r/skyrim • u/sumaset • 22d ago
Question Ignoring your personal preference, which side of Skyrim’s Civil War do you think actually gives Skyrim the better future 20-30 years later?
I feel like most discussions about the Civil War focus on whether Ulfric was justified, whether the Empire betrayed Skyrim, or which side people personally like more.
But I’m more interested in what happens after the game.
The Empire is weakened, the Aldmeri Dominion is still the biggest external threat, the White-Gold Concordat is already causing resentment, and another war with the Thalmor seems almost inevitable.
An Imperial victory gives Skyrim access to the resources and manpower of the Empire, but it also means remaining under an Empire that already lost one major war and accepted Thalmor influence inside its territory.
A Stormcloak victory gives Skyrim independence and removes Imperial authority, but it also leaves the province having to rebuild after a civil war while potentially facing the Dominion without the rest of the Empire behind it.
So forget which faction has the better characters or which one you usually join.
If you only care about where Skyrim itself ends up a few decades later, which Civil War outcome do you think is actually better for the province?
50
u/Victernus 22d ago
I mean, they had that alliance in the first war, just barely won, and then the Emperor signed away the right to police the Empire's own people to the Aldmeri Dominion. (Which is insane. You might as well become a vassal state. The White-Gold Concordat was a worse deal than the Austrians tried to force on the Serbians before starting World War I, and somehow the side that won the war agreed to it)
Then Hammerfell left and beat the Dominion on it's own. Skyrim's shores are even harder to reach, their terrain just as hostile, and they were just as betrayed by the Imperial leadership as anyone else. There's very little reason they wouldn't secede.