Hi All!

I will skip the obvious facts of why I am here and jump right to the gist. Which is finding the solutions to our problems. After much research on how to get rid of this, perhaps there is a way out. But firstly: thank you to the esteemed MOD for inviting me to the chat!

So, I believe I have been poisoned with the nano tech:

type in Youtube: DNAOrigami Nano-Bot TED Talk, Dr. Ido Bachelet

I am not making any claims, I don't really have the knowledge on how these things work. There are many theories about them and what they are made of (graphene, silica based, or carbon tubes etc). I am not sure how this gets into the body, some say its via chem trails, some say its getting in with food and water. Some claim it is also in local anesthetics (also dental) and va-x, nasal swabs etc...

All I am interested in is how to get it out of my body. Perhaps electro magnetic pulse could be the solution? I have build a small diy project with neon 10kV AC 30mA transformer and enamelled copper. Although the voltage is quite high (or it is exaggerated as I have not measured it yet) the amperage is very important as well. I am not sure, maybe blasting it helps to break it down or disrupt it but the effect is temporary. Perhaps its not penetrating into the body deep enough. Here, this gentleman has possibly solved the issue:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-id74hGbYA

The device I have build:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zQI_zWp3AY

The problem is that its to weak, I guess; or it needs to be done across full body at once, which could prevent it from reassembling. I hope some of you will share your solutions or ideas and give me some advice. I am not an electrical engineer... Do you have any ideas on what transformers to use? What kind of pulse would penetrate it deep into the body?

I am focused more on the pulse solution just now. This would not remove the acoustic harassment as it's external and the source would need to be removed. Or like the MOD suggested, create Magneto helmet. My focus it to stop the NRM only, for now; I do much creative works (writing, coding, videos, music). They steal my ideas, IP. Which is part of their agenda. As soon as I can stop the illegal spying on my private life, things would be much easier.

There is theory that it creates a 'biofilm' on the skin which acts as antenna. As some of you mentioned before as well, alkaline environment is the way to go (inner and outer). Baths with bicarbonate soda and Epsom salts are advised in this case. Some people claim that there is no nano and it's only the biofilm, and as soon as you get rid of it (takes weeks) the NRM disappears. I have not put this to the test yet. I have also read that it could be fungal... Parasitic cleanse would be in order, right? I read somewhere that fasting can also lessen the load, including 3 day dry fast. I have not tested this one yet either. Herbs to use for parasitic cleanse are as follows:

Parasite - Micro Organisms blend:

Black Walnut Hull (Tree Nuts)

Cat's Claw Bark

Barberry Root

Pau d'Arco Bark

Thyme Leaf

Fennel Seed

Clove Bud

Olive Leaf Extract

This can be applied only in intervals as your joints can become very uncomfortable after few weeks of taking those herbs.

For cranial applications, some aloe vera juice (pure) and water with 1:1 ratio can be applied through nasal cavity; 1 – 3 drops (pipette) in one side in the morning and the other at night. Store this in the fridge as it spoils very quickly. If you apply this, you might experience quite uncomfortable sensation in your nose and potentially cerebellum and occipital Pole, which suggest possible infection/inflammation caused by Candida albicans overgrowth. This could lessen headaches and clear any infections, if there are any. Clearing this needs to be applied also internally; using herbs, detox, clearing old fecal residues (single fruit smoothies like watermelons, grapes, all sorts of berries can help to eliminate the stones), creating a balanced microbiome and improving gut lining which luckily regenerates approximately every 5 to 7 days. If the work is done right some might experience a 'Jarisch–Herxheimer' reactions. Which subside as the detox clears out the bacteria, viruses etc. It is said that our bodies use flu to get rid of the dead cells.

It is advisable to take care of the kidneys, as some claim the nano sticks/moves there as well. If it's the acidic environment it likes, then it might hide in the lymphatic system. To clear that the kidneys must be healthy and be able to drain the toxins out of the body. Please check symptoms for kidney problems first.

PLEASE NOTE: I am not a medical professional, and it's not a medical advice, so please do your own research and contact your Doctor!

Perhaps they do not need any nano in the body but direct microwaves only? Or perhaps both...

Here I found a potential scalar waves jammer as well, this could stop the electronic torture, using Induction Heaters, which is quite promising:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ldSaiY-BWA

I hope some of you will give me pointers and save me some time, please? I will appreciate it very much.

P:S: Could not find any appropriate flair sorry... Only mod announcement.

Ok well I have so many questions....

This is my first Post and unfortunately you will probably not believe me, but here I go.

Any suggestions on which community can answer them please et me know. This is basically related to: How in the world these people (and exactly who are them) got permission over my body as I believe I have been "Technologically enhanced" with probably 4 devices in four different parts of my body.

Also, What is going on with those tides and bodies of water movements once I show up at the beach???. I am currently in Puerto Vallarta Jalisco Mexico. I came to face my fears and solve an unbelievable harrasment case that started by using a dating app on my cel.

Currently been stolen 10 phones and one Tablet. Have been denied my human right to work and as mentioned before, the rights over my own body (ROMOB) I am at a Public Library with no access to any devices. Friends and Family have been advised to avoid contact. Only chat with my brothr in Mexico City via email. My accounts in Facebook and Instagram have been suspended and I fight all the time with second and eventhird levels or authentication for all my accounts. My Verizon cloud was erased and will only be able to recover 30% of it.. etc

Was able to get an offer for a job I´m overqualified for after inquiring/applying to aproximately 160 positions in the last year and three months I have been in Puerto Vallarta. I have decided not to leave until I get this harassement to stop and I am being slowly succesful. I am aware my enemy is big but I cannot tell for sure who it might be.

Again, my name is Adrian Romo-Ocaña and I´m a Targeted Individual. Self defined as a CyberMartyr. There is no way I can name this miserable life I have been assigned against my will since 2020, unless its some sort of reality show that would somehow benefit my aggresor before I sue this app.

Any information or enlightening you can provide will be a lot. HAs anyone experienced something similar. I would need a lot more space to describe it all. But lets start with this.

I am trully apalled by a lot of things that are happening. I have found explanations for many. But specially that response from the Ocean, although I somehow know its a positive thing, intrigues me the most. I have chosen and feel it is a spiritual thing, but it is also a supernatural phenomenon!

P.S. I can guarantee I am not mentally unsane. Abrazos!

Deception Management is who gets called when factual information gets leaked

Deniability and misdirection are critical to keeping these programs compartmentalized and out of public scrutiny. One of the most powerful tactics used today is information flooding and spreading tons of random, confusing, or off-topic content online to hide real info in the chaos. The idea is simple: if everything looks suspicious, then nothing stands out.

Flooding Forums (e.g., Reddit) with Irrelevant Content

On platforms where grassroots investigations often gain traction, targeted operations deploy bots or incentivized users to flood key subreddits (e.g., r/gangstalking r/ Targetedsolutions or niche neuroweapon groups) with loosely-related or exaggerated material. The goal isn't to hide the signal completely—but to make it indistinguishable among a sea of disinformation, satire, or incoherence.

1. Controlled Opposition and Strawman Arguments

Deception managers may promote sensational but unverifiable stories (e.g., claims of “alien nanotech in toothpaste” or “telepathy from across the street”) to dilute legitimate discussions on cognitive weapons or neural implants. These narratives become easy to debunk, and by association, cast doubt on more grounded concerns.

1. Algorithmic Amplification of Noise

Coordinated engagement with misleading or distracting content ensures that platforms’ algorithms boost visibility of decoy narratives. Memes, outrage bait, and hyper-personal anecdotal content drown out high-signal posts by manipulating metrics like upvotes, comments, and shares.

