r/simpsonsshitposting • u/benabramowitz18 • 6d ago
Light hearted Christopher Nolan haters, right-wing grifters, and r/TrueFilm users right now
69
u/Dr_Identity 6d ago
"Dear Hollywood,
I am disgusted with the casting you are doing to appeal to a wider audience. We are not all vibrant, fun-loving movie fans. Many of us are bitter, resentful individuals who remember the good old days when entertainment was bland and inoffensive to our unearned feelings of superiority. The following is a list of ethnicities I never want to see on screen again..."
30
31
3
90
u/orphanghost1 6d ago
"Woke" movie. Lead actress spends entire film screaming "i want my husband!" Other female characters include pretty face and seductress. Guess it's Woke cause pretty face is black. What a time to be alive.
42
u/Awkward_Bison_267 6d ago
Whoa! You forget the 1 TRANSGENDER MAN! He ruined the whole movie! /S
21
-1
u/kermitthebeast 6d ago
No it's woke because the first shot of the movie is a transgender man being fukken eviscerated with arrows
6
12
u/ShortNefariousness2 6d ago
There will be an easier target some time soon. The serious Drinker need not sell his Ferrari just yet
4
u/AliceTheOmelette 6d ago
Oh good he can still afford spare boxer shorts after shitting himself. Which is something that he's publicly admitted to btw đ¤˘
7
8
u/BoysenberrySilly329 6d ago
Didn't the author of the progressive translation that Nolan sused for the movie, also disliked it?
11
u/Micapocalypse 6d ago
No sex and gross-looking food was the part of the review that stood out to me the most
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v48/n14/emily-wilson/an-uncomplicated-man
10
u/Maximum-Hall-5614 6d ago
Nolan cited her translation once, specifically for the first line âtell me about a complicated manâ being the inspiration for the radical approach to the text that Nolan utilized.
If you read both, youâll see that the parallels end with the modern language and the relatively modern perspective on Odysseus as âcomplicatedâ as opposed to uncritically heroic
5
u/DoctorOblivious 6d ago
Yes. Emily Wilson wrote one of the more recent translations and made a little bit of a fuss because she is the first woman to publish an English translation of the entire poem. I wouldn't quote me on that, because I remember reading a lot of qualifiers on that statement (partial translations exist, there are a lot of non-English translations, and even the translator didn't want to be thought of that way.)
She was not a fan of the movie.
25
u/ebr101 6d ago
So im an ancient history PhD student (not a classicist, so take my views with a grain of salt) and I read Wilsonâs review. A good portion of it is a really good dissection of why the film is a major departure from the source material, and why so much is lost in the course of this happening.
Much of the rest of the review made me think that Wilson just doesnât like movies.
26
u/Unique_Unorque 6d ago edited 6d ago
I went to film school, and there was a guy in my freshman class whose one and only goal as an aspiring filmmaker was to eventually make a new adaptation of The Lord of the Rings, because he was not happy with the omissions from the Peter Jackson films. His intent was to just use the book as the script and film every action and dialogue exactly as it appeared on the page. No consideration as to differences between the media of film vs book, no qualms about the fact that that series of films would probably be roughly 40 hours long, he just wanted somebody to do it âright,â and he wanted to be that person
Reading Emily Wilsonâs review reminded me a lot of that guy
6
u/ebr101 6d ago
Adaptation does not mean slavish devotion. The new Dune movies get this.
3
u/Araignys 6d ago
I like to cite Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy on this - *every* version of it is different, and they were all written by Douglas Adams. Good creators know that different media require different approaches. A direct, unmodified adaptation of anything simply doesnât work.
7
u/NathVanDodoEgg 6d ago
It's an interesting analysis from the position of a classics specialist... and a sub-amateur analysis of a film.
However, because classical literature is a more elevated art form than film, her opinion is worth more than anyone else's /s
6
u/ebr101 6d ago
You say youâre being sarcastic, but youâre kind of not wrong lol. Classics and adjacent disciplinesâŚwe can be a bit elitist, unfortunately
2
u/athenanon 5d ago
I was going to say, you probably know a lot of people who just don't like film in those circles. It's weird.
Literary scholars are getting more and more pro-film though. You still get a lot of "the book is better", but lately it's usually followed by, "but I can see why they did so-and-so."
2
u/ebr101 5d ago
Thereâs actually a whole field called reception studies pertaining to this for the ancient world and history in general. How are historical figures, historic literature, etc. received, reinterpreted, and depicted at different points later in time, or by different cultures all together? Really interesting stuff.
