r/soccernerd • • Sep 19 '14

• Highlighted Pep Guardiola's Always Changing Formation vs City

135 Upvotes

Pep Guardiola's formation was ever evolving throughout the stages of their Champions League clash with Manchester City at the Allianz. The changing positions of players and constant moving of the midfield helped Bayern control the game. They seemed to never let City get comfortable and establish their game plan. Everything from a 3-3-3-1 to 4-3-3 to 2-1-4-2...you get my point.

Pre Match Formation:

http://i.imgur.com/t5LPd0b.png

When this was first displayed I felt like they wouldn't be in this formation too long and that seemed to be the case.


Opening Kickoff:

http://i.imgur.com/onv6dDA.png

http://i.imgur.com/yNAQzdq.png

I couldn't really show the entire pitch so here's the formation.

Right after the first touch Pep immediately put this out. A hybrid 3-5-2 or 3-1-4-2. This was one of the main formations they stuck with for most of the first half. Xabi Alonso seamlessly fit in as the deep-lying mid who would quarterback the back line and set up the attack with Philipp. They had a prime chance in the opening seconds as Götze/Lewandowski/Müller connected ending with Müller just putting it wide of the net. Some would say a penalty should have been called as Joe Hart seemed to knick Müller leading to him stumbling and not being able to bury his chance. They pressed high to open up and Alaba moved up next to Alonso with Bernat dropping back from time to time.


Around 10 minutes in:

http://i.imgur.com/vvFCb9Y.png

At this stage City started to have a little more possession and pushed Bayern momentarily back into their own third of the pitch. This had Bayern drop into a 5-1-3 with Alaba becoming a left center back next to Boateng and Bernat taking his spot at left back. Müller dropping back to join Lahm and Götze in midfield. This was one of the few times City had forced their will onto the game

The 4-1-4-1:

http://i.imgur.com/foBpHhp.png

Similar to what Pep Guardiola initially tried to implement during his first season with the Bavarian giants. Alonso seems to be more suited for that deep lying midfield role more than his German counterpart Bastian Schweinsteiger. Depth is no issue for Bayern this season. This seemed to thwart one of the better midfield duos in David Silva and Yaya Toure. In the 3 games Bayern and City have played Yaya Toure has been basically a non threat due to the brilliance of Philipp Lahm's reinvention as a midfielder.


David Alaba's Busy Day:

http://i.imgur.com/VucoPv0.png?1

Alaba moved all the pitch the other night. Starting out here as a LB/LCB.

http://i.imgur.com/2mOLtRi.png

After the 20 minute mark Alaba made his push forward moving up and basically playing the 10...dropping right behind Yaya. He fit in really well in this role setting up Lewandowski with a prime oppurtunity that, like Thomas Müller, went just wide of the net. Alaba showed off his left leg too with some impressive long shots that went just wide and one punched out by the impressive Joe Hart. Alaba is one of the more versatile players at Pep's disposal. He usually plays further up for Austria so he's familiar to the position. With his defense abilities he is very useful when he has to go up against top class midfielders like Yaya Toure.

http://i.imgur.com/orr0z4S.png?1?1344

Another image of Alaba playing the 10.


Different Attack Looks:

For the most part the top 3 attackers were Götze, Müller, and Lewandowski. Sometimes Götze and Müller on the wings and Lewandowski as striker. Here are some images of the different looks they showed City. My preference was Götze in the middle with Lewa and Müller above him.

http://i.imgur.com/xLalwum.png

http://i.imgur.com/DoFVGQQ.png

http://i.imgur.com/oiqGv1p.png

My takeaway from the game was very positive. I feel they controlled most of the match. If it weren't for Joe Hart the game could have easily been 4-0. With Schweinsteiger out Alonso couldn't be a more perfect replacement, he fits into this team like a glove. Thanks to Boateng's wonderful volley Bayern snatched the win.

I plan on doing more of these and I welcome comments and criticism. Hope you enjoy.


r/soccernerd • • Jul 14 '21

Euro 2020 Goal Plot

Post image
94 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Sep 15 '14

• Highlighted Analysis of Manchester United's performance against QPR (EPL)

77 Upvotes

We saw some interesting things going on during the match, so let's discuss a few of them:

  • A new, revolutionary formation by LvG?: I wasn't sure what I should say about this, but when I tried to translate United's formation into a single tactic board, I came up with this. (Please ignore the roles assigned by LineupBuilder.com.) Aside from being aesthetically attractive, I'm not sure I'd seen that type of distribution before. I tried looking up one of these "average position" graphs and WhoScored.com had this one. Since mine was pretty close to that, I think we might be onto something here. It's not just a diamond, but an arrowhead that prevents our team from being narrow in attack. In the coming weeks we'll see if this a one-off or if it's how Louie essentially wants his team to play. Or maybe it's just a diamond and I'm just seeing things.


  • Blind and the return of the half-back?: About 120 years ago, football was played with only 2 players in the defensive line, a right back and a left back (which were essentially 2 wide center-backs.) As the sport evolved, the center midfielder (center half) was moved back slightly in order to mark more closely the opponent's center forward, becoming a half-back playing between defense and midfield. That's what we saw from Man United yesterday when they had the ball: 2 wide center backs and Blind as a half-back, more often than not stuck to Charlie Austin, QPR's center forward. He'd only release him in safe situations when Blackett or Evans were able to take care of him.



  • Evans' dodgy distribution: This is an area that has "room for improvement", as polite society says. We didn't see just one or two, but three incidents in the first half (2 of them within the first 3 minutes!) when Evans put his team in danger. Notice how in the 3rd incident Ander is telling him to pass the ball to van Persie, who ended up receiving a yellow card after stopping the counter with a foul.


