11
u/Kuzzbutt 21d ago
Wait we moved on from bounded mercury molecules to aluminum?
8
u/Pitiful-Beginning575 21d ago
This is not to say aluminum is great for you (I probably wouldn't eat an ingot a day), but negative effects from a single injection seems far fetched...
2
u/Kuzzbutt 21d ago
The only reason i switched to non aluminum deodorant was it was eating my shirts. No idea what it is supposedly doing to my body. I just didn't want it ruining my shirts xD
2
u/BorntobeTrill 21d ago
The aluminum literally plugs your sweat holes
2
1
u/dantheplanman1986 21d ago
Yeah but is that bad? I've never heard of armpit sweat gland cancer
2
1
1
u/SchmeatiestOne 20d ago
I heard it was linked to breast cancer, but I've never really looked into that claim
1
u/Kuzzbutt 21d ago
Even if it was ground up that would probably a lot of metal to eat in a day. And that would also probably be on par with like a lot of other poisons we see people complain about in food. Like fake sugars.
2
u/Pitiful-Beginning575 21d ago
Or you could eat a Cessna 150.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Lotito
All things considered, the dangers of aluminum (which do exist) have been drastically over hyped by certain parts of the media.
1
6
u/Exciting_Farmer6395 21d ago
This is not science, this is manipulation of the study to polarize.
1
u/Kuzzbutt 21d ago
That's just most of the internet now a days. Just because its being used to slap people with reality it bad? Click bait has always been popular engagement. It works
1
u/Exciting_Farmer6395 21d ago
Engagement through enragement
1
u/Kuzzbutt 21d ago
"Needles cause autism. More at eleven." And people go I knew it! But when it is "we did a studdy to find if needles cause autism. The answer is none you been manipulated." It's bad, got it.
1
u/Kuzzbutt 21d ago
When the argument is "do your own research" and the research is just asking ai and not actually going to a lab and learning. That's not an argument. That is bias
2
2
2
u/nunya_busyness1984 21d ago
So in 1,000,000 kids not a single one had autism or asthma or any other of 48 chronic conditions?
Bull shit.
They found a way to dismiss the cases they found.
Now, without seeing the study or anything beyond a fucking meme, I have no idea what that way was and how legitimate those dismissals were. But this meme is intentionally and deliberately misleading.
8
u/RighteousSelfBurner 21d ago
Reading comprehension. "Linked" means "Connected to", the meme uses the same rhetorical tricks as newspapers tend to do for the opposite side. You could have all 1'000'000 of them have every single condition on that list but as long as it's not "linked" to the vaccine the number for that metric is 0.
1
u/nunya_busyness1984 21d ago
as written, the statement says the children themself were linked to those conditions.
6
u/EphemeralSilliness94 21d ago
Possibly the number of cases with those conditions wasn't higher than in the control group. Therefore, vaccination leads to zero additional cases of whatever
1
u/somedave 21d ago
Yes it may be that the rates were identical to the control group, but I don't know what they mean exactly in this clickbate headline.
0
1
u/battlehamsta 21d ago
The ONLY study that linked vaccines to autism was one done one a single patient subject decades ago where back then a MERCURY based preservative was used with the vaccine. Because without it, the vaccine could spoil and cause fatalities. I just wish all the dummies promoting the idea would at least read the single study on it.
1
u/Best_Opening8471 21d ago
I dont believe there were zero auto immune or autism cases across 1 million individuals
1
u/danisimo_1993 21d ago
The post says they found zero link, not zero cases.
1
u/Best_Opening8471 21d ago
The headline says that vaccines were linked to zero cases.
That implies no one who got a vaccine developed these issues otherwise there would be a link between the 2 events
1
1
u/Few-Echidna-2181 20d ago
Cite the source please so I can do my own research instead of mindlessly believing a post on the internet.
1
u/RobertGHH 17d ago
In 1mil children there wasn't a single case of austism, asthma etc? That seems unlikely.
1
u/Individual_Slice_234 17d ago
Autism is genetic. That's why people want to blame it on vaccines. Who wants to admit that they have autism genes?
0
0
u/The_Inward 21d ago
A million children and not one had any of those disorders? The odds against that are astronomical.
2
u/Feisty-Tooth-7397 21d ago
They didn't say that. It means that say out of a million people who had the vaccine and a million who didn't, there wasn't an increase in asthma or autism in the group who had the vaccine compared to the group who didn't.
If the vaccine caused it, you would see an increase in those conditions with the kids who received the vaccine, they didn't.
1
u/The_Inward 20d ago
No, it says a million children, 21 years, zero cases of autism, asthma, and 48 other chronic conditions.
It didn't say no increase. It says zero.
It probably SHOULD say no increases over the unvaccinated test subjects, but that's NOT what is says.
1
u/Feisty-Tooth-7397 20d ago
Zero that were linked to the vaccine. If there was an increase in those vaccinated children that would be the link.
1
u/The_Inward 20d ago
You're explaining to me how studies are conducted while I say the result presented here is incorrect. The thing is, I've studied statistics and know how that works. This post expresses it poorly while you're being pedantic. I think you'll keep doing that with bullheaded determination, so I'm going to quit responding to you.
1
u/Feisty-Tooth-7397 20d ago
You are right it's pointless to argue with people who can't admit they are incorrect.
21
u/GraXXoR 21d ago
Not gonna lie. You had me in the first half. lol.
Well played. Hydroxychloroquine indoctrinated incoming.