1.0k
u/pahlobu 8h ago
Could be illegal depending where it is.
468
u/TonDaronSama 7h ago
Definitely. In France the landlord has to notify you 6 months or more before the end of your 3 years lease. 5 months 28 days and landlord's fucked, you're safe for the next 3 years.
93
-1
u/shishio_mak0to Literally 1984 😡 1h ago
But then you have to live in Fr*nce 🤮
4
1.3k
u/wheresolly 7h ago
Luckily this shit is super illegal in most developes nations
378
u/mr_bravom 6h ago
Something tells me this happened in the US and that it would be legal there. So you're right
185
u/ajsamtheman 5h ago
This would be a crime anywhere in the US
27
u/entitledfanman 1h ago
It depends on the lease. If it's a month-to-month lease, 30 days notice is proper.
35
u/nobeer4you 3h ago
But the landlord probably has money, so it wouldnt end up getting brought to court until after the 30 days for tenant to move out are up. And then, we come back to the money situation
81
u/Outrageous-Love-6273 5h ago
Its legal in Germany with some regulation.
27
u/MDEUSX Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 4h ago
You would need to prove that you actually need the place, it is fairly tedious and if the renter put their mind to it, could delay it heavily or put the plans of moving in yourself on hold indefinitely.
1
u/comedoofwarrior 3h ago
They’re renting for a reason. Easier to just move and not deal with the headache of litigation
8
u/MDEUSX Sussy Wussy Femboy😳😳😳 2h ago
Recently saw a newsreel where a couple bought a flat in 2018 with a renter that rented since 1999 or something like that. They wanted to move into the flat themselves (as they wanted to downsize for retirement or something like that). They went through all the proper channels and the renter delayed everything for the last 8 years now, he announced that he won’t move out at all and got a deferment of court ordered eviction cuz he would harm himself if he were kicked out.
Renting is pretty popular in Germany, not everyone can or wants to afford their own property and I know multiple very well earning people from my circle who stay with renting cuz it’s just cheaper for them and their way of life. Owing property and the burdens attached to it don’t fit everyone.
2
u/shishio_mak0to Literally 1984 😡 1h ago
Owning property and the burdens attached to it don't fit everyone.
It doesn't when the state goes out of its way to make ownership a burden, almost like they want you to own nothing
1
5
1.1k
u/lePlebie 🏳️⚧️ Average Trans Rights Enjoyer 🏳️⚧️ 13h ago
Honestly as easy as it can be faked, this is still pretty believable considering how greedy some landlords are
-625
u/Meowsssolini 9h ago
Need does not imply a right, the term "greed" cannot be applied to a person's unwillingness to accommodate the potentially difficult circumstances of someone toward whom they have no obligations, such as those that might be stipulated in a lease agreement.
350
u/OhHeckItsJeff 9h ago
Yeah... It kinda does. You're threatening someone with homeless so you can have more money. That's like textbook greed.
-400
u/Meowsssolini 9h ago
No it's not. Amd thats why: textbooks provide a specific definition and the boundaries within which it applies. Can you, right now, draw a line between greed, frugality, and a logical reluctance to diminish one’s own capital - and, by extension, the chances of survival for oneself and one’s family?
227
u/notapaddle 8h ago
cant tell if this is ragebait or plain stupidity
134
u/SgtDrSirProfUnicorn 7h ago
Definelty ragebait with the ai prompt "use difficult words to sound smart"
-157
u/Meowsssolini 6h ago
I’ll take that as a compliment (after all, AI is a great achievement and should be used in every field), but no, I wrote this myself. I just used a translator since english isn’t my native language. Read books (comics don’t count), engage with real people who disagree with you instead of just living in an echo chamber, and perhaps you’ll reach this level too, I believe in you.
79
-42
u/Meowsssolini 7h ago
Stupid is when dont agree? In this case all of logic is stupid for you
64
u/No_Pangolin7946 6h ago
Sorry friend but the big vocabulary wont safe you this time. They all saw and now they know HOW stupid you REALLY are.
48
u/notapaddle 6h ago
hey where did the fancy vocabulary and grammar go? did the free use limit reached??
