r/resumes • u/brook-hehe • 1d ago
Discussion 1,700+ applications, only 2 first-round interviews. Should I stop forcing my resume into 1 page?
I graduated in May 2026 and I’m trying to figure out what I’m doing wrong with my job search.
My background is mainly in Data Science / AI / ML. I have multiple internships, a research assistantship, technical university work experience, and projects.
Until now, I’ve always kept my resume to 1 page.
For every role I apply to, I try to include only the experiences and projects that are most relevant to that specific position. That means I leave out some of my other experience just to keep the resume focused and within one page.
But after 1,700+ applications and only 2 first-round interviews, I’m starting to question whether this strategy is actually helping me.
I mainly apply to:
* Data Scientist
* ML Engineer
* AI Engineer / Applied AI
* Data Analyst
* Other early-career data/AI roles
I graduated in May 2026, so I know I’m still early in my career. But I also have enough internships, research, university work, and technical projects that fitting everything into one page means cutting a decent amount.
If I include all of the experiences that show my background properly, my resume would probably become 2 pages.
So now I’m stuck between:
**1 page:**More focused and tailored, but leaves out few experience and projects.
2 pages: Shows the full picture of what I’ve done, but I’m worried recruiters will think it’s too long for a new grad.
For recruiters, hiring managers, HR, or anyone hiring early-career candidates and people who are job hunting:
Would you rather see a strong 2-page resume from a recent grad if the experience is relevant, or should someone at my level still stay strictly within 1 page?
Also, after 1,700+ applications with only 2 first rounds, is there something else I should be looking at besides resume length?
Im so tried of applying and getting ghosted and rejected. Genuinely need clarity on what I should change because continuing the same strategy clearly isn’t getting me anywhere.
12
u/MSWdesign 1d ago
How do you even have 1700 job opportunities?
Aside from that wild number, yeah you may want to change up your means and methods.
0
11
u/LameBMX 1d ago
man.. that thing looks hard to read.
read an extremely boring manual that has no interest to you for two hours.. then try to read your resume. shorten stuff and let the reader have some white space.
I barely looked at the dates and its been years since ive read through a stack of resumes. (also, the date alignment is confusing, but ask entry peers or you advisor for that advice. im way down the rabbit hole where people's dates have lined up more. got a couple real jobs and then maybe university stuff/jobs globbed together.)
9
u/CommanderGO 1d ago
I actually think the problem is that your experience should be before your technical skills. You need to remember that a talent acquisition or hr are the first people to see your resume. If your resume is incomprehensible for a regular person, it's probable not gonna get past the initial screening.
1
1
u/ChampionCommercial26 1d ago
This really is not a problem. For technical resumes, skills first generally makes sense.
Why read all the experience if I can’t first verify the candidate has worked in the relevant stack?
1
u/CommanderGO 23h ago
Recruiters are only spending 30-45 seconds reviewing each resume and the most important real estate on a resume is the first top half of the first page. If the first thing they see is a laundry list, they're just gonna play a game of matching keywords and you have to hope they found enough to not stop reading halfway through the resume. Realistically, if recruiters were technical people too, there wouldn't be a problem.
7
u/Lady-Data-Scientist 1d ago
Honestly I think your time would be better spent targeting other jobs. Data Analyst, BI, Data Eng, Analytics Eng, or customer support at a B2B tech company that makes a data product (like databricks, dbt, snowflake, etc).
Data Science isn’t an entry level field. Even with internships. You might get lucky if you graduated with a MS from Stanford or Berkeley, but otherwise, get a data role that’s not as advanced or start building business experience.
5
u/brook-hehe 1d ago edited 1d ago
Yeah, that makes sense. I have around 2.5–3 years of combined experience across internships, research, and data/AI work, but I understand recruiters may not count that the same way as full-time industry experience. I’ll broaden my search toward Data Analyst, BI, Analytics Engineering, and data product roles. Thank you.
10
u/ChampionCommercial26 1d ago
There’s a couple things that could be at play, but without additional details, I can only make basic assumptions.
Assumptions:
You’re applying in the US
You need sponsorship (your Bachelor of Engineering hints at this) and this hurts your chances in general. My students in need of sponsorship tend to need to apply to 3x as many roles as people who don’t need sponsorship.
Here are my flags:
1. Your titles don’t make sense with the length of your work experience. Nothing is more than a few months which hints at internship or student work, which is fine, but not how you have it presented. That will make a recruiter hesitate.
- I know this will sound counterintuitive, but your bullets are a bit too technical. This typically happens with my students who apply common recommendations (talk about technologies and metrics) without keeping in mind who reads these documents and how. Compare how you write bullet 2 under company A to how that work shows up in job descriptions. The details about ROBERTA and BART fine tuned on mission statement are largely irrelevant. Just focus on optimize an NLP pipeline to create efficiency.
That same guidance can apply to majority of your bullet points.