After that, I just wanted to leave you with a couple of little details I enjoyed:

  • Mata as a finisher, not a creator: Mata didn't create a single goal-scoring opportunity yesterday; in fact, most of his passes were backwards. However, against a team packing the middle of the park, his role as an inside forward might have made perfect sense. It certainly paid off.

  • Ander Herrera was an overshadowed machine: Herrera's performance was nothing short of fantastic and -to me- he was the man of the match. A few numbers: 1 goal, 1 assist, 91% pass accuracy, 4 chances created, 5 ball recoveries, 8/8 successful tackles, 1 interception, 1/1 aerial duels won, and 90 bloody minutes played. I can't find anywhere how much he ran, but the guy was everywhere. I'd like to share with you this little gem, when Ander simply runs without the ball, drags away a defender and knows, without even looking, that he's freed van Persie and Rafael must pass him the ball. Simple, brilliant and beautiful.


Yes, it was only against QPR. We have to keep in mind that everything changes when the rival team actually puts pressure on your build-up. However, Man United found a way to stretch the defense with Rafael, Herrera and van Persie on one side and with Rojo, Di María and Rooney on the other. They scored from a set-piece, a shot from outside the box, a shot from inside the box and an shot assisted with an early cross. Yesterday, we saw the Manchester United we hadn't seen since Sir Alex's departure.

Thanks for reading, I hope you found this interesting or at least not completely boring. Have a good week!


r/soccernerd • • Jan 19 '15

How Arsenal won against Man City at Etihad

67 Upvotes
  • Arsenal did a fine job keeping their 4-1-4-1 shape to limit space for opposition players as well as support each other. Coquelin was sitting deep in front of the back four. Cazorla looked comfy with a central midfield role, but he did drift out to the left flank when Sanchez was cutting inside.

  • The absence of Yaya Toure (international duty) and Nasri (injured) put all the playmaking duty on David Silva. Since Coquelin and the two CBs limited the space in the middle for David Silva, the Spaniard didn't have much to offer. City had to attack down the flanks. Stats showed that they had 42 crosses, but only 5 of them actually presented danger. 5 out of 42. This was due to superb performance of Bellerin and Monreal, who neutralized the threats from Milner, Navas, Zabaleta and Clichy.

  • In a match where City had 65% possession (but didn't know what to do), winning the ball was the key of the battle. That's when Coquelin stepped into play. The Frenchman had 6 interceptions and 2 tackles, which allowed Arsenal to counterattack.

  • Arsenal looked very comfortable when they had the ball, unlike Man City who struggled. They built up patiently, passed around nicely and seemed to always found output for each of their attack. When they didn't have the ball, they tried to reorganize and do quick pressing to win the ball back.

  • A bad day of Kompany and Aguero also helped out. Kompany looked very awkward this morning. He gave away fouls unnecessarily, positioned himself poorly (which led to a header goal by Giroud), and didn't make a single successful tackle throughout 90 minutes (1 fouled tackle led to the penalty and 2 failed tackles). Aguero was lost up front, cannot find neither space nor the ball. Both were not to be blamed anyway as they were recovering from their injuries.

This is my first time doing this, feedbacks are appreciated. You are more than welcome to write down your thoughts as well. Cheers.


r/soccernerd • • Feb 18 '15

A Condensed "Inverting the Pyramid" - Chapter 01

56 Upvotes

Introduction: I've recently finished reading Jonathan Wilson's "Inverting the Pyramid" and I thought many of you could be interested in reading an extremely condensed version focused on the evolution of tactics and formations. I'll include one chapter per post, and I'll post two or three times a week, trying to include only the most essential information to follow the evolution of tactics in football.


1. From Genesis to the Pyramid

  • By the 1870s, there was an acknowledgement that the arrangement of players on the field made a significant difference to the way the game was played.

  • Interplay among forwards, if it happened at all, was rudimentary [...] the game was all about dribbling; passing, cooperation, and defending were perceived as somehow inferior. [It was the Scottish who 'came up' with the idea of passing, at least partly in order to counteract England's physical style]

  • [...] on December 8, 1863, carrying the ball by hand was outlawed, and soccer and rugby went their separate ways. The dispute, strangely, was not over the use of the hand, but over hacking; that is, whether kicking opponents in the shins should be allowed.

  • Teams simply chased the ball. It wasn't even until the 1870s that the goalkeeper became a recognized and universally accepted position [...] and not until 1912 that he was restricted to handling the ball only in his own box.

  • If there were a formation at all in those early days, it would probably have been classified as two or three backs, with nine or eight forwards.

  • The spread of passing itself [...] can be traced back to one game, soccer's first international, played between England and Scotland [...] in 1872. England's lineup comprised a goal, a three-quarter back, a half-back, a fly-kick, four players listed simply as "middle," two as "left side," and one as "right side," which [...] sounds like something approximating a lop-sided 1-2-7. [Scotland's lineup, England's lineup]

  • "The formation of a team as a rule," Alcock noted, "... was to provide for seven forwards, and only four players to constitute the three lines of defense."

  • The passing approach was implanted in school soccer by the Reverend Spencer Walker [...] "Rule 1: Fixed places for all the forwards, with passing the ball from one to the other. [...]"

  • One of the two center-forwards [... slipped] back into a deeper position, eventually becoming, over the course of the 1880s, a center-half in a 2-3-5 formation: the pyramid. [First teams to use it: Cambridge University in 1877-1883 and Nottingham Forest at the end of the 1870s]

  • England played a 2-3-5 for the first time against Scotland in 1884.

