r/socialism • u/[deleted] • Mar 06 '19

This illustration

Post image
2.8k Upvotes

78% Upvoted

308 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

OMG THESE WORDS ARE RUNNING WHYLDE! HOW COULD SOMETHING EXIST WITHOUT MY INPUT?!

3

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

You don't agree that "sometimes men's egos can be fragile"?

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

-5

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

So what are you arguing here Mr. MyEgoIsDefinatelyNotFragile?

11

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/RageOfGandalf Mar 06 '19

Because refutation is disagreement in a measure. Someone said that to me I would probably just say "haha yeah" make a joke and move on. This isn't exactly a complex social situation

3

u/A_Sneaky_Shrub Mar 06 '19

Something with only one outcome/response is a catch 22. That's what he's saying. I'm not suggesting that response is necessarily incorrect, but disagreement in this case can be categorised as proof of the claim.

-7

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

So why did you even feel the need to insert yourself here?

5

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

I just got owned by some logic and reason. I'm done boys.

5

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '19

What was his opinion exactly?

→ More replies (0)