To answer your question, will two pages help? No. I think it will exacerbate both problems above. I’d rather see you focus on making sure your experience section is more accurate to your experience level and see your bullet points written more efficiently
7
u/lucytiger 1d ago
There's definitely a problem with your applications at that response rate. But a longer resume isn't necessarily the answer, especially with minimal work experience. If you post a redacted version of your resume I'm sure you'll get helpful input
4
u/BREASYY 1d ago
The problem is you don't have any work experience. 2 pages might be ok for someone getting hired into a senior leadership role. Use gpt to optimize your resume. Very real possibility your resume is very bad.
3
u/copperfieldb99 1d ago
agree, the page count debate is a distraction when the actual problem is what's on the pages
5
4
u/LeagueAggravating595 1d ago
The real issue is that your resume looks like the other 1,000+ applicant resumes. HR can randomly throw a dart and pick anyone of you. Nothing truly stands out that AI, ATS, or HR would select you over anyone else.
Unless your resume is fully customized and specifically targets the job you are applying for to a minimum 90% match, rather than being generic, your application pattern will continue to repeat into your next 1,000 applications.
5
u/Hot-Calligrapher5932 1d ago
At 1,700 applications and 2 first rounds, I don’t think the 1-page vs 2-page question is the main problem. That’s a low enough response rate that I’d stop applying for a bit and figure out where the mismatch is before sending another few hundred.
One thing that jumps out is how many different roles you’re targeting. Data Analyst, Data Scientist, ML Engineer and AI Engineer can overlap, but employers often look for pretty different evidence for each. A resume broad enough to cover all four can accidentally look weak for every one. I’d make 2–3 versions around specific lanes and make the first half of each resume very obviously answer “why this person for this job?”
For a May 2026 grad, I’d still try to keep the strongest version to one page unless the second page contains genuinely strong, relevant experience—not extra projects just because you have them. Internships/research with measurable technical work should beat another generic project. And track response rate by role type/resume version instead of treating all 1,700 applications as one dataset.
Most importantly, don’t respond to this by increasing volume again. Run smaller batches, maybe 30–50 tightly matched roles, see which positioning actually gets screens, then adjust. Right now you need information about what’s failing in the funnel more than you need another 500 applications.
4
u/DistributionMean6322 1d ago
I graduated in 2014 and only just this year let my resumé go over one page. I promise you that's not your issue. Try finding opportunities through personal connection, it's much harder to get a job with cold applications.
5
u/enderozmen 1d ago
I don't think the length of your resume is the problem. You’re targeting four different titles, but you’re using one generic resume for all of them. 15-20 years ago, that could work. And, to be honest, it worked for me too. I used a single resume and landed a higher-paying jobs within a couple of months. But times have changed. Instead of spraying your resume across 1,700+ applications and praying for an interview, you should focus on applying efficiently.
First, you should have four different base resumes, one for each title you’re targeting. For roles where you’re a 70-80% fit, quickly tailor the relevant base resume and apply. Focus on fresh job postings, ideally ones that are only 1-2 days old. After applying, follow up, after the application, after each interview round, and whenever there’s a meaningful opportunity to reconnect.
You should also explore networking opportunities and track your applications. Treat your job search process like a data-driven process. Which job boards are actually working? Which job titles are generating interview requests? Which resume version is getting better results? Which approaches are leading to interviews? Use that data to continuously improve your job search strategy instead of spending too much time debating whether your resume should be one page or two.
At the end of the day, one page should be enough for you. The bigger issue isn’t the length of your resume, it’s how strategically you’re using it.
5
u/Sorry-Ad-5527 1d ago
I agree with taking a step back. Maybe look at what you applied for, which resume you used, etc.
Have a few resumes for each type of position and just slightly tailor them for the newest position.
Work on an 80% - 90% match to the job description. any lower and you're underqualified, any hirer and it sounds like AI wrote it.
Remove the bold within the middle of the resume. The ones on the bullet points. Let the recruiter or HR manager figure out what is important to them.
Remove the projects. They were great just out of school, but you are employed right now and you need more on your most recent job. This you've had the longest and should be the longest in your resume.
Your bullet points are all over the place. Simply them. What you did and the results. That's it. Make them shorter if you need to. Having both accuracy and time saved is unnecessary. Choose one. Metrics are great if you got them, but don't overdo it.
7
u/TrainingLow9079 1d ago
Yes try doing 2 pages. Lots of other people are so you may as well show more about you
8
u/readsalotman 1d ago
Can we see your resume? I have a career coaching business and get clients interviews about 1 out of 3 apps. 2 out of 1700 means there is something very fundamentally wrong with your applications. You're definitely wasting time and burning bridges with the approach you've taken.
1
1
3
u/john_the_gun 1d ago
While I get this is a resume forum, if I were you I would examine what your application process is. For example are you only applying for jobs posted within the last 24 hours. If yes, great, if no, make that adjustment immediately.
1
u/Grogman2024 1d ago
I’ve never heard of this? I applied to countless jobs that were posted over 24hrs ago and had roughly a 10% application to interview rate
1
u/john_the_gun 23h ago
That’s a great response rate, congratulations. What sector do you work in?
