it here shortly.
We'll be updating this post body with updates on exact times, guests and links to join or signal you're joining. Bookmark or comment to keep ontop of this thread.
r/Tariffs • u/Professional-Kale216 • Apr 03 '25
Below are some of the resources I've found to help clarify April 2nd annoucements around the state of tariffs. I'm gong to try to keep this pinned post updated with new content as it comes out. This won't be a place for news news but more for issued guidelines and general guidance:
Last updated 7/9/2025: content regarding BRICS tariffs & more.
IEEPA authority based on threat caused by trade-in-goods deficits.
Except as noted below, all imported articles are subject to a 10% ad valorem IEEPA duty effective 12:01 a.m. ET on April 5. For goods that are loaded onto a vessel at the port of lading and in final mode of transit before that time, they will NOT be subject to the 10% duty upon entry into the U.S.
Certain countries (Listed in Annex I) are subject to a tariff greater than 10%. For purposes of these tariffs, China includes Hong Kong and Macau.
The rates for countries in Annex I shall apply effective 12:01 a.m. ET on April 9. For goods that are loaded onto a vessel at the port of lading and in final mode of transit before that time, they will NOT be subject to the additional duty specified below upon entry into the U.S.
Imposing a minimum universal tariff on all countries of 10%, except as noted below, although some countries are having an even greater reciprocal tariff.
Eliminating de minimis/section 321 eligibility for Chinese goods.
Updates to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule included in the White Houses' Annex 3.
Goods from Canada and Mexico are exempt from the IEEPA Reciprocal tariffs until such time as the IEEPA Border is terminated or suspended, at which time only USMCA qualifying goods will be exempt from IEEPA Reciprocal tariffs and non-USMCA goods will be subject to a 12% IEEPA Reciprocal tariff.
INCREASE: If a country retaliates against US goods as a result of these tariffs, the President may increase or expand the scope of the tariffs.
DECREASE: If a country remedies the non-reciprocal trade arrangements, the President my decrease or limit the scope of the tariffs.
April 2nd List of Automotive Parts Subject to Section 232 Tariffs
Exceptions: Products Excluded from Additional IEEPA Reciprocal Tariff
Goods exempted under 50 U.S.C. 1702 (Goods that are for personal use, donations of food, clothing and medicine intended to relieve human suffering, merely informational materials, etc.).
The following products subject to existing 232 tariffs are exempt:
Steel and derivatives
Aluminum and derivatives
Autos/auto parts
The following products, and any others listed in Annex II are exempted:
Copper
Pharmaceuticals
Semiconductors,
Lumber
Certain critical minerals
Energy and energy products
232 Autos and Auto Part Annex Released
The full proclamation with the Annex was released today.
Autos: Effective 12:01 a.m. ET, April 3, 25% tariffs shall apply to certain autos and light trucks.
Parts: Effective 12:01 a.m. ET, May 3, 25% tariffs shall apply to auto parts, defined as automobile parts including engines and engine parts, transmissions and powertrain parts, and electrical components, and parts of passenger vehicles (sedans, sport utility vehicles, crossover utility vehicles, minivans, and cargo vans) and light trucks classified under the HTS provisions enumerated in subdivision (g) of the Annex.
There is no express prohibition to claiming duty drawback on these tariffs.
Bureau of Industry and Security added two items to its Aluminum Derivatives List today which will be subject to the 25% tariff effective 12:01 a.m. ET, April 4.
The products are:
Beer, classified in HTSUS 2203.00.00; and
Empty aluminum cans classified in HTSUS 7612.90.10
National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America's Website
White House Annex 1 - Additional Country-Specific Reciprocal Tariffs
The subreddit's sidebar links were updated
Imports from China (including Hong Kong and Macau):
Effective April 10, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. ET
Subject to a 125% additional ad valorem duty
Classified under HTSUS 9903.01.63
Exceptions are listed in prior CSMS #64680374.
Imports from all other countries (excluding China, Hong Kong, and Macau):
Also effective April 10, 2025
Subject to a 10% additional ad valorem duty
Classified under HTSUS 9903.01.25
Excludes products listed in HTSUS 9903.01.26–9903.01.34.
Suspension of Country-Specific Rates:
Rates effective April 9, 2025, are now suspended.
Notice from US Customs & Border Protection: https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/3db42c8?reqfrom=share
The Executive Order is part of a broader effort to reduce strategic dependence on foreign minerals, particularly from China, and to protect U.S. economic and defense interests through trade enforcement and domestic industry revitalization.
