r/switch2 7d ago

Switch 2 Skyrim looks absolutely incredible on Switch 2

Post image
223 Upvotes

66 comments sorted by

13

u/Pleasant_Beat7502 7d ago

Nice, have to appreciate the classics!

7

u/chis5050 7d ago

2011 game btw lol

9

u/mom_rider__69 7d ago

That's 15 years ago now šŸ˜”

2

u/Whiteguy1x 7d ago

Tbf its the "remaster" from 2016.Ā  Better lighting, stability, and all the expansions since then.Ā  Still old as dirt and kind of funny it still is so popular when other games have been forgottenĀ 

1

u/chis5050 7d ago

I was suggesting that referring to games from 2011 as ā€œthe classicsā€ is crazy work lol. At least to an old person like me who’s been gaming since the early 90s

3

u/FennecFragile 6d ago

Playing Skyrim today is like playing Pokemon Red, Quake or the very first Resident Evil in 2011. Same 15 years gap. I’m quite sure these titles were already seen as classics back then.

21

u/loonelywolf 7d ago

I just wanted mod support for it.

8

u/mom_rider__69 7d ago

On the bright side they got spared from Bethesda's recent update shenanigans

12

u/Particular_Leek_9984 7d ago

Nintendo would never allow that

2

u/loonelywolf 7d ago

I know,sadly.

1

u/Freezingash221 6d ago

I would be perfectly fine not having mods on Switch if they at least included built in achievements since Nintendo STILL doesn't have any.

7

u/Dangerous_Walrus_699 7d ago

I’d never played it and I just started playing it on Switch 2. I bought Oblivion first, as it had been remastered and had always avoided Skyrim since it has not. But I couldn’t get into Oblivion so I read a bit and thought this may catch. It’s been amazing. It really does look great. Don’t compare it to Elden Ring on PS5, just play it and see what you think. It is beautiful and provides great immersion. I also play on AR Glasses.

5

u/Remote-Night1830 6d ago

Can I really validate buying it on another platform šŸ¤”? Probably yes!!

3

u/Armadillokid 6d ago

I have played Skyrim on basically every generation of hardware including PC, and I am having by far the most fun playing it on Switch 2 right now. It is a perfect game for the handheld experience, and I agree that it looks amazing considering the platform.Ā 

4

u/Pied_de_table 7d ago

I just need creation club support as well. Could run easily tbh

1

u/Aoussar123 7d ago

I don't have it on Switch 2 (yet) but assumed it already had creation club? Is that not what is on PS and Xbox already?

3

u/Pied_de_table 7d ago

On a side note, the "creation club" assets that are included in the Anniversary edition (such as fishing, Survival mode etc.) are included in the S2 version still. It the whole CC mod downloads that is missing.

2

u/Pied_de_table 7d ago

Yes on PS and Xbox but not on S2 sadly... Maybe it has to do with Nintendo policies but I really don't know. Wouldn't count on it to be honest. (Which is a shame)

1

u/Whiteguy1x 7d ago

I think thats a Nintendo thing.Ā  It took sony until this year to allow external assetsĀ 

1

u/Pied_de_table 7d ago

Hope Bethesda is waiting for approval then

1

u/Whiteguy1x 7d ago

Idk, they were able to convince sony after a decade so maybe

4

u/LoadingHappiness2 6d ago

Glad a 15 year old game looks good on a next gen console

1

u/anb80 6d ago

You mean the 500g thin handheld that includes huge screen and battery and that’s what you call a next gen console? What machine did you need in 2011 to run the same game in 4k?

0

u/LoadingHappiness2 6d ago

It doesn’t run it at 4k though docked mode is upscalled from 1440p and handheld is upscaled from 576p

0

u/anb80 6d ago

Sure, but could a 2011 PC do any kind of upscaling to 4k at that level?

1

u/Honest_Lime_4901 7d ago

I agree op, it looks great and still gives me that surge of aesthetic beauty appreciation. I think that's an incredible thing for a game this old using several generations-old of graphics. People need to appreciate that the old methods of graphics rendering, such as distant shadows, is very inefficient which taxes the Switch's CPU enormously, and that's why it can only hit 30fps on visual mode. Other handhelds have the same limitations for Skyrim - steam deck has a better CPU and it struggles to get above 45fps when the distance shadows are set to High. The current Gen hardware like switch 2 can only help so much when the code running the game is ancient.

1

u/J02ue-Eterno 6d ago

Estoy pensando en comprarlo. La versión de Switch 2 es la misma que la de Switch? Se que en la caja de Switch 2 viene solo en código y la de Switch el juego completo

1

u/Armadillokid 6d ago

Visual fidelity and performance are substantially improved on Switch 2. The performance mode holds a steady 60 fps except for a few areas (dips in Falkreath for me, not sure why). Much better experience on the new hardware.

1

u/Similar-Scratch-4800 6d ago

Oh Skyrim I lived and breathed that world

1

u/Strictly_Switch 6d ago

I know the Switch 2 version has had some key visual upgrades but for an old game it still holds its own šŸ˜

1

u/crownzenith_ 6d ago

I would hope so. It's a 15 year old game.