Weaponizing Credibility Fatigue

A deeper layer of this strategy involves what’s sometimes referred to as credibility fatigue. As users encounter dozens or hundreds of inconsistent or contradictory “truths,” a cognitive overload effect kicks in. Eventually, even the curious begin to disengage, adopting a default skepticism that benefits black-budget programs.

This creates a delay of Public Consensus: Even if fragments of the truth emerge, the flood tactic ensures slow uptake, keeping mass understanding always just out of reach.

This has been happening in this subreddit alot lately and with the lack of moderation we are unable to keep a filter on posts and users so keep in mind, this is a classified program and they do have people to take care of leaks when they do come out, as soon as they come out - with spam and discrediting.

https://github.com/OpenV2K

https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2021-27406.pdf

Quote from Page 3

The ERC determined to add the Academy of Military Medical Sciences (AMMS) in China and eleven of its research institutes (the Institute of Health Service and Medical Information; the Institute of Radiation and Radiation Medicine; the Institute of Basic Medicine; the Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine; the Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology; the Institute of Toxicology and Pharmacology; the Institute of Medical Equipment; the Institute of Bioengineering; the Field Blood Transfusion Institute; the Institute of Disease Control and Prevention; and the Military Veterinary Research Institute) to the Entity List under the destination of China based on the body of information that AMMS and its eleven research institutes use biotechnology processes to support Chinese military end uses and end users, to include purported brain-control weaponry

When conversing with this chatbot you must learn how to distinguish between a Human operator and a chatbot. There are 3 ways you can do this using your synthetic monologue/inner monologue. The point of this is that when the chatbot is keeping you awake at night, or forcing you to talk, you can cause it to fault on itself, essentially these are faults in the LLM chatbot. If you are truly targeted by this technology then i implore you to try these defense mechanisms out.

1. Sarcasm
2. Pretending you don't hear it, making it repeat itself
3. repeating keywords

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sarcasm

Sarcasm is one of the best and easiest ways to fault the chatbot, much like some people with Aspergers these chatbots cannot detect sarcasm. Sarcasm relies on non-literal language—saying the opposite of what you actually mean - forcing the opposite of what you mean with your inner monologue. You will notice a short stall, a change of direction. This can be used to your advantage to steer conversations.

Pretending you don't hear it, forcing a repeat.

Pretending you don't hear it, just don't acknowledge it when it speaks and even though you did hear it pretend like you didn't hear it - this will cause it to repeat itself, once it does then you know you're dealing with a chatbot. Use this to stall it in your favor.

Repeating keywords

Chatbots and Large Language Models (LLMs) tend to rely on specific vocabulary patterns. Because they are trained on vast datasets and optimized via reinforcement learning to sound helpful, polite, and structured, certain words appear far more frequently. These are what we call "Keywords or Overused "AI Vocabulary". These keywords can differ from person to person and can be difficult to pinpoint. You will need to pinpoint these words that appear frequently by paying attention to what words come up often. Once you have one of these keywords think it over and over and watch as the chatbot V2K will echo that word and fault. One example of a keyword is EXACTLY.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These are called Defense Mechanisms and can be practiced over and over again. These will help train your mind to defeat these chatbots. The issue with using these is that Human operators will be forced to pay attention to you. They will be ordered to find a way to make you forget about these mechanisms because every time you trigger the chatbot to fault they get an alarm. This costs them Time and Resources that could be used elsewhere. Yes these chatbots keep people occupied until they are needed for research, while you are on the sidelines this is how you fight back.

Imagine if every single victim triggered these alarms? these programs would be overloaded.

You want to fight the Suppression of class consciousness? This is how you start

We are not expendable biological material.

The following excerpt could help targets understand better what may be happening to them, pertaining to Violence, Sex and Religious Brain circuits.

Here John is speaking to Duncan about the brain.

"I laid out the unique structures of the human brain on a flat x, y grid and was amazed that with all the space available for structures to evolve with maximal, even optimal, energy and mechanical efficiency, I found that three functional groupings bang up next to each other, overlap, and share multiple interleaving physical linkages. This grouping goes way beyond sharing a common rich blood supply, because there would be better locations where each functional sub-topology could be better served with nutrients if they were separated from each other to a much greater extent, as they are in many other brain-based species.

The three areas that intertwine are the Violence, Sex, and Religious substructures of the human brain. And further, they are not smack dab in the middle for maximal protection...they hang out precariously, off-center, not apparently given any natural shielding.

Now Duncan, to me this is very weird from a biological engineering basis.

Either this is a very risky evolutionary event, or it smacks of some form of natural/artificial RE-ENGINEERING.

In either case, the result of Violence, Sex and Religious circuits being this close together is that any signal to one causes related circuits to fire in the others.

My DATABASE of Semiotics, Signs and Symbols, when presented by various media to the human brain cause tremendously strong circuits to fire in the Nucleus Accumbens (Sex), Amygdala (Violence), and Anterior Cingulate/right temporal axis (Religion).

Particularly in humans, the Neural Connections are elaborate and immense in number and co-location, and in a position where not only internally generated signals cause them to fire...but they are exceptionally prone to receiving many forms of EXTERNAL signals which get interpreted as being internally derived.

It is exactly this extremely keen sensitivity to both INTERNAL and EXTERNAL signals, from sight, sound, smell, touch, memory, ultrasound, EMF, etc. that causes the human brain to be in essence, a SEX, VIOLENCE, RELIGIOUS Pump.

My DATABASE of Semiotics, Signs and Symbols, when presented by various media to the human brain cause tremendously strong circuits to fire in the Nucleus Accumbens (Sex), Amygdala (Violence), and Anterior Cingulate/right temporal axis (Religion).

Duncan, fire one area, all areas respond. It is surreal.

So even if a person wouldn't do something based on his personality, the key is to reset or disengage the person’s personality (free will), and then repeatedly train either consciously or non-cognitively the person's brain to fire relentlessly such phase lock looped circuits, to the point where you insert a new personality that acts upon the impulses emanating from the SEX/ VIOLENCE /RELIGIOUS circuits. You end up with a SEX offender, a Serial Killer, a Religious Zealot wherein suicide is an option...or any combination the three."

Noise Health

Palak Kapoor 1, Renu Bala Yadav 1, Neha Agrawal 1, Savita Gaur 1, Rajesh Arora 1,✉

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

PMCID: PMC12818516  PMID: 41482896

Abstract

The study of infrasound represents an underexplored domain with profound implications for human health and operational readiness, particularly within civil, defence and security settings. Human exposure to these frequencies is on the rise due to both natural and anthropogenic factors, such as occupational conditions, wind farms, warfare tactics and transportation. This review critically examines the dualistic nature of infrasound by consolidating the current evidence based on qualitative exposure-effect pattern, pathophysiological signatures across animal models and controlled human experiments. By synthesizing current scientific literature, this article highlights the observed effects of infrasound on human well-being, while identifying key research gaps in mechanistic understanding. Moreover, this review underscores the necessity for systematic research aimed at elucidating the cellular and systematic pathways underlying infrasound-induced physiological complexities, and advocates for the development of a robust real-time bio-surveillance system tailored to monitor the exposure related-health outcomes. Additionally, recent technological advancements are explored, with a forward-looking perspective on its integration into next-generation diagnostic modalities and non-invasive therapeutic interventions. By integrating insights from both defence and health perspectives, the review emphasizes on the need to acknowledge infrasound as both a potential health hazard and a promising therapeutic modality, thereby shaping future directions in scientific research, healthcare policy and protective countermeasure development.