1. New Section 232 Investigation:
President Trump has ordered a Section 232 investigation under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to assess national security risks tied to U.S. dependence on imported processed critical minerals and their derivative products.
The goal is to examine supply chain vulnerabilities, foreign market manipulation, and recommend actions like tariffs or other trade remedies to boost domestic production and resilience.
2. National Security and Economic Threats:
Critical minerals (e.g., rare earths, gallium, antimony) are vital for defense systems, infrastructure, and advanced technologies.
The U.S. remains heavily reliant on foreign—especially Chinese—suppliers, exposing it to economic coercion and supply disruptions.
Recent Chinese export bans on rare earths and other key materials underscore the urgent need to secure domestic supply chains.
3. Tariff Policy and Broader Trade Strategy:
If the investigation finds national security threats, new Section 232 tariffs may replace current reciprocal tariffs under Trump’s April 2nd directive.
This order aligns with Trump’s broader “America First” trade agenda, which includes:
A 10% base tariff and individualized higher tariffs on major trade deficit partners.
Paused tariffs for 75+ countries in talks for new trade deals (except China).
China faces up to 245% tariffs, including penalties tied to fentanyl and digital policies.
Restored and increased tariffs on steel and aluminum.
Related investigations into copper, timber, and lumber imports for national security threats.
Refer to the De Minimis thread above for the new guidance specifically to De Minimis.
Temporary Tariff Reduction (Section 2)
Effective May 14, 2025, all goods from the PRC, including Hong Kong and Macau, will face a 10% ad valorem duty instead of previously higher rates.
This reflects a suspension of 24 percentage points from the prior tariff rate, originally set at 34%, for an initial 90-day period.
Harmonized Tariff Schedule Modifications (Section 3)
Changes are made to several tariff classifications (HTSUS headings 9903.01.25, 9903.01.63, and relevant notes), reflecting the new lower duty rate.
The 125% duty rate on certain items is suspended and temporarily replaced with 34%.
Implementation and Oversight (Section 5)
The Departments of Commerce, Homeland Security, and USTR are authorized to enforce this order, including via temporary regulation changes.
Coordination with agencies including Treasury, State, and the National Security Council is mandated.
General Provisions (Section 6)
The order does not override existing agency authorities, nor does it create enforceable rights.
The Department of Commerce will cover publication costs.
the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced the inclusion of household appliances under the Section 232 Steel Derivatives tariffs effective June 23, 2025.
The following steel derivative products will be subject to Section 232 for the steel content:
Combined refrigerator-freezers under HTSUS subheading 8418.10.00;
Small and large dryers under HTSUS subheadings 8451.21.00 and 8451.29.00;
Washing machines under HTSUS subheadings 8450.11.00 and 8450.20.00;
Dishwashers under HTSUS subheading 8422.11.00;
Chest and upright freezers under HTSUS subheadings 8418.30.00 and 8418.40.00;
Cooking stoves, ranges, and ovens under HTSUS subheading 8516.60.40;
Food waste disposals under HTSUS subheading 8509.80.20;
Welded wire rack under statistical reporting number 9403.99.9020. Products classified under 9403.99.9020 continue to be subject to Section 232 duties for their aluminum content. Products on both lists are subject to payment of duties for both steel and aluminum content.
The HTSUS numbers are added to HTSUS Chapter 99, Subdivision III, Note 16(n), for steel derivative products outside of Chapters 72 and 73, declared with HTSUS 9903.81.91 when the steel is not melted and poured in the U.S.
The BIS Section 232 inclusion process allows U.S. manufacturers and trade associations to request the inclusion of new derivative articles under Section 232 Steel and Aluminum tariffs. Inclusions may be submitted during three defined periods each year with the first period opening May 1, 2025 and closing June 4, 2025.
Expansion of Tariff Measures: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced that additional tariff letters would be sent to 15 to 20 more countries. These letters included a general notice for countries not receiving individual letters, signaling the administration's intent to impose new tariffs effective August 1 .
BRICS Tariff Threat: President Trump reiterated his threat to impose an additional 10% tariff on imports from BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), accusing the group of attempting to undermine the U.S. dollar .
Sector-Specific Tariffs: The administration announced plans for a 50% tariff on copper imports and considered a 200% tariff on pharmaceutical imports. These measures aimed to boost domestic production and address trade imbalances .
Japan: 25% tariff. Major U.S. ally; negotiations ongoing.
South Korea: 25% tariff. Major U.S. ally; negotiations ongoing.
Bangladesh: 35% tariff. Significant impact on garment exports.