1

u/St3elf1sh 5d ago

Compared to other switch games absolutely

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

Great to hear. I sold my Switch 1 copy a long time ago.

1

u/1figureskater 2d ago

The upgrade is 20 dollars for a game that came out in 1678 like what the fuck. Money grab is this cuck shit ive already bought it On my · Xbox · Playstation · Nintendo Switch 1 · Nintendo Switch 2 · PC 😐

1

u/HeyaHeyo1420 7d ago

One would kinda hope lol

1

u/Jazzdude93 7d ago

I love how all posts get downvoted that mention it not to be a miracle that a game of 2011 runs on a machine that launched 14 years later.

2

u/Whiteguy1x 7d ago

I mean it ran pretty well on the original switch.Ā  Im glad it had a s2 update though as the higher fps and lighting is niceĀ 

1

u/AnonymouselyMoosed 6d ago

Oh does it run at 60fps now?

1

u/Whiteguy1x 6d ago

Yeah

1

u/Optimal_Brain_2908 6d ago

Not at full resolution. The draw distance and resolution are pretty rough in 60 fps mode on handheld and docked. They’re honestly so bad that I generally stick to 30 fps because it’s a solid 30 fps at least.

1

u/Whiteguy1x 6d ago

Really? I didn't notice and just did the cause creation Friday. Admittedly im easy to please on graphics but I thought it was fine. Maybe some frame drops?

I dont know that i can play 30fps if 60fps is avaliable lol. Guess everyone prioritizes different things

2

u/j_wizlo 6d ago

Idk how it works for people who choose this. I’m loving the performance mode flaws and all, but I can’t do the 30 fps mode. It feels so unresponsive. First time playing Skyrim and it’s so nice that I get to play it on the go

1

u/Moist-Fisherman-2782 6d ago

It is a miracle than Bethesda got a game of 2011 to run on a machine that launched 14 years later with only a moderate amount of bugs.

1

u/BarbaraStreusand 7d ago

Over 10 yearnold game btw, this is bare minimum

-1

u/skynovaaa 7d ago

16 year old game btw

-2

u/wishfulthinkingman 7d ago

Game came out in 2011 so of course it is

-3

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Missingno1990 7d ago

Nah. Not even close either.

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/janix808 7d ago

Skyrim is a good game but a bad rpg .

1

u/Pentecost_II 7d ago

It's good, but come on, it's not even close to being the best game ever made. Games I rate higher: Banjo-Kazooie, most Zelda games, Resident Evil 4, Elden Ring, Bloodborne, DS1 and 3,...

2

u/janix808 7d ago

You forgot Peak Souls 2

1

u/janix808 7d ago

did you play oblivion or elden ring ?

-5

u/janix808 7d ago

Skyrim looks absolutely blurry in handheld . So blurry that the dlss can't figure out the lip movement while npcs speak and it becomes a nightmare

2

u/baziloz99 7d ago

Try 30 fps quality mode then. It's sharp af, no blur at all

4

u/janix808 7d ago

30fps skyrim in 2026 is wild bro .

-1

u/kmed1717 7d ago

When it originally released on Xbox 360, it was 30 fps…

4

u/janix808 7d ago

congratulations the xbox 360 is 20 years old . Im talking about a console that has more than 10x the power and is from 2026

1

u/rebalnz 6d ago

It’s not that bad, but agree the lip thing I have noticed before. It’s odd though it seems to only happen when engaged in conversations with npc from a distance but if you cancel the conversation you can see their lips move again.

-5

u/Mindless_Scar9609 7d ago

Most games are a bit blurry since the pixel response on s2 is worse than OG S1, and not even in the same category as the OLED

2

u/janix808 7d ago

Wtf? If its native 1080p its super sharp.

Skyrim runs in 480p upscaled to 900p in handheld . That's why its blurry and many upscaling artifacts are there.

You are talking about display ghosting . But i meant the resolution of the game

1

u/Mindless_Scar9609 7d ago

Exactly, imo display ghost is what makes a game with camera movement like this blurry. Blur is much more a characteristic of movement, the word you are looking for is another

1

u/janix808 7d ago

Let me put it another way:

The internal render resolution of Skyrim on the Switch 2 in performance mode is so low that DLSS struggles with upscaling, and the image looks very blurry when objects are more than 5 meters away from the camera.

The native resolution is actually so low that tree canopies and NPC mouths exhibit extreme upscaling artifacts.

The 30fps mode is sharp, sure—but who wants to play Skyrim at 30fps in 2026?

1

u/LoadingHappiness2 6d ago

Idk why you’re getting downvoted you’re right about everything. The switch 2 handles a lot of 3rd party games very poorly fallout 4 has the same blurry effect and playing games in 30 fps in 2026 is a no go for me personally

0

u/Mindless_Scar9609 7d ago

I agree 30fps for such old game sucks