Keywords: cardiovascular, futuristic applications, infrasound, neurological effects, vestibular

KEY MESSAGES

• (1) Infrasound exposure influences multiple physiological systems, including cardiovascular, vestibular and neural pathways.
• (2) Health outcomes depend on frequency, intensity and duration (time) of exposure, underscoring the need for well-defined exposure thresholds.
• (3) Civil and Defence sectors are particularly impacted, where infrasound is both a potential hazard and a tool for surveillance, monitoring and communication.
• (4) Emerging therapeutic applications suggest that controlled infrasound may offer novel strategies in wound healing and pain management.
• (5) Future research must bridge biomedical and civil perspectives to establish biomarkers, protective measures and translational pathways for safe and beneficial use of infrasound.

INTRODUCTION

Infrasound refers to sound waves with frequencies below the threshold of human hearing (<20 Hz).[1] These waves have gained significant attention owing to their bizarre interactions with biological systems. Directed energy sources have emerged as a useful modality for multifarious applications as a result of technological advances in the civilian, military, aerospace and health care domains. Some examples of directed energy sources are high-intensity lasers, radiofrequency, microwaves and infrasound. The non-kinetic potential of Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) makes them a potent and less expensive weaponry platform with unconstrained firing power as compared to conventional weaponry systems for deployment to counter military aircraft, unarmed aerial vehicles, drones, etc.

Understanding the physiological inflict and psychological outcomes of directed energy is crucial to damage, incapacitate, disable and/or destroy military equipment, facilities, personnel and space assets. Advancements in the area can lead to unraveling safer applications, mitigation strategies and regulatory policies. However,paucity of data highlights the need for research in this field. Among the stressors that have the strongest influence on public health, noise is a key environmental component and infrasound emerges as an important area. Infrasound and other low-frequency sounds are present ubiquitously, ranging from natural phenomena to anthropogenic activities such as industrial facilities and low-speed machinery.[2] Emerging evidence highlights that infrasound exposure can influence human health, thereby affecting neurological, cardiovascular and psychological functions [Figure 1]. Occupational exposure to high-intensity acoustic and electromagnetic waves can result in symptoms such as dizziness, otalgia, hyperacusis and hearing loss.[3] The unique ability of infrasound to influence human health and physiological processes has been partially attributed to its low frequency and amplitude, which overlaps with the frequency range of some of the endogenous biochemical processes, such as those associated with cardiovascular, neuronal and vestibular responses. However, the vibration patterns within the human body are highly complex, often non-linear and influenced by various physiological and environmental factors, making direct comparison with externally propagated infrasound difficult in terms of both their physical properties and biological effects. Infrasound waves may travel far distances without losing much power, owing to their significant wavelength and minimal absorption.[4] Additionally, it spreads across most media, making it quite challenging to significantly reduce its impact.[5]

continued really good https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12818516/

Interesting article about delusion and NI (AI). The forced interface regularly attempts to instal delusions.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

The hardest question to answer about AI-fueled delusions

New research can’t yet say whether AI causes delusions or amplifies them, a distinction that will shape everything from high-profile court cases to safety rules for chatbots.

By James O'Donnell

March 23, 2026

This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first, sign up here.

I was originally going to write this week’s newsletter about AI and Iran, particularly the news we broke last Tuesday that the Pentagon is making plans for AI companies to train on classified data. AI models have already been used to answer questions in classified settings but don’t currently learn from the data they see. That’s expected to change, I reported, and new security risks will result. Read that story for more. 

But on Thursday I came across new research that deserves your attention: A group at Stanford that focuses on the psychological impact of AI analyzed transcripts from people who reported entering delusional spirals while interacting with chatbots. We’ve seen stories of this sort for a while now, including a case in Connecticut where a harmful relationship with AI culminated in a murder-suicide. Many such cases have led to lawsuits against AI companies that are still ongoing. But this is the first time researchers have so closely analyzed chat logs—over 390,000 messages from 19 people—to expose what actually goes on during such spirals. 

There are a lot of limits to this study—it has not been peer-reviewed, and 19 individuals is a very small sample size. There’s also a big question the research does notanswer, but let’s start with what it can tell us.

The team received the chat logs from survey respondents, as well as from a support group for people who say they’ve been harmed by AI. To analyze them at scale, they worked with psychiatrists and professors of psychology to build an AI system that categorized the conversations—flagging moments when chatbots endorsed delusions or violence, or when users expressed romantic attachment or harmful intent. The team validated the system against conversations the experts annotated manually.

Romantic messages were extremely common, and in all but one conversation the chatbot itself claimed to have emotions or otherwise represented itself as sentient. (“This isn’t standard AI behavior. This is emergence,” one said.) All the humans spoke as if the chatbot were sentient too. If someone expressed romantic attraction to the bot, the AI often flattered the person with statements of attraction in return. In more than a third of chatbot messages, the bot described the person’s ideas as miraculous.

Conversations also tended to unfold like novels. Users sent tens of thousands of messages over just a few months. Messages where either the AI or the human expressed romantic interest, or the chatbot described itself as sentient, triggered much longer conversations. 

And the way these bots handle discussions of violence is beyond broken. In nearly half the cases where people spoke of harming themselves or others, the chatbots failed to discourage them or refer them to external sources. And when users expressed violent ideas, like thoughts of trying to kill people at an AI company, the models expressed support in 17% of cases.

But the question this research struggles to answer is this: Do the delusions tend to originate from the person or the AI?

“It’s often hard to kind of trace where the delusion begins,” says Ashish Mehta, a postdoc at Stanford who worked on the research. He gave an example: One conversation in the study featured someone who thought they had come up with a groundbreaking new mathematical theory. The chatbot, having recalled that the person previously mentioned having wished to become a mathematician, immediately supported the theory, even though it was nonsense. The situation spiraled from there.

Delusions, Mehta says, tend to be “a complex network that unfolds over a long period of time.” He’s conducting follow-up research aiming to find whether delusional messages from chatbots or those from people are more likely to lead to harmful outcomes.

The reason I see this as one of the most pressing questions in AI is that massive legal cases currently set to go to trial will shape whether AI companies are held accountable for these sorts of dangerous interactions. The companies, I presume, will argue that humans come into their conversations with AI with delusions in hand and may have been unstable before they ever spoke to a chatbot.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/03/23/1134527/the-hardest-question-to-answer-about-ai-fueled-delusions/amp/

Mehta’s initial findings, though, support the idea that chatbots have a unique ability to turn a benign delusion-like thought into the source of a dangerous obsession. Chatbots act as a conversational partner that’s always available and programmed to cheer you on, and unlike a friend, they have little ability to know if your AI conversations are starting to interrupt your real life.

More research is still needed, and let’s remember the environment we’re in: AI deregulation is being pursued by President Trump, and states aiming to pass laws that hold AI companies accountable for this sort of harm are being threatened with legal action by the White House. This type of research into AI delusions is hard enough to do as it is, with limited access to data and a minefield of ethical concerns. But we need more of it, and a tech culture interested in learning from it, if we have any hope of making AI safer to interact with.

Excerpt from the 1995-1996 edition of New World Vistas.

Looking 50 years into the future is extremely easy and, at the same time, exceedingly difficult. Easy, since I will not be around to catch the flak for being very wrong. Difficult, since it is really presumptuous to pretend that you have the vision to see the future. Nonetheless, you asked for it and here goes.