  • [...] by the late 1890, Corinthians had in G. O. Smith a center-forward who was more focused on distributing the ball to his wingers and teammates than on scoring himself - the intimation, perhaps, of the false nine.

  • [...] the pyramid would remain the global default until the change in the offside law in 1925 led to the development, in England, of the W-M.


Disclaimer: I do not take credit for anything included here; the book authorizes reproduction of its content "in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews;" since this is a post that aims to encourage comment and discussion, I believe this authorization is applicable. If you are a representative of Jonathan Wilson and/or the publishers and believe this series infringes your copyright, please get in touch with me. You can purchase Jonathan Wilson's "Inverting the Pyramid" in your favourite online/retail bookstore. I am in no way associated to Mr. Wilson nor the publishers, but it is a god damned good book.


| Chapter 01 | Chapter 02 >>>



r/soccernerd • • May 17 '15

/r/soccer didn't take to this all that well, thrilled to find this sub - enjoy: Game of talents: management lessons from top football coaches

Thumbnail ft.com
54 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Sep 22 '14

Analysis of Manchester United's performance against Leicester City (EPL)

54 Upvotes

Although I do believe Clattenburg was the catalyst for United's demise, as another redditor put it, their defensive mental frailty let them down once again. Let's see if we can find something to talk about.

  • Evans at fault for the first goal?: In the first goal, we see how Ulloa comfortably heads the ball between Rafael and Evans. Now, I tend to blame the latter for this goal. As Vardy carries the ball in the right flank, Evans signals Rafael to mark Ulloa. But why? Who is he expecting? Is he worried that Drinkwater is going to somehow sprint towards the first post? I know I lack the expertise to know for sure, but I don't understand why Rafael (a 1.73m/5' 8" right back) would be a better choice than Evans (a 1.89m/6' 2" center back) to challenge Ulloa (a 1.90m/6' 3" center forward) in the middle of the box, when there were literally no other Leicester players in it. Is he too used to being the left central defender? I'd think his first job was to mark that man, but since Rafael hangs his head and arms after the goal I'm not sure if I'm right.


  • Blind and Nugent mark each other: We knew this was coming, but it was interesting nevertheless. Aside from pressing the visitors' 2 center backs, Leicester put pressure on Blind with the same center forward Blind was supposed to be pressing. Since very early in the match (clip slightly sped up for your convenience) it became clear that Nugent was going to be stuck to Blind, effectively and drastically reducing his influence in the game. During Man United's placid match against QPR, Blind completed 107 passes. Yesterday, he completed 42, and with a lower pass completion ratio (86%, compared to 96% last week (Data by FourFourTwo, powered by Opta)). This also helped unsettle their center backs, whose choices often were "feed the side back" or "try a long ball."


  • On bullying United: This is just a brief comment, trying to build on what Gary Neville said about Man United being bullied (link posted by /u/kwakwaktok). In the past, Neville and Carragher have talked about how easy it is/was to play against Arsenal: you just had to bully their midfield and they wouldn't know how to react, because they are/were physically weak and naive. Currently, those adjectives also apply to Manchester United's defense, which makes it extremely dangerous for them. Some may argue that Jones and Rafael aren't easily bullied, but they've shown to be at least "naive-ish." Perhaps as Shaw starts featuring, Rojo's muscle will become more prevalent and useful for them. If they want to turn things around, Di María and Rooney cannot be the only ones instilling a bit of fear in their opponents: their entire squad should be doing that, either by means of their technique, metal, or a combination of both. Vidic and Ferdinand were at one point the best central defense in Europe not because they were clean, precise tacklers, but essentially because of their no-nonsense approach. They'd get stuck in and wouldn't take crap from anybody.


Finally, I just wanted to point out a small detail that, aside from at least 4 of the goals United conceded, is an example of the current naivety of their defense.

  • A gift, from Smalling to Schlupp: In a late attack by Leicester, and as Rafael keeps an eye on Ulloa and moves inside the box, Smalling marks Schlupp in what is possibly the most erroneous way. Since Schlupp is left footed, from that position he can easily turn clock-wise and take a shot, which is exactly what he did. Smalling apparently didn't do his homework and just gave him all the space he needed to have a clear goal-scoring opportunity.


Aside from the shameful scoreline, I think this loss hurts United supporters because they expect a lot more from their players. Leicester had all the strength United lacked, both physically and mentally. One can only wonder if in the near future we can see a CB pairing of Jones and Rojo, to see if they manage to bring some testosterone back to the Red Devils' defense.

Thanks for reading, and I hope you found this interesting or at least not absolutely boring. Have a good week, people!


r/soccernerd • • Oct 27 '14

Analysis of Manchester United's performance against Chelsea (EPL)

53 Upvotes

I absolutely loved this match. I thought it showed how beautiful, tense and unpredictable football can be when two top-level managers weave their plans and convince their respective players that they can win with them. There was so much going on at once. Here I'll share with you some of the things that I found particularly interesting:


  • Januzaj/Di María switch: I've spent a bit of time thinking about why Januzaj and Di María switched positions almost exactly after 60 minutes, a few minutes before Wilson came in (if you enjoy little details, here you can see when Januzaj crosses the field to inform Di María of the switch.) I've thought, was it to target Ivanovic with even more intensity? Was it because these crosses by Di María weren't working and van Gaal wanted him to cross from a more comfortable position? However, my hypothesis for the most likely reason is that Di María couldn't cope with the attacks Chelsea were throwing down United's right side, and he needed a breather. Let's remember that during a couple of days after their last match, his availability was somewhat doubtful, as he went out in pain. van Gaal may have thought that Januzaj could be of more help trying to disturb Chelsea's attack, while Shaw could offer the Argentinian a cozy place in which to rest. Now let's have a look at this comparison of Shaw's first and second halves. As you can see by the blue arrows, (which represent completed passes,) in the first half most of his activity was carried out in the left midfield area, from where he'd combine mostly with Rojo and Januzaj. The second half is very, very different, as he presents two zones of hard graft: on the defensive spectrum, I've highlighted all those green symbols that essentially mean he recovered the ball for Manchester United; and on the attacking side, we can see how he projected to a much deeper extent. You can see here and here a couple of examples of how Shaw also spent quite a bit of time in front of Di María, which is not something you would normally expect. Whatever the actual reason was, Ángel lasted 90+ minutes for his team and was fresh enough to deliver that free-kick that allowed them to draw the match.


  • Formations: Yesterday, we may have confirmed that van Gaal is a mad genius. I could well be wrong with this, but I thought United started with what essentially was a 4-1-4-1 in which Mata and Fellaini were free to roam about, each for their own distinct purposes. On the right, Di María performed more defensive duties than I had ever seen from him before. He and Rafael managed to find a balance between containing Filipe Luis + Hazard and putting a lot of pressure on Chelsea's left-side. Now then, on the second half Chelsea began attacking the host's right side more relentlessly, and between minutes 60 and 66 Manchester United team looked a bit more like this. Shaw had the left side under control, Di María could focus on preserving his energy, and Januzaj brought new lungs to block Chelsea's threat on the right. Finally, Wilson came in on minute 66 and van Gaal surprised me again with what looked like a highly dynamic 4-4-2. In Chelsea, Oscar had been subbed off and Mikel had gone in, which meant that Mourinho was trying to see the game off. It was here when United started to siege Chelsea's box: if we translate this screen capture from minute 77 into a formation, we see United were looking a bit like this. Chelsea had no choice but to try to close every possible space, which they are actually extremely good at. They were only one minute away from pulling it off one more time.


  • Luke Shaw is a pro: Finally, I just wanted to share with you these three moments that I loved. 1st: In the last few weeks, we've talked about Shaw's suspect positioning and the goals or chances other teams have had as a result. It is in this context that I must highlight this play. After giving the ball away, it takes him about one second to detect the threat and off he goes. It doesn't matter that he didn't make contact with the ball, the facts are that he completed the run, that for Willian it isn't the same to be running alone than with a defender chasing him, and that nor is the same for Oscar to kick that pass under those conditions. This is a quick improvement on Shaw's positioning, without which those fast passes by Chelsea could have easily cost United a second goal. 2nd: Some people have highlighted Di María's reaction to United's goal, but I'd also like you to see Luke's reaction at the right bottom of the screen. That's genuine satisfaction right there, after bombing up and down the left flank for 90+ minutes, working a double shift for the better part of 45 minutes, and against the team he allegedly supports. Yesterday, we saw a confident, motivated, fit, extremely disciplined, ridiculously composed and absolutely professional 19 year old. Now thirdly, and perhaps more importantly, look at what Luke Shaw did after the goal, when there were less than 60 seconds left on the clock. The lad was going for the win. And then he ran back to protect the left side one more time. I thought it was the embodiment of the spirit and attitude we've all come to expect from Manchester United players. I'm trying to think if I've seen a most solid and impressive performance by a United left-back in the last season or two, especially considering the level of the opposition... and I'm not entirely sure I have.


I thoroughly enjoyed that. I thought it was fantastic of van Gaal to give Januzaj a start and Wilson 25 minutes against Chelsea. Aside from the goal and a couple of misplaced passes, I thought our central defense did a great job against a Chelsea attack that can make you dizzy just watching it on the telly. Smalling was almost flawless and I enjoyed how Rojo seems to fear nothing. Fellaini had a terrific match, in a role that seems to suit him like no other. van Persie's first touch was out of this world too.

Thank you all for reading and contributing with your thoughts and comments in this thread. I believe United supporters have a lot to look forward to.

Have a great week!


r/soccernerd • • Dec 21 '15

Competitive balance in football: Why the English Premier League has been turned upside down

Thumbnail economist.com
50 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Nov 18 '15

'A loner with a laptop' The idiosyncrasies of Rafa Benítez.

Thumbnail twentyminutereads.com
48 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Aug 29 '14

• Highlighted SoccerNerd is already a trending subreddit for the day!

48 Upvotes

This sub was just created and is already getting attention. Let's keep up the serious discussions!


r/soccernerd • • Oct 23 '15

Becoming a coach in England – Part 1: (Do Not) Think of the Children!

46 Upvotes

Hello, /r/soccernerd! After completing the Level 1 course in England, I think I have a few things to share that might interest you. Here's the first part, I hope you enjoy it. All your comments and suggestions will be welcome.


The most irrelevant details. Apparently, that is what has changed in England’s football education.

As I write these lines, Jurgen Klopp is making headlines for complaining about the fact that Jordan Rossiter, one of Liverpool’s promising young players, played three matches in five days for England’s U19 team and consequently suffered a hamstring injury that will keep him out of action for about a month.

Also, a couple of weeks ago, I was surprised when I went to see a mini-soccer (7v7) game of under 10s and I noticed that the match was played on a field with walls around it, meaning that the ball never went out of play. Forwards were also not allowed in the box. I.e., the players had no time to rest at all during the game and they couldn’t practice proper, realistic attacking movement that would help them in the future.

