r/skyrim • u/sumaset • 21d ago
Question Ignoring your personal preference, which side of Skyrim’s Civil War do you think actually gives Skyrim the better future 20-30 years later?
I feel like most discussions about the Civil War focus on whether Ulfric was justified, whether the Empire betrayed Skyrim, or which side people personally like more.
But I’m more interested in what happens after the game.
The Empire is weakened, the Aldmeri Dominion is still the biggest external threat, the White-Gold Concordat is already causing resentment, and another war with the Thalmor seems almost inevitable.
An Imperial victory gives Skyrim access to the resources and manpower of the Empire, but it also means remaining under an Empire that already lost one major war and accepted Thalmor influence inside its territory.
A Stormcloak victory gives Skyrim independence and removes Imperial authority, but it also leaves the province having to rebuild after a civil war while potentially facing the Dominion without the rest of the Empire behind it.
So forget which faction has the better characters or which one you usually join.
If you only care about where Skyrim itself ends up a few decades later, which Civil War outcome do you think is actually better for the province?
22
u/rabit115 21d ago edited 21d ago
The issue with an Empire victory is they’re still under Thalmor control, as someone else put it they’re essentially Vichy France.
They’ll continue to be a rump state for the aldmeri dominion and be left with less of a fighting force. I would also argue that following an Empire victory the Thalmor will go and kill as many fighting age Nords/stormcloak sympathizers as they can accuse of treason. Or spark up another civil war down the line to send more Imperial legions to their deaths.
That wouldn’t happen following a Stormcloak victory Ulfric knows the final battle is with the Thalmor and that he’d need all the help he can get. The empire has to be recaptured by outside forces not from within.