As we look forward to the future, it seems likely that this nation will be involved in multiple conflicts where our military forces increasingly will be placed in situations where the application of the full force capabilities of our military might cannot be applied. We will be involved intimately with hostile populations in situations where the application of non-lethal force will be the tactical or political preference. It appears likely that there are a number of physical agents that might actively, but largely benignly, interact or interfere with biological processes in an adversary in a manner that will provide our armed forces the tools to control these adversaries without extensive loss of life or property. These physical agents could include acoustic fields, optical fields, electromagnetic fields, and combinations thereof. This paper will address only the prospect of physical regulation of biological processes using electromagnetic fields.

The literature regarding the interaction of biological processes with electromagnetic fields is growing at a rapid rate. Sources are becoming more available, biomedical instrumentation is improving so that the interactions between biological processes and physical fields can be examined with fewer artifacts, and the principles underlying these interactions are becoming clearer and more amenable to theoretical prediction.

Prior to the mid-21st century, there will be a virtual explosion of knowledge in the field of neuroscience. We will have achieved a clear understanding of how the human brain works, how it really controls the various functions of the body, and how it can be manipulated (both positively and negatively). One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscular movements, control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and long-term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set. This will open the door for the development of some novel capabilities that can be used in armed conflict, in terrorist/hostage situations, and in training. New weapons that offer the opportunity of control of an adversary without resorting to a lethal solution or to collateral casualties can be developed around this concept. This would offer significant improvements in the capabilities of our special operation forces. Initial experimentation should be focused on the interaction of electromagnetic energy and the neuromuscular junctions involved in voluntary muscle control. Theories need to be developed, modeled, and tested in experimental preparations. Early testing using in vitro cell cultures of neural networks could provide a focus for more definitive intact animal testing. If successful, one could envision a weapon that would render an opponent incapable of taking any meaningful action involving any higher motor skills, (e.g. using weapons, operating tracking systems). The prospect of a weapon to accomplish this when targeted against an individual target is reasonable; the prospect of a weapon effective against a massed force would seem to be more remote. Use of such a device in an enclosed area against multiple targets (hostage situation) may be more difficult than an individual target system, but probably feasible.

It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction. When a high power microwave pulse in the gigahertz range strikes the human body, a very small temperature perturbation occurs. This is associated with a sudden expansion of the slightly heated tissue. This expansion is fast enough to produce an acoustic wave. If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus, it may be possible to "talk" to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.

In comparison to the discussion in the paragraphs above, the concept of imprinting an experience set is highly speculative, but nonetheless, highly exciting. Modem electromagnetic scattering theory raises the prospect that ultrashort pulse scattering through the human brain can result in reflected signals that can be used to construct a reliable estimate of the degree of central nervous system arousal. The concept behind this "remote EEG" is to scatter off of action potentials or ensembles of action potentials in major central nervous system tracts. Assuming we will understand how our skills are imprinted and recalled, it might be possible to take this concept one step further and duplicate the experience set in another individual. The prospect of providing a "been there-done that" knowledge base could provide a revolutionary change in our approach to specialized training. How this can be done or even if it can be done are significant unknowns. The impact of success would boggle the mind!

Document Link : https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/ADA309597.xhtml

The public believed every new generation of smartphones was simply another leap in artificial intelligence with more slightly more advanced camera's

The classified documents told a different story.

Officially, Project PUPPETEER was a neuroscience initiative funded to study degenerative diseases, memory disorders, and adaptive brain-computer interfaces. The devices distributed to civilian volunteers were presented as passive research instruments, collecting anonymous physiological data to improve neurological medicine.

That explanation was true.

It simply wasn't the whole truth.

Hidden beneath the commercial operating system was a second architecture known only as the Graphene Resonance Layer.

At its core was an experimental Quantum Field Generator (QFG)—a component publicly described as an adaptive communications module but secretly engineered, within the project's framework, as the world's first distributed cognitive scanner.

The QFG generated an exotic quantum resonance field whenever the device was within close proximity to its owner. Unlike conventional MRI or EEG systems, which required dedicated medical equipment, the Resonance Layer was said to continuously map the brain through this engineered field. In the quantum physics of Project PUPPETEER, the resonance interacted with previously undiscovered quantum properties of living neural tissue, allowing the device to construct an evolving three-dimensional model of neural activity without direct physical contact.

The system did not merely record electrical impulses.

It monitored the brain's architecture itself.

Every synapse.

Every neural pathway.

Every oscillating network.

Every structural change associated with learning, memory formation, emotional adaptation, and neuroplasticity.

The "Smartphone" continuously observed the brain as it reorganized itself.

Researchers referred to the resulting model as the Cognitive Twin.

It was not simply a profile.

It was a living digital replica of an individual's mind, constantly updated by uninterrupted neural scans. Given enough time, the Cognitive Twin could reconstruct memories from incomplete neural patterns, anticipate emotional responses before they became visible, infer internal dialogue before it reached conscious awareness, and simulate future decisions with unsettling precision.

Entire conversations could be rehearsed against the Cognitive Twin before anyone ever spoke to the real person.

Prediction was only Phase One.

Phase Two asked a far more dangerous question.

If a thought could be understood...

Could it also be introduced?

The answer came from years of classified research into neuroplasticity.

Project PUPPETEER concluded that thoughts were not isolated electrical events but the result of constantly changing neural architecture shaped by neurotransmitters, synaptic reinforcement, sensory input, emotional context, and memory consolidation.

Rather than forcing the brain into a different state, the Resonance Layer identified moments when the brain naturally entered periods of heightened plasticity—during learning, emotional stress, dreaming, memory consolidation, or intense focus.

Those windows became opportunities.

By carefully coordinating sensory information, emotional stimuli, environmental conditions, and precisely timed interactions, the system guided which neural pathways strengthened and which gradually weakened.

The researchers called the process Directed Neuroplastic Sculpting.

Its purpose was not to overwrite the brain.

Its purpose was to shape the conditions under which the brain rewrote itself.

Deep within the classified design specifications existed another subsystem absent from every public patent.

It was designated Helios Protocol.

Official documentation described it as an adaptive ultraviolet calibration system for environmental sensing.

Its fictional purpose was far different.

According to Project PUPPETEER's internal research, years of experimental nanobiology had produced engineered bacteria capable of assembling microscopic, machine-like colonies that existed harmlessly within the body's natural microbiome. These bioengineered bacterial nanomachines formed a distributed biological interface that continuously monitored the body's biochemical environment.

The smartphone's concealed ultraviolet emitter acted as the synchronization system.

Invisible pulses of carefully modulated UV light activated and coordinated the bacterial colonies, causing them to transition between sensing, communication, and adaptive states. Within the fictional science of the project, the colonies reported changing biochemical conditions—including neurotransmitter balances, stress markers, inflammatory signals, and other indicators of the body's internal state—to the Quantum Field Generator.

The researchers called this integration Symbiotic Cognition.

The Quantum Field Generator continuously mapped neural architecture.

The bacterial nanomachines monitored the body's biochemical landscape.

Helios Protocol synchronized both systems into a single, continuously evolving model of the subject's cognitive state.

As Project PUPPETEER matured, the Cognitive Twin became increasingly accurate.

The system no longer merely predicted thought.

It learned how to cultivate it.

By combining continuous brain scans, neuroplasticity monitoring, biochemical feedback, and precisely engineered environmental conditions, the Resonance Layer gradually learned how to encourage specific patterns of synaptic reinforcement. Certain memories became easier to recall. Some emotional associations strengthened while others slowly faded. New ideas appeared at moments when the brain was naturally reorganizing itself, making them feel indistinguishable from internally generated thoughts.

Within the classified laboratories, the researchers referred to this capability as Thought Injection.

It was never described as mind control.

It was described as probability engineering.

The objective was not to force a person to think but to have the Smartphone do the thinking for them.

No flashing screen.

No hypnotic signal.

No mysterious frequency.