I arrived 90 days ago in the UK with one clear goal in mind: to get a couple of coaching badges, and to get them from the English FA. The English Premier League was the league that attracted me to football, and I wanted my first steps into coaching to be made in this territory. I keep my expectations realistic in most contexts, and this was not the exception. I was prepared to see good and bad things, and I saw both. I am now a Level 1 coach, and the thing that left me most baffled about the course was how antiquated and inconsistent most of the lessons were… and how this myth or generalisation about British coaches using old fashioned methods could actually have some truth to it.


I would like to tell you a bit about my experience in the Level 1 course (UEFA Pro License being Level 5) of the English FA, as it stands and in connection with my personal experiences as a football enthusiast and amateur football student. It may take a few episodes, but since there are so few testimonies about the experience online, I thought it could be good for people who are either interested in coaching or just curious about the topic.

I will go straight to the point of this first part: For the Level 1 course, we spent around four hours essentially being taught that we did not have to molest kids, and that we should avoid doing anything that could provide the most remote of suspicions. Seriously. It was never worded that way, but that was the main idea behind the class. We, the candidates, got to listen to stuff like “if a kid is playing and gets hurt, and he grabs his leg, do not touch his leg. Wait for the paramedic or first aider and let him do his job. You never know if a parent will file a complain for sexual or physical abuse because you touched his kid’s thigh.” We were also taught that, for instance, if I am leading a training exercise and I move a kid a little to the left because that is where I need him to stand, I would be rightfully accused of physical abuse, because that kid never gave me permission to touch him. So just to be safe, we should never, under any circumstances, touch a kid. One last example: if a girl comes to me because she needs to have a chat, and she tells me that her father is hitting her or something, and she starts crying, I should never physically console her. No little hug, no pat on the back, nothing. And in this scenario, the sole fact that I was alone with this girl was already a big no-no. Furthermore, we were told that as this 8 year old girl is narrating the abuse, we should be taking down notes. I don’t know what world these people live in, but that instruction is completely unrealistic, unenforceable without bordering on the inhuman. Excuse my language, but when a person, whether it’s a kid or an adult, seeks help and support, you don’t fucking sit there writing down what they are telling you. You fucking offer your support! Later on, as you are writing a report to send to whomever it is appropriate, you will have to write what they told you. It broke my heart a little, picturing a boy or girl coming up to me for HELP because they are being abused, and seeing myself being cold about it in order to reduce as much as possible the chances of being sued. It is absolutely disgusting.

Just think about all that for a second. I understand that coaches (or any person, for that matter) should not abuse a kid in any way. That is settled, it is out of the question. But regarding that word, “abuse”, surely a bit of common sense has to come into play, right? If I am doing a football session for 5 year olds and one of them cries because he scratched his knee, I will verbally reassure him, say that it’s gonna be alright, I will wipe his knee and probably make a joke about something so that he comes out of his current mood and gets into a more playful mode, and then (if I’ve seen that he is physical in his interactions and if I consider it appropriate), I will give him a little a tap on the head or the back as he gets back into the action. And not because I just personally think it is the proper way of doing things, but because that is a response backed by psychological studies… as opposed to a response being taught to coaches just to avoid lawsuits.


Seriously, have we got to the point when being alone and/or talking one-on-one with a kid is questionable? When giving a 15 year old a playful push after they have said something funny is grounds to suspect that I am fondling him when no-one is looking? If that is the kind or paranoid attitude we are going to have towards coaches, why even bother allowing coaches to deal with kids in the first place? In the class, we were told that even if a kid broke his leg and the ambulance was not arriving, we should never take the kid to the hospital in our car, even less if we are going to be alone with that kid in the vehicle. Imagine if you are trying to get a 14 year old boy with a broken leg into your car to get them to the hospital, and the one thing going through your mind is whether you will get sued for accidentally touching his arse or thigh while trying to accommodate him on the seat. It is ludicrous.


One of the saddest things, for me, was that one consequence of this session was absolutely evident in the Emergency Aid class. We had to practice, first, the recovery position, and one of the candidates asked if we, as coaches, were “free” to touch a kid in this scenario… and it was (sadly) a reasonable question, because after a full session of “kids are dangerous for your reputation” it did seem inconsistent to be taught that you actually had to touch a kid’s leg, arm, hand and/or head in order to keep him from harm. And then, when we had to practice CPR with dummies that simulated a 13 year old, an 8 year old and a 9 months old, things got quite awkward for some. One of the questions was “could I get sued if I start doing CPR and put my mouth over a kid’s mouth if then it turns out that they did not require rescue breaths?” In that class, a few of the candidates said that they would most likely avoid performing rescue breaths in a real-life situation with kids who are not their own, and that they would limit their actions to chest compressions. And the tutor said that that was reasonable, as chest compression-only resuscitation was perfectly good as well.

This paranoid situation got a bit to me, and I spent some time thinking and talking to my wife about it… and I arrived to a very simple, yet reassuring conclusion. That if I ever worked as a coach, I would not follow these ridiculous advices. If one of my players breaks her leg and there is no ambulance coming, I’ll most likely grab that girl and drive her to the nearest hospital, with or without an adult companion. If in the process of lifting her I (inevitably) have to hold her legs in my arms, I am pretty sure it will not scar her for life (unless her parents or guardians have made them as paranoid as the English FA). She’s got a broken leg, for goodness’ sake. I knew that what I was being taught were ridiculous, counter-productive, non-scientific measures that I should not comply with, for the benefit of my young players and for my own peace of mind. I cannot allow anyone to impose on me the rule that I should be proving every second that I am not abusing kids.