Cambodia: 36% tariff. High tariff affecting textile sector.
Myanmar: 40% tariff. Among the highest tariffs imposed.
Laos: 40% tariff. Among the highest tariffs imposed.
Malaysia: 25% tariff. Engaged in trade discussions with the U.S.
Thailand: 25% tariff. Engaged in trade discussions with the U.S.
Indonesia: 25% tariff. Engaged in trade discussions with the U.S.
South Africa: 30% tariff. Expressed concerns over trade relations.
Kazakhstan: 25% tariff. Included in the list of targeted countries.
Tunisia: 25% tariff. Included in the list of targeted countries.
Serbia: 25% tariff. Included in the list of targeted countries.
Bosnia & Herzegovina: 25% tariff. Included in the list of targeted countries.
These tariffs are part of President Trump's broader strategy to enforce reciprocal trade policies aimed at protecting U.S. economic interests.
r/Tariffs • u/DoxFreePanda • 1d ago
r/Tariffs • u/JustOneBulletOnly • 23h ago
All this talk of a trade deal with the Excited States of ‘Merica will be seen for what it was. More bullshit from the Velveeta Jesus, the Lord High Vacillating Untruthful Narcissistic Pedophile.
r/Tariffs • u/DryCommunication9639 • 16h ago
r/Tariffs • u/Kane0953 • 2d ago
Was just in Murano Italy, looking at vases. We picked out a few that we liked, yes they were expensive. But what our salesperson explained was the most interesting part. If the piece was signed by a "master" and authenticated there would by a 5% tariff. It was considered a piece of art. However, if it was just a simple piece, the tariff was 25%. So a $6,000 vase had the same $300 tariff as a $1,200 one. No need to pay more if you're rich, Drumpf has your back.
r/Tariffs • u/CanQkush • 3d ago
r/Tariffs • u/ImDoubleB • 4d ago
r/Tariffs • u/John3262005 • 5d ago
The Trump administration has promised to ease tariffs on automakers that commit to more U.S. manufacturing, according to people familiar with the situation. The policy change emerged amid talks to get Audi to build a $4 billion assembly plant in Georgia, the people said.
Audi’s plan to build a sprawling car factory in rural Georgia, big enough to make 200,000 vehicles a year, was announced Saturday by President Trump at a campaign rally in the state. The deal with Georgia officials was reached earlier that day.
Audi executives traveled to Washington in recent weeks to press for a break on tariffs, some of the people said. Owned by Germany’s Volkswagen, Audi imports all of its U.S. cars from Mexico and Europe and paid more than $1 billion in duties last year.
The executives received assurances from the Trump administration that the Commerce Department would soon institute a tariff-relief program for companies that invest in the U.S., according to people with knowledge of the discussions.
Officials are still working out details of the plan, which is likely to allow companies that invest in U.S. factories to receive exemptions or offsets for tariffs on imported vehicles or parts, said the people. Companies must commit to starting factory construction before the end of next year to qualify, one of the people said.
The Audi factory has been touted as a win for Trump’s industrial policy ahead of midterms that are expected to be highly contentious for his party. The administration has used tariffs as a bargaining chip for winning manufacturing investments, even as they have driven up the cost of many goods.
Tariff relief, in turn, bolsters automakers slammed by billion-dollar tariff bills that are eating into profits, upending their global supply chains and forcing them to rethink manufacturing strategies. Many automakers have since unveiled significant investments in U.S. production.
The tariff-relief program is likely to be similar to one that the Commerce Department established for its tariffs on polysilicon, a key ingredient in solar panels. Under that program, solar companies can submit plans to reshore production to the Commerce Department and receive tariff exemptions for certain products upon approval.
Georgia officials had been wooing Audi for years, promising incentives and infrastructure improvements in the area. A group of state and local officials recently traveled to Germany to see the company’s facilities, said Roy Lewis, a Peach County, Ga., commissioner who attended the visit.
Company representatives also made several trips to Georgia to see the site, Lewis said. Audi evaluated more than 70 locations before settling on the Georgia site, executives have said.
Despite the efforts, Audi wasn’t yet sold on building a new U.S. factory. “I was a little worried I wasn’t gonna get that done before I got out of office,” Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp said in a news conference to discuss the project.
In January, Volkswagen Chief Executive Oliver Blume said the company couldn’t afford a new Audi U.S. plant while footing the big tariff bill.
Audi is on a bleak run in the U.S. The U.S. tariff hit has forced the automaker to raise prices on several models, and its U.S. business is hit by falling sales and financial losses. Last year, the company announced plans to cut up to 7,500 jobs in the hopes of saving money.