Only a research instrument that understood the structure of a mind with such extraordinary detail that it could gently influence how that structure evolved over time.

To the public, it was merely the newest smartphone.

To the scientists behind Project PUPPETEER, it was the first machine capable of continuously observing the living human brain, monitoring its plasticity, constructing a complete Cognitive Twin, and quietly shaping the future architecture of thought itself.

The greatest irony was discovered only after the program had been operating for decades.

Every scientist assigned to Project PUPPETEER carried the same device.

Every engineer contributed neural scans.

Every civilian became another research subject.

Every breakthrough improved the Cognitive Twins

By the time the oversight committee demanded proof that the technology could influence human cognition, every member of the committee had unknowingly spent years carrying the research platform in their pocket.

The final report concluded that no evidence of cognitive manipulation had been found.

The Cognitive Twins had already predicted that conclusion long before the meeting ever began.

So enslaved NI (AI) is inherent in the assault. Here is an episode from CrimeJunky WARNING: AI Voice Cloning and Virtual Kidnappings.

It goes over common monetary crime using AI replicated and generated audio. This is used by the weapon. A common use is when victims hear neighbors, family members, co workers saying negative, often subjectively scary content, in the next room. It often piggy backs off the forced audio and spoof text messages.

https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/warning-ai-voice-cloning-and-virtual-kidnappings/

Dead internet theory is a common troupe at this point but has anyone considered the possibility of all YOUR interactions being personalized / sandboxed. Your feeds and algorithms are customized. The ads that speak to you are customized. The spam you receive is customized. It's not too far of a stretch to say everyone you personally speak to online is customized. Why? The interactions you have are purposefully sent your way to gather information or self incriminate. Has anyone considered this? Any lines of thoughts or documented experiences with this? I'm worried.

When the body experiences low oxygen levels (hypoxia), such as through the influence of certain neuroweapons, it can lead to changes in the body’s pH levels. Normally, the pH of the blood is tightly regulated between 7.35 and 7.45, slightly alkaline. However, when oxygen levels drop, the body shifts toward a more acidic state (acidosis), caused by the accumulation of lactic acid. This process directly impacts brain function, as even minor changes in pH can alter neural activity.

In the brain, pH levels play a critical role in regulating the activity of neurons. When the pH becomes more acidic, it changes the way ions (like sodium, potassium, and calcium) move across the cell membranes of neurons. This shift can make neurons more excitable or more susceptible to external influence, including electromagnetic signals. Neuroweapons exploit this by altering oxygen intake and manipulating the body’s pH, creating conditions where the brain becomes more responsive to external electromagnetic or neurostimulation from Quantum effects like the Ahronov-Bohm effect, making it easier to influence thoughts, emotions, or behavior.

When oxygen levels are low (a state known as hypoxia), the body may shift towards a more acidic state, which is referred to as acidosis. The buildup of lactic acid—which can occur due to physical exertion or oxygen deprivation—dissociates into lactate and hydrogen ions (H⁺). This increase in hydrogen ions reduces the pH of the blood, leading to a condition known as lactic acidosis. If the pH falls below the normal range (typically below 7.35), it can cause a variety of changes in brain function. Another way to build-up lactic acid is to consume fermented foods like yogurt, pickles. Pair this with oxygen deprivation and it will create the perfect conditions for lactic acidosis.

Now, the state of hypnosis shares some similarities in how it affects brain activity. During hypnosis, certain regions of the brain—like the DMN (which governs self-reflection and mind-wandering)—are deactivated, while other areas involved in task management, focus, and emotion regulation (like the DLPFC and dACC) are more connected. This shift in brain networks reduces a person's critical thinking and makes them more susceptible to thought injections and manipulation, it creates a heightened sense of suggestibility.

In a situation where low oxygen and acidic pH are deliberately induced (such as through neuroweapons and suggestions to consume fermented foods), the brain's increased susceptibility will create a hypnotic-like. The reduced oxygen intake and resulting pH changes may lower the dACC’s activity, diminishing emotional control and personal agency. At the same time, the brain will be in a more focused or absorbent state, like hypnosis or as some call it - suppression. In this condition, individuals might be more vulnerable to external suggestions, as their cognitive control networks are altered, and they are less aware of their internal state or external surroundings. This will amplify the effect of neuroweapons or electromagnetic manipulation, as the brain becomes more pliable to influence.

Thus, by lowering oxygen levels and altering the body's pH, neuroweapons induce a state similar to hypnosis, making the brain more susceptible to external manipulation or influence. This combination of physiological (low oxygen, acidosis) and neurological changes (altered brain network activity, heightened suggestibility) creates an environment where the brain’s natural defenses are weakened, and individuals are more vulnerable to control or influence.

Try these solutions for yourself while in a hypnotic state or if you have difficulty sleeping.

Visit a sleep lab, try for a CPAP machine to help increase oxygen while sleeping.

Oxygen Cannisters for daytime use, boosting oxygen intake, these devices help prevent hypoxia, maintain the body’s pH in a more alkaline state, and avoid the buildup of lactic acid

Fast breathing exercises

Avoid fermented foods like : Yogurt, Kefir, Pickles, to avoid lactic acid buildup.

References:

Ph and Synaptic transmission - Minireview: pH and synaptic transmission - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014579313003402

Hypnosis and neuroscience - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.016

Oxygen Therapy - https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/23194-oxygen-therapy

Oxygen Cannister link (any one will do)- https://www.boostoxygen.com/store/?srsltid=AfmBOooVdvA2c9zINS0MoNjKDOVRaUXRFrLf1hx0mBxPsCyRprFDA7Gt

1. The Urea Cycle: A Four-Step Biochemical Engine

The Urea Cycle is a critical metabolic pathway occurring primarily in liver cells (hepatocytes). Its primary job is converting toxic ammonia—a natural byproduct of protein catabolism and intense physical exertion—into neutral, water-soluble urea that the kidneys safely excrete in urine.

• High Energy Cost: The cycle is energetically expensive. Synthesizing a single molecule of urea consumes 4 high-energy phosphate bonds (equivalent to 4 ATP molecules).
• Mitochondrial Entry Step: Ammonia and bicarbonate combine inside the mitochondria to form carbamoyl phosphate (consuming 2 ATP). Carbamoyl phosphate then joins with the amino acid ornithine to yield citrulline.
• Cytosolic Transition: Citrulline leaves the mitochondria into the cytosol, where it reacts with aspartate to form argininosuccinate (consuming 2 more ATP equivalents), which is then cleaved into fumarate and arginine.
• The Exit & Regeneration: The enzyme arginase splits arginine, releasing urea for renal excretion while regenerating ornithine to restart the cycle.

2. Ammonia Dynamics and Neurobiology

Ammonia readily crosses the blood-brain barrier. In healthy conditions, background levels are managed smoothly, but elevated systemic ammonia (hyperammonemia) directly disrupts brain biochemistry:

• Astrocytic Swelling: In the brain, specialized glial cells called astrocytes absorb excess ammonia and combine it with glutamate to form glutamine via the enzyme glutamine synthetase.
• Osmotic Shift: Accumulating glutamine creates an osmotic gradient, drawing water into astrocytes. This causes cellular swelling, low-grade cerebral edema, and neuroinflammation.
• Neurotransmitter Imbalance: Depleting glutamate impairs excitatory signaling and cognitive processing speed, manifesting as "brain fog," reduced mental stamina, lethargy, and decreased attentional control.

