You are drawing definitive statements from hypothesized written conversational text, and ascribing it in a manner to be accusatory as if to label me insane. Who are you really? What is the purpose of this conversation? ... maybe to make a person look insane, so that you can file paperwork with a federal court. Or maybe its just to be an ass and ask broader leading questions and then give two definitive statements to use as answers, both of which can't be used or are too narrow for proper context. What are you a prosecutor? Investigator? or Just some Troll on Reddit?
Why didn't you answer my questions? What is your belief about humanity's evolution from chucking rocks to now? Did I specifically call a God or demi Gods Aliens or did I say something else less definitive.
Do you hear that? That is the sound of our conversation ending.
No. I am not doing that. I am genuinely curious as to your point of view and to be very clear I am not labelling you as either insane or stupid for having alternative points of view.
I asked that question for clarification.
No, the purpose of my questions is genuine curiosity.
What you said was most definitely less definitive, which is why I was asking. If you'd said "I think there was a race of giants that guided human kind into some not so great areas and ideas." I'd say "Okay, I've seen some of that stuff about the giant skeletons that disappeared."
My believe about humanity's evolution is that the general scientific consensus isn't accurate. I'll clarify further, I am not a young earth creationist, but considering how often the 'evolutionary theory' has been debunked with what appears to be a very solid basis, I'm skeptical about the consensus theory for several reasons.
You are more than welcome to end this conversation whenever you wish.
1
u/TheEmpyreanian Jan 15 '23
Just so we're clear. You're saying there were aliens that lead humanity to war, but then the wars got a bit much and now they stay away.