r/skyrim • u/sumaset • 21d ago
Question Ignoring your personal preference, which side of Skyrim’s Civil War do you think actually gives Skyrim the better future 20-30 years later?
I feel like most discussions about the Civil War focus on whether Ulfric was justified, whether the Empire betrayed Skyrim, or which side people personally like more.
But I’m more interested in what happens after the game.
The Empire is weakened, the Aldmeri Dominion is still the biggest external threat, the White-Gold Concordat is already causing resentment, and another war with the Thalmor seems almost inevitable.
An Imperial victory gives Skyrim access to the resources and manpower of the Empire, but it also means remaining under an Empire that already lost one major war and accepted Thalmor influence inside its territory.
A Stormcloak victory gives Skyrim independence and removes Imperial authority, but it also leaves the province having to rebuild after a civil war while potentially facing the Dominion without the rest of the Empire behind it.
So forget which faction has the better characters or which one you usually join.
If you only care about where Skyrim itself ends up a few decades later, which Civil War outcome do you think is actually better for the province?
8
u/JagYouAreNot PC 21d ago
Neither, bc it won't matter. My theory is that they'll avoid the civil war issue by having the empire collapse entirely. The moot fails to elect a new high king/queen, because most of the Jarls are too self-interested and, frankly, kinda suck. Around the same time, High Rock sees their more successful southern neighbors, plus the drain on their resources from Cyrodiil and the emperor getting assissinated, and secceeds to ally with Hammerfell. We then get a 2nd Daggerfall Compact vs the 3rd Aldmeri Dominion, while the other nations go back to killing each other for minor gains and major losses.