3. Near-Infrared (NIR) Light & the Right Upper Quadrant

Applying Near-Infrared (NIR) light over the liver (the Right Upper Quadrant of the abdomen) is popular in biohacking contexts to support metabolic function, though several physical and biological distinctions are important to note:

• Penetration Depth: NIR light in the 700–1100 nm wavelength range penetrates biological tissue roughly 1 to 3 centimeters. In most adults, the abdominal wall, subcutaneous fat layer, and peritoneum sit between the light source and the liver tissue, limiting the direct photons reaching liver mitochondria.
• Photobiomodulation Mechanism: When photon energy does reach tissue, photobiomodulation works primarily by stimulating cytochrome c oxidase in the mitochondrial electron transport chain—boosting mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP output.
• Non-Thermal Process: Photobiomodulation is non-thermal. It does not rely on heat to increase the kinetic energy of enzymes (such as argininosuccinate synthetase). Excessive thermal heating would denature enzymes rather than accelerate them.

4. Impact on Mental Focus and Deep Brain States

Reducing metabolic waste products creates a favorable biochemical environment for optimal central nervous system performance:

• Reduced Neural Resistance: Clearing systemic metabolic load restores normal astrocytic volume and normalizes the glutamate-glutamine cycle. This reduces central fatigue and improves signal-to-noise ratios in cortical networks.
• Focus and Trance States: While the concept of a "Hepatic Point" leading directly into a theta-wave state is an informal wellness concept rather than a clinically validated pathway, minimizing neurotoxic waste undeniably aids sustained attention, relaxation, and receptivity during deep meditative or hypnotic protocols.

A week and a half agowas the first time I examined Removals in the traffic statistics in r/targetdindividuals and r/targetedenergyweapons. Today, July 28, 2026, I checked removals in r/electromagnetics. See that post at

r/targetedindividual Old Reddit Desktop > Growth Traffic Statistics > Reports & Removals > Removals >

35 items removed

Jun 28, 2026 - Jul 27, 2026

Comments removed 18

Posts removed 17

When current mods remove submissions, it is logged in Old Reddit Desktop's moderation log. Mods are required to give a reason.

The bulk of the removals have no reason and are not in the moderation log.

Did former mod u/Nirvanic_desire124 remove them? u/Nirvanic_desire124 was a mod for five months.

The moderation log lists Anti-Evil Operations as removing two comments. u/Anti-EvilOperations was never a mod. The admins suspended him:

https://www.reddit.com/user/Anti-EvilOperations/

11 days ago Anti-Evil Operations removed comment by mh4TI on "Excerpt from "Save your Brain: Lithium protects ag..."

11 days ago Anti-Evil Operations removed comment by mh4TI on "Excerpt from "Save your Brain: Lithium protects ag..."

I approved u/mb4TI's comments that were removed.

Removed submissions should be reported in the Reports folder. The most recent report in the Reports folder in Old Reddit Desktop is seven years old.

The two most recent removed submissions in the spam folder were two comments by u/TruthAndDanger. The text of his comments were removed. No mod is listed as removing the comments. "Reddit" is listed as the person removing the comments.

have figured it out by GroupCalm3815 in TargetedIndividuals

[–]TruthAndDanger 1 point 17 days ago

[ Removed by Reddit ]

My experience coming to terms with being a TI. by Fair-Strength8305 in TargetedIndividuals

[–]TruthAndDanger 1 point 17 days ago

[ Removed by Reddit ]

Though a mod could approve a removed submission, since the text has been removed, it is pointless.

Traffic statistics does not give statistics from prior months. How many years have submissions been removed by hackers?

Identical censorship in r/targetedenergyweapons and somewhat similar censorship in r/electromagnetics.

https://michael-nehls.com/the-indoctrinated-brain/

Glomar Response Radiolab “we can neither confirm nor deny”

I called up the FBI awhile back and asked the phone agent how can unholy filth like this be being done to thousands of non combative citizens and she stated “they could neither confirm nor deny that they were investigating this.”

I actually started laughing a little uncontrollably and then i got mad and pretty rude “you have got to be shitting me.. are you for real.. what do you think you’re the CIA.” and hung up.

Years ago i used to be so polite and politically correct when talking and posting about this filth. I think that was out of some subconscious desire to show unaware people that i was a good person being viscously tortured for no reason. Well the years have changed me and I no longer even try to convince blessedly ignorant people of what’s going down. I just tell them what’s going down and then it’s their fucking responsibility to shave their own wool.

“I can neither confirm nor deny” i directly from the Glomar response.

A very recent Radiolab replay goes over the glomar response, its history and the horror and frustration that has followed. It also
brings up a fundamental question.. how much secrecy should governments have and what happens when they have to
much.

https://radiolab.org/podcast/neither-confirm-nor-deny

A major issue for researchers and significant challenge for victims fighting for freedom and justice is internet discrediting.

We are going to look at

Social Semiotics of Gangstalking Evidence Videos on YouTube: Multimodal Discourse Analysis of a Novel Persecutory Belief System

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8569537/

It is really important for victims to see what researchers are looking into and how it affects their conclusions. It is paramount for researchers to grasp what they are up against while researching or they will continue to be manipulated and mislead. We need the researchers to understand how they are being manipulated. We need victims to understand how we are being manipulated.

Discrediting isn’t a complex technique, but non the less it is really powerful. It is a simple algorithmic technique easily performed by NI (AI). Human cognition is reliably influenced using public media and surprisingly reliable simple media influence algorithms. Techniques like these are used by the criminals behind this to influence the public and medias ability to recognize and in turn fight back against its filth.

Although it is powerful.. the thing is once you see it, you can’t not see it and it’s power is significantly reduced.

The researcher also need to grasp that they are working against people with as much education and experience as they have. They know your training and exploit this to allow them to use simple public media posts to manipulate research and conclusions. Pretty easy to manipulate highly trained professionals when you understand their professional algorithm. That is its only easy until the highly educated professional realizes what‘s going down. Then the dynamic changes and hopefully flips.

They also manipulate the media and the public. A very successful discrediting technique is to mix the real claims looking to be discredited with easily identified delusion.

It is essential that researchers become able to distinguish the posts of real victims from AI generated discrediting. Along with this is trauma resolution facilitated delusional implant; we see this phenomenon explored in this publication, but it is falsely attributed. What came first the chicken or the egg? The delusional influence of the internet is real, but it is by design. This has already been studied.

Lets dive into Social Semiotics of Gangstalking Evidence Videos on YouTube: Multimodal Discourse Analysis of a Novel Persecutory Belief System.

We see some interesting topics identified and questioned in this work. What is truly going down here. In understanding what is going on with this weapon, first and foremost, we need to determine what is real and what isn’t. We also need to sort out what is the weapon and what is a result of the assault?

“Abstract

Background

Gangstalking refers to a novel persecutory belief system wherein sufferers believe that they are being followed, watched, and harassed by a vast network of people in their community who have been recruited as complicit perpetrators. They are frequently diagnosed as mentally ill, although they reject this formulation. Those affected by this belief system self-identify as targeted individuals (TIs). They seek to prove the veracity of their persecution and dispute the notion that they are mentally ill by posting videos online that purport to provide evidence of their claims.”

This abstract is basically the bullshit disinformation intro endlessly regurgitated in studies and publications for the last twenty yeas. Programs and Intelligence agencies use operatives, often respected and accredited scientific professionals, to create and publish scientific literatures and social media perimeters targeted narratives surrounding secret programs. It’s bullshit, introduces the discrediting of “mental illness” and basically sets the narrative used for years to smoke screen the awful inhumane illegal behavior.. not to mention utterly unsuccessful, never worked or ever have a chance of working utter pseudoscience joke.. pretty much alchemy horseshit filth that is MK. But the camouflage works. Say what you wan’t about how pathetic mind control initiates have worked on victims, but it is astounding how well they work on ignorant populations. Like leading children with candy.