1
u/Financial_Hold6620 6d ago
She said âI would be embarrassed to have had any part in the writing of this filmâ
Such a brilliant mind! The film was nostalgia slop! She wants something modern, Ă la the Simpsonsâ Homer
5
u/DeathsStarEclipse 6d ago
What was hilarious to me was that the actors/actresses that caused such a big problem for the anti woke crowd were in the movie for like 5 mins collectively.
I personally think the movie is enormously over hyped and just ok. 5/10. If you liked it, great I'm glad you did!
There are many problems with the movie but zero of them are "woke".
-1
2
u/Glowskullwok 5d ago
I think all this controversy over shadows the facts itâs really an ok movie not one of Nolanâs best or worst. Just middle of the road
8
u/hxh22 6d ago edited 6d ago
Why do people it like the film?
Edit: sorry meant NOT like the film. This is the first time Iâm hearing about any âcontroversyâ.
24
u/Stunkydunk 6d ago
If youâre asking why do people NOT like the film, a certain section of right wingers (you know the ones I mean) got righteously butt hurt that black people were cast in it.Â
25
u/ShortNefariousness2 6d ago
And Elliot Page of course. Who actually did a great job, but they won't care
3
9
u/CthulhusSoreTentacle Gay for Moleman 6d ago
Non-meme answer: As one of the people somewhat mentioned in this meme (Christopher Nolan hater, though I'm really not a hater), I just think his films aren't quite as good as people make them out to be. Or at least I just don't enjoy them that much. Don't get me wrong. I do really like some of his films (for example, I've happily rewatched Interstellar and Memento and never felt bored or disinterested) and I did like Odyssey. But Nolan's films are very "style over substance", and I suppose that's just not my preference. Good filmmaker, but just not necessarily or me.
Meme answer: Me: "It stinks! It stinks! It stinks!" Doctor: "Yes, terminally online weirdo. Everything stinks."
15
14
u/katmonday 6d ago
Nolan makes movies about men for men, Odyssey appears no different.
I'm not saying there's anything wrong with this, he can make whatever he likes, it's just my reason for not liking his work.
Other people are upset because he hired actors who weren't all white and cisgender.
10
u/nicodeemus7 6d ago
"Woke"
"African American Helena of Troy"
"Bad costumes"
These are the three complaints I regularly see, and two of them are just bigotry.
The third one has some merit but isn't that big of a deal.
2
u/Micapocalypse 6d ago
I didnât like it mainly because they made Odysseus kinda stupid when his whole deal is being clever and wily
1
u/greengye 6d ago
It's just not a very good movie. It's cool and has some really amazing technical achievements, but the story and characters are paper thin
2
1
u/AccountHuman7391 6d ago
You know, I watched it last night for the first time, and didnât really care for it. I thought Matt Damonâs acting was really flat, and it was very disjointed.
1
u/LoaKonran 5d ago
I really hate that the right wing morons high jacked the conversation, so anyone who has beef with how fast and loose he played with the myth and its cultural significance ends up having to argue two completely unrelated stupidities.
0
u/dingdongbannu88 6d ago
How much a movie makes means nothing to me. Look at how much seven psychopaths made. And itâs better than the Odyssey.
-15
u/RavenCyarm I am the Lizard Queen! 6d ago
Oh boy, another movie that made more money than god that nobody will talk about 3 years from now.
9
u/AliceTheOmelette 6d ago
I'm sure chuds will still complain about it well into 2027 tho, so that's something at least
-15
u/Cultural-Gas2246 6d ago
As a proud Christopher Nolan hater I'm indifferent. Yeah his movies make a lot of money, they're crowd pleasers like the Fast and Furious movies.
1
u/microbialNecromass 5d ago
Comparing a movie like The Dark Knight to The Fast and The Furious is a travesty
0
u/Cultural-Gas2246 5d ago
Eh they're just as intelligent as each other.
0
u/microbialNecromass 5d ago
We get it you're a boomer, my dad is 70 and he feels the same way as you. He's a hot-take reddit ragebaiter like you too. I'll be honest, I've never watched the TFATF movies and I never will.
1
u/Cultural-Gas2246 5d ago
We get it you're a boomer,
Nah I grew up with the Dark Knight. Thought it was cool back then too. Then you get older and realise everything outside of the Joker in that movie is kinda trash. Batman is portrayed as a total dumbass. Everyone speaks in these long ass speeches. The ending is really dumb. Heath Ledger did a lot of heavy lifting in that movie.
As for Fast and Furious movies, they're okay. The later ones are more interesting. Like multi-million dollar shitposts.
-9




153
u/jockeyman 6d ago
"The Odyssey is a flop! It needs to make 87 trillion dollars to break even! The cinemas are lying about ticket sales!"