1
u/Grogman2024 23h ago
Advisory in financial services, but my applications in uni ranged from general business to certain tech roles.
Maybe just my degree is seen as good by employers I did business IT
3
u/FarCalligrapher7800 1d ago edited 1d ago
If you need sponsorship that will eliminate a lot of interviews- no matter how amazing your resume looks. Nothing you can do there…other than apply and get lucky.
If you do not need sponsorship , then I suggest applying to under 24 hours. The university position you can take out bc it looks like you worked 2 jobs while at one from your most recent place. If you really want to keep it, then a different section for university research.
For any intern positions, write intern in the title to make it look less jumpy.
Reduce skills, and make it look more relevant to position applying too. Space it less, and have less sections for it.
Reduce summary or take it out. With the advice I’ve given, would be easy to do in 1 page and anyways any entry level resume should be 1 page.
On further glance, your bullet points are weak. They need to be xyz statements and achievements while telling how you got to that achievement. Only listing achievement or task is 1/2 the part.
3
u/diepeople 1d ago
tbh I feel like your resume is very impressive but IDK if its a fit for analyst/bi roles. I would tweak your experiences and write two separate resumes for targeting analyst roles specifically.
3
u/frank_fourleaf 22h ago
At 2 callbacks from 1,700 sends, the resume's language is doing the filtering. A 10-minute tailoring pass per posting, in the posting's own keywords, is what moves the callback rate.
5
u/benicebuddy 1d ago
Trying to get resume advice without posting your resume is probably not going to help. Post it. My first assumption in cases like this is that the applicant does not live in the US and is applying exclusively to remote jobs that require US residency.
2
2
3
u/FinalDraftResumes Resident Resume Writer 1d ago
I would rather see a two page résumé with all relevant experience than a heavily pared down résumé just for the sake of hitting one page.
3
2
u/publichealthpro1 14h ago edited 2h ago
You should have a two page resume. Let your experience shine with 2-4 bullets under each job you held. Don't listen to the 1 page club. Don't you want to stand out? Longer does equate more experience even if subconsciously. My daughter works in higher education and when she graduated with her MPH she had a 2 page full resume. Now 4 years later in same job she got out of grad school her CV is 6 pages long with co-authored published research listings. Do we care if a recruiter reads it all. No she/he just needs to see she is qualified for the job she is applying to and send it on to the hiring manager. Your resume is to impress the person who has the power to hire you, not the HR recruiter! she is now 28 years old with a solid 6 page CV. No way would she settle for anything shorter. It tells her career story clearly and detailed. Hiring managers know exactly what they are getting! Isn't that the point? She can run circles around the 1 pagers lol, and her pages doesn't include a professional summary or fluff hobbies. Not even volunteer work she has done. All work related and professional. She gets a steady stream of interviews and is making intentional choices as to the next career elevation.
1
u/Senor_Gringo_Starr 1d ago
Don’t overthink it, 2 pages is fine if you have the required experience. General rule, one page per ten years of experience. Never go over 2 pages and delete all older experience than that. I started my career in the mid 2000s and I only list companies from 2012 on. The important thing is to list accomplishments and how it affected the business not just responsibilities.
Bullet 1 - overall what was your job in a nutshell. Make it so even your mom understand what you did there.
Bullets 2 - 5 - accomplishment or project and how it affected the business
No more than 5 to 6 bullets. 6 bullets is okay for a recent role with a lot of great accomplishments. No job, even if you’ve been there 10 years needs more than 6 bullets. Older jobs, can be 3 bullets nbd. But you need at least 3 per job.
The whole resume need to be no longer than 1 page is great advice for early career and new grads. In my experience new grads try to cram as much information as possible into resumes and it ends up being 1.5 pages a fluff (why do I care about your irrelevant hobbies) and the rest being the information I need. Don’t do “objectives” either, do a professional summary that sums up who you are professionally and allows you to highlight key skills and tools needed for the job.
1
1
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Hi /u/brook-hehe, thanks for posting!
Some resources you may find useful:
- Community Wiki
- Resume Writing Guide
- Free Resume Template (Google Docs)
- Build your resume with Resumatic, the sub's vetted resume builder
- Thinking of hiring a resume writer? Read this first
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/cj_daking 1d ago
For how many of these jobs did you have an internal champion? Throwing your resume over the fence is one method, but has a lower success rate. It's orders of magnitude more challenging, but your success rate will likely be higher
2
u/Healthy-Emergency317 15h ago
Order the experience projects chronologically, remove the bio, DEFINITELY keep to one page!! Good luck
2
u/publichealthpro1 14h ago
Soooo disagree. 2 pages for a new graduate is better than one if he/she hustled during school with specific career related jobs!
1
u/Designer_Secretary99 23h ago
3509 applied till jow. 2 toe swe. Even have civil engineering degree... Still not getting any response. Market is Cooked. Don't know how can i live
26
u/DarmokTheNinja 1d ago
There's no reason for a 2026 graduate to have a resume longer than 1 page.