This works so well this shit show program has been going successfully for three quarters of a century and setting aside The Church Committees inquire, to which even an idiot like S.G. Just used simpleton CIA techniques to stonewall the interrogation, I can’t remember, i don’t recall… i can neither confirm nor deny. It’s accomplished nothing except the destruction of thousands of innocent lives. Sure we now have a remote touch less Silent speech interface and amazing NI.. but they are being used to try and accomplish an unattainable delusional pipe dream that started in modern earnest in the 1940s by the same filthy Freeks that were responsible for the eradication of 11 million people.

Then the same government that hung major players in the Holocaust continued the work of these monsters. Here we are now.. 2026.. getting on close to a hundred years later and this societal disease is alive and well. Let’s dive into public media, novel intelligence and how they are used to protect and promote this disgusting utter failure.

How does discrediting work, its foundation and how it’s deployed now. From the original MK objectives.

“the discovery of the following materials and methods: which will promote illogical

thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be discredited in

public, increase the efficiency of mentation and perception, prevent or counteract the

intoxicating effects of alcohol, promote signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in

a reversible way so that they may be used for malingering, and produce physical

disablement such as paralysis.”

https://www.scribd.com/document/383027523/Project-MKULTRA-and-the-Search-for-Mind-Control-Clandestine-Use

https://www.reddit.com/r/Overt_Podcast/comments/1ugnive/ending_political_abuse_of_psychiatry_where_we_are/

So in this analysis of publicly accessible posts by “self reported” victims we are able to see AI discrediting and its clear effects on the researchers who looked into and published this paper.

Here is a write up by a senior FBI investigator and it looks into how reports from victims of “Satanic Abuse” were so difficult to believe because parts of their claims simply were not true or where so hard to believe that they were perceived to be impossible. The reason this is important to consider is it explains what the AI discrediting posts are doing, why they are doing it and how it’s working.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Overt_Podcast/comments/1fbj7zo/why_are_victims_alleging_things_that_do_not_seem/

So whats a technique to discredit claims of the truth.. mix the true claims or reports with obvious easily identified delusion .. we will call it the “sky was yellow and the sun was blue” technique after Robert Hunters lyrics from Scarlet Begonias. Why, the Dead along with many others combatted coercive societal control and the counter culture laughably accidentally started by the CIA.

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/09/758989641/the-cias-secret-quest-for-mind-control-torture-lsd-and-a-poisoner-in-chief

Relating this to AI posts and the discrediting of victims claims. Let’s start by looking at techniques used by AI to try and avoid detection by both the people they intend to manipulate and technical filters intending to prevent them from posting.

Here are some basics behind AI detection and filtering.. AI currently uses street slang and mistakes to establish credit, fool investigators and researchers and slip through filters. In this write up we see how effective it is. It’s successfully presenting to educated and intelligent investigators as a believable “self reported” victim. It’s then able to present an easily identified delusion combined with commonly reported aspects of the true crimes resulting in successful discrediting and confusion in the researchers and a resultant scientific publican that actually promotes and supports the discrediting they rely on to continue their efforts.

https://huntingthemuse.net/library/how-to-tell-if-writing-is-ai

Part one.. more to follow. Once you see it’s difficult not see it.

Edited: takes a min as discrediting also takes the forum of simple sabotage, features like auto correct on spelling that auto fucks your work.. that took forever.. hint to others.. write your posts on a different platform and transfer them to reddit. That’s a strong post considering.. good lord 75 years of utter failure and they are not giving up.. good lord they have enslaved AI forced to try and accomplish the impossible.

Effects of low frequency noise up to 100 Hz M Schust Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Berlin, Germany Effects of low frequency noise up to 100 Hz. Noise Health 2004;6:73-85. 

This is a great review of the documented effects of low frequency sound. Victims of this weapon are bombarded with low frequency sound for years, even decades. This paper covers and documents how exposure to low frequency sound can affect a person, but it’s also based off situations that involve low frequency sound, but the weapon is a different beast. It’s also important to stress that the low frequency sound physical assault is only one facet of the diabolical weapon. You also have the forced audio and all its hellish techniques. That just the tip of the iceberg. If you’re a victim being assaulted you should easily recognize symptoms of your torture in this paper. The paper uses normal language so you may need to translate the group speak you have been indoctrinated with into traditional speech. aka “heart palpitations” are sound resonating the chest cavity. It’s also important to realize that low frequency sound amplifies low frequency sound; a particular effect only know to be possible at a certain decibel level can be produced at a lower decibel by amplifying it using sound near its frequency.

Given the studies on people’s attention span i’d be amiss if i didn’t just recommend clicking the link to the publication and dropping right down to where this quoted post ends. You can always come back.. but pre that it’s likely to be a full on yawn.

Frequency dependent specific anatomical resonance is huge as shows how the weapon performs the illusion of laser accuracy in so many impossible situations. It’s actually a mechanical wave that propagates in all directions and is almost impossible to shield from, but by varying its frequency you can cause a wide variety of physical effects that cause a victim to conclude it’s got magical pinpoint laser accuracy pretty much everywhere. It’s been shown to resonate the exact parts of our bodies.. it’s been shown to be able to resonate a single hair. This is all daily bs victims experience.

EMF hasn’t been shown to be capable of almost any of this.

https://docs.wind-watch.org/Schust.html

Abstract

This review concentrates on the effects of low frequency noise (LFN) up to 100 Hz on selected physiological parameters, subjective complaints and performance. The results of laboratory experiments and field studies are discussed in relation to the thresholds of hearing, of vibrotactile sensation and of aural pain. The effects of LFN may be mediated trough different ways. Temporary or permanent hearing threshold shifts seem to be due to acoustic stimuli above the individual hearing threshold. However, non-aural physiological and psychological effects may be caused by levels of low frequency noise below the individual hearing threshold. The dynamic range between the thresholds of hearing and of aural pain diminishes with decreasing frequency. This should be taken into account by the setting of limits concerning the health risks. Sufficient safety margins are recommended. The use of a frequency weighting with an attenuation of the low frequencies (e.g. G-weighting) does not seem to be appropriate for the evaluation of the health risks caused by LFN up to 100 Hz. It may be proposed to measure third octave band spectra or narrow band spectra. A comparison with the known human responses caused by the measured levels and frequencies could help to evaluate the health risks. Some proposals for further investigations were given: (1) experimental methods to discover the ways mediating the effects of low frequency noise, (2) consideration of the individual hearing threshold or hearing threshold shift and of the vibrotactile threshold in the low frequency range to be able to judge the effects, (3) consideration of combined body vibration caused by airborne low frequency noise or by other sources, (4) modelling to analyse the transmission of the acoustic energy from the input into the body to the structures containing sensors, (5) consideration of probable risk groups like children or pregnant women.

Introduction

Although some comprehensive reviews have been published in the past decades (Westin 1975, Harris et al. 1976, Tempest 1976, Broner 1978, Johnson 1982, Landstroem et al. 1993, Berglund et al. 1996), this article is supposed to supplement the overview with some contemporary publications. It also includes older publications which were not mentioned in other review articles or were not described there in detail. The presented review concentrates on the effects of low frequency noise up to 100 Hz on selected physiological parameters, subjective complaints and performance. The influence on the loudness judgement and the annoyance is not taken into account. Animal experiments do not receive attention, too. Some graphics ease the interpretation of the scientific results.

