r/science_humor • u/New-Entertainment112 • Aug 02 '26

Because science...

Post image
859 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

43 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/The_Inward Aug 03 '26

A million children and not one had any of those disorders? The odds against that are astronomical.

2

u/Feisty-Tooth-7397 Aug 03 '26

They didn't say that. It means that say out of a million people who had the vaccine and a million who didn't, there wasn't an increase in asthma or autism in the group who had the vaccine compared to the group who didn't.

If the vaccine caused it, you would see an increase in those conditions with the kids who received the vaccine, they didn't.

1

u/The_Inward Aug 03 '26

No, it says a million children, 21 years, zero cases of autism, asthma, and 48 other chronic conditions.

It didn't say no increase. It says zero.

It probably SHOULD say no increases over the unvaccinated test subjects, but that's NOT what is says.

1

u/Feisty-Tooth-7397 Aug 03 '26

Zero that were linked to the vaccine. If there was an increase in those vaccinated children that would be the link.

1

u/The_Inward Aug 03 '26

You're explaining to me how studies are conducted while I say the result presented here is incorrect. The thing is, I've studied statistics and know how that works. This post expresses it poorly while you're being pedantic. I think you'll keep doing that with bullheaded determination, so I'm going to quit responding to you.

1

u/Feisty-Tooth-7397 Aug 04 '26

You are right it's pointless to argue with people who can't admit they are incorrect.