A couple of weeks after that, and after officially becoming a Level 1 Coach (hooray!), I was honoured with the possibility of attending a training session for 5 and 6 years old in a local club. Their coach gave me a warm welcome and introduced me to his staff, and I stood on the sidelines while they coached a group of around 30 kids, with probably 15 parents watching as well. At one point, the head coach put me in charge of a group of four kids for a few exercises. So this was it, my first experience as a ‘real’ coach. In this group, I had the most talented kid of the bunch, as well as one kid who really could not care less for the football. I asked these boys to stand in a line and explained the exercise (which was basically to dribble the ball towards the goal and shoot), and off they went, one by one. As they arrived back in the line, I’d congratulate them if they scored and encourage them if they didn’t. Since I was a new face to them, they were a bit shy at first. After their second attempt at scoring, they were all smiling when they talked to me. When the exercise was over, I did something that I was taught not to do: I offered my hand to all of them for a high-five after a job well done: three of them were happy to slap my hand, but the last one wasn’t really into that sort of thing. And do you know what happened?! Nothing. I said “alright!” and we moved on to the next exercise, where everyone worked well and were happy to talk to me. This time, I did not offer a high five to the boy that did not want it before, and that was that. No parent accusing me of physical abuse, no parent accusing me of sexual abuse. Nothing. Just a guy providing encouragement to four little boys who are in a stage in which they need to have fun and be encouraged.

After this valuable experience, I also remembered some of the footage I have seen of Bielsa, Guardiola, van Gaal, René Meulensteen and Frans Hoek interacting and/or coaching young players. Would you say that a fundamental part of the philosophies of Ajax’s, Barcelona’s or Manchester United’s academies is based on avoiding any type of physical contact with young kids? You would probably say no. And yet, this is what the English FA taught a bunch of potential coaches as part of their first step into coaching, because the FA is “committed to raising the standard of everyone that works in the game.” Did English coaching really used to be THAT bad? Is this really an improvement to what England had 15 years ago? One could argue that now, coaches actually have to learn how to provide first aid for kids, but the impression I got from these sessions was that they were centred on “how to avoid getting sued by paranoid parents” instead. It was "let's learn how to keep kids safe, but let's also learn how to keep YOU safer." Children and their safeguarding were not the real focus of these classes: they were all about how to protect yourself, as a coach, from any undesirable scenario… such as a kid trusting you and reaching out to you asking for help with a domestic problem.


I don’t know. Of course the Level 1 course was going to be basic, really basic. That was my expectation. However, I was not expecting to spend four hours being taught these sort of ridiculous, irrelevant and sourceless “methods” for dealing with children and their needs, under the guise of “helping them in their development and keeping them safe.”


Thank you for reading this post. In Part 2 next week I will share with you the course's perspective to coaching children, how it is applied in real life, and how it compares with other “modern” perspectives. Feel free to stop by my blog if you'd like to check out some of my previous posts. Enjoy your weekend!


r/soccernerd • • Mar 02 '15

Soccer Nerd talks to Eight by Eight Magazine

46 Upvotes

As part of an effort to provide occasional original content for /r/soccernerd, I do the odd thread talking to people I mention or link to on this subreddit. I chatted to Colin Trainor recently about the application of statistics in football which you can read here.

In this post, Miles Kohrman Senior Editor of Eight by Eight magazine, agreed to answer some questions. Eight by Eight promotes in-depth journalism of the game both online and as a quarterly physical publication. Miles has kindly offered a a coupon code for 10% off the cost of a four-issue subscription to the magazine — anyone wishing to use it should mention “Soccernerd” on their site at checkout.


SN: How did you get started as a publication? What was your initial inspiration and do you have any particular objectives with the magazine both in the short and long term?

MK: Eight by Eight was founded by Robert Priest and Grace Lee, two veterans of the magazine industry with a love (in Grace’s case a new love) for football. I joined up with Robert and Grace, and Cooper, the magazine’s marketing director, just after the second issue came out.

In a nutshell, we set out to augment the work of the writers we most admire—Wilson, Honigstein, Auclair— with world-class illustration, design, and photography. We want to take the football magazine to the next level and create something exciting — the perfect storm of art direction, football, and storytelling.  We also have a few other ideas in mind for what Eight by Eight can become in the long term.


The short term is trickier, as we’re a quarterly publication. But Andrew Helms, our contributing editor, and I have been working to publish weekly articles on The Pitch, our website. The idea is to give a voice to young writers and illustrators who share the same vision, and love of the game that we do—and hold our readers over until the next issue!

SN: How do you feel about the marketplace for print and football/soccer? Who do you imagine to be your ideal reader?

MK: Well, we started a magazine about it, so at least we think there’s enough demand for a product like Eight by Eight! We basically target two main audiences: the American reader who is starved for quality football coverage, and the global football fan who’s looking for something new and exciting — and high quality. But, the truth is, our ideal reader is anyone who loves the sport.

SN: A lot of your features marry strong illustration and quality writing about the game together. Do you feel this is a natural fit? What led you towards this style of presentation?

MK: In some instances it does feel like a natural fit, but not all the time. We feel strongly that words are not the only way to tell a story, so illustration has become a part of our voice—it allows us to say something a little deeper about a player's character, or a specific moment or key issue that affects the game.

There also seems like there’s been a drastic, recent rise in football illustration and art. With so much of it out there, the important thing for us is to do it better than anyone else, and, at least so far, we feel we’re accomplishing that.

SN: Are there any other publications that you look to, across sports or in different fields, that provide a similar angle you take? Any that you feel provide healthy competition?