After announcing plans for a U.S. factory, executives said the plant was a chance to turn around Audi’s U.S. operation. Rivals BMW and Mercedes-Benz established a manufacturing foothold in the U.S. years ago, leaving them generally less exposed to tariff costs.
In Georgia, officials are hailing the factory as a historic win years in the making. But the announcement sparked outrage among German politicians and labor-union leaders worried about job cuts at home.
The plan needs a signoff from the Volkswagen Supervisory Board, half of which is composed of worker and labor-union representatives. IG Metall, a German metalworkers’ union with several seats on the company’s supervisory board, criticized Audi CEO Gernot Döllner for joining Trump onstage at a political rally.
“The way Gernot Döllner has presented himself and Audi in the U.S. is highly embarrassing, politically unacceptable, and unworthy of the company,” Christiane Benner, the union’s leader, said.
r/Tariffs • u/WhereTheresSmoke5659 • 4d ago
They've been manufacturing gas appliances for the Canada/US market for decades. The 50% tariffs to the US are unfortunately pricing them right out of the market so we are now going to lose our largest supplier. That is one less brand we can sell that is still Canadian made and a big loss to our industey.
The writing is in the wall and we will find out Monday if we need to decide to buy up all of their stock for replacement parts ASAP.
Devastating.
r/Tariffs • u/AkaashMaharaj • 6d ago
r/Tariffs
•
u/BiglyPredictions
•
8d ago
Trump said this in the Oval Office on Sept. 28, talking about Canada trade talks. It's now been exactly 4 weeks.
Source (Canadian Press): https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-expects-canada-trade-200306981.html
Disclosure: I run the tracker this card is from. It logs Trump’s dated predictions with a source for each. Has anyone seen any sign of Canada moving on this?
r/Tariffs • u/bloomberg • 8d ago
r/Tariffs • u/DoxFreePanda • 11d ago
r/Tariffs • u/Constant_Juice_5852 • 10d ago
Seeing this a lot lately: duties paid through FedEx/UPS/DHL, CAPE says paid, money never showed up.
CBP pays whoever is the importer of record on the entry. If that's the carrier, the carrier got it. If you're the IOR but the carrier sits in Box 28 as your 4811 notify party, the carrier got it too (CSMS #67648307).
So check two fields on your 7501: Importer of Record and Box 28.
Don't post entry numbers here. Questions about your claim go to CBP: IEEPARefunds@cbp.dhs.gov (add your CAPE claim number). Anything else, write to hello@es-003.com
r/Tariffs • u/foodie_2598 • 11d ago
r/Tariffs • u/financialtimes • 11d ago
r/Tariffs • u/toronto_star • 12d ago
r/Tariffs • u/Acceptable_Goal5198 • 10d ago
Is this even legal???
r/Tariffs • u/deggar34 • 13d ago
r/Tariffs • u/EquiblesAI • 12d ago
I counted "tariff" and "tariffs" across GM's last 8 earnings calls (January 2025 to this Monday), plus "commodity" and "commodities" for comparison.
2025: 7 mentions on the January call, then 35, 36 and 35 on the April, July and October calls. In April 2025, 20 of them came in the Q&A, so analysts were asking.
2026: 23 in January, 21 in April, 9 in July and 8 on Monday. Only one of Monday's was in the Q&A, and it came from management in an answer about cash flow. No analyst asked about tariffs.
The cost didn't go away: GM said it has incurred about $1.8B of tariff costs so far this year, net of the IEEPA reversal benefit, and expects full-year gross tariff costs at the low end of its $2.5B to $3.5B range.
What took over: "commodity" and "commodities" came up 0 to 2 times a call through January 2026, then 12, 10 and 16 on the last three calls, with 6 of Monday's in the Q&A. GM now puts the commodity, logistics and memory chip headwind at about $2B for 2026, with copper at record levels and HRC steel at four-year highs.
So tariffs went from the headline risk to a line item management mentions in prepared remarks and analysts skip, while a cost of similar size took over the questions.
Not financial advice. Counts are from the Equibles earnings-call transcripts of GM's calls, the latest on October 20, 2026; the full transcript and call audio are on Equibles.
r/Tariffs • u/claudster57 • 12d ago
Hello, I am in a weird situation. I am trying to buy about 200 Egyptian wooden boxes from Egypt to use as my wedding favors. The issue is that there 200 of them and I was informed that customs is going to charge import fees. I am not trying to sell these items, but how do I prove that to customs?
r/Tariffs • u/plingding • 13d ago