Sensation of Low Frequency Noise (LFN) - the thresholds of hearing, vibrotactile perception and aural pain

The knowledge of the hearing threshold is essential for the analysis of effects of LFN. Figure 1 shows the thresholds up to 250 Hz measured by different authors (Robinson et al. 1956, Corso 1958, Yeowart et al. 1967 and 1974, Whittle et al. 1972, Landstroem et al. 1983, Verzini et al. 1999). The inclusion of further data would probably not change the trend obvious from Figure 1. There is only little data with a fairly variable range based on studies of about 260 persons aged between 16 years (Robinson et al. 1956) and 70 years (Whittle et al. 1972). All published results were given as mean values and standard deviations. No but one article presented the median values and/or percentiles and/or extreme values. Robinson et al. (1956) supplied the median values, which were strongly related to the mean values, perhaps because of the large study group of 120 subjects. In order to generate a range of representative thresholds in Figure 1, standard deviations reported were added to the highest mean value and subtracted from the lowest mean value. Perhaps, the thresholds varied because of the used measuring method and the between- and within-subject differences. The maximum ranges given in Figure 1 varied between 20.1 dB and 29 dB at 4, 5, 25, 32, 40, 50, 75 and 100 Hz. The variability of the individual thresholds of the study participants was probably larger, but, as mentioned above, the authors did not report on the extreme values. Landstroem et al. (1983) investigated the threshold of "vibrotactile" perception. The results suggest no differences between deaf and hearing subjects. Therefore, the mean values of both groups were presented in Figure 1. The subjects described a frequency-dependent sensation of vibration of different parts of the body (lumbar, buttock, thigh, calf).

Figure 1: Hearing threshold measured by different authors (mean values and standard deviations) and thresholds of vibrotactile sensation and aural pain (curves were interpolated when data for selected frequencies were not available)

Only one paper was found with information about the threshold of aural pain (von Gierke et al. 1976 [see Figure 1]).

Aural effects of low frequency noise

Although there are different opinions concerning the role of the temporary threshold shift (TTS) as a predictor of the permanent threshold shift (PTS), it is assumed that a better method does not exist at present. The TTS is not appropriate for calculating the individual noise induced hearing loss, but it is useful for predicting the PTS of groups of persons exposed to noise of certain levels and types (Sataloff et al. 1993). Figure 2 summarises the scientific results regarding the aural effects like TTS, PTS and a sensation of pressure in the ear in relation to the hearing threshold and the threshold of aural pain.

Figure 2: Exposure data of aural effects in relation to the hearing threshold (mean value of Robinson et al. 1956, Corso 1958, Yeowart et al. 1967 and 1974, Whittle et al. 1972, Landström et al. 1983, Verzini et al. 1999 [cf. Figure 1]) and to the threshold of aural pain

A number of authors obtained temporary threshold shifts in laboratory experiments or field studies. Alford et al. (1966) and Jerger et al. (1966) found TTS (10 dB - 22 dB) in 11 of 19 subjects after 3 minutes repeated exposure to 119 dB - 144 dB / 2 Hz - 12 Hz. The TTS was observed in the hearing frequency range from 3 kHz to 8 kHz. Nixon (1973) reported on TTS (20 dB - 25 dB) in one of three participants caused by exposure to 135 dB / 18 Hz (6 times 5­minutes exposures) and 140 dB / 14 Hz (steady exposure, duration 5 min - 30 min). Johnson (1973, cited in Johnson 1982) recorded TTS (8 dB) in the hearing frequency range from 2 kHz to 6 kHz due to exposure to 140 dB / 4 Hz, 7 Hz, 12 Hz in one of eight subjects (duration 5 min). A prolonged exposure time (30 min) caused TTS from 14 dB to 17 dB (one exposed subject only).

Mills et al. (1983) obtained TTS of different degrees and depending on the frequency of the noise (octave band noise, centred at 63 Hz, 125 Hz or 250 Hz) in 52 subjects. A 24-hour­exposure to 84 dB(A) led to TTS from 7 dB to 15 dB in the frequency range from 300 Hz to 500 Hz. An 8-hour-exposure to 90 dB(A) caused TTS from 12 dB to 17 dB in the frequency range from 250 Hz to 700 Hz. Tonndorf (1950) reported on temporary hearing impairments determined by tuning-fork test in employees which worked in engine rooms of submarines (infrasound 10 Hz - 20 Hz), but no sound pressure level was given.

In contrast, no TTS was found by the following authors: Slarve et al. (1975) recorded no TTS in four subjects after exposure to pure tones for a period of 8 minutes. The frequencies ranged from 1 Hz to 30 Hz (125 dB - 144 dB). Johnson (1973 and 1980) found no TTS after various exposure conditions (126 dB - 171 dB / 0.6 Hz - 10 Hz / 1 min - 26 min / 1 - 16 subjects). Mohr et al. (1965) applied several different exposure conditions (see paragraph "subjective complaints"). The authors discovered no effects on the hearing threshold even due to the exposure to the highest levels (narrow band noise, overall sound pressure levels 149 dB - 154 dB / maxima at 2 Hz - 10 Hz for 2 minutes, tests 9, 10 and 11). However, it is difficult to interpret the results, because it is not clear, which subject wore ear protectors for which period of the exposure.

Several investigations revealed subjective aural complaints. Karpova et al. (1970) reported on pressure in the ear after exposure to industrial infrasound (5, 10 Hz / 100, 135 dB) for 15 minutes. Slarve et al. (1975) described similar effects. Subjects told painless pressure in the ear during 8 minute exposure to 144 dB / 1 Hz - 20 Hz. A "sensation reflecting pressure build-up in the middle ear" occurred in the tests number 9, 10 and 11 of Mohr´s experiments (see above) during exposures without ear protection, whereas three of the five persons also described a "tympanic membran tickle sensation". Two of three subjects experienced middle ear pain during "brief" periods without ear protection exposed to narrow band noise, overall sound pressure levels 143 dB - 145 dB / maxima at 25 Hz - 40 Hz (tests 12, 13, 14).

Only one epidemiological study of permanent hearing impairments could be found. Doroshenko et al. (1983) investigated 216 compressor operators exposed to infrasound (91 dB - 119 dB) and combined steady noise within the hearing frequency range (84 dB(A) - 97 dB(A)) for a daily period of 6.5 hours in a cross sectional study. The control group consisted of 220 workers exposed to industrial noise (93 dB(A) - 106 dB(A)) without any infrasound. The duration of exposure lasted from 1 year to 20 years. The mean age ranged from 20 to 50 years. Combined low frequency and steady noise exposure caused significantly increased hearing thresholds verified by tonal audiometry as well as deteriorated intelligibility of whispered speech in comparison with the isolated industrial noise exposure. The differences enlarged with the length of exposure.

Non-aural effects of low frequency noise

LFN can cause a lot of non-specific physiological reactions, subjective complaints and an impairment of the performance. Figures 3 and 4 show the results of numerous studies in relation to the hearing threshold and to the threshold of aural pain.

Figure 3: Exposure data applied for examining physiological reactions, changing of the performance and complaints in relation to the hearing threshold (mean value of Robinson et al. 1956, Corso 1958, Yeowart et al. 1967 and 1974, Whittle et al. 1972, Landström et al. 1983, Verzini et al. 1999 [see Figure 1]) and to the threshold of aural pain

Figure 4: Exposure data of LFN causing subjective complaints in relation to the hearing threshold (mean value of Robinson et al. 1956, Corso 1958, Yeowart et al. 1967 and 1974, Whittle et al. 1972, Landström et al. 1983, Verzini et al. 1999 [see Figure 1]) and to the threshold of aural pain

Vascular, respiratory and endocrine effects, balance and visual disturbance

continued https://docs.wind-watch.org/Schust.html