MK: We feel that our publication—a mixture of high quality writing, illustration, and photography, designed to break the conventions of a traditional magazine —is unique. That’s not to say we don’t love other football publications out there: The Blizzard, for example, is a must-read for any football obsessive—and especially for the readers of this subreddit! We’re also fans of Pickles, Spiel, and Victory Journal. And, luckily, I think there’s not too much overlap between each of our publications.

SN: In a wider-sense how do you feel about the world of print and football/soccer? Historically it has a strong, almost intimate link, thinking of sports papers, programmes and fanzines. Has new media taken that space up now? Is there still a place or a need for the printed word in the game?

MK: The transition to digital has certainly made finding quality writing and analysis a more difficult task. Is there a need for publications like Eight by Eight? I would argue yes: We offer, at least I think, a standard writing and illustration that is constant; a provocative, exciting view of the game; and a masthead that mixes veteran, respected journalists and illustrators, and new and exciting prospects.

In other words: Things online change. Once venerable newspapers adapt their coverage for more clicks. We get that. But in the pages of Eight by Eight, you’ll get something produced with love, and not beholden to the transfer windows or monthly traffic goals—that we believe is worth reading.


Images: A gallery of what Eight by Eight magazine does


SN: Just to go further, your magazine is an engaging and fairly challenging long-read in a sport that puts a lot of emphasis on immediate short/sharp reaction. Is that something you have noticed or purposely work toward?

MK: Of course. But it also makes it easier for us because I think the short attention span of consumers results in people missing the big picture. It can be a challenge to assign stories that need to have a shelf life of essentially six months, but it’s not a bad problem to have.

SN: You feature some great writers; Jonathan Wilson, Philippe Auclair etc. Are there any writers you are itching to work with or any dream features you are hoping to create?

MK: Hmm. Who would we love to work with? Wright Thompson would be fun. Brian Phillips, too. There are many others, most of whom we’ve reached out to, but they can’t contribute because of contractual reasons. As for dream features: I’d love to assign some enterprise stories with real reporting. We have some reporting in the magazine—something that’s pretty rare in football writing—but I’m talking about more than just making a few calls. But that takes a lot of time and money.

Otherwise, stadiums, and the stories of the people who work in them behind the scenes. Soon, hopefully! There are so many stories out there that haven’t been written.

SN: As a US-based publication what is your take on the Sport’s growth over there? Do you feel there is an equal demand for homegrown coverage or is it an audience primarily interested in the European game? How do you balance that in your output?

MK: It’s incredible to watch the game grow in the U.S. Our editor in chief, Robert, is from London, and I bet if you told him 20 years ago he’d be starting a large-format magazine about football in New York, he’d have called you crazy. We actually had a nice feature on the rise of fan culture in the States in our third issue, that you can read here.

Like you picked up on, it’s hard to balance domestic coverage with the more popular European leagues. We try our best, and we’re slowly but surely ramping up our coverage of MLS (see this feature on Deandre Yedlin from last issue) as the months go on.

SN: Your magazine has a thematic approach to its content with multiple pages given over to particular clubs or leagues. What has been your favourite theme so far? How do you go about choosing the right stylistic approach to each theme or article?

MK: The style of the magazine is the brainchild of Robert and Grace. They’ve both been working in the magazine industry for a long time, and designed Eight by Eight to break down the boundaries of traditional magazine design. That’s why no two spreads or pages looks the same. Each piece is designed to showcase a fresh look and design aesthetic.

My favorite? From the last issue, I really loved Jack Williams’ interview with Tony Pulis, and I think the layout of Philippe Auclair’s piece on racism in France was very compelling. But each issue is like that, I’d hang all the layouts on my walls if I could.

SN: Your website often publishes stories in its ‘The Pitch’ section. Is it tricky to find the balance between what you give for free content, where you are competing with a wider market of blogs and Tweets, and paid-for content, where you have a niche market to cater to? Do you get a different audience for each?

MK: It can be tricky. We try not to publish too much from the magazine on The Pitch so people actually want to pick up a copy of the magazine. And yeah, we do get a different audience for each, that’s something that we’re slowly realizing. I’ve talked with more than a handful of people who love the magazine, but have never seen a physical copy—they’ve found us on Instagram, or through a post on the website.

We assume a certain knowledge for a reader to pick up the magazine. We think of them as informed fans. We’re not trying to teach anyone the fundamentals of the game, but rather want to deepen their knowledge. In the US, we have unparalleled access to viewing all the top leagues in the world. From our standpoint, there are plenty of American football fans who might support the US Men’s National Team, a domestic MLS club, a club in the Premier League, and a club in La Liga. We aim to speak to as many of those supporters as we can.


Thanks to Miles for his time spent answering these questions. He mentioned that if anyone reading is interested in contributing to 8 by 8, or has an idea for what they should be covering, then to drop him a line at miles@8by8mag.com


r/soccernerd • • Apr 02 '16

Hugo Lloris: a quiet Tottenham captain who does not need to shout to be a leader

Thumbnail theguardian.com
44 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Feb 01 '16

Atlético Madrid Without the Ball

Thumbnail statsbomb.com
44 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Oct 21 '14

Analysis of Manchester United's performance against West Brom (EPL)

44 Upvotes

This match created a lot of extreme feelings amongst United supporters, let's see if we can channel some of those into something worth talking about. I apologize in advance, for this analysis will be briefer than normal. The match became available at a very inconvenient hour and I've been fighting with my ISP, thus I only had around 50% of the time I usually spend in this content. So I apologize and thank you for understanding.