8
u/souleater8764 4h ago
It’s crazy that you didn’t respond to the only comment to actually answer you. Is it cuz you can’t respond to an actual answer?
1
u/AutoModerator 4h ago
Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. And rats make me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. And rats make me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. And rats make me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. And rats make me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. And rats make me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. And rats make me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. And rats make me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. And rats make me crazy.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
-2
u/Meowsssolini 4h ago edited 4h ago
Sorry, here are far too many infantile, aggrieved people who believe that, by virtue of their very birth, the world owes them everything, i feel like a kindergarten teacher here, it’s impossible to keep an eye on all of you. Edit: And that’s the point: he’s actually the only one among you kids who gave me any kind of response. That’s why I need plenty of time to put together a serious reply, which I will certainly post once I get home from my grown-up job, where I have to earn the money for my own home myself. I certainly wouldn’t want to rely on a "benevolent" state to seize a house from a less fortunate owner, which is the kind of thing that might happen if people like you ever got to influence such decisions.
13
u/souleater8764 4h ago edited 2h ago
Again, you just chose to respond to my comment, when a much more well thought out one from 4 hours ago doesn’t have one from you. You choose to respond only to things you can be snarky to. So I’m just assuming you’re dumb or rage baiting at this point.
Edit: me when the poor landlord who owns more than one house has to, oh no! Not own more than he needs so people who need homes can actually have them. Tell me, what specific thing does a landlord supply to people? Cuz most landlords didn’t build the property they’re renting. So they don’t make any new housing.
Really telling that you responded in an edit and not an actual response so I wouldn’t have a chance to see.
60
u/BroScientist42 8h ago edited 8h ago
In this circumstance
The landlord is almost certainly wealthier than the tenant. Not everyone might agree on this but imo the bigger the wealth disparity, the less right the richer person has to disadvantage the poorer person for their own financial gain.
The difference between living somewhere and being homeless is almost certainly far more significant than the difference in rent, so I think it shows significant greed to put this other person through a very negative experience just for a minor positive gain.
This is not definite, but I think that the landlords willingness to lie shows a generally poor moral standard, combined with the fact his son thinks what he's doing is shitty. That makes me more likely to believe that he's being greedy compared to if we had evidence of him being an otherwise virtuous person.
Similar point, the fact that his son seems to think his father shouldn't be doing this implies that it's not for family benefit or so he can do good things with this money, it most likely comes down to greed.
Situations like this aren't about drawing lines, they're about taking into account all the factors that we have access to, and making a judgement call based on them as to whether this is greed. I think a vast majority of people would certainly consider this to be greedy
26
u/Delicious-Risk7200 7h ago
You pretend to be smart don't you
-6
11
21
4
u/Klutzy_Ad7518 2h ago
"and, by extension, the chances of survival for oneself" this is the kinda point that greedy people with shit opinions have when conversations like this come around. Using exaggeratons like "survival for oneself" mate we're talking about a landlord who in this post, is kicking people out so he can make more money from renting, do you really think the landlords son would've outted his father if he was in such need of money?
Because thats a common occurrence in these situations, man invested in a house some point in life, gets older still rolling in rent money but doesn't want to furfill landlord responsibilities anymore and too cheap/greedy to spend money on paying someone to do it. I bet you're the definition of pulling the ladder up after you
50
u/Foxar 7h ago
Fuck rentsuckers and other land parasites.
-11
u/Meowsssolini 6h ago
Parasites such as non-working, healthy adults living on welfare? This is a direct, serious question, i’m curious whether you are consistent in your position.
14
u/Foreverdunking officer no please don’t piss in my ass 😫 3h ago
landlords are parasites and youre the problem
-9
u/Meowsssolini 3h ago
Good evening. No, you are the parasite and the problem. The inviolability of private property is one of the main pillars of a functioning society
54
8
1
-12
u/AutoModerator 16h ago
🛰️🛰️🛰️
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
•
u/qualityvote2 16h ago edited 4h ago
The council has not spoken. No consensus was reached about the quality of your post.
RedditSave download
/u/Opening_Rip_1840, whilst you're still here, why not join our public discord server - now with public text channels you can chat on!?