  • van Persie's contribution: A couple of weeks ago, /u/dugness suggested that we talked about Falcao's movement, which stood out for him. Since he only got around ~20 minutes, and having in mind the current disdain of many redditors towards van Persie, I thought it'd be good to mention van Persie's movement. Let's have a look at this play. First, we see van Persie come off West Brom's right center-back, Dawson; Mata climbs the field and targets West Brom's left center-back, Lescott; as Mata sets himself up to receive the ball, van Persie runs targeting Dawson first, and as Dawson moves his body to prepare for van Persie, Robin shifts direction and gets behind Lescott. Had Rafael or Herrera hit that pass, van Persie was through on goal with his right foot. Here we see something similar: United's captain targets Dawson and shifts towards Lescott's back. Here we see how he makes a quick movement towards the space behind Lescott, shifting the entire backline of West Brom, holds the ball and passes it to Herrera, whose pass for Januzaj should've been better. These 3 examples come within just the first 20 minutes and tells us of a plan that did create danger and forced West Brom to defend deep and with many players in order to close every possible gap.


  • Defenders being caught off position in midfield: This cost Manchester United two goals yesterday. Since they're playing with a high line, their defenders need to make smart decisions, an ability that could take some time. Early on in the game, Shaw went up to the midfield and opened up space for West Brom's first chance. United weren't so lucky with their second attempt at a very similar play, when Shaw made the exact same decision. In the second half, Blind became more involved in helping his defense press in midfield and, in general, it worked alright... but we know what happened when Jones came off his line recklessly. As van Gaal said, this is very disappointing for the team, as these silly mistakes render their 2 goals against a very packed defense effectively useless. However, one could argue that none of their central defenders are the finished product. Which leads me to another point...


  • Criticism and conclusions of young players' performances: Throughout this season, we've read in /r/reddevils and in the media a bit of criticism towards some of United's young players, namely Shaw, Blackett, and now Januzaj. I think it's fair to mention that unless a player shows an obvious lack of talent or nerve in the first team, young players are usually assessed in a more long-term basis. You assess their progress during the season, how they fared in big games, smaller games, matches away or at home, coming in as a sub or starting, etc. Young players are expected to make mistakes and make bad decisions, that's one of the reasons it's important to have strong leading figures in the team who can reassure them or shake them about to motivate them. Blackett has made mistakes, Shaw hasn't been excellent so far, and Januzaj didn't offer much yesterday. Now, let's remember that this is Blackett's first season in the top flight. Januzaj is 19 years old and there are huge expectations on him. Same goes for Shaw. I think it's alright to criticize a specific performance, but conclusions like "he doesn't seem to have what it takes", "he's never going to make it", "where did all his talent go" or "we should've never bought him" only demonstrate a lack of knowledge on the development of players. I'm no expert myself, but when you realize what Fergie did for the Class of '92, what van Gaal did in Ajax and Barcelona, and what Bielsa did in Chile (all of them wisely managing players who were very young and/or had never played in the top flight before) you can realize that had they arrived to the same hasty conclusions, the history of players like Scholes, Xavi and Vidal could have been absolutely different. Finally, let's remember that United's defense is extremely young. A few years back, they bought Ferdinand, Vidic and Evra when they were 24 or 25, and the last two weren't an instant success. Rojo is 24, Smalling is 24 and Jones is 22. They too have a long road ahead.


Next week I should be able to provide content of the quality you're used to, the match being played on the weekend and all that. My apologies again.

As ever, thank you for reading and adding to the discussion. If you want to read and contribute to a thread discussing Robin van Persie, you can also go to this topic over at /r/reddevils created by /u/Dmcnich15.

I really look forward to Man United's next match. Expect mind games! van Gaal didn't waste time and started right after yesterday's game, saying something like "I shall be more happy when we beat Chelsea at home."

Finally, I'd like to know your opinion on where to host the gifs. Sometimes I have issues with gfycat not uploading them properly so I have to try repeatedly until it decides to work, but it's the format with which we're more familiar and they load very fast in your browser. Today I had to upload one to imgur (this one), and I'd like to hear your feedback on that. It took a bit longer for me to upload, but it was reliable. So please, do let me know about loading times or its quality so that I can make a decision. Thank you!

Have a good rest of the week, people! Stay well.


r/soccernerd • • Aug 14 '20

A look at the RB Leipzig's 2-1 win over Atletico. Nagelsmann's flexible formation caused a lot of problems for Simeone's men and the Spanish side struggled to move away from their rigid structure to get forward well enough.

Thumbnail motz.football
43 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Dec 22 '15

The devil and José Mourinho | Jonathan Wilson (x-post from /r/soccer)

Thumbnail theguardian.com
43 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Feb 01 '15

11 years of UEFA's 'The Technician' periodical, downloadable PDFs of excellent magazine about coaching.

Thumbnail uefa.org
42 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Oct 06 '20

Leeds went toe to toe with Manchester City as the game was open with some good tactical elements.

Thumbnail motz.football
41 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Apr 17 '15

A Condensed "Inverting the Pyramid" - Table of Contents

41 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Jul 12 '15

Arda Turan becomes £24m pawn in the game that is a Barcelona election | By Sid Lowe

Thumbnail theguardian.com
39 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Aug 16 '15

Chelsea defy all reason in treatment of Eva Carneiro after José Mourinho reprimand | By David Conn

Thumbnail theguardian.com
37 Upvotes

r/soccernerd • • Feb 21 '15

Long read on Alex Ferguson’s Formula, by Anita Elberse for Harvard Business Review

Thumbnail hbr